[Gluster-infra] Smoke builds (other than *bsd) moving to cage

[Nigel Babu]

Hello folks,

In the next week or so, we'll be moving all of our smoke builds to the cage.
This way, we can get rid of some of our cloud machines. This will also speed up
the smoke builds a bit since they'll be on the same network as Gerrit resulting
in faster clones.

If there's something you forsee going wrong with this, let us know and we'll
hold off.

--
nigelb


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1425683] New: 8 more build machines on the cage

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425683

Bug ID: 1425683
   Summary: 8 more build machines on the cage
   Product: GlusterFS
   Version: mainline
 Component: project-infrastructure
  Assignee: b...@gluster.org
  Reporter: nig...@redhat.com
CC: b...@gluster.org, gluster-infra@gluster.org



Let's have 10 machines on the cage for doing all the Centos smoke builds and
use cloud providers only for regression runs. 2G RAM and 2 CPU should be good
enough, I think. Unless we can spare more.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Uq0wIopHj2=cc_unsubscribe
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1424982] Need a new project to be hosted on gerrit for gluster-block

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424982

Nigel Babu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ASSIGNED
 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE  |---
  Flags|needinfo?(nig...@redhat.com |
   |)   |
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #8 from Nigel Babu  ---
So the merge type that I usually select for projects lets you build have
dependent reviews. However, in that case you can't have the Reviewed-by and
Review-on flags. I default to this submit type because of the advantages it
providers.

If you'd like the flags more than anything else, I can change the submit type.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nmQpbvYBki=cc_unsubscribe
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

Re: [Gluster-infra] Coverty report on another server than download

[Kaleb S. KEITHLEY]

On 02/21/2017 10:40 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:

Hi,

I am pondering on putting the result of coverty scan on a separate
website than download.gluster.org, or if possible, on a separate vhost.

I did deploy today a server that verify the integrity of
download.gluster.org, and I realize that since we host the coverty scan
results there, this will generate a ton of false positive.

While I could fix that in aide config, I think it might be better to
further isolate the downloads by splitting that on another server.

Do people have a opinion on that ?


Putting it on another machine is fine, and will free up a lot of space 
on download.gluster.org for packages.


Just tell me the name of the machine.

Likewise I presume for clang compile, clang analyze, and cppcheck; yes?

--

Kaleb


___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1423002] Changes needed in infra to accommodate move to github for issue tracking and updates

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423002

Jiffin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||Triaged
   Assignee|b...@gluster.org|m...@zarb.org



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tuB6Dxn6lY=cc_unsubscribe
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra