[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1457827] Changes to the voting system on glusterfs 'master' branch

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457827



--- Comment #2 from Amar Tumballi  ---
for 'master':

1) tests/basic is good.

2) lets run netbsd6-smoke 

3) We can run 'netbsd' job in nightly IMO. (doesn't matter much on 'master'
branch decision now).


On 'release-x.y':

* For now, lets keep going as is, and see if any changes required later.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=b7xKSYyzdO=cc_unsubscribe
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1457827] Changes to the voting system on glusterfs 'master' branch

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457827

Nigel Babu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||nig...@redhat.com



--- Comment #1 from Nigel Babu  ---
On master:

1) I'm thinking we just run the tests/basic folder?
2) Do you mean netbsd builds or regressions? The netbsd build (netbsd6-smoke)
itself takes a short duration and is trivial to run. I recommend we keep that
remove the NetBSD voting job. Additionally, are we running the netbsd
regressions on a nightly basis now?
3) We already have a 32-bit compilation test in the form of strfmt_errors. Do
we want more?


On release branch:

As far as I can see, this seems to be "keep going as we do right now". Are we
removing netbsd voting regressions here too?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=im3FgS3P4U=cc_unsubscribe
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra