[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1514331] jenkins slave passes tests even though they fail on master locally

2017-11-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514331



--- Comment #3 from Worker Ant  ---
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/18893 (tests: Fix a broken test case) posted
(#1) for review on master by Poornima G

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JNsGCb1GdS=cc_unsubscribe
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra


[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1514331] jenkins slave passes tests even though they fail on master locally

2017-11-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514331

Nigel Babu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2017-11-17 02:05:19



--- Comment #2 from Nigel Babu  ---
I'm going to dupe this infra bug to our bug to activate the Centos 7 nodes,
since that will solve the problem from the infra side of things.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1509335 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2XkxgqETDD=cc_unsubscribe
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra


[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1514331] jenkins slave passes tests even though they fail on master locally

2017-11-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514331

Nigel Babu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||nig...@redhat.com



--- Comment #1 from Nigel Babu  ---
>From working with Nithya over the last couple of days to debug this, it appears
that us running regressions on Centos 6 has caught up with us. We will need to
upgrade to newer versions to hit these failures. I can reliably reproduce both
of these on latest CentOS 7. The case may be that we have newer dependencies
(in the second case, XFS changed behavior).

>From an infra point of view, we'll take the following actions:
We've been working on moving our regression machines into the cage. We already
have a bunch of new machines ready for import into the cage. Those machines are
already setup with Centos 7. I'll get regression-test-burn-in to run on those
nodes. This will give us an environment where these tests can fail consistently
and therefore can be fixed.

Once they're fixed, we'll cycle our regression infra to be completely Centos 7.
We already run smoke on Centos 7 ever since it moved to the cage.

>From a dev point of view, we'll need to fix these tests or fix the underlying
code because it's no longer behaving as it should.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=u42BTZmZ8f=cc_unsubscribe
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra