Re: [Gluster-infra] Smoke tests run on the builder in RH DC (at least)
Le mardi 26 janvier 2016 à 09:47 +0100, Niels de Vos a écrit : > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 08:55:39AM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote: > > Le lundi 25 janvier 2016 à 22:24 +0100, Niels de Vos a écrit : > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 06:59:33PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote: > > > > I was also planning to look at jenkins job builder for the jenkins, but > > > > no time yet. Will be after jenkins migration to a new host (which is > > > > still not planned, unlike gerrit where we should be attempting to find a > > > > time for that) > > > > > > We also might want to use Jenkins Job Builder for the tests we're adding > > > to the CentOS CI. Maybe we could experiment with it there first, and > > > then use our knowledge to the Gluster Jenkins? > > > > Why not. I think it would work fine on our too, as i am not sure it need > > to completely take over the server configuration. > > I dont have any experience with JBB, and have no idea how it works. Our > Gluster Jenkins does not have many changes in the jobs, so maybe there > is no need for it? I really dont know. But, you might be able to spend > your time in a more useful way until we find out ;-) It allow us to track change in git, kinda like the get-job and xml script that you pointed. So people that would make change would have to submit patches, which permit to revert, track what was changed, review, etc, etc. -- Michael Scherer Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Gluster-infra mailing list Gluster-infra@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
Re: [Gluster-infra] Smoke tests run on the builder in RH DC (at least)
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 08:55:39AM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le lundi 25 janvier 2016 à 22:24 +0100, Niels de Vos a écrit : > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 06:59:33PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > so today, after fixing one last config item, the smoke test jobs run > > > fine on the Centos 6 builder in the RH DC, which build things as non > > > root, then start the tests, then reboot the server. > > > > Nice, sounds like great progress! > > > > Did you need to change anything in the build or test scripts under > > /opt/qa? If so, please make sure that the changes land in the > > repository: > > > > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs-patch-acceptance-tests/ > > So far, I mostly removed code that was running on the jenkins script > (ie, the cleanup part that kill process), and added a reboot at the end. > Not sure I want to have that in the script :) We also have the Jenkins scripts in the jenkins/jobs directory there. They got exported with the jenkins-cli "get-job" command. If we make changes to the Jenkins jobs, we should update the xml files in the repository with a note about the change. It help to have a history of the jobs, and when/why something was changed. > > > Now, I am looking at the fedora one, but once this one is good, I will > > > likely reinstall a few builders as a test, and go on Centos 7 builder. > > > > I'm not sure yet if I made an error, or what is going on. But for some > > reason smoke tests for my patch series fails... This is the smoke result > > of the 1st patch in the serie, it only updates the fuse-header to a > > newer version. Of course local testing works just fine... The output and > > (not available) logs of the smoke test do not really help me :-/ > > > > https://build.gluster.org/job/smoke/24395/console > > > > Could this be related to the changes that were made? If not, I'd > > appreciate a pointer to my mistake. > > No, I tested on a separate job to not interfere. Ok, thanks :) > > > I was also planning to look at jenkins job builder for the jenkins, but > > > no time yet. Will be after jenkins migration to a new host (which is > > > still not planned, unlike gerrit where we should be attempting to find a > > > time for that) > > > > We also might want to use Jenkins Job Builder for the tests we're adding > > to the CentOS CI. Maybe we could experiment with it there first, and > > then use our knowledge to the Gluster Jenkins? > > Why not. I think it would work fine on our too, as i am not sure it need > to completely take over the server configuration. I dont have any experience with JBB, and have no idea how it works. Our Gluster Jenkins does not have many changes in the jobs, so maybe there is no need for it? I really dont know. But, you might be able to spend your time in a more useful way until we find out ;-) Niels signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Gluster-infra mailing list Gluster-infra@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
Re: [Gluster-infra] Smoke tests run on the builder in RH DC (at least)
Le lundi 25 janvier 2016 à 22:24 +0100, Niels de Vos a écrit : > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 06:59:33PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > so today, after fixing one last config item, the smoke test jobs run > > fine on the Centos 6 builder in the RH DC, which build things as non > > root, then start the tests, then reboot the server. > > Nice, sounds like great progress! > > Did you need to change anything in the build or test scripts under > /opt/qa? If so, please make sure that the changes land in the > repository: > > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs-patch-acceptance-tests/ So far, I mostly removed code that was running on the jenkins script (ie, the cleanup part that kill process), and added a reboot at the end. Not sure I want to have that in the script :) > > Now, I am looking at the fedora one, but once this one is good, I will > > likely reinstall a few builders as a test, and go on Centos 7 builder. > > I'm not sure yet if I made an error, or what is going on. But for some > reason smoke tests for my patch series fails... This is the smoke result > of the 1st patch in the serie, it only updates the fuse-header to a > newer version. Of course local testing works just fine... The output and > (not available) logs of the smoke test do not really help me :-/ > > https://build.gluster.org/job/smoke/24395/console > > Could this be related to the changes that were made? If not, I'd > appreciate a pointer to my mistake. No, I tested on a separate job to not interfere. > > I was also planning to look at jenkins job builder for the jenkins, but > > no time yet. Will be after jenkins migration to a new host (which is > > still not planned, unlike gerrit where we should be attempting to find a > > time for that) > > We also might want to use Jenkins Job Builder for the tests we're adding > to the CentOS CI. Maybe we could experiment with it there first, and > then use our knowledge to the Gluster Jenkins? Why not. I think it would work fine on our too, as i am not sure it need to completely take over the server configuration. -- Michael Scherer Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Gluster-infra mailing list Gluster-infra@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
Re: [Gluster-infra] Smoke tests run on the builder in RH DC (at least)
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 06:59:33PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote: > Hi, > > so today, after fixing one last config item, the smoke test jobs run > fine on the Centos 6 builder in the RH DC, which build things as non > root, then start the tests, then reboot the server. Nice, sounds like great progress! Did you need to change anything in the build or test scripts under /opt/qa? If so, please make sure that the changes land in the repository: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs-patch-acceptance-tests/ > Now, I am looking at the fedora one, but once this one is good, I will > likely reinstall a few builders as a test, and go on Centos 7 builder. I'm not sure yet if I made an error, or what is going on. But for some reason smoke tests for my patch series fails... This is the smoke result of the 1st patch in the serie, it only updates the fuse-header to a newer version. Of course local testing works just fine... The output and (not available) logs of the smoke test do not really help me :-/ https://build.gluster.org/job/smoke/24395/console Could this be related to the changes that were made? If not, I'd appreciate a pointer to my mistake. > I was also planning to look at jenkins job builder for the jenkins, but > no time yet. Will be after jenkins migration to a new host (which is > still not planned, unlike gerrit where we should be attempting to find a > time for that) We also might want to use Jenkins Job Builder for the tests we're adding to the CentOS CI. Maybe we could experiment with it there first, and then use our knowledge to the Gluster Jenkins? Thanks, Niels signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Gluster-infra mailing list Gluster-infra@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
