[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1291537] [RFE] Provide mechanism to spin up reproducible test environment for all developers

2016-02-17 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291537



--- Comment #14 from Vijay Bellur  ---
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13458 (vagrant-test: Install helper packages)
posted (#1) for review on master by Raghavendra Talur (rta...@redhat.com)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=d5duxoiTba=cc_unsubscribe
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

Re: [Gluster-infra] Migrating Gerrit and Jenkins out of iWeb

2016-02-17 Thread Michael Scherer 
Le mardi 16 février 2016 à 17:39 -0800, Amye Scavarda a écrit :
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Michael Scherer  wrote:
> > Le mardi 16 février 2016 à 23:05 +0530, Kaushal M a écrit :
> >> On Feb 12, 2016 10:50 PM, "Kaushal M"  wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Michael Scherer 
> >> wrote:
> >> > > Le vendredi 12 février 2016 à 12:16 +0100, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> >> > >> Le mercredi 10 février 2016 à 19:18 +0530, Kaushal M a écrit :
> >> > >> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Michael Scherer 
> >> > >> > 
> >> wrote:
> >> > >> > > Le mercredi 10 février 2016 à 11:44 +0530, Kaushal M a écrit :
> >> > >> > >> On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Michael Scherer <
> >> msche...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > >> > >> > Le samedi 06 février 2016 à 18:17 -0500, Vijay Bellur a écrit :
> >> > >> > >> >> I think starting around 0900 UTC on Friday of next week (12th
> >> Feb)
> >> > >> > >> >> should be possible. We should be done with 3.7.8 before that
> >> and can
> >> > >> > >> >> afford a bit of downtime then. In case any assistance is
> >> needed post the
> >> > >> > >> >> migration, we can have folks around the clock to help.
> >> > >> > >> >>
> >> > >> > >> >> If migration fails for an unforeseen reason, would we be able
> >> to
> >> > >> > >> >> rollback and maintain status quo?
> >> > >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >> > Yes. Worst case, I think people would just redo a few reviews
> >> or push
> >> > >> > >> > again patch.
> >> > >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >> > Also, since gerrit is critical, I wonder what is the support of
> >> gerrit
> >> > >> > >> > for slaves and replication.
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> Michael are you okay with the time? If you are, I think we should
> >> > >> > >> announce the migration.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > I am ok.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > So as discussed in the community meeting, we will be announcing the
> >> > >> > migration and downtime. Vijay, you said you required the exact
> >> > >> > schedule? This is what I expect
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Friday 12th Feb 2016
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > 0900 UTC : build.gluster.org and review.gluster.org are taken down
> >> and
> >> > >> > migration begins.
> >> > >> > <1-2 hrs?>: Michael copies over data onto the RH community infra and
> >> > >> > sets up the VMs.
> >> > >> > : The DNS records are updated, and some time is for it to
> >> propogate.
> >> > >> > <3hr?>: Verify everything is working well (I can help with this).
> >> We'd
> >> > >> > possibly need to run a regression job, so this will take longest I
> >> > >> > think.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > 1700UTC : We announce the finish of the migration and
> >> open
> >> > >> > the services back up. If migration failed, we bring the existing
> >> > >> > servers back on, and continue on.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> So, for people wanting to know, the migration has started.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> 1) gerrit
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> gerrit seems to be ok, it has a new IP 66.187.224.201
> >> > >>
> >> > >> people who used to have access there need to contact me so I can
> >> > >> explain/create required account on the new virt host.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> the old VM is shutdown for now. I will make a backup copy of the disk.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> 2) jenkins
> >> > >> --
> >> > >>
> >> > >> so the preparation of the migration didn't worked as well, so we have
> >> to
> >> > >> copy the VM when offline, and then prepare it later ( ie, import in
> >> > >> libvirt, adjust network, etc). So jenkins master is offline (sorry 
> >> > >> manu
> >> > >> for your tcpdump monitoring), we are making a copy of the disk that is
> >> > >> gonna take between 3 and 14h (most likely < 4h, but rsync estimation 
> >> > >> is
> >> > >> moving a lot), and then restart like before.
> >> > >
> >> > > So turn out I was wrong, and the copy is taking a much longer time.
> >> > > Despites me trying to investigate why, it didn't copied everything.
> >> > >
> >> > > So the new plan is to stop the VM, make a local copy of the disk, start
> >> > > the VM, and then copy that one over the new server, prepare for the new
> >> > > host (firewall, public ip, etc), and sync from the old VM to the new
> >> > > host.
> >> > >
> >> > > All is ok with this plan ?
> >> >
> >> > Sounds good to me. No need to wait for the copy to happen and the
> >> > downtime should be minimal like with gerrit.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Can we schedule this minimal downtime sometime tomorrow? Or if possible
> >> tonight itself. Since we don't require a long downtime we can do this
> >> anytime we like.
> >
> > No. I am at ansiblefest/contributor meeting tomorrow and the day after,
> > and then I took a PTO on friday, until end of February.
> 
> So it sounds like we're going to have to wait until March for this, if
> I'm reading this correctly.
> Accurate?

Yep.

Cf my calendar for the date I am out
-- 
Michael Scherer
Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS

Re: [Gluster-infra] Some gerrit email is getting "high" spam scores

2016-02-17 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY 
On 02/16/2016 04:47 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le lundi 15 février 2016 à 17:11 +0100, Michael Scherer a écrit :
>> Le lundi 15 février 2016 à 17:07 +0100, Michael Scherer a écrit :
>>> Le lundi 15 février 2016 à 08:03 -0500, Kaleb Keithley a écrit :
 Hi,

 e.g. 

 ...
 X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 2.614 ** (BAYES_50,MISSING_HEADERS,RDNS_NONE) 
 66.187.224.184 [66.187.224.184] 66.187.224.184 [66.187.224.184] 
 
 ...

 (yes, two asterisks is not really very high, but it's what I have to set 
 in my zimbra filter to catch the majority of the real spam.)

 Is there something we can do, e.g. add whatever missing headers are 
 necessary or an PTR record for dev.gluster.org to gluster.org DNS 
 somewhere, to yield lower scores?
>>>
>>> Yup, we can do that. I will ask IT as I do not have access.
>>
>> In fact, that's more complicated. 
>>
>> We have 1 IP address incoming (66.187.224.201), which is natted to the
>> internal IP of the server, and we have 1 ip for outgoing connexion,
>> which is shared (66.187.224.184). 
> 
> So rdns is done.
> 
> For missing_headers, there is this page:
> https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/MISSING_HEADERS
> 
> I am a bit puzzled about it. Could you look at a previous mail header to
> see if something changed ?
> 

I'm not sure what a previous mail header is, or would tell us. Here are
the headers from one of the mails that had a MISSING_HEADERS hit. As you
can see it does not have a To: line. I guess Du really did only sent to CC:

Is there somewhere I can set my ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs and adjust my
score for MISSING_HEADERS?

From - Wed Feb 17 08:06:34 2016
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Return-Path: rev...@dev.gluster.org^M
Received: from zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (LHLO^M
 zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com) (10.5.81.13) by^M
 zmail12.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com with LMTP; Mon, 15 Feb 2016^M
 21:50:44 -0500 (EST)^M
Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
(int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24])^M
by zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id D79CE169703;^M
Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:50:43 -0500 (EST)^M
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com
[10.5.110.31])^M
by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4)
with ESMTP id u1G2ohQA012057^M
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256
verify=NO);^M
Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:50:43 -0500^M
Received: from dev.gluster.org (unknown [66.187.224.184])^M
by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF83BC0BBE51;^M
Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:50:41 + (UTC)^M
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])^M
by dev.gluster.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2046505F2;^M
Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:46:43 -0800 (PST)^M
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:46:43 -0800^M
From: "Raghavendra G (Code Review)" ^M
CC: Gluster Build System ,^M
NetBSD Build System ,^M
Pranith Kumar Karampuri ,^M
Raghavendra Talur ,^M
Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna ,^M
soumya k ^M
Reply-To: rgowd...@redhat.com^M
X-Gerrit-MessageType: comment^M
List-Id: ^M
List-Unsubscribe: ^M
Subject: Change in glusterfs[master]: performance/write-behind:
guaranteed retry after a short write^M
X-Gerrit-Change-Id: I73a18b39b661a7424db1a7855a980469a51da8f9^M
X-Gerrit-ChangeURL: ^M
X-Gerrit-Commit: db8849a6285334aab502e1be9bd5dc876eaf89c3^M
In-Reply-To:
^M
References:
^M
MIME-Version: 1.0^M
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8^M
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit^M
Content-Disposition: inline^M
User-Agent: Gerrit/2.9.4^M
Message-Id: <20160216024643.e204650...@dev.gluster.org>^M
X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 2.614 ** (BAYES_50,MISSING_HEADERS,RDNS_NONE)
66.187.224.184 [66.187.224.184] 66.187.224.184 [66.187.224.184]
^M
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24^M
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.5.110.31^M




-- 

Kaleb
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

Re: [Gluster-infra] Some gerrit email is getting "high" spam scores

2016-02-17 Thread Michael Scherer 
Le mercredi 17 février 2016 à 08:13 -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY a écrit :
> On 02/16/2016 04:47 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > Le lundi 15 février 2016 à 17:11 +0100, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> >> Le lundi 15 février 2016 à 17:07 +0100, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> >>> Le lundi 15 février 2016 à 08:03 -0500, Kaleb Keithley a écrit :
>  Hi,
> 
>  e.g. 
> 
>  ...
>  X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 2.614 ** (BAYES_50,MISSING_HEADERS,RDNS_NONE) 
>  66.187.224.184 [66.187.224.184] 66.187.224.184 [66.187.224.184] 
>  
>  ...
> 
>  (yes, two asterisks is not really very high, but it's what I have to set 
>  in my zimbra filter to catch the majority of the real spam.)
> 
>  Is there something we can do, e.g. add whatever missing headers are 
>  necessary or an PTR record for dev.gluster.org to gluster.org DNS 
>  somewhere, to yield lower scores?
> >>>
> >>> Yup, we can do that. I will ask IT as I do not have access.
> >>
> >> In fact, that's more complicated. 
> >>
> >> We have 1 IP address incoming (66.187.224.201), which is natted to the
> >> internal IP of the server, and we have 1 ip for outgoing connexion,
> >> which is shared (66.187.224.184). 
> > 
> > So rdns is done.
> > 
> > For missing_headers, there is this page:
> > https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/MISSING_HEADERS
> > 
> > I am a bit puzzled about it. Could you look at a previous mail header to
> > see if something changed ?
> > 
> 
> I'm not sure what a previous mail header is, or would tell us.

My goal is more to see ff there was the same problem before the
migration.

>  Here are
> the headers from one of the mails that had a MISSING_HEADERS hit. As you
> can see it does not have a To: line. I guess Du really did only sent to CC:

Ok so maybe "gerrit bug". Let's hope that the rdns stuff do fix it
enough to not score above 2.0.

If not, I guess gerrit update would solve that, once we can do that.

> Is there somewhere I can set my ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs and adjust my
> score for MISSING_HEADERS?

On RH side, nope. Something that would help is the scoring used, so we
can see if MISSING_HEADERS is 0.1 or 1.9.

> From - Wed Feb 17 08:06:34 2016
> X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
> X-Mozilla-Status2: 
> X-Mozilla-Keys:
> Return-Path: rev...@dev.gluster.org^M
> Received: from zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (LHLO^M
>  zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com) (10.5.81.13) by^M
>  zmail12.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com with LMTP; Mon, 15 Feb 2016^M
>  21:50:44 -0500 (EST)^M
> Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
> (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24])^M
> by zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
> id D79CE169703;^M
> Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:50:43 -0500 (EST)^M
> Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com
> [10.5.110.31])^M
> by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4)
> with ESMTP id u1G2ohQA012057^M
> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256
> verify=NO);^M
> Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:50:43 -0500^M
> Received: from dev.gluster.org (unknown [66.187.224.184])^M
> by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF83BC0BBE51;^M
> Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:50:41 + (UTC)^M
> Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])^M
> by dev.gluster.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2046505F2;^M
> Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:46:43 -0800 (PST)^M
> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:46:43 -0800^M
> From: "Raghavendra G (Code Review)" ^M
> CC: Gluster Build System ,^M
> NetBSD Build System ,^M
> Pranith Kumar Karampuri ,^M
> Raghavendra Talur ,^M
> Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna ,^M
> soumya k ^M
> Reply-To: rgowd...@redhat.com^M
> X-Gerrit-MessageType: comment^M
> List-Id: ^M
> List-Unsubscribe: ^M
> Subject: Change in glusterfs[master]: performance/write-behind:
> guaranteed retry after a short write^M
> X-Gerrit-Change-Id: I73a18b39b661a7424db1a7855a980469a51da8f9^M
> X-Gerrit-ChangeURL: ^M
> X-Gerrit-Commit: db8849a6285334aab502e1be9bd5dc876eaf89c3^M
> In-Reply-To:
> ^M
> References:
> ^M
> MIME-Version: 1.0^M
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8^M
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit^M
> Content-Disposition: inline^M
> User-Agent: Gerrit/2.9.4^M
> Message-Id: <20160216024643.e204650...@dev.gluster.org>^M
> X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 2.614 ** (BAYES_50,MISSING_HEADERS,RDNS_NONE)
> 66.187.224.184 [66.187.224.184] 66.187.224.184 [66.187.224.184]
> ^M
>

Re: [Gluster-infra] Reboot of the infra tomorrow

2016-02-17 Thread Michael Scherer 
Le mardi 16 février 2016 à 21:40 +0100, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> due to a glibc issue, I will likely have to reboot random part of the
> infra tomorrow. I just did supercolony, because it was running on RHEL
> and was updated, but the others are on the list once there is updated
> rpm for them. Reboot would be brief, like less than 5 minutes of
> downtime.

So I did reboot formicary, the virt host running dev.gluster.org, but it
seems to not have suspended and restart as I believed, so
dev.gluster;org got restarted too for no good reason, sorry about that.

I will fix the config after I am back, but just wanted to tell to people
that some jobs might have been lost and need to be retriggered.

I have also updated part of the infra, will do the rest later (with
jenkins maybe restarted tonight)
-- 
Michael Scherer
Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

[Gluster-infra] review.gluster.org not responsive

2016-02-17 Thread Vijay Bellur 

Both the web and git interfaces are failing to load.

Michael - can you please help?

Thanks,
Vijay
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

Re: [Gluster-infra] review.gluster.org not responsive

2016-02-17 Thread Michael Scherer 
Le mercredi 17 février 2016 à 18:06 -0500, Vijay Bellur a écrit :
> Both the web and git interfaces are failing to load.
> 
> Michael - can you please help?

I am taking a look. I see no message on the console however.
-- 
Michael Scherer
Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra