Re: [Gluster-users] backupvolfile-server fqdn vs short
yes certain - the mount command is in the fstab and it uses all fully qualified domain names. btw Atin, gmail showed me an empy reply - had to use view original to see your question, not sure why, are you sending plaintext? gluster0.vsnet.gmu.edu:/digitalcorpora /var/www/digitalcorpora glusterfs _netdev,use-readdirp=no,backupvolfile-server=gluster1.vsnet.gmu.edu:g luster-2.vsnet.gmu.edu 0 0 On 23 July 2015 at 12:30, Atin Mukherjee atin.mukherje...@gmail.com wrote: -Atin Sent from one plus one On Jul 23, 2015 9:07 PM, Alastair Neil ajneil.t...@gmail.com wrote: I just had a curious failure. I have a gluster 3.6.3 replica 3 volume which was mounted via an 3.6.3 client from one of the nodes with the other two specified in the backupvolfile-server mount option. In the fstab entry all the nodes are referenced by their fully qualified domain names. When I rebooted the primary node, the mount became detached because the client was trying to use the short name to communicate with the backup nodes and failing to resolve it. This was fixed by adding the domain to the search in resolv.conf. However I am curious as to why it should try and use the short name instead of the fqdn specified in the fstab entry? The nodes all have peer entries for hostname, ip address and fqdn. Are you sure you didn't use short name in your mount command? Thanks, Alastair ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] Replace failed Node in a 4nodes Distributed-Replicate Volume
Any idea on this ? Regards 2015-07-23 17:16 GMT-03:00 Luciano Facchinelli lfacchine...@canal10.com.uy : Any idea on this ? Regards Luciano 2015-06-25 18:18 GMT-03:00 Luciano Facchinelli facchinelli.luci...@gmail.com: Hi guys! I did a google search but i found a lot of information and i don't really know which one should i follow . My scenario is this : 2 Volumes distributed-replicated 4 Nodes / 2 brick on each Each node is running glusterfs 3.4.0 One of those nodes, died, completely, so i'm planning a new install of OS on that node, recreate brick's folders and re-add it . Which steps should i follow in order to accomplish that task ? Is there any pitfall I should be aware of ? Thanks and regards form Uruguay, South America . ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] Gentle Reminder.. (Was: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS Documentation Improvements - An Update)
This is still confising me a little. The presentations from the Mediawiki instance have been put in the glusterdocs/presentations/ directory. If we should put them on the website instead, they should not be part of glusterdocs. However, there is currently no page that I can find on the website that lists the different presentations. The only link that I can find is this one: http://gluster.readthedocs.org/en/latest/presentations/ Is that going to be replaced with an explanation (or pointer) on how to get the presentation on the website? Well, we are yet to finalize on it. If we can render it on website we will do the same. Otherwise it will be a pointer from website. --Humble On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 03:51:59PM +0530, Anjana Sriram wrote: Hello All, Thank you for the feedback and suggestions provided on the GlusterFS Documentation improvements. We have analyzed them and here's a proposal to address them: We plan to use three independent repos for our projects: ... snip /Static Documentation/: Currently, Mediawiki is read-only. We have ported most of the documents from Mediawiki. There few pages which do not qualify to be placed in the above three repos for example, Presentations which will be considered to be placed on the website. This is still confising me a little. The presentations from the Mediawiki instance have been put in the glusterdocs/presentations/ directory. If we should put them on the website instead, they should not be part of glusterdocs. However, there is currently no page that I can find on the website that lists the different presentations. The only link that I can find is this one: http://gluster.readthedocs.org/en/latest/presentations/ Is that going to be replaced with an explanation (or pointer) on how to get the presentation on the website? Thanks, Niels Your thoughts and feedback are the major influences to our constant endeavor to make the community documentation better, effective, and useful. Please revert with your thoughts and feedback on the above proposal outlined by 29th July 2015. Regards, Humble, Shravan, and Anjana On 06/22/2015 05:24 PM, Shravan Chandrashekar wrote: Hello all, We would like to finalize on the documentation contribution workflow by 26th June 2015. As we have not yet received any comments/suggestion, we will confirm the recommend workflow after 26th June. Kindly provide your suggestion on how we can improve this workflow. Currently, mediawiki is read-only. We have ported most of the documents from mediawiki to the new repository [1]. If you find any document which is not ported, feel free to raise this by opening an issue in [2] or if you would like to port your documents, send a pull request. [1] https://github.com/gluster/glusterdocs [2] https://github.com/gluster/glusterdocs/issues Regards, Shravan - Original Message - From: Humble Devassy Chirammal humble.deva...@gmail.com To: Gluster-users@gluster.org List gluster-users@gluster.org, Gluster Devel gluster-de...@gluster.org Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 7:48:16 PM Subject: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS Documentation Improvements - An Update Hello all, The GlusterFS documentation team is constantly working to improve the quality, findability, and usefulness of its documentation. Our goal is to increase community contribution, remove barriers that discourage contribution and give you the help you need, when and where you need it. As part of this strategy, we’ve just rolled out the revamped GlusterFS Documentation: gluster.readthedocs.org We started by curating content from various sources including gluster.org static HTML documentation, various blog posts and the Community wiki. We used readthedocs service to host the documentation and mkdocs to convert the Markdown source files to HTML pages. We also put our thought into classifying the documentation based on their content: * Quick Start Guide : A headstart guide for the beginners. * Installation Guide : Step by step instructions to install GlusterFS. * Administration Guide : Container for for all administrative actions. * Developer Guide : Container for all development related aspects. * Upgrade Guide : Contains guides to upgrade from older versions of GlusterFS. * Features : Container for all the features of GlusterFS introduced in various versions. * GlusterFS Tools : Contains information about the tools used in GlusterFS. * Troubleshooting Guide : Container for basic troubleshooting and debugging guides. * Images : Container for images (in .jpg or .png format) that are present inline the documentation pages. Doing so, we gain these benefits: * Version based
Re: [Gluster-users] Setup with replica 3 for imagestorage
For now I made a setup with drbd and cman, ssem to work for me, even I hope to solve the problems with glusterfs. Cause there ar nice features in glusterfs and it is handy to setup. If you still need some test from me, I'm on the list, and I test glusterfs on... bye Gregor ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
[Gluster-users] backupvolfile-server fqdn vs short
I just had a curious failure. I have a gluster 3.6.3 replica 3 volume which was mounted via an 3.6.3 client from one of the nodes with the other two specified in the backupvolfile-server mount option. In the fstab entry all the nodes are referenced by their fully qualified domain names. When I rebooted the primary node, the mount became detached because the client was trying to use the short name to communicate with the backup nodes and failing to resolve it. This was fixed by adding the domain to the search in resolv.conf. However I am curious as to why it should try and use the short name instead of the fqdn specified in the fstab entry? The nodes all have peer entries for hostname, ip address and fqdn. Thanks, Alastair ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] gluster in cloud environment
-Atin Sent from one plus one On Jul 23, 2015 3:41 PM, Timo Schaepe i...@timoschaepe.de wrote: Hey guys, we are trying to use gluster 3.6.4 in a cloud environment. Creating the gluster itself is not a problem. Mounting the created vol from a machine in the cloud infrastructure is not a problem. But when I am trying to mount the created gluster vol from an external machine it fails. In the log files of the client I can see that gluster is annoucing the bricks with the cloud infrastructure internal ips, which are not accessible from outside of the cloud. When I change the internal ips to the public domain names in /var/lib/glusterd/gv0.tcp-fuse.vol on every cluster host it works seamless. I definitely think that this is not the recommended way to solve this problem. Of course it breaks, if I add another bricks to the gluster. Is there a possibility to change the annouced ip adresses? Or is there another way to solve this problem? Probably in that case its better to peer probe using public domain name instead of internal IP? Thanks, Timo ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Re: [Gluster-users] backupvolfile-server fqdn vs short
-Atin Sent from one plus one On Jul 23, 2015 9:07 PM, Alastair Neil ajneil.t...@gmail.com wrote: I just had a curious failure. I have a gluster 3.6.3 replica 3 volume which was mounted via an 3.6.3 client from one of the nodes with the other two specified in the backupvolfile-server mount option. In the fstab entry all the nodes are referenced by their fully qualified domain names. When I rebooted the primary node, the mount became detached because the client was trying to use the short name to communicate with the backup nodes and failing to resolve it. This was fixed by adding the domain to the search in resolv.conf. However I am curious as to why it should try and use the short name instead of the fqdn specified in the fstab entry? The nodes all have peer entries for hostname, ip address and fqdn. Are you sure you didn't use short name in your mount command? Thanks, Alastair ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
[Gluster-users] gluster in cloud environment
Hey guys, we are trying to use gluster 3.6.4 in a cloud environment. Creating the gluster itself is not a problem. Mounting the created vol from a machine in the cloud infrastructure is not a problem. But when I am trying to mount the created gluster vol from an external machine it fails. In the log files of the client I can see that gluster is annoucing the bricks with the cloud infrastructure internal ips, which are not accessible from outside of the cloud. When I change the internal ips to the public domain names in /var/lib/glusterd/gv0.tcp-fuse.vol on every cluster host it works seamless. I definitely think that this is not the recommended way to solve this problem. Of course it breaks, if I add another bricks to the gluster. Is there a possibility to change the annouced ip adresses? Or is there another way to solve this problem? Thanks, Timo ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
