[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 5.11

2019-12-17 Thread Hari Gowtham
Hi,

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster
5.11 (packages available at [1]).

Release notes for the release can be found at [2].

Major changes, features and limitations addressed in this release:
None

Thanks,
Gluster community

[1] Packages for 5.11:
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/5.11/

[2] Release notes for 5.11:
https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/release-notes/5.11/



-- 
Regards,
Hari Gowtham.


Community Meeting Calendar:

APAC Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968

NA/EMEA Schedule -
Every 1st and 3rd Tuesday at 01:00 PM EDT
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968

Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


Re: [Gluster-users] GFS performance under heavy traffic

2019-12-17 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa
What version of Glusterfs are you using? Though, not sure what's the root
cause of your problem, just wanted to point out a bug with read-ahead which
would cause read-amplification over network [1][2], which should be fixed
in recent versions.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214489
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393419

On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 2:50 AM David Cunningham 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> We switched a production system to using GFS instead of NFS at the
> weekend, however it didn't go well on Monday when full load hit. The
> application started crashing regularly and we had to revert to NFS. It
> seems that the problem was high network traffic used by GFS.
>
> We've two GFS nodes plus one arbiter node, each about 1.3ms latency from
> each other. Attached is a chart of network traffic on one of the GFS nodes.
> We see that it saturated the 1Gbps link before we reverted to NFS at 15:10.
>
> The question is, why does GFS use so much network traffic and is there
> anything we can do about it? NFS traffic doesn't exceed 4MBps, so 120MBps
> for GFS seems awfully high.
>
> It would also be good to have faster read performance from GFS, but that's
> another issue.
>
> Thanks in advance for any assistance.
>
> --
> David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited
> http://voisonics.com/
> USA: +1 213 221 1092
> New Zealand: +64 (0)28 2558 3782
> 
>
> Community Meeting Calendar:
>
> APAC Schedule -
> Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST
> Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968
>
> NA/EMEA Schedule -
> Every 1st and 3rd Tuesday at 01:00 PM EDT
> Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968
>
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>


Community Meeting Calendar:

APAC Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968

NA/EMEA Schedule -
Every 1st and 3rd Tuesday at 01:00 PM EDT
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968

Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


[Gluster-users] GFS performance under heavy traffic

2019-12-17 Thread David Cunningham
Hello,

We switched a production system to using GFS instead of NFS at the weekend,
however it didn't go well on Monday when full load hit. The application
started crashing regularly and we had to revert to NFS. It seems that the
problem was high network traffic used by GFS.

We've two GFS nodes plus one arbiter node, each about 1.3ms latency from
each other. Attached is a chart of network traffic on one of the GFS nodes.
We see that it saturated the 1Gbps link before we reverted to NFS at 15:10.

The question is, why does GFS use so much network traffic and is there
anything we can do about it? NFS traffic doesn't exceed 4MBps, so 120MBps
for GFS seems awfully high.

It would also be good to have faster read performance from GFS, but that's
another issue.

Thanks in advance for any assistance.

-- 
David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited
http://voisonics.com/
USA: +1 213 221 1092
New Zealand: +64 (0)28 2558 3782


Community Meeting Calendar:

APAC Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968

NA/EMEA Schedule -
Every 1st and 3rd Tuesday at 01:00 PM EDT
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968

Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


[Gluster-users] Bug: storage.reserve ignored by self-heal so that bricks are 100% full

2019-12-17 Thread David Spisla
Dear Gluster Community,

just another bug found. See here for details:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1784402

Logs and Infos are provided in a file.

Regards
David Spisla


Community Meeting Calendar:

APAC Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968

NA/EMEA Schedule -
Every 1st and 3rd Tuesday at 01:00 PM EDT
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968

Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users