subject:"Re\: \[Gluster\-users\] Turn off replication"

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

2018-05-02 Thread Jose Sanchez


Hi, All and thank you. 

We left it alone and finished rebalancing, it seems to be working . Thanks 
again for your help

J. Sanchez

-
Jose Sanchez
Systems/Network Analyst 
Center of Advanced Research Computing
1601 Central Ave.
MSC 01 1190
Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001
carc.unm.edu 
575.636.4232

> On May 2, 2018, at 3:20 AM, Hari Gowtham  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Removing data to speed up from rebalance is not something that is recommended.
> Rebalance can be stopped but if started again it will start from the beginning
> (will have to check and skip the files already moved).
> 
> Rebalance will take a while, better to let it run. It doesn't have any
> down side.
> Unless you touch the backend the data on gluster volume will be
> available for usage
> in spite of rebalance running. If you want to speed things up
> rebalance throttle option
> can be set to aggressive to speed things up. (this might increase the
> cpu and disk usage).
> 
> 
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 6:24 PM, Jose Sanchez  wrote:
>> Hi All
>> 
>> We were able to get all 4 bricks are distributed , we can see the right
>> amount of space. but we have been rebalancing since 4 days ago for 16Tb. and
>> still only 8tb. is there a way to speed up. there is also data we can remove
>> from it to speed it up, but what is the best procedures removing data , is
>> it from the Gluster main export point or going on each brick and remove it .
>> We would like to stop rebalancing , delete the data and rebalancing again.
>> 
>> is there a down side, doing this, What happens with Gluster missing data
>> when rebalancing?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Jose
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> Jose Sanchez
>> Systems/Network Analyst 1
>> Center of Advanced Research Computing
>> 1601 Central Ave.
>> MSC 01 1190
>> Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001
>> carc.unm.edu
>> 575.636.4232
>> 
>> On Apr 27, 2018, at 4:16 AM, Hari Gowtham  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Jose,
>> 
>> Why are all the bricks visible in volume info if the pre-validation
>> for add-brick failed? I suspect that the remove brick wasn't done
>> properly.
>> 
>> You can provide the cmd_history.log to verify this. Better to get the
>> other log messages.
>> 
>> Also I need to know what are the bricks that were actually removed,
>> the command used and its output.
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 3:47 AM, Jose Sanchez  wrote:
>> 
>> Looking at the logs , it seems that it is trying to add using the same port
>> was assigned for gluster01ib:
>> 
>> 
>> Any Ideas??
>> 
>> Jose
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.169302] I [MSGID: 106482]
>> [glusterd-brick-ops.c:447:__glusterd_handle_add_brick] 0-management:
>> Received add brick req
>> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.186037] I [run.c:191:runner_log]
>> (-->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.8.15/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so(+0x33045)
>> [0x7f5464b9b045]
>> -->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.8.15/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so(+0xcbd85)
>> [0x7f5464c33d85] -->/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(runner_log+0x115)
>> [0x7f54704cf1e5] ) 0-management: Ran script:
>> /var/lib/glusterd/hooks/1/add-brick/pre/S28Quota-enable-root-xattr-heal.sh
>> --volname=scratch --version=1 --volume-op=add-brick
>> --gd-workdir=/var/lib/glusterd
>> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.309534] I [MSGID: 106143]
>> [glusterd-pmap.c:250:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick
>> /gdata/brick1/scratch on port 49152
>> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.309659] I [MSGID: 106143]
>> [glusterd-pmap.c:250:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick
>> /gdata/brick1/scratch.rdma on port 49153
>> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310231] E [MSGID: 106005]
>> [glusterd-utils.c:4877:glusterd_brick_start] 0-management: Unable to start
>> brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
>> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310275] E [MSGID: 106074]
>> [glusterd-brick-ops.c:2493:glusterd_op_add_brick] 0-glusterd: Unable to add
>> bricks
>> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310304] E [MSGID: 106123]
>> [glusterd-mgmt.c:294:gd_mgmt_v3_commit_fn] 0-management: Add-brick commit
>> failed.
>> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310316] E [MSGID: 106123]
>> [glusterd-mgmt.c:1427:glusterd_mgmt_v3_commit] 0-management: Commit failed
>> for operation Add brick on local node
>> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310330] E [MSGID: 106123]
>> [glusterd-mgmt.c:2018:glusterd_mgmt_v3_initiate_all_phases] 0-management:
>> Commit Op Failed
>> [2018-04-25 22:09:11.678141] E [MSGID: 106452]
>> [glusterd-utils.c:6064:glusterd_new_brick_validate] 0-management: Brick:
>> gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or
>> be contained by an existing brick
>> [2018-04-25 22:09:11.678184] W [MSGID: 106122]
>> [glusterd-mgmt.c:188:gd_mgmt_v3_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: ADD-brick
>> prevalidation failed.
>> [2018-04-25 22:09:11.678200] E [MSGID: 106122]
>> [glusterd-mgmt-handler.c:337:glusterd_handle_pre_validate_fn] 0-management:
>> Pre Validation failed on operation Add brick
>> [root@gluster02 glusterfs]# gluster

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

2018-05-02 Thread Hari Gowtham

Hi,

Removing data to speed up from rebalance is not something that is recommended.
Rebalance can be stopped but if started again it will start from the beginning
(will have to check and skip the files already moved).

Rebalance will take a while, better to let it run. It doesn't have any
down side.
Unless you touch the backend the data on gluster volume will be
available for usage
in spite of rebalance running. If you want to speed things up
rebalance throttle option
can be set to aggressive to speed things up. (this might increase the
cpu and disk usage).


On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 6:24 PM, Jose Sanchez  wrote:
> Hi All
>
> We were able to get all 4 bricks are distributed , we can see the right
> amount of space. but we have been rebalancing since 4 days ago for 16Tb. and
> still only 8tb. is there a way to speed up. there is also data we can remove
> from it to speed it up, but what is the best procedures removing data , is
> it from the Gluster main export point or going on each brick and remove it .
> We would like to stop rebalancing , delete the data and rebalancing again.
>
> is there a down side, doing this, What happens with Gluster missing data
> when rebalancing?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jose
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> Jose Sanchez
> Systems/Network Analyst 1
> Center of Advanced Research Computing
> 1601 Central Ave.
> MSC 01 1190
> Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001
> carc.unm.edu
> 575.636.4232
>
> On Apr 27, 2018, at 4:16 AM, Hari Gowtham  wrote:
>
> Hi Jose,
>
> Why are all the bricks visible in volume info if the pre-validation
> for add-brick failed? I suspect that the remove brick wasn't done
> properly.
>
> You can provide the cmd_history.log to verify this. Better to get the
> other log messages.
>
> Also I need to know what are the bricks that were actually removed,
> the command used and its output.
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 3:47 AM, Jose Sanchez  wrote:
>
> Looking at the logs , it seems that it is trying to add using the same port
> was assigned for gluster01ib:
>
>
> Any Ideas??
>
> Jose
>
>
>
> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.169302] I [MSGID: 106482]
> [glusterd-brick-ops.c:447:__glusterd_handle_add_brick] 0-management:
> Received add brick req
> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.186037] I [run.c:191:runner_log]
> (-->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.8.15/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so(+0x33045)
> [0x7f5464b9b045]
> -->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.8.15/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so(+0xcbd85)
> [0x7f5464c33d85] -->/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(runner_log+0x115)
> [0x7f54704cf1e5] ) 0-management: Ran script:
> /var/lib/glusterd/hooks/1/add-brick/pre/S28Quota-enable-root-xattr-heal.sh
> --volname=scratch --version=1 --volume-op=add-brick
> --gd-workdir=/var/lib/glusterd
> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.309534] I [MSGID: 106143]
> [glusterd-pmap.c:250:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick
> /gdata/brick1/scratch on port 49152
> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.309659] I [MSGID: 106143]
> [glusterd-pmap.c:250:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick
> /gdata/brick1/scratch.rdma on port 49153
> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310231] E [MSGID: 106005]
> [glusterd-utils.c:4877:glusterd_brick_start] 0-management: Unable to start
> brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310275] E [MSGID: 106074]
> [glusterd-brick-ops.c:2493:glusterd_op_add_brick] 0-glusterd: Unable to add
> bricks
> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310304] E [MSGID: 106123]
> [glusterd-mgmt.c:294:gd_mgmt_v3_commit_fn] 0-management: Add-brick commit
> failed.
> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310316] E [MSGID: 106123]
> [glusterd-mgmt.c:1427:glusterd_mgmt_v3_commit] 0-management: Commit failed
> for operation Add brick on local node
> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310330] E [MSGID: 106123]
> [glusterd-mgmt.c:2018:glusterd_mgmt_v3_initiate_all_phases] 0-management:
> Commit Op Failed
> [2018-04-25 22:09:11.678141] E [MSGID: 106452]
> [glusterd-utils.c:6064:glusterd_new_brick_validate] 0-management: Brick:
> gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or
> be contained by an existing brick
> [2018-04-25 22:09:11.678184] W [MSGID: 106122]
> [glusterd-mgmt.c:188:gd_mgmt_v3_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: ADD-brick
> prevalidation failed.
> [2018-04-25 22:09:11.678200] E [MSGID: 106122]
> [glusterd-mgmt-handler.c:337:glusterd_handle_pre_validate_fn] 0-management:
> Pre Validation failed on operation Add brick
> [root@gluster02 glusterfs]# gluster volume status scratch
> Status of volume: scratch
> Gluster process TCP Port  RDMA Port  Online  Pid
> --
> Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch 49152 49153  Y
> 1819
> Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch 49154 49155  Y
> 1827
> Brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch N/A   N/AN   N/A
>
>
>
> Task Status of Volume scratch
> --
> There are no active

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

2018-04-30 Thread Jose Sanchez

Hi All

We were able to get all 4 bricks are distributed , we can see the right amount 
of space. but we have been rebalancing since 4 days ago for 16Tb. and still 
only 8tb. is there a way to speed up. there is also data we can remove from it 
to speed it up, but what is the best procedures removing data , is it from the 
Gluster main export point or going on each brick and remove it . We would like 
to stop rebalancing , delete the data and rebalancing again. 

is there a down side, doing this, What happens with Gluster missing data when 
rebalancing?

Thanks

Jose






-
Jose Sanchez
Systems/Network Analyst 1
Center of Advanced Research Computing
1601 Central Ave.
MSC 01 1190
Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001
carc.unm.edu 
575.636.4232

> On Apr 27, 2018, at 4:16 AM, Hari Gowtham  wrote:
> 
> Hi Jose,
> 
> Why are all the bricks visible in volume info if the pre-validation
> for add-brick failed? I suspect that the remove brick wasn't done
> properly.
> 
> You can provide the cmd_history.log to verify this. Better to get the
> other log messages.
> 
> Also I need to know what are the bricks that were actually removed,
> the command used and its output.
> 
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 3:47 AM, Jose Sanchez  wrote:
>> Looking at the logs , it seems that it is trying to add using the same port
>> was assigned for gluster01ib:
>> 
>> 
>> Any Ideas??
>> 
>> Jose
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.169302] I [MSGID: 106482]
>> [glusterd-brick-ops.c:447:__glusterd_handle_add_brick] 0-management:
>> Received add brick req
>> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.186037] I [run.c:191:runner_log]
>> (-->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.8.15/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so(+0x33045)
>> [0x7f5464b9b045]
>> -->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.8.15/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so(+0xcbd85)
>> [0x7f5464c33d85] -->/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(runner_log+0x115)
>> [0x7f54704cf1e5] ) 0-management: Ran script:
>> /var/lib/glusterd/hooks/1/add-brick/pre/S28Quota-enable-root-xattr-heal.sh
>> --volname=scratch --version=1 --volume-op=add-brick
>> --gd-workdir=/var/lib/glusterd
>> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.309534] I [MSGID: 106143]
>> [glusterd-pmap.c:250:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick
>> /gdata/brick1/scratch on port 49152
>> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.309659] I [MSGID: 106143]
>> [glusterd-pmap.c:250:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick
>> /gdata/brick1/scratch.rdma on port 49153
>> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310231] E [MSGID: 106005]
>> [glusterd-utils.c:4877:glusterd_brick_start] 0-management: Unable to start
>> brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
>> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310275] E [MSGID: 106074]
>> [glusterd-brick-ops.c:2493:glusterd_op_add_brick] 0-glusterd: Unable to add
>> bricks
>> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310304] E [MSGID: 106123]
>> [glusterd-mgmt.c:294:gd_mgmt_v3_commit_fn] 0-management: Add-brick commit
>> failed.
>> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310316] E [MSGID: 106123]
>> [glusterd-mgmt.c:1427:glusterd_mgmt_v3_commit] 0-management: Commit failed
>> for operation Add brick on local node
>> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310330] E [MSGID: 106123]
>> [glusterd-mgmt.c:2018:glusterd_mgmt_v3_initiate_all_phases] 0-management:
>> Commit Op Failed
>> [2018-04-25 22:09:11.678141] E [MSGID: 106452]
>> [glusterd-utils.c:6064:glusterd_new_brick_validate] 0-management: Brick:
>> gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or
>> be contained by an existing brick
>> [2018-04-25 22:09:11.678184] W [MSGID: 106122]
>> [glusterd-mgmt.c:188:gd_mgmt_v3_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: ADD-brick
>> prevalidation failed.
>> [2018-04-25 22:09:11.678200] E [MSGID: 106122]
>> [glusterd-mgmt-handler.c:337:glusterd_handle_pre_validate_fn] 0-management:
>> Pre Validation failed on operation Add brick
>> [root@gluster02 glusterfs]# gluster volume status scratch
>> Status of volume: scratch
>> Gluster process TCP Port  RDMA Port  Online  Pid
>> --
>> Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch 49152 49153  Y
>> 1819
>> Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch 49154 49155  Y
>> 1827
>> Brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch N/A   N/AN   N/A
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Task Status of Volume scratch
>> --
>> There are no active volume tasks
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> [root@gluster02 glusterfs]#
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 25, 2018, at 3:23 PM, Jose Sanchez  wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Karthik
>> 
>> 
>> Im having trouble adding the two bricks back online.  Any help is
>> appreciated
>> 
>> thanks
>> 
>> 
>> when i try to add-brick command this is what i get
>> 
>> [root@gluster01 ~]# gluster volume add-brick scratch
>> gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch/
>> volume add-brick: failed: Pre Validation failed on gluster02ib. Brick:
>> gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or
>>

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

2018-04-27 Thread Hari Gowtham

Hi Jose,

Why are all the bricks visible in volume info if the pre-validation
for add-brick failed? I suspect that the remove brick wasn't done
properly.

You can provide the cmd_history.log to verify this. Better to get the
other log messages.

Also I need to know what are the bricks that were actually removed,
the command used and its output.

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 3:47 AM, Jose Sanchez  wrote:
> Looking at the logs , it seems that it is trying to add using the same port
> was assigned for gluster01ib:
>
>
> Any Ideas??
>
> Jose
>
>
>
> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.169302] I [MSGID: 106482]
> [glusterd-brick-ops.c:447:__glusterd_handle_add_brick] 0-management:
> Received add brick req
> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.186037] I [run.c:191:runner_log]
> (-->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.8.15/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so(+0x33045)
> [0x7f5464b9b045]
> -->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.8.15/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so(+0xcbd85)
> [0x7f5464c33d85] -->/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(runner_log+0x115)
> [0x7f54704cf1e5] ) 0-management: Ran script:
> /var/lib/glusterd/hooks/1/add-brick/pre/S28Quota-enable-root-xattr-heal.sh
> --volname=scratch --version=1 --volume-op=add-brick
> --gd-workdir=/var/lib/glusterd
> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.309534] I [MSGID: 106143]
> [glusterd-pmap.c:250:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick
> /gdata/brick1/scratch on port 49152
> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.309659] I [MSGID: 106143]
> [glusterd-pmap.c:250:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick
> /gdata/brick1/scratch.rdma on port 49153
> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310231] E [MSGID: 106005]
> [glusterd-utils.c:4877:glusterd_brick_start] 0-management: Unable to start
> brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310275] E [MSGID: 106074]
> [glusterd-brick-ops.c:2493:glusterd_op_add_brick] 0-glusterd: Unable to add
> bricks
> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310304] E [MSGID: 106123]
> [glusterd-mgmt.c:294:gd_mgmt_v3_commit_fn] 0-management: Add-brick commit
> failed.
> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310316] E [MSGID: 106123]
> [glusterd-mgmt.c:1427:glusterd_mgmt_v3_commit] 0-management: Commit failed
> for operation Add brick on local node
> [2018-04-25 22:08:55.310330] E [MSGID: 106123]
> [glusterd-mgmt.c:2018:glusterd_mgmt_v3_initiate_all_phases] 0-management:
> Commit Op Failed
> [2018-04-25 22:09:11.678141] E [MSGID: 106452]
> [glusterd-utils.c:6064:glusterd_new_brick_validate] 0-management: Brick:
> gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or
> be contained by an existing brick
> [2018-04-25 22:09:11.678184] W [MSGID: 106122]
> [glusterd-mgmt.c:188:gd_mgmt_v3_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: ADD-brick
> prevalidation failed.
> [2018-04-25 22:09:11.678200] E [MSGID: 106122]
> [glusterd-mgmt-handler.c:337:glusterd_handle_pre_validate_fn] 0-management:
> Pre Validation failed on operation Add brick
> [root@gluster02 glusterfs]# gluster volume status scratch
> Status of volume: scratch
> Gluster process TCP Port  RDMA Port  Online  Pid
> --
> Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch 49152 49153  Y
> 1819
> Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch 49154 49155  Y
> 1827
> Brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch N/A   N/AN   N/A
>
>
>
> Task Status of Volume scratch
> --
> There are no active volume tasks
>
>
>
> [root@gluster02 glusterfs]#
>
>
>
> On Apr 25, 2018, at 3:23 PM, Jose Sanchez  wrote:
>
> Hello Karthik
>
>
> Im having trouble adding the two bricks back online.  Any help is
> appreciated
>
> thanks
>
>
> when i try to add-brick command this is what i get
>
> [root@gluster01 ~]# gluster volume add-brick scratch
> gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch/
> volume add-brick: failed: Pre Validation failed on gluster02ib. Brick:
> gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or
> be contained by an existing brick
>
> I have run the following commands and remove the .glusterfs hidden
> directories
>
> [root@gluster02 ~]# setfattr -x trusted.glusterfs.volume-id
> /gdata/brick2/scratch/
> setfattr: /gdata/brick2/scratch/: No such attribute
> [root@gluster02 ~]# setfattr -x trusted.gfid /gdata/brick2/scratch/
> setfattr: /gdata/brick2/scratch/: No such attribute
> [root@gluster02 ~]#
>
>
> this is what I get when I run status and info
>
>
> [root@gluster01 ~]# gluster volume info scratch
>
> Volume Name: scratch
> Type: Distribute
> Volume ID: 23f1e4b1-b8e0-46c3-874a-58b4728ea106
> Status: Started
> Snapshot Count: 0
> Number of Bricks: 4
> Transport-type: tcp,rdma
> Bricks:
> Brick1: gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
> Brick2: gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
> Brick3: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
> Brick4: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
> Options Reconfigured:
> nfs.disable: on
> performance.readdir-ahead: on
> [root@gluster01 ~]#
>
>
> [root@gluster02 ~]# gluster

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

2018-04-26 Thread Jose Sanchez

Looking at the logs , it seems that it is trying to add using the same port was 
assigned for gluster01ib:


Any Ideas??

Jose



[2018-04-25 22:08:55.169302] I [MSGID: 106482] 
[glusterd-brick-ops.c:447:__glusterd_handle_add_brick] 0-management: Received 
add brick req
[2018-04-25 22:08:55.186037] I [run.c:191:runner_log] 
(-->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.8.15/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so(+0x33045) 
[0x7f5464b9b045] 
-->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.8.15/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so(+0xcbd85) 
[0x7f5464c33d85] -->/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(runner_log+0x115) [0x7f54704cf1e5] 
) 0-management: Ran script: 
/var/lib/glusterd/hooks/1/add-brick/pre/S28Quota-enable-root-xattr-heal.sh 
--volname=scratch --version=1 --volume-op=add-brick 
--gd-workdir=/var/lib/glusterd
[2018-04-25 22:08:55.309534] I [MSGID: 106143] 
[glusterd-pmap.c:250:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick 
/gdata/brick1/scratch on port 49152
[2018-04-25 22:08:55.309659] I [MSGID: 106143] 
[glusterd-pmap.c:250:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick 
/gdata/brick1/scratch.rdma on port 49153
[2018-04-25 22:08:55.310231] E [MSGID: 106005] 
[glusterd-utils.c:4877:glusterd_brick_start] 0-management: Unable to start 
brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
[2018-04-25 22:08:55.310275] E [MSGID: 106074] 
[glusterd-brick-ops.c:2493:glusterd_op_add_brick] 0-glusterd: Unable to add 
bricks
[2018-04-25 22:08:55.310304] E [MSGID: 106123] 
[glusterd-mgmt.c:294:gd_mgmt_v3_commit_fn] 0-management: Add-brick commit 
failed.
[2018-04-25 22:08:55.310316] E [MSGID: 106123] 
[glusterd-mgmt.c:1427:glusterd_mgmt_v3_commit] 0-management: Commit failed for 
operation Add brick on local node
[2018-04-25 22:08:55.310330] E [MSGID: 106123] 
[glusterd-mgmt.c:2018:glusterd_mgmt_v3_initiate_all_phases] 0-management: 
Commit Op Failed
[2018-04-25 22:09:11.678141] E [MSGID: 106452] 
[glusterd-utils.c:6064:glusterd_new_brick_validate] 0-management: Brick: 
gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or be 
contained by an existing brick
[2018-04-25 22:09:11.678184] W [MSGID: 106122] 
[glusterd-mgmt.c:188:gd_mgmt_v3_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: ADD-brick 
prevalidation failed.
[2018-04-25 22:09:11.678200] E [MSGID: 106122] 
[glusterd-mgmt-handler.c:337:glusterd_handle_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: Pre 
Validation failed on operation Add brick
[root@gluster02 glusterfs]# gluster volume status scratch
Status of volume: scratch
Gluster process TCP Port  RDMA Port  Online  Pid
--
Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch 49152 49153  Y   1819 
Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch 49154 49155  Y   1827 
Brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch N/A   N/AN   N/A  
 
Task Status of Volume scratch
--
There are no active volume tasks
 
[root@gluster02 glusterfs]# 



> On Apr 25, 2018, at 3:23 PM, Jose Sanchez  wrote:
> 
> Hello Karthik
> 
> 
> Im having trouble adding the two bricks back online.  Any help is appreciated 
>  
> 
> thanks 
> 
> 
> when i try to add-brick command this is what i get 
> 
> [root@gluster01 ~]# gluster volume add-brick scratch 
> gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch/
> volume add-brick: failed: Pre Validation failed on gluster02ib. Brick: 
> gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or 
> be contained by an existing brick
> 
> I have run the following commands and remove the .glusterfs hidden 
> directories 
> 
> [root@gluster02 ~]# setfattr -x trusted.glusterfs.volume-id 
> /gdata/brick2/scratch/
> setfattr: /gdata/brick2/scratch/: No such attribute
> [root@gluster02 ~]# setfattr -x trusted.gfid /gdata/brick2/scratch/
> setfattr: /gdata/brick2/scratch/: No such attribute
> [root@gluster02 ~]# 
> 
> 
> this is what I get when I run status and info
> 
> 
> [root@gluster01 ~]# gluster volume info scratch
>  
> Volume Name: scratch
> Type: Distribute
> Volume ID: 23f1e4b1-b8e0-46c3-874a-58b4728ea106
> Status: Started
> Snapshot Count: 0
> Number of Bricks: 4
> Transport-type: tcp,rdma
> Bricks:
> Brick1: gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
> Brick2: gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
> Brick3: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
> Brick4: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
> Options Reconfigured:
> nfs.disable: on
> performance.readdir-ahead: on
> [root@gluster01 ~]# 
> 
> 
> [root@gluster02 ~]# gluster volume status scratch
> Status of volume: scratch
> Gluster process TCP Port  RDMA Port  Online  Pid
> --
> Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch 49156 49157  Y   1819 
> Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch 49158 49159  Y   1827 
> Brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch N/A   N/AN   N/A  
> Brick

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

2018-04-26 Thread Jose Sanchez

Hello Karthik


Im having trouble adding the two bricks back online.  Any help is appreciated  

thanks 


when i try to add-brick command this is what i get 

[root@gluster01 ~]# gluster volume add-brick scratch 
gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch/
volume add-brick: failed: Pre Validation failed on gluster02ib. Brick: 
gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or be 
contained by an existing brick

I have run the following commands and remove the .glusterfs hidden directories 

[root@gluster02 ~]# setfattr -x trusted.glusterfs.volume-id 
/gdata/brick2/scratch/
setfattr: /gdata/brick2/scratch/: No such attribute
[root@gluster02 ~]# setfattr -x trusted.gfid /gdata/brick2/scratch/
setfattr: /gdata/brick2/scratch/: No such attribute
[root@gluster02 ~]# 


this is what I get when I run status and info


[root@gluster01 ~]# gluster volume info scratch
 
Volume Name: scratch
Type: Distribute
Volume ID: 23f1e4b1-b8e0-46c3-874a-58b4728ea106
Status: Started
Snapshot Count: 0
Number of Bricks: 4
Transport-type: tcp,rdma
Bricks:
Brick1: gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
Brick2: gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
Brick3: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
Brick4: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
Options Reconfigured:
nfs.disable: on
performance.readdir-ahead: on
[root@gluster01 ~]# 


[root@gluster02 ~]# gluster volume status scratch
Status of volume: scratch
Gluster process TCP Port  RDMA Port  Online  Pid
--
Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch 49156 49157  Y   1819 
Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch 49158 49159  Y   1827 
Brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch N/A   N/AN   N/A  
Brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch N/A   N/AN   N/A  
 
Task Status of Volume scratch
--
There are no active volume tasks
 
[root@gluster02 ~]# 


This are the logs files from Gluster ETC

[2018-04-25 20:56:54.390662] I [MSGID: 106143] 
[glusterd-pmap.c:250:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick 
/gdata/brick1/scratch on port 49152
[2018-04-25 20:56:54.390798] I [MSGID: 106143] 
[glusterd-pmap.c:250:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick 
/gdata/brick1/scratch.rdma on port 49153
[2018-04-25 20:56:54.391401] E [MSGID: 106005] 
[glusterd-utils.c:4877:glusterd_brick_start] 0-management: Unable to start 
brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
[2018-04-25 20:56:54.391457] E [MSGID: 106074] 
[glusterd-brick-ops.c:2493:glusterd_op_add_brick] 0-glusterd: Unable to add 
bricks
[2018-04-25 20:56:54.391476] E [MSGID: 106123] 
[glusterd-mgmt.c:294:gd_mgmt_v3_commit_fn] 0-management: Add-brick commit 
failed.
[2018-04-25 20:56:54.391490] E [MSGID: 106123] 
[glusterd-mgmt-handler.c:603:glusterd_handle_commit_fn] 0-management: commit 
failed on operation Add brick
[2018-04-25 20:58:55.332262] I [MSGID: 106499] 
[glusterd-handler.c:4349:__glusterd_handle_status_volume] 0-management: 
Received status volume req for volume scratch
[2018-04-25 21:02:07.464357] E [MSGID: 106452] 
[glusterd-utils.c:6064:glusterd_new_brick_validate] 0-management: Brick: 
gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or be 
contained by an existing brick
[2018-04-25 21:02:07.464395] W [MSGID: 106122] 
[glusterd-mgmt.c:188:gd_mgmt_v3_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: ADD-brick 
prevalidation failed.
[2018-04-25 21:02:07.464414] E [MSGID: 106122] 
[glusterd-mgmt-handler.c:337:glusterd_handle_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: Pre 
Validation failed on operation Add brick
[2018-04-25 21:04:56.198662] E [MSGID: 106452] 
[glusterd-utils.c:6064:glusterd_new_brick_validate] 0-management: Brick: 
gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or be 
contained by an existing brick
[2018-04-25 21:04:56.198700] W [MSGID: 106122] 
[glusterd-mgmt.c:188:gd_mgmt_v3_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: ADD-brick 
prevalidation failed.
[2018-04-25 21:04:56.198716] E [MSGID: 106122] 
[glusterd-mgmt-handler.c:337:glusterd_handle_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: Pre 
Validation failed on operation Add brick
[2018-04-25 21:07:11.084205] I [MSGID: 106482] 
[glusterd-brick-ops.c:447:__glusterd_handle_add_brick] 0-management: Received 
add brick req
[2018-04-25 21:07:11.087682] E [MSGID: 106452] 
[glusterd-utils.c:6064:glusterd_new_brick_validate] 0-management: Brick: 
gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or be 
contained by an existing brick
[2018-04-25 21:07:11.087716] W [MSGID: 106122] 
[glusterd-mgmt.c:188:gd_mgmt_v3_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: ADD-brick 
prevalidation failed.
[2018-04-25 21:07:11.087729] E [MSGID: 106122] 
[glusterd-mgmt.c:884:glusterd_mgmt_v3_pre_validate] 0-management: Pre 
Validation failed for operation Add brick on local node
[2018-04-25 21:07:11.087741] E [MSGID: 106122]

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

2018-04-12 Thread Karthik Subrahmanya

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 7:38 PM, Jose Sanchez  wrote:

> Hi Karthik
>
> Looking at the information you have provided me, I would like to make sure
> that I’m running the right commands.
>
> 1.   gluster volume heal scratch info
>
If the count is non zero, trigger the heal and wait for heal info count to
become zero.

> 2. gluster volume remove-brick scratch *replica 1 *
> gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch force
>
3.  gluster volume add-brick* “#"* scratch gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/
> scratch gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
>
>
> Based on the configuration I have, Brick 1 from Node A and B are tide
> together and Brick 2 from Node A and B are also tide together. Looking at
> your remove command (step #2), it seems that you want me to remove Brick 1
> and 2 from Node B (gluster02ib). is that correct? I thought the data was
> distributed in bricks 1 between nodes A and B) and duplicated on Bricks 2
> (node A and B).
>
Data is duplicated between bricks 1 of nodes A & B and bricks 2 of nodes A
& B and data is distributed between these two pairs.
You need not always remove the bricks 1 & 2 from node B itself. The idea
here is to keep one copy from both the replica pairs.

>
> Also when I add the bricks back to gluster, do I need to specify if it is
> distributed or replicated?? and Do i need a configuration #?? for example
> on your command (Step #2) you have “replica 1” when remove bricks, do I
> need to do the same when adding the nodes back ?
>
No. You just need to erase the data on those bricks and add those bricks
back to the volume. The previous remove-brick command will make the volume
plain distribute. Then simply adding the bricks without specifying any "#"
will expand the volume as a plain distribute volue.

>
> Im planning on moving with this changes in few days. At this point each
> brick has 14tb and adding bricks 1 from node A and B, i have a total of
> 28tb, After doing all the process, (removing and adding bricks) I should be
> able to see a total of 56Tb right ?
>
Yes after all these you will have 56TB in total.
After adding the bricks, do volume rebalance, so that the data which were
present previously, will be moved to the correct bricks.

HTH,
Karthik

>
> Thanks
>
> Jose
>
>
>
>
> -
> Jose Sanchez
> Systems/Network Analyst 1
> Center of Advanced Research Computing
> 1601 Central Ave
> .
> MSC 01 1190
> Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001
> carc.unm.edu
> 575.636.4232
>
> On Apr 7, 2018, at 8:29 AM, Karthik Subrahmanya 
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jose,
>
> Thanks for providing the volume info. You have 2 subvolumes. Data is
> replicated within the bricks of that subvolumes.
> First one consisting of Node A's brick1 & Node B's brick1 and the second
> one consisting of Node A's brick2 and Node B's brick2.
> You don't have the same data on all the 4 bricks. Data are distributed
> between these two subvolumes.
> To remove the replica you can use the command
> gluster volume remove-brick scratch replica 1 gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/
> scratch gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch force
> So you will have one copy of data present from both the distributes.
> Before doing this make sure "gluster volume heal scratch info" value is
> zero. So copies you retain will have the correct data.
> After the remove-brick erase the data from the backend.
> Then you can expand the volume by following the steps at [1].
>
> [1] https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%
> 20Guide/Managing%20Volumes/#expanding-volumes
>
> Regards,
> Karthik
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Jose Sanchez 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Karthik
>>
>> this is our configuration,  is 2x2 =4 , they are all replicated , each
>> brick has 14tb. we have 2 nodes A and B, each one with brick 1 and 2.
>>
>> Node A  (replicated A1 (14tb) and B1 (14tb) ) same with node B
>> (Replicated A2 (14tb) and B2 (14tb)).
>>
>> Do you think we need to degrade the node first before removing it. i
>> believe the same copy of data is on all 4 bricks, we would like to keep one
>> of them, and add the other bricks as extra space
>>
>> Thanks for your help on this
>>
>> Jose
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [root@gluster01 ~]# gluster volume info scratch
>>
>> Volume Name: scratch
>> Type: Distributed-Replicate
>> Volume ID: 23f1e4b1-b8e0-46c3-874a-58b4728ea106
>> Status: Started
>> Snapshot Count: 0
>> Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4
>> Transport-type: tcp,rdma
>> Bricks:
>> Brick1: gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
>> Brick2: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
>> Brick3: gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
>> Brick4: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
>> Options Reconfigured:
>> performance.readdir-ahead: on
>> nfs.disable: on
>>
>> [root@gluster01 ~]# gluster volume status all
>> Status of volume: scratch
>> Gluster process TCP Port  RDMA Port  Online
>> Pid
>>

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

2018-04-07 Thread Karthik Subrahmanya

Hi Jose,

Thanks for providing the volume info. You have 2 subvolumes. Data is
replicated within the bricks of that subvolumes.
First one consisting of Node A's brick1 & Node B's brick1 and the second
one consisting of Node A's brick2 and Node B's brick2.
You don't have the same data on all the 4 bricks. Data are distributed
between these two subvolumes.
To remove the replica you can use the command
gluster volume remove-brick scratch replica 1 gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/
scratch gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch force
So you will have one copy of data present from both the distributes.
Before doing this make sure "gluster volume heal scratch info" value is
zero. So copies you retain will have the correct data.
After the remove-brick erase the data from the backend.
Then you can expand the volume by following the steps at [1].

[1]
https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Managing%20Volumes/#expanding-volumes

Regards,
Karthik

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Jose Sanchez  wrote:

> Hi Karthik
>
> this is our configuration,  is 2x2 =4 , they are all replicated , each
> brick has 14tb. we have 2 nodes A and B, each one with brick 1 and 2.
>
> Node A  (replicated A1 (14tb) and B1 (14tb) ) same with node B (Replicated
> A2 (14tb) and B2 (14tb)).
>
> Do you think we need to degrade the node first before removing it. i
> believe the same copy of data is on all 4 bricks, we would like to keep one
> of them, and add the other bricks as extra space
>
> Thanks for your help on this
>
> Jose
>
>
>
>
>
> [root@gluster01 ~]# gluster volume info scratch
>
>
> Volume Name: scratch
> Type: Distributed-Replicate
> Volume ID: 23f1e4b1-b8e0-46c3-874a-58b4728ea106
> Status: Started
> Snapshot Count: 0
> Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4
> Transport-type: tcp,rdma
> Bricks:
> Brick1: gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
> Brick2: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
> Brick3: gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
> Brick4: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
> Options Reconfigured:
> performance.readdir-ahead: on
> nfs.disable: on
>
> [root@gluster01 ~]# gluster volume status all
> Status of volume: scratch
> Gluster process TCP Port  RDMA Port  Online
> Pid
> 
> --
> Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch 49152 49153  Y
> 1743
> Brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch 49156 49157  Y
> 1732
> Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch 49154 49155  Y
> 1738
> Brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch 49158 49159  Y
> 1733
> Self-heal Daemon on localhost   N/A   N/AY
> 1728
> Self-heal Daemon on gluster02ib N/A   N/AY
> 1726
>
>
> Task Status of Volume scratch
> 
> --
> There are no active volume tasks
>
> -
> Jose Sanchez
> Systems/Network Analyst 1
> Center of Advanced Research Computing
> 1601 Central Ave
> .
> MSC 01 1190
> Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001
> carc.unm.edu
> 575.636.4232
>
> On Apr 6, 2018, at 3:49 AM, Karthik Subrahmanya 
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jose,
>
> By switching into pure distribute volume you will lose availability if
> something goes bad.
>
> I am guessing you have a nX2 volume.
> If you want to preserve one copy of the data in all the distributes, you
> can do that by decreasing the replica count in the remove-brick operation.
> If you have any inconsistency, heal them first using the "gluster volume
> heal " command and wait till the
> "gluster volume heal  info" output becomes zero, before removing
> the bricks, so that you will have the correct data.
> If you do not want to preserve the data then you can directly remove the
> bricks.
> Even after removing the bricks the data will be present in the backend of
> the removed bricks. You have to manually erase them (both data and
> .glusterfs folder).
> See [1] for more details on remove-brick.
>
> [1]. https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%
> 20Guide/Managing%20Volumes/#shrinking-volumes
>
> HTH,
> Karthik
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:17 PM, Jose Sanchez 
> wrote:
>
>>
>> We have a Gluster setup with 2 nodes (distributed replication) and we
>> would like to switch it to the distributed mode. I know the data is
>> duplicated between those nodes, what is the proper way of switching it to a
>> distributed, we would like to double or gain the storage space on our
>> gluster storage node. what happens with the data, do i need to erase one of
>> the nodes?
>>
>> Jose
>>
>>
>> -
>> Jose Sanchez
>> Systems/Network Analyst
>> Center of Advanced Research Computing
>> 1601 Central Ave
>> .
>> MSC 01 1190
>> Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001
>> carc.unm.edu
>>

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

2018-04-06 Thread Karthik Subrahmanya

Hi Jose,

By switching into pure distribute volume you will lose availability if
something goes bad.

I am guessing you have a nX2 volume.
If you want to preserve one copy of the data in all the distributes, you
can do that by decreasing the replica count in the remove-brick operation.
If you have any inconsistency, heal them first using the "gluster volume
heal " command and wait till the
"gluster volume heal  info" output becomes zero, before removing
the bricks, so that you will have the correct data.
If you do not want to preserve the data then you can directly remove the
bricks.
Even after removing the bricks the data will be present in the backend of
the removed bricks. You have to manually erase them (both data and
.glusterfs folder).
See [1] for more details on remove-brick.

[1].
https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Managing%20Volumes/#shrinking-volumes

HTH,
Karthik

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:17 PM, Jose Sanchez  wrote:

>
> We have a Gluster setup with 2 nodes (distributed replication) and we
> would like to switch it to the distributed mode. I know the data is
> duplicated between those nodes, what is the proper way of switching it to a
> distributed, we would like to double or gain the storage space on our
> gluster storage node. what happens with the data, do i need to erase one of
> the nodes?
>
> Jose
>
>
> -
> Jose Sanchez
> Systems/Network Analyst
> Center of Advanced Research Computing
> 1601 Central Ave.
> MSC 01 1190
> Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001
> carc.unm.edu
> 575.636.4232
>
>
> ___
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

Re: [Gluster-users] Turn off replication

9 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information