[gmx-users] Output of rotation

2012-09-30 Thread Shima Arasteh
Dear gmx users,

I have .pdb file. This .pdb file represents a dimer protein. When I try to 
generate a topology file of it, GROMACS asks for terminals one by one, ( 2 
N-terminals, 2 C-terminals ) . But after rotation of protein, 2 terminals are 
lost and the total charge is incorrect.
The pdb file was visualized and its format seems to be correct.
Anybody knows what is the problem? How can I overcome this problem? 
Please help me

Thanks in advance.


Sincerely,
Shima 
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] on tpbconv

2012-09-30 Thread rama david
Yes it will work ..
Just at the time of mdrun add -cpi cpt ( prvious cpt file )

With best wishes and regards..!!

On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Acoot Brett acootbr...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Dear All,

 for my original MD, based on mdp file the total time is 500 ps. After it
 finished,  I have decided to extend the MD run to 2.5 ns.

 I think the following command should be used:

 tpbconv -s original500ps.tpr -extend 2000 -o md-0.5ns-to-2.5ns.tpr


 But as for in the original mdp file the total time is 500 ps,is the
 -extend 2000 workable in the tpbconv -s original500ps.tpr -extend 2000
 -o md-0.5ns-to-2.5ns.tpr? Do I need to change the total time in the
 original mdp file from 500 ps to 2000 ps or a time period longer than 2000
 ps, after the original 500 pd finished, in order to make tpbconv -s
 original500ps.tpr -extend 2000 -o md-0.5ns-to-2.5ns.tpr workable?

 I am looking forward to getting your reply.

 Cheers,

 Acoot
 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Output of rotation

2012-09-30 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Shima,

How did you rotate the structure? Probably the TER records got lost in
the process.

Cheers,

Tsjerk

On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Shima Arasteh
shima_arasteh2...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Dear gmx users,

 I have .pdb file. This .pdb file represents a dimer protein. When I try to 
 generate a topology file of it, GROMACS asks for terminals one by one, ( 2 
 N-terminals, 2 C-terminals ) . But after rotation of protein, 2 terminals are 
 lost and the total charge is incorrect.
 The pdb file was visualized and its format seems to be correct.
 Anybody knows what is the problem? How can I overcome this problem?
 Please help me

 Thanks in advance.


 Sincerely,
 Shima
 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists



-- 
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.

post-doctoral researcher
Biocomputing Group
Department of Biological Sciences
2500 University Drive NW
Calgary, AB T2N 1N4
Canada
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Output of rotation

2012-09-30 Thread Shima Arasteh


The input file has TER  between 2 monomers. 
The command which I use is:
#editconf -princ -rotate 0 60 0 -f protein.pdb -o protein-rotate.gro

After that, I use editconf to convert .gro to .pdb file:
#editconf -f protein-rotate.gro -o protein.pdb

The residue numbers after 10th one of output pdb file are changed and not 
correct. 


Sincerely,
Shima


- Original Message -
From: Tsjerk Wassenaar tsje...@gmail.com
To: Shima Arasteh shima_arasteh2...@yahoo.com; Discussion list for GROMACS 
users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Cc: 
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2012 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Output of rotation

Hi Shima,

How did you rotate the structure? Probably the TER records got lost in
the process.

Cheers,

Tsjerk

On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Shima Arasteh
shima_arasteh2...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Dear gmx users,

 I have .pdb file. This .pdb file represents a dimer protein. When I try to 
 generate a topology file of it, GROMACS asks for terminals one by one, ( 2 
 N-terminals, 2 C-terminals ) . But after rotation of protein, 2 terminals are 
 lost and the total charge is incorrect.
 The pdb file was visualized and its format seems to be correct.
 Anybody knows what is the problem? How can I overcome this problem?
 Please help me

 Thanks in advance.


 Sincerely,
 Shima
 --
 gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists



-- 
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.

post-doctoral researcher
Biocomputing Group
Department of Biological Sciences
2500 University Drive NW
Calgary, AB T2N 1N4
Canada

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Calculate Density with respect to time...

2012-09-30 Thread rama david
Thank you for your immediate reply..

I need the xvg graph that will tell me the density of water in between the
protein with respect to time .
g_densmap not give such out put..

Sol please would you tell me  how to do it ???

How to select the Sol that  are only in between the protein ??


Thank you in advance..


With best wishes and regards

Rama David
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] .itp and .rtp file modifications?

2012-09-30 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 9/29/12 11:47 PM, Elie M wrote:


Dear all,
I am trying to minimize the energy of a polymer system I have. I have successfully 
modified the n2t file to include force fields for atoms that were not present. However 
now I am using grompp before using mdrun (to minimize). However I have a 
question should the .ITP and .RTP files be modified accordingly and if yes how is this 
possible? Any information of how to modify them?



If g_x2top is providing you with a suitable topology, then no adjustments need 
to be made.  g_x2top uses .n2t files like pdb2gmx uses .rtp files - they provide 
the building blocks for topologies.


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] number of coordinates in coordinate file does not match topology -reg

2012-09-30 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 9/30/12 1:06 PM, venkatesh s wrote:

Respected gromacs users
   now iam buliding the simulation system
for protein + peptide simulation (manually insert the peptide into the
protein structure file  after the TER )
following commands i used here

1. pdb2gmx  -f 2KW8.pdb -o lpvtg.gro -water tip3p -ignh -chainsep ter

in topol.top file i manually made change as a Protein_chain_A 2 (previously
it is  1)
[ molecules ]
; Compound#mols
Protein_chain_A 2



This does not sound correct to me.  You have a large protein and a small 
peptide, correct?  These should be different proteins and different 
[moleculetype] entries, correct?  If this is true, you have two distinct 
proteins, not two copies of the same one.



2. editconf -f lpvtg.gro -o lpvtg_newbox.gro -c -d 1.0 -bt dodecahedron

3. genbox -cp lpvtg_newbox.gro -cs spc216.gro -o lpvtg_solv.gro -p topol.top

4. grompp -f ions.mdp -c lpvtg_solv.gro -p topol.top -o lpvtg_ions.tpr


fatal error
number of coordinates in coordinate file (lpvtg_solv.gro, 24393)
  does not match topology (topol.top, 26811)

and i read following link
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors#Number_of_coordinates_in_coordinate_file_does_not_match_topology

manually may want update topol.top file, if yes can you explain?



I think you need to revisit step 1.

-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] Re: g_wham

2012-09-30 Thread Justin Lemkul


Please keep all Gromacs-related correspondence on the gmx-users mailing list.  I 
am CC'ing this message there and would ask that all further correspondence be 
posted to the list so that you can benefit from commentary from the entire 
community.


See comments below.

On 9/30/12 2:09 PM, Chris Shuck wrote:

Hello,

I'm hoping you can help me with this. I was running umbrella sampling and was
having an issue. In running g_wham I get this error:

  Program g_wham, VERSION 4.5.5
Source code file: futil.c, line: 459

File input/output error:
histo.xvg
For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the GROMACS
website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors

I used the following command:

g_wham -it umb.dat -if pullf.dat -o -hist -unit kCal


umb.dat contains:

umbrella0.tpr
umbrella1.tpr
... etc

pullf.dat contains:

pullf-umbrella0.xvg
pullf-umbrella1.xvg
...etc

Now, the issue I may be experiencing could be due to what I have in the folder.
I do not have the TRR files in this folder, only GRO, XTC, and XVG files. Is
that an issue? I was under the impression that g_wham does not require TRR or
LOG files. Can you shed any light on this issue?



I/O errors suggest you do not have sufficient read/write permissions on the 
working directory or perhaps enough disk space.


You do not need anything beyond .tpr and and .xvg files in the working 
directory.  From your description, it seems you do not have the .tpr files 
there, so that could be one potential problem, but I would expect a different 
error message in that case.


-Justin

--


Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] Error with grompp

2012-09-30 Thread Elie M

Dear all,
Maybe this error has been discussed before; I have checked previous messages on 
it but i could not resolve it. I have done a modified version of the oplsaa 
forcefield which I have called ffoplsaamod.n2t. The top file was created 
successfully. However when I run grompp, I get the error:
Fatal error:Syntax error - File ffoplsaabon.itp, line 306Last line read:'[ 
bondtypes ]'
I tried to uncomment the bond types then the error moves to contraint types. 
What is the solution in this case?
N.B: I have copied the file ffoplsaa.itp and called it ffoplsaamod.itp.. Not 
sure if this has anything to do with the error.
Thanks in advance,

Elie
  --
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] DNA orientation restraint

2012-09-30 Thread 仝督读
Hi everyone,

I am doing a DNA simulation in a long simulation box (the lengthen of z is
much larger than x and y). So I want to constrain the DNA molecule lying
along the z axis. But I don't know how to realize this in GROMACS.

Actually I notice there is orientation restraints in 4.3.5 of GMX Manual.
But the orientation value is set to be observables of NMR experiments, such
as this example:
; ai aj type exp. label alpha
31 32 1 1 3 3
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] DNA orientation restrain

2012-09-30 Thread 仝督读
Hi everyone,

I am doing a DNA simulation in a long simulation box (the lengthen of z is
much larger than x and y). So I want to constrain the DNA molecule lying
along the z axis. But I don't know how to realize this in GROMACS.

Actually I notice there is orientation restraints in 4.3.5 of GMX Manual.
But the orientation value is set to be observables of NMR experiments, such
as this example:
; ai aj type exp. label alpha const. obs. weight
31 32 1  1  3  3  6.083  -6.73  1.0
But how can I set the observable in my case as it's not an NMR experiment?

Any suggestion will be appreciate.
Thanks very much

Dudu Tong
31%2032%201%201%203%203
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists