[gmx-users] Gromacs 4.6.3 Installation Issues,

2013-08-24 Thread No One
hi,

i'm having difficulties installing gromacs by creating static links to the 
libraries for fftw3.

i am currently running:
cygwin1.7.24-1
cmake2.8.11.2-1
fftw33.3.3-1

this is the input that i'm attempting to utilize and flags errors (and some 
combination there of):
cmake FFTW3F_INCLUDE_DIR=C:\FFTW\fftw-3.3.3\api  
FFTWF_LIBRARIES=C:\FFTW\fftw-3.3.3\.libs

this is my error output:
/cygdrive/c/gromacs/gromacs-4.6.3/build-cmake
$ cmake FFTW3F_INCLUDE_DIR=C:\FFTW\fftw-3.3.3\api  
FFTWF_LIBRARIES=C:\FFTW\fftw-3.3.3\.libs ..
-- Could NOT find CUDA (missing:  CUDA_CUDART_LIBRARY) (found suitable version 
5.5, minimum required is 3.2)
-- Enabling native GPU acceleration
CMake Error at cmake/FindFFTW.cmake:122 (message):
  The FFTW library /usr/local/lib/libfftw3f.a cannot be used with shared
  libraries.  Provide a different FFTW library by setting FFTWF_LIBRARY.  If
  you don't have a different one, recompile FFTW with --enable-shared or
  --with-pic.  Or disable shared libraries for Gromacs by setting
  BUILD_SHARED_LIBS to no.  Note: Disabling shared libraries requires up to
  10x as much disk space.
Call Stack (most recent call first):
  CMakeLists.txt:948 (find_package)

any assistance would be appreciated. thanks.
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] 'Command not found' after installation

2013-08-24 Thread Nimmy McNimmerson
Hello all,
I have been trying to get GROMACS (4.6.3) to work on my Mac (10.8.1). I 
downloaded the latest Intel C++ compilers and built Gromacs successfully (at 
least it appeared to be successful since I saw no error messages). I appended 
this line to my ~/.profile file: source /usr/local/gromacs/bin/GMXRC.bash, and 
restarted my terminal. Still, every time I type in a GROMACS command, such as 
luck, it says command not found. f I do echo $GMXDATA, it does return 
/usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs, though.
Thanks,
John
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] 'Command not found' after installation

2013-08-24 Thread Barnett, James W.
Try g_luck. That's what has worked for me.

On 08/24/2013 12:37 PM, Nimmy McNimmerson wrote:
 Hello all,
 I have been trying to get GROMACS (4.6.3) to work on my Mac (10.8.1). I 
 downloaded the latest Intel C++ compilers and built Gromacs successfully (at 
 least it appeared to be successful since I saw no error messages). I appended 
 this line to my ~/.profile file: source /usr/local/gromacs/bin/GMXRC.bash, 
 and restarted my terminal. Still, every time I type in a GROMACS command, 
 such as luck, it says command not found. f I do echo $GMXDATA, it does 
 return /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs, though.
 Thanks,
 John
 


-- 
Wes Barnett | jbarn...@tulane.edu

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] VDW Cut-off vs Switch with CHARMM force field

2013-08-24 Thread Gianluca Interlandi

Hi!

I am running explicit solvent simulations with the CHARMM force field 
implemented in gromacs 4.6.3. For VDW I have been using:


rlist= 1.0
vdw-type = Cut-off
rvdw = 1.0

in conjunction with PME and rcoulomb=1 for electrostatics.

I wonder whether it would be more accurate to use instead a switching 
function for VDW between 0.8 and 1.0 and a larger rlist:


rlist   = 1.2
vdw-type= Switch
rvdw_switch = 0.8
rvdw= 1.0

My question is: does switching between 0.8 and 1.0 generate less artifacts 
than abrupt truncation at 1.0 nm for VDW?


Thanks!

 Gianluca

-
Gianluca Interlandi, PhD gianl...@u.washington.edu
http://artemide.bioeng.washington.edu/

Research Scientist at the Department of Bioengineering
at the University of Washington, Seattle WA U.S.A.
-
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] 'Command not found' after installation

2013-08-24 Thread Barnett, James W.


Barnett, James W. jbarn...@tulane.edu wrote:

Unfortunately this is now beyond what I know with a Mac. It sounds like a 
library is missing that GROMACS needs, or GROMACS can't find it, which is 
probably a simple fix.

Perhaps someone more familiar with Mac will be able to weigh in.

jbarn...@tulane.edu | from mobile-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] VDW Cut-off vs Switch with CHARMM force field

2013-08-24 Thread James Krieger
CHARMM is generally used with vdw switching between 1.0 and 1.2 nm - I presume 
it must be more accurate that way. There are a number of discussions on this 
already. Justin recommended using rlistlong 1.4 as well I think. You might want 
to use a short range cutoff (rcoulomb) of 1.2 for PME as well. That is what was 
done in the Bjelkmar et al paper where CHARMM27 was implemented in GROMACS 
(http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/ct900549r).

Best wishes
James

On 24 Aug 2013, at 23:08, Gianluca Interlandi gianl...@u.washington.edu wrote:

 Hi!
 
 I am running explicit solvent simulations with the CHARMM force field 
 implemented in gromacs 4.6.3. For VDW I have been using:
 
 rlist= 1.0
 vdw-type = Cut-off
 rvdw = 1.0
 
 in conjunction with PME and rcoulomb=1 for electrostatics.
 
 I wonder whether it would be more accurate to use instead a switching 
 function for VDW between 0.8 and 1.0 and a larger rlist:
 
 rlist   = 1.2
 vdw-type= Switch
 rvdw_switch = 0.8
 rvdw= 1.0
 
 My question is: does switching between 0.8 and 1.0 generate less artifacts 
 than abrupt truncation at 1.0 nm for VDW?
 
 Thanks!
 
 Gianluca
 
 -
 Gianluca Interlandi, PhD gianl...@u.washington.edu
http://artemide.bioeng.washington.edu/
 
 Research Scientist at the Department of Bioengineering
 at the University of Washington, Seattle WA U.S.A.
 -
 -- 
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface 
 or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] VDW Cut-off vs Switch with CHARMM force field

2013-08-24 Thread James Krieger
Here is a relevant previous discussion 
http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2013-May/081425.html

Best wishes
James

On 25 Aug 2013, at 00:28, James Krieger jkrie...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk wrote:

 CHARMM is generally used with vdw switching between 1.0 and 1.2 nm - I 
 presume it must be more accurate that way. There are a number of discussions 
 on this already. Justin recommended using rlistlong 1.4 as well I think. You 
 might want to use a short range cutoff (rcoulomb) of 1.2 for PME as well. 
 That is what was done in the Bjelkmar et al paper where CHARMM27 was 
 implemented in GROMACS (http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/ct900549r).
 
 Best wishes
 James
 
 On 24 Aug 2013, at 23:08, Gianluca Interlandi gianl...@u.washington.edu 
 wrote:
 
 Hi!
 
 I am running explicit solvent simulations with the CHARMM force field 
 implemented in gromacs 4.6.3. For VDW I have been using:
 
 rlist= 1.0
 vdw-type = Cut-off
 rvdw = 1.0
 
 in conjunction with PME and rcoulomb=1 for electrostatics.
 
 I wonder whether it would be more accurate to use instead a switching 
 function for VDW between 0.8 and 1.0 and a larger rlist:
 
 rlist   = 1.2
 vdw-type= Switch
 rvdw_switch = 0.8
 rvdw= 1.0
 
 My question is: does switching between 0.8 and 1.0 generate less artifacts 
 than abrupt truncation at 1.0 nm for VDW?
 
 Thanks!
 
Gianluca
 
 -
 Gianluca Interlandi, PhD gianl...@u.washington.edu
   http://artemide.bioeng.washington.edu/
 
 Research Scientist at the Department of Bioengineering
 at the University of Washington, Seattle WA U.S.A.
 -
 -- 
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www 
 interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 -- 
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] VDW Cut-off vs Switch with CHARMM force field

2013-08-24 Thread Gianluca Interlandi

Thanks James!

I was also wondering whether there is a significant penalty in performance 
if I use rlist=1.2 instead of rlist=1.0


There has already been a discussion in the NAMD mailing list about the VDW 
cutoff issue:


http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/namd/mailing_list/namd-l/7551.html

It is apparently common among NAMD users to use switch for VDW between 0.8 
and 1.0 nm. I have often received negative criticism from supercomputer 
grant reviewers whenever I suggested using a 1.0 - 1.2 switching distance 
for VDW and 1.2 nm for Coulomb as in their eyes a 1.0 cutoff distance is 
enough (when PME is in use).


Thanks!

 Gianluca

On Sun, 25 Aug 2013, James Krieger wrote:


Here is a relevant previous discussion
http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2013-May/081425.html

Best wishes
James

On 25 Aug 2013, at 00:28, James Krieger jkrie...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk wrote:

CHARMM is generally used with vdw switching between 1.0 and 1.2 nm - I 
presume it must be more accurate that way. There are a number of 
discussions on this already. Justin recommended using rlistlong 1.4 as 
well I think. You might want to use a short range cutoff (rcoulomb) of 
1.2 for PME as well. That is what was done in the Bjelkmar et al paper 
where CHARMM27 was implemented in GROMACS 
(http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/ct900549r).


Best wishes
James

On 24 Aug 2013, at 23:08, Gianluca Interlandi gianl...@u.washington.edu wrote:


Hi!

I am running explicit solvent simulations with the CHARMM force field 
implemented in gromacs 4.6.3. For VDW I have been using:

rlist= 1.0
vdw-type = Cut-off
rvdw = 1.0

in conjunction with PME and rcoulomb=1 for electrostatics.

I wonder whether it would be more accurate to use instead a switching function 
for VDW between 0.8 and 1.0 and a larger rlist:

rlist   = 1.2
vdw-type= Switch
rvdw_switch = 0.8
rvdw= 1.0

My question is: does switching between 0.8 and 1.0 generate less artifacts than 
abrupt truncation at 1.0 nm for VDW?

Thanks!

   Gianluca

-
Gianluca Interlandi, PhD gianl...@u.washington.edu
  http://artemide.bioeng.washington.edu/

Research Scientist at the Department of Bioengineering
at the University of Washington, Seattle WA U.S.A.
-
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface 
or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists



-
Gianluca Interlandi, PhD gianl...@u.washington.edu
+1 (206) 685 4435
http://artemide.bioeng.washington.edu/

Research Scientist at the Department of Bioengineering
at the University of Washington, Seattle WA U.S.A.
http://healthynaturalbaby.org
-
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] VDW Cut-off vs Switch with CHARMM force field

2013-08-24 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 8/24/13 8:19 PM, Gianluca Interlandi wrote:

Thanks James!

I was also wondering whether there is a significant penalty in performance if I
use rlist=1.2 instead of rlist=1.0



I doubt one would consider it significant, but of course any time you decrease 
rlist, you potentially speed up the simulation a bit.  Whether or not doing so 
is appropriate is an entirely separate issue.



There has already been a discussion in the NAMD mailing list about the VDW
cutoff issue:

http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/namd/mailing_list/namd-l/7551.html

It is apparently common among NAMD users to use switch for VDW between 0.8 and
1.0 nm. I have often received negative criticism from supercomputer grant
reviewers whenever I suggested using a 1.0 - 1.2 switching distance for VDW and
1.2 nm for Coulomb as in their eyes a 1.0 cutoff distance is enough (when PME is
in use).



It is important to remember that all of these settings are interconnected.  For 
PME, rlist must equal rcoulomb.  It is true that the value of rcoulomb is 
somewhat flexible when using PME, but you must be sure that the changes you are 
making to other settings are not detrimental.  If you decrease rcoulomb, then 
you must also decrease rlist, which then also has implications for van der Waals 
interactions, even if the change was originally only motivated by using PME.  To 
reproduce the typical CHARMM usage, one would set:


vdwtype = switch
rlist = 1.2
rlistlong = 1.4
rvdw = 1.2
rvdw-switch = 1.0
rcoulomb = 1.2

Unless you can demonstrate that your changes in cutoffs do not produce artifacts 
or lead to other inaccuracies using robust test systems, I wouldn't recommend 
any deviations.  Note that the response you received on the NAMD list also 
suggested this to be true.


-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441

==
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] Help with Error Message

2013-08-24 Thread The One And Only
So I started following some tutorials online since I didn't get a response
last time. the tutorial I'm using is:
http://nmr.chem.uu.nl/%7Etsjerk/course/molmod/
I followed that tutorial to the second page and got stuck at the step where
it asks you to input: pdb2gmx -f protein.pdb -o protein.gro -p protein.top
-ignh
I picked GROMOS96 45a3 force field(11) for the force field and spc(1) for
the water model but got the following error message:
Opening force field file
/usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/gromos45a3.ff/aminoacids.r2b
Reading protein.pdb...

---
Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 4.6.3
Source code file:
/Users/christinalin/wget-1.14/gromacs-4.6.3/src/gmxlib/futil.c, line: 593

File input/output error:
protein.pdb
For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the GROMACS
website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors

Help please?
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Help with Error Message

2013-08-24 Thread Rafael I. Silverman y de la Vega
It sounds like you dont have the .pdb file in your working directory.
Perhaps you need to learn a bit about unix filesystems


On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 6:18 PM, The One And Only chappybo...@gmail.comwrote:

 So I started following some tutorials online since I didn't get a response
 last time. the tutorial I'm using is:
 http://nmr.chem.uu.nl/%7Etsjerk/course/molmod/
 I followed that tutorial to the second page and got stuck at the step where
 it asks you to input: pdb2gmx -f protein.pdb -o protein.gro -p protein.top
 -ignh
 I picked GROMOS96 45a3 force field(11) for the force field and spc(1) for
 the water model but got the following error message:
 Opening force field file
 /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/gromos45a3.ff/aminoacids.r2b
 Reading protein.pdb...

 ---
 Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 4.6.3
 Source code file:
 /Users/christinalin/wget-1.14/gromacs-4.6.3/src/gmxlib/futil.c, line: 593

 File input/output error:
 protein.pdb
 For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the GROMACS
 website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors

 Help please?
 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Help with Error Message

2013-08-24 Thread The One And Only
that's something i know nothing about; I just graduated from high school
and I have no background or experience in open source projects or programs
like pymol/gromacs. My professor wants me to be able to produce a setup,
simulation, and analysis within a week so I'm pretty desperate right now in
terms of getting help. Do you know how to get the right .pdb file in my
working directory?


On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Rafael I. Silverman y de la Vega 
rsilv...@ucsc.edu wrote:

 It sounds like you dont have the .pdb file in your working directory.
 Perhaps you need to learn a bit about unix filesystems


 On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 6:18 PM, The One And Only chappybo...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  So I started following some tutorials online since I didn't get a
 response
  last time. the tutorial I'm using is:
  http://nmr.chem.uu.nl/%7Etsjerk/course/molmod/
  I followed that tutorial to the second page and got stuck at the step
 where
  it asks you to input: pdb2gmx -f protein.pdb -o protein.gro -p
 protein.top
  -ignh
  I picked GROMOS96 45a3 force field(11) for the force field and spc(1) for
  the water model but got the following error message:
  Opening force field file
  /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/gromos45a3.ff/aminoacids.r2b
  Reading protein.pdb...
 
  ---
  Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 4.6.3
  Source code file:
  /Users/christinalin/wget-1.14/gromacs-4.6.3/src/gmxlib/futil.c, line: 593
 
  File input/output error:
  protein.pdb
  For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the
 GROMACS
  website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors
 
  Help please?
  --
  gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
  http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
  * Please search the archive at
  http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
  * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
  www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
  * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Help with Error Message

2013-08-24 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 8/24/13 9:26 PM, The One And Only wrote:

that's something i know nothing about; I just graduated from high school
and I have no background or experience in open source projects or programs
like pymol/gromacs. My professor wants me to be able to produce a setup,
simulation, and analysis within a week so I'm pretty desperate right now in
terms of getting help. Do you know how to get the right .pdb file in my
working directory?



Rudimentary Unix commands like cp and mv are covered in any Unix/Linux tutorial. 
 Google can find lots of good ones.  Producing a quality simulation cannot be 
rushed, and if you don't know the fundamentals of navigating the command line 
and directory structure, it's nearly impossible.  You need to invest time in 
learning the environment before doing anything, I'm afraid.  Just to give a bit 
of perspective, we used to train our undergrads for nearly a full semester (at 
least 2-3 months) before requiring them to do any real work.  At least a week 
or two of that time was spent getting used to command line and Linux in general.


-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441

==
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Help with Error Message

2013-08-24 Thread The One And Only
so how do i solve the protein.pdb issue?


On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:



 On 8/24/13 9:26 PM, The One And Only wrote:

 that's something i know nothing about; I just graduated from high school
 and I have no background or experience in open source projects or programs
 like pymol/gromacs. My professor wants me to be able to produce a setup,
 simulation, and analysis within a week so I'm pretty desperate right now
 in
 terms of getting help. Do you know how to get the right .pdb file in my
 working directory?


 Rudimentary Unix commands like cp and mv are covered in any Unix/Linux
 tutorial.  Google can find lots of good ones.  Producing a quality
 simulation cannot be rushed, and if you don't know the fundamentals of
 navigating the command line and directory structure, it's nearly
 impossible.  You need to invest time in learning the environment before
 doing anything, I'm afraid.  Just to give a bit of perspective, we used to
 train our undergrads for nearly a full semester (at least 2-3 months)
 before requiring them to do any real work.  At least a week or two of
 that time was spent getting used to command line and Linux in general.

 -Justin

 --
 ==**

 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Postdoctoral Fellow

 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
 School of Pharmacy
 Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
 University of Maryland, Baltimore
 20 Penn St.
 Baltimore, MD 21201

 jalemkul@outerbanks.umaryland.**edu jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | 
 (410)
 706-7441

 ==**
 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**
 Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore
  posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
 interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read 
 http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Help with Error Message

2013-08-24 Thread The One And Only
Never mind, I'm dumb. I just realized that protein.pdb means i have to
specify which protein i want like 1qlz.pdb and not actually type
protein.pdb BUT THANKS GUYS!!


On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 6:40 PM, The One And Only chappybo...@gmail.comwrote:

 so how do i solve the protein.pdb issue?


 On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:



 On 8/24/13 9:26 PM, The One And Only wrote:

 that's something i know nothing about; I just graduated from high school
 and I have no background or experience in open source projects or
 programs
 like pymol/gromacs. My professor wants me to be able to produce a setup,
 simulation, and analysis within a week so I'm pretty desperate right now
 in
 terms of getting help. Do you know how to get the right .pdb file in my
 working directory?


 Rudimentary Unix commands like cp and mv are covered in any Unix/Linux
 tutorial.  Google can find lots of good ones.  Producing a quality
 simulation cannot be rushed, and if you don't know the fundamentals of
 navigating the command line and directory structure, it's nearly
 impossible.  You need to invest time in learning the environment before
 doing anything, I'm afraid.  Just to give a bit of perspective, we used to
 train our undergrads for nearly a full semester (at least 2-3 months)
 before requiring them to do any real work.  At least a week or two of
 that time was spent getting used to command line and Linux in general.

 -Justin

 --
 ==**

 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Postdoctoral Fellow

 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
 School of Pharmacy
 Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
 University of Maryland, Baltimore
 20 Penn St.
 Baltimore, MD 21201

 jalemkul@outerbanks.umaryland.**edu jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu| 
 (410)
 706-7441

 ==**
 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**
 Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore
  posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
 interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read 
 http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists



-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] Ok now what?

2013-08-24 Thread The One And Only
I've been able to set up everything correctly according to the tutorial I
found on the website. I got the following error when I typed:
grompp -v -f minim.mdp -c 1qlz-solvated.pdb -p 1qlz.top -o
1qlz-EM-solvated.tpr

Ignoring obsolete mdp entry 'title'
Ignoring obsolete mdp entry 'cpp'

Back Off! I just backed up mdout.mdp to ./#mdout.mdp.3#
checking input for internal consistency...
processing topology...
Generated 141 of the 1176 non-bonded parameter combinations
Excluding 3 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_A'
Excluding 2 bonded neighbours molecule type 'SOL'

NOTE 1 [file 1qlz.top, line 7226]:
  System has non-zero total charge: -2.99
  Total charge should normally be an integer. See
  http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Floating_Point_Arithmetic
  for discussion on how close it should be to an integer.



processing coordinates...

---
Program grompp, VERSION 4.6.3
Source code file:
/Users/christinalin/wget-1.14/gromacs-4.6.3/src/kernel/grompp.c, line: 563

Fatal error:
number of coordinates in coordinate file (1qlz-solvated.pdb, 24574)
 does not match topology (1qlz.top, 24672)

I'm stuck.
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


RE: [gmx-users] Ok now what?

2013-08-24 Thread Emanuel Birru


-Original Message-
From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On 
Behalf Of The One And Only
Sent: Sunday, 25 August 2013 12:20 PM
To: forum
Subject: [gmx-users] Ok now what?

I've been able to set up everything correctly according to the tutorial I found 
on the website. I got the following error when I typed:
grompp -v -f minim.mdp -c 1qlz-solvated.pdb -p 1qlz.top -o 1qlz-EM-solvated.tpr

Ignoring obsolete mdp entry 'title'
Ignoring obsolete mdp entry 'cpp'

Back Off! I just backed up mdout.mdp to ./#mdout.mdp.3# checking input for 
internal consistency...
processing topology...
Generated 141 of the 1176 non-bonded parameter combinations Excluding 3 bonded 
neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_A'
Excluding 2 bonded neighbours molecule type 'SOL'

NOTE 1 [file 1qlz.top, line 7226]:
  System has non-zero total charge: -2.99
  Total charge should normally be an integer. See
  http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Floating_Point_Arithmetic
  for discussion on how close it should be to an integer.



processing coordinates...

---
Program grompp, VERSION 4.6.3
Source code file:
/Users/christinalin/wget-1.14/gromacs-4.6.3/src/kernel/grompp.c, line: 563

Fatal error:
number of coordinates in coordinate file (1qlz-solvated.pdb, 24574)
 does not match topology (1qlz.top, 24672)

Check your topology file and make sure that the number of atoms are correct. I 
guess in your topology you have more water SOL atoms than in your pdb file, 
so check that and amend it accordingly. 
As you are very new for this work it is obvious that you will face so many 
error, are you planning to post all those errors every time you get one :) As 
Justin suggested, better for you to invest time in learning with someone before 
doing anything.
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] VDW Cut-off vs Switch with CHARMM force field

2013-08-24 Thread Gianluca Interlandi

vdwtype = switch
rlist = 1.2
rlistlong = 1.4
rvdw = 1.2
rvdw-switch = 1.0
rcoulomb = 1.2


I'm confused about the difference between rlist and rlistlong. I am 
planning to also setup an implicit solvent simulation with GBSA and 
CHARMM-FF. Would this make sense?


rlist= 1.4

coulombtype  = Shift
rcoulomb_switch  = 0
rcoulomb = 1.2

vdw-type = Switch
rvdw_switch  = 1.0
rvdw = 1.2

Thanks!

 Gianluca



==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441

==
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface 
or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists



-
Gianluca Interlandi, PhD gianl...@u.washington.edu
+1 (206) 685 4435
http://artemide.bioeng.washington.edu/

Research Scientist at the Department of Bioengineering
at the University of Washington, Seattle WA U.S.A.
http://healthynaturalbaby.org
-
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] rvdw, rlist and rcoulomb for Amber03

2013-08-24 Thread Rajat Desikan
Hi Justin,
In a recent post
(http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/VDW-Cut-off-vs-Switch-with-CHARMM-force-field-td5010695.html;cid=1377399737789-944)
you commented that:

Unless you can demonstrate that your changes in cutoffs do not produce
artifacts or lead to other inaccuracies using robust test systems, I
wouldn't recommend any deviations.

I have the habit of reading the original forcefield papers and using their
parameters directly. In this regard, I use rlist=rvdw=rcoulomb=0.8 nm for
Amber03 (same parameters are used in the following tutorial:
http://ringo.ams.sunysb.edu/index.php/MD_Simulation:_Protein_in_Water_(Pt._2) 
).

My system is a protein in a water box with counter-ions and 0.1M NaCl. It is
a NVT simulation at 310 K.

My queries are the following
1) Are my parameters appropriate for Amber03?
2) How would I go about constructing robust test systems to demonstrate the
validity of my parameters for a protein in a water box? What parameters do I
measure? Energies? Any structural parameters in particular?

Thank you.



--
View this message in context: 
http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/rvdw-rlist-and-rcoulomb-for-Amber03-tp5010711.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] #coordinates do not match

2013-08-24 Thread The One And Only
I've tried the same process twice to two different proteins, but still got
the same error that the #coordinates in the topology file did not match the
#coordinates of the file I'm trying to use (1xyw-solvated.pdb). Below is
the process I went through:

*pdb2gmx -f 1xyw.pdb -o 1xyw.gro -p 1xyw.top -ignh*

*grompp -f minim.mdp -c 1xyw.gro -p 1xyw.top -o 1xyw-EM-vacuum.tpr*

*mdrun -v -deffnm 1xyw-EM-vacuum -c 1xyw-EM-vacuum.pdb -pd*

*editconf -f 1xyw-EM-vacuum.pdb -o 1xyw-PBC.gro -bt dodecahedron -d 1.0*

*genbox -cp 1xyw-PBC.gro -cs spc216.gro -p 1xyw.top -o 1xyw-water.pdb*

*grompp -v -f minim.mdp -c 1xyw-water.pdb -p 1xyw.top -o 1xyw-water.tpr*

*genion -s 1xyw-water.tpr -o 1xyw-solvated.pdb -conc 0.15 -neutral -pname
NA -nname CL*

*grompp -v -f minim.mdp -c 1xyw-solvated.pdb -p 1xys.top -o
1xyw-EM-solvated.tpr*
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] #coordinates do not match

2013-08-24 Thread rajat desikan
Hi,
In *genion -s 1xyw-water.tpr -o 1xyw-solvated.pdb -conc 0.15 -neutral
-pname NA -nname CL* , you have not used -p 1xys.top   Consequently, I
don't think the ions are written into your .top . Please check and see if
grompp works.


On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 9:34 AM, The One And Only chappybo...@gmail.comwrote:

 I've tried the same process twice to two different proteins, but still got
 the same error that the #coordinates in the topology file did not match the
 #coordinates of the file I'm trying to use (1xyw-solvated.pdb). Below is
 the process I went through:

 *pdb2gmx -f 1xyw.pdb -o 1xyw.gro -p 1xyw.top -ignh*

 *grompp -f minim.mdp -c 1xyw.gro -p 1xyw.top -o 1xyw-EM-vacuum.tpr*

 *mdrun -v -deffnm 1xyw-EM-vacuum -c 1xyw-EM-vacuum.pdb -pd*

 *editconf -f 1xyw-EM-vacuum.pdb -o 1xyw-PBC.gro -bt dodecahedron -d 1.0*

 *genbox -cp 1xyw-PBC.gro -cs spc216.gro -p 1xyw.top -o 1xyw-water.pdb*

 *grompp -v -f minim.mdp -c 1xyw-water.pdb -p 1xyw.top -o 1xyw-water.tpr*

 *genion -s 1xyw-water.tpr -o 1xyw-solvated.pdb -conc 0.15 -neutral -pname
 NA -nname CL*

 *grompp -v -f minim.mdp -c 1xyw-solvated.pdb -p 1xys.top -o
 1xyw-EM-solvated.tpr*
 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




-- 
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13),
Dept. of Chemical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] #coordinates do not match

2013-08-24 Thread The One And Only
How do you decrease the number of solvent molecules in a topology file? I
think this will solve my problem.


On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 9:08 PM, rajat desikan rajatdesi...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,
 In *genion -s 1xyw-water.tpr -o 1xyw-solvated.pdb -conc 0.15 -neutral
 -pname NA -nname CL* , you have not used -p 1xys.top   Consequently, I
 don't think the ions are written into your .top . Please check and see if
 grompp works.


 On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 9:34 AM, The One And Only chappybo...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  I've tried the same process twice to two different proteins, but still
 got
  the same error that the #coordinates in the topology file did not match
 the
  #coordinates of the file I'm trying to use (1xyw-solvated.pdb). Below is
  the process I went through:
 
  *pdb2gmx -f 1xyw.pdb -o 1xyw.gro -p 1xyw.top -ignh*
 
  *grompp -f minim.mdp -c 1xyw.gro -p 1xyw.top -o 1xyw-EM-vacuum.tpr*
 
  *mdrun -v -deffnm 1xyw-EM-vacuum -c 1xyw-EM-vacuum.pdb -pd*
 
  *editconf -f 1xyw-EM-vacuum.pdb -o 1xyw-PBC.gro -bt dodecahedron -d 1.0*
 
  *genbox -cp 1xyw-PBC.gro -cs spc216.gro -p 1xyw.top -o 1xyw-water.pdb*
 
  *grompp -v -f minim.mdp -c 1xyw-water.pdb -p 1xyw.top -o 1xyw-water.tpr*
 
  *genion -s 1xyw-water.tpr -o 1xyw-solvated.pdb -conc 0.15 -neutral -pname
  NA -nname CL*
 
  *grompp -v -f minim.mdp -c 1xyw-solvated.pdb -p 1xys.top -o
  1xyw-EM-solvated.tpr*
  --
  gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
  http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
  * Please search the archive at
  http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
  * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
  www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
  * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 



 --
 Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
 Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13),
 Dept. of Chemical Engineering,
 Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] 'Command not found' after installation

2013-08-24 Thread Nimmy McNimmerson
Hi,

Apparently this is an issue with my intel compiler; the dynamic linker isn't 
finding the libiomp5.dylib library. However, I don't know how to fix this (the 
google results haven't worked.)

Please help,

Thanks,
John



 From: Barnett, James W. jbarn...@tulane.edu
To:  nimzs...@yahoo.com 
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] 'Command not found' after installation
 

Unfortunately this is now beyond what I know with a Mac. It sounds like a 
library is missing that GROMACS needs, or GROMACS can't find it, which is 
probably a simple fix.

Perhaps someone more familiar with Mac will be able to weigh in.

jbarn...@tulane.edu | from mobile

nimzs...@yahoo.com wrote:

This gives the following:

dyld: Library not loaded: libiomp5.dylib
  Referenced from: /usr/local/gromacs/bin/g_luck
  Reason: image not found
Trace/BPT trap: 5

If I try 'pdb2gmx', it says:

dyld: Library not loaded: libiomp5.dylib
  Referenced from: /usr/local/gromacs/bin/pdb2gmx
  Reason: image not found
Trace/BPT trap: 5

Did the installation not work properly?



 From: Barnett, James W. jbarn...@tulane.edu
To: Nimmy McNimmerson nimzs...@yahoo.com; Discussion list for GROMACS users 
gmx-users@gromacs.org 
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] 'Command not found' after installation
 

Try g_luck. That's what has worked for me.

On 08/24/2013 12:37 PM, Nimmy McNimmerson wrote:
 Hello all,
 I have been trying to get GROMACS (4.6.3) to work on my Mac (10.8.1). I 
 downloaded the latest Intel C++ compilers and built Gromacs successfully (at 
 least it appeared to be successful since I saw no error messages). I 
 appended this line to my ~/.profile file: source 
 /usr/local/gromacs/bin/GMXRC.bash, and restarted my terminal. Still, every 
 time I type in a GROMACS command, such as luck, it says command not 
 found. f I do echo $GMXDATA, it does return 
 /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs, though.
 Thanks,
 John
 


-- 
Wes Barnett | jbarn...@tulane.edu
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists