[gmx-users] Confuse about trjconv tool

2013-09-21 Thread Caizk
Dear users,

I was following Justin's tutorial and in the analysis step trjconv was used to 
account for any periodicity in the system and then analyses were conducted with 
the so-called corrected trajectory file.

The first question is: does it means that particles might diffuse though one 
side of the box and doesn't get into the box from the opposite side? 

If not, why does trjconv have to be used? If so, why could't gromacs maintain 
the periodicity of all particles' coordinates in the production MD?

Finally, Is it necessary to use trjconv to currect the trajectory file every 
time before you conduct any analysis?


Please correct me if something is wrong. Your reply will be highly appreciated.

Wishes,
Zhikun--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] Confuse about trjconv tool

2013-09-21 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 9/21/13 10:28 PM, Caizk wrote:

Dear users,

I was following Justin's tutorial and in the analysis step trjconv was used to account 
for any periodicity in the system and then analyses were conducted with the so-called 
corrected trajectory file.



The first thing that is important to note is that the use of the word 
corrected does not imply that the original trajectory is in any way 
incorrect.  It's just a colloquialism because the trjconv output is easier to 
visualize and thus seems more correct when pulled up in the visualization 
software of choice, rather than having a bunch of broken molecules and weird 
lines drawn all over the place.



The first question is: does it means that particles might diffuse though one 
side of the box and doesn't get into the box from the opposite side?



No, that is not the case.  Periodicity is always correctly maintained during the 
run.


If not, why does trjconv have  to be used? If so, why could't gromacs maintain the periodicity of all 

particles' coordinates in the production MD?




It is a waste of CPU cycles for mdrun to try to fix something during the run 
that doesn't matter at all to the physics going on.  Using trjconv is not 
compulsory for all processes, but it is important for visualization and certain 
analyses that require intact coordinates (like RMSD).



Finally, Is it necessary to use trjconv to currect the trajectory file every 
time before you conduct any analysis?



As above, it depends on the analysis.  Most tools handle PBC elegantly.  Some 
don't.

-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441

==
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists