Re: [gmx-users] Converting between cartesian coordinates and torsion angles

2010-11-14 Thread Martin Kamp Jensen
Hi Mark,

Thanks (again, again) for your input!

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.auwrote:

  On 13/11/2010 12:49 AM, Martin Kamp Jensen wrote:

 Hi,

  As far as I understand, a topology (a .top file) and a conformation
 (e.g., a .gro file) contain enough information to calculate the torsion
 angles of that specific conformation.

  Table 5.5 (page 124) in the GROMACS manual[1] describes possible
 interactions (which are contained in the topology) between different
 molecules while the conformation contains the cartesian coordinates. I did
 not immediately find a way to convert between the cartesian coordinates and
 the torsion angles. Can GROMACS do it or do I need to understand (or just
 find) all the functions/formulas that are referenced in Table 5.5?


 Section 4.2 has the relevant definitions. Table 5.5 pertains to the
 definition of force field elements that act upon (for example) such internal
 coordinates, which is not what you're looking for.



  I have included screenshots of Table 5.5[2] and the relevant part of some
 example .top file[3].

  (Also, it seems that I can use the read_tpx method defined in
 include/tpxio.h to read in a topology from a .tpr file. This would then,
 after converting the cartesian coordinates of some conformation, enable me
 to work with the torsion angles in my own program before writing cartesian
 coordinates back for use with GROMACS.)


 Either

 a) write something that post-processes the result of grompp -pp in concert
 with the same coordinate file to get the internal coordinates, or


Okay, I see that grompp -pp generates a .top file with a lot of parameters
(and maybe even some angles), but for some reason atom numbers have been
exchanged with atom names, but of course I can change that back. Then I
would need to apply the math from Section 4.2 together with a specific
conformation to get the angles (and then do the math to get back to
cartesian coordinates after having played with the angles... hmm). Unless my
contacts tell me that only a few of those interactions will be needed for
our purposes, this seems to be unnecessary extra work.




 b) use a hacked version of mdrun that writes internal coordinates from
 within src/gmxlib/bondfree.c (probably used as mdrun -rerun)


This could be fine since I will only need to go from cartesian coordinates
to angles once. However, I will need to go from angles to cartesian
coordinates many, many times. And I would need to write inverse methods
since the methods in bondfree.c calculate angles from cartesian coordinates
to use them for force and energy calculations.

Or am I missing something - is it possible to let GROMACS work on angles
instead of cartesian coordinates? (I mean give the input not as, e.g., a
.gro file with cartesian coordinates, but as another file with torsion
angles - which I will first get via bondfree.c.)



 to create input for your procedure.

 Mark



  Regards,
 Martin.

  [1] http://www.gromacs.org/@api/deki/files/126/=gromacs_manual-4.5.pdf
 [2]
 http://imada.sdu.dk/~mkjens04/gromacs/intra-molecular_interactions_definitions.pnghttp://imada.sdu.dk/%7Emkjens04/gromacs/intra-molecular_interactions_definitions.png
 [3] 
 http://imada.sdu.dk/~mkjens04/gromacs/part_of_top_file.pnghttp://imada.sdu.dk/%7Emkjens04/gromacs/part_of_top_file.png



 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Regards,
Martin.
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] Converting between cartesian coordinates and torsion angles

2010-11-14 Thread Mark Abraham

On 15/11/2010 4:13 AM, Martin Kamp Jensen wrote:

Hi Mark,

Thanks (again, again) for your input!

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au 
mailto:mark.abra...@anu.edu.au wrote:


On 13/11/2010 12:49 AM, Martin Kamp Jensen wrote:

Hi,

As far as I understand, a topology (a .top file) and a
conformation (e.g., a .gro file) contain enough information to
calculate the torsion angles of that specific conformation.

Table 5.5 (page 124) in the GROMACS manual[1] describes possible
interactions (which are contained in the topology) between
different molecules while the conformation contains the cartesian
coordinates. I did not immediately find a way to convert between
the cartesian coordinates and the torsion angles. Can GROMACS do
it or do I need to understand (or just find) all the
functions/formulas that are referenced in Table 5.5?


Section 4.2 has the relevant definitions. Table 5.5 pertains to
the definition of force field elements that act upon (for example)
such internal coordinates, which is not what you're looking for.




I have included screenshots of Table 5.5[2] and the relevant part
of some example .top file[3].

(Also, it seems that I can use the read_tpx method defined in
include/tpxio.h to read in a topology from a .tpr file. This
would then, after converting the cartesian coordinates of some
conformation, enable me to work with the torsion angles in my own
program before writing cartesian coordinates back for use with
GROMACS.)


Either

a) write something that post-processes the result of grompp -pp in
concert with the same coordinate file to get the internal
coordinates, or


Okay, I see that grompp -pp generates a .top file with a lot of 
parameters (and maybe even some angles), but for some reason atom 
numbers have been exchanged with atom names, but of course I can 
change that back. Then I would need to apply the math from Section 4.2 
together with a specific conformation to get the angles (and then do 
the math to get back to cartesian coordinates after having played with 
the angles... hmm). Unless my contacts tell me that only a few of 
those interactions will be needed for our purposes, this seems to be 
unnecessary extra work.




b) use a hacked version of mdrun that writes internal coordinates
from within src/gmxlib/bondfree.c (probably used as mdrun -rerun)


This could be fine since I will only need to go from cartesian 
coordinates to angles once. However, I will need to go from angles to 
cartesian coordinates many, many times. And I would need to write 
inverse methods since the methods in bondfree.c calculate angles 
from cartesian coordinates to use them for force and energy calculations.


It seems to me that a better way of thinking/describing about what you 
want to do is to convert something to an internal coordinate 
representation, then do some operations on that, and then rebuild the 
Cartesian coordinates for GROMACS. All of that is best done by pretty 
much anything you can think of, rather than GROMACS (not least because 
you may have to rebuild the solvent and whatever else goes along with 
the changed internal coordinates). There is a body of literature and 
software that deals with this problem, which is of interest to many 
areas of computational chemistry (e.g. 
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcc.20237/abstract, and many 
Google hits).


Or am I missing something - is it possible to let GROMACS work on 
angles instead of cartesian coordinates? (I mean give the input not 
as, e.g., a .gro file with cartesian coordinates, but as another file 
with torsion angles - which I will first get via bondfree.c.)


No, GROMACS will only accept Cartesian input. While it is well known 
that geometry optimization is best done in (redundant) internal 
coordinates when the evaluation of energy and/or force is expensive 
(e.g. quantum chemistry on small systems), this is not true for the 
large majority of EM problems on biomolecular systems. There, the 
problem is dominated by the presence of multiple minima, the result is 
not of great interest if you're preparing a system for MD, and there is 
no payoff for the development time. Thus, GROMACS only computes an 
internal coordinate immediately before using it to evaluate its 
contribution to bonded energy and/or force, and then discards it.


Mark
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

[gmx-users] Converting between cartesian coordinates and torsion angles

2010-11-12 Thread Martin Kamp Jensen
Hi,

As far as I understand, a topology (a .top file) and a conformation (e.g., a
.gro file) contain enough information to calculate the torsion angles of
that specific conformation.

Table 5.5 (page 124) in the GROMACS manual[1] describes possible
interactions (which are contained in the topology) between different
molecules while the conformation contains the cartesian coordinates. I did
not immediately find a way to convert between the cartesian coordinates and
the torsion angles. Can GROMACS do it or do I need to understand (or just
find) all the functions/formulas that are referenced in Table 5.5?

I have included screenshots of Table 5.5[2] and the relevant part of some
example .top file[3].

(Also, it seems that I can use the read_tpx method defined in
include/tpxio.h to read in a topology from a .tpr file. This would then,
after converting the cartesian coordinates of some conformation, enable me
to work with the torsion angles in my own program before writing cartesian
coordinates back for use with GROMACS.)

Regards,
Martin.

[1] http://www.gromacs.org/@api/deki/files/126/=gromacs_manual-4.5.pdf
[2]
http://imada.sdu.dk/~mkjens04/gromacs/intra-molecular_interactions_definitions.png
[3] http://imada.sdu.dk/~mkjens04/gromacs/part_of_top_file.png
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Re: [gmx-users] Converting between cartesian coordinates and torsion angles

2010-11-12 Thread Mark Abraham

On 13/11/2010 12:49 AM, Martin Kamp Jensen wrote:

Hi,

As far as I understand, a topology (a .top file) and a conformation 
(e.g., a .gro file) contain enough information to calculate the 
torsion angles of that specific conformation.


Table 5.5 (page 124) in the GROMACS manual[1] describes possible 
interactions (which are contained in the topology) between different 
molecules while the conformation contains the cartesian coordinates. I 
did not immediately find a way to convert between the cartesian 
coordinates and the torsion angles. Can GROMACS do it or do I need to 
understand (or just find) all the functions/formulas that are 
referenced in Table 5.5?


Section 4.2 has the relevant definitions. Table 5.5 pertains to the 
definition of force field elements that act upon (for example) such 
internal coordinates, which is not what you're looking for.




I have included screenshots of Table 5.5[2] and the relevant part of 
some example .top file[3].


(Also, it seems that I can use the read_tpx method defined in 
include/tpxio.h to read in a topology from a .tpr file. This would 
then, after converting the cartesian coordinates of some conformation, 
enable me to work with the torsion angles in my own program before 
writing cartesian coordinates back for use with GROMACS.)


Either

a) write something that post-processes the result of grompp -pp in 
concert with the same coordinate file to get the internal coordinates, or


b) use a hacked version of mdrun that writes internal coordinates from 
within src/gmxlib/bondfree.c (probably used as mdrun -rerun)


to create input for your procedure.

Mark



Regards,
Martin.

[1] http://www.gromacs.org/@api/deki/files/126/=gromacs_manual-4.5.pdf
[2] 
http://imada.sdu.dk/~mkjens04/gromacs/intra-molecular_interactions_definitions.png 
http://imada.sdu.dk/%7Emkjens04/gromacs/intra-molecular_interactions_definitions.png
[3] http://imada.sdu.dk/~mkjens04/gromacs/part_of_top_file.png 
http://imada.sdu.dk/%7Emkjens04/gromacs/part_of_top_file.png


-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists