[gmx-users] simulation single molecule in water

2013-05-07 Thread Souilem Safa
Dear gromacs users,
I'm simulating a single molecule in spc water. I'm using a cubic water box
which has 3.4 nm size.
I got the toplogy of my molecule via PRODRG.
After running minimization, NVT , NPT and MD for 10 ns , I checked the
density of water ,it was less than the real value (1000 kg m\S-3\N)
,actually I got around 950.
I have checked my mdp file in the NPT step and I was wondering about tau_p
that I should use. First I used 2.0 ps with Parrinello-Rahman coupling.
After checking in gromacs archive, I found it is better to use 0.5 ps, I
have changed tau-p ,but I still have density value less than 1000.
Details of my  mdp file are below :
 Run parameters
integrator= md; leap-frog integrator
nsteps= 500; 2 * 500 = 1 ps, 1 ns
dt= 0.002; 2 fs
; Output control
nstxout= 1000; save coordinates every 2 ps
nstvout= 1000; save velocities every 2 ps
nstxtcout= 1000; xtc compressed trajectory output every 2 ps
nstenergy= 1000; save energies every 2 ps
nstlog= 1000; update log file every 2 ps
; Bond parameters
continuation= yes; Restarting after NPT
constraint_algorithm = lincs; holonomic constraints
constraints= all-bonds; all bonds (even heavy atom-H bonds)
constrained
lincs_iter= 1; accuracy of LINCS
lincs_order= 4; also related to accuracy
; Neighborsearching
ns_type= grid; search neighboring grid cells
nstlist= 5; 10 fs
rlist= 1.0; short-range neighborlist cutoff (in nm)
rcoulomb= 1.0; short-range electrostatic cutoff (in nm)
rvdw= 1.0; short-range van der Waals cutoff (in nm)
; Electrostatics
coulombtype= PME; Particle Mesh Ewald for long-range
electrostatics
pme_order= 4; cubic interpolation
fourierspacing= 0.16; grid spacing for FFT
; Temperature coupling is on
tcoupl= V-rescale; modified Berendsen thermostat
tc-grps= system; two coupling groups - more accurate
tau_t= 0.1; time constant, in ps
ref_t= 300 ; reference temperature, one for each group, in K
; Pressure coupling is on
pcoupl= Parrinello-Rahman; Pressure coupling on in NPT
pcoupltype= isotropic; uniform scaling of box vectors
tau_p= 0.50; time constant, in ps
ref_p= 1.0; reference pressure, in bar
compressibility = 4.5e-5; isothermal compressibility of water, bar^-1
; Periodic boundary conditions
pbc= xyz; 3-D PBC
; Dispersion correction
DispCorr= EnerPres; account for cut-off vdW scheme
; Velocity generation
gen_vel= no; Velocity generation is off

What should be the origin of this density difference?
looking forward to your advise
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


RE: [gmx-users] simulation single molecule in water

2013-05-07 Thread Emanuel Birru
It would be better if you run it a bit longer than 10ns and check the density 
again. But it is not a big problem I guess as the density of water at 300K 
should not be exactly 1000kg/m^3. Its ~1000kg/m^3 at 277K. do not expect to get 
exactly real value :) Additionally your system is not purely water molecules in 
a box there is a small molecule in it which might have an effect on the density.

Cheers,

-Original Message-
From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On 
Behalf Of Souilem Safa
Sent: Tuesday, 7 May 2013 4:38 PM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: [gmx-users] simulation single molecule in water

Dear gromacs users,
I'm simulating a single molecule in spc water. I'm using a cubic water box 
which has 3.4 nm size.
I got the toplogy of my molecule via PRODRG.
After running minimization, NVT , NPT and MD for 10 ns , I checked the density 
of water ,it was less than the real value (1000 kg m\S-3\N) ,actually I got 
around 950.
I have checked my mdp file in the NPT step and I was wondering about tau_p that 
I should use. First I used 2.0 ps with Parrinello-Rahman coupling.
After checking in gromacs archive, I found it is better to use 0.5 ps, I have 
changed tau-p ,but I still have density value less than 1000.
Details of my  mdp file are below :
 Run parameters
integrator= md; leap-frog integrator
nsteps= 500; 2 * 500 = 1 ps, 1 ns
dt= 0.002; 2 fs
; Output control
nstxout= 1000; save coordinates every 2 ps
nstvout= 1000; save velocities every 2 ps
nstxtcout= 1000; xtc compressed trajectory output every 2 ps
nstenergy= 1000; save energies every 2 ps
nstlog= 1000; update log file every 2 ps
; Bond parameters
continuation= yes; Restarting after NPT
constraint_algorithm = lincs; holonomic constraints
constraints= all-bonds; all bonds (even heavy atom-H bonds)
constrained
lincs_iter= 1; accuracy of LINCS
lincs_order= 4; also related to accuracy
; Neighborsearching
ns_type= grid; search neighboring grid cells
nstlist= 5; 10 fs
rlist= 1.0; short-range neighborlist cutoff (in nm)
rcoulomb= 1.0; short-range electrostatic cutoff (in nm)
rvdw= 1.0; short-range van der Waals cutoff (in nm)
; Electrostatics
coulombtype= PME; Particle Mesh Ewald for long-range
electrostatics
pme_order= 4; cubic interpolation
fourierspacing= 0.16; grid spacing for FFT
; Temperature coupling is on
tcoupl= V-rescale; modified Berendsen thermostat
tc-grps= system; two coupling groups - more accurate
tau_t= 0.1; time constant, in ps
ref_t= 300 ; reference temperature, one for each group, in K
; Pressure coupling is on
pcoupl= Parrinello-Rahman; Pressure coupling on in NPT
pcoupltype= isotropic; uniform scaling of box vectors
tau_p= 0.50; time constant, in ps
ref_p= 1.0; reference pressure, in bar
compressibility = 4.5e-5; isothermal compressibility of water, bar^-1
; Periodic boundary conditions
pbc= xyz; 3-D PBC
; Dispersion correction
DispCorr= EnerPres; account for cut-off vdW scheme
; Velocity generation
gen_vel= no; Velocity generation is off

What should be the origin of this density difference?
looking forward to your advise
-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface 
or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] simulation single molecule in water

2013-05-07 Thread Dr. Vitaly Chaban
Your problem has nothing to do with barostat.

There is such thing as DispCorr. I am unsure whether if should be turned on
or off in case of your model. It does influence density to certain extent.


Dr. Vitaly Chaban







 -Original Message-
 From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org]
 On Behalf Of Souilem Safa
 Sent: Tuesday, 7 May 2013 4:38 PM
 To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
 Subject: [gmx-users] simulation single molecule in water

 Dear gromacs users,
 I'm simulating a single molecule in spc water. I'm using a cubic water box
 which has 3.4 nm size.
 I got the toplogy of my molecule via PRODRG.
 After running minimization, NVT , NPT and MD for 10 ns , I checked the
 density of water ,it was less than the real value (1000 kg m\S-3\N)
 ,actually I got around 950.
 I have checked my mdp file in the NPT step and I was wondering about tau_p
 that I should use. First I used 2.0 ps with Parrinello-Rahman coupling.
 After checking in gromacs archive, I found it is better to use 0.5 ps, I
 have changed tau-p ,but I still have density value less than 1000.
 Details of my  mdp file are below :
  Run parameters
 integrator= md; leap-frog integrator
 nsteps= 500; 2 * 500 = 1 ps, 1 ns
 dt= 0.002; 2 fs
 ; Output control
 nstxout= 1000; save coordinates every 2 ps
 nstvout= 1000; save velocities every 2 ps
 nstxtcout= 1000; xtc compressed trajectory output every 2 ps
 nstenergy= 1000; save energies every 2 ps
 nstlog= 1000; update log file every 2 ps
 ; Bond parameters
 continuation= yes; Restarting after NPT
 constraint_algorithm = lincs; holonomic constraints
 constraints= all-bonds; all bonds (even heavy atom-H bonds)
 constrained
 lincs_iter= 1; accuracy of LINCS
 lincs_order= 4; also related to accuracy
 ; Neighborsearching
 ns_type= grid; search neighboring grid cells
 nstlist= 5; 10 fs
 rlist= 1.0; short-range neighborlist cutoff (in nm)
 rcoulomb= 1.0; short-range electrostatic cutoff (in nm)
 rvdw= 1.0; short-range van der Waals cutoff (in nm)
 ; Electrostatics
 coulombtype= PME; Particle Mesh Ewald for long-range
 electrostatics
 pme_order= 4; cubic interpolation
 fourierspacing= 0.16; grid spacing for FFT
 ; Temperature coupling is on
 tcoupl= V-rescale; modified Berendsen thermostat
 tc-grps= system; two coupling groups - more accurate
 tau_t= 0.1; time constant, in ps
 ref_t= 300 ; reference temperature, one for each group, in
 K
 ; Pressure coupling is on
 pcoupl= Parrinello-Rahman; Pressure coupling on in NPT
 pcoupltype= isotropic; uniform scaling of box vectors
 tau_p= 0.50; time constant, in ps
 ref_p= 1.0; reference pressure, in bar
 compressibility = 4.5e-5; isothermal compressibility of water, bar^-1
 ; Periodic boundary conditions
 pbc= xyz; 3-D PBC
 ; Dispersion correction
 DispCorr= EnerPres; account for cut-off vdW scheme
 ; Velocity generation
 gen_vel= no; Velocity generation is off

 What should be the origin of this density difference?
 looking forward to your advise
 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
 interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists