Re: [gmx-users] trjconv

2008-09-10 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Ram,

-fit rot+trans performs an ordinary least-squares fit using the
reference structure provided with -s, removing rotational and
translational degrees of freedom.

Cheers,

Tsjerk

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:47 PM, rams rams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dear Users,

 I have a question about the option -fit in trjconv.

 The default option with -fit is none. If I use the option as rot+trans, does
 it mean that the rotational and translational motions are removed from the
 trajectory ? If not, is there any option in gromacs, to create a
 translational and rotational free trajectory from the original trajecotry
 file ? I also want to make sure the usage of the command:

 trjconv -f original trr -s .tpr -o rot_trans_free.trr -fit rot+trans

 Thanks in advance.

 Ram.

 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php




-- 
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
Junior UD (post-doc)
Biomolecular NMR, Bijvoet Center
Utrecht University
Padualaan 8
3584 CH Utrecht
The Netherlands
P: +31-30-2539931
F: +31-30-2537623
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] RE: D2O

2008-09-10 Thread Vitaly Chaban
 Hi
 I would like to simulate the solutes are embeded in D2O solution.
 
 Could someone explain the difference of simulating D2O solution and H2O
 solution?
 

It differs with FF for D instead of H. It's quite primitive for make
such exchange in topology.


-- 
Vitaly V. Chaban
School of Chemistry
National University of Kharkiv
Svoboda sq.,4, Kharkiv 61077, Ukraine
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype: vvchaban
tel.: +38-097-8259698

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] : Incorrect number of parameters - found 4, expected 6 or 12.

2008-09-10 Thread Morteza Khabiri
Dear justin,

I have made the itp file on a basis of chapter 5 of gromacs. Every things
seems fine. my itp file for opls is as follow:

;
[ moleculetype ]
; Name nrexcl
DRG  3

[ atoms ]
;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1   opls_185   1  DRG HAD 10.02734   1.0080
 2   opls_182   1  DRG CAL 10.10638  12.0110
 3   opls_185   1  DRG HAE 10.02734   1.0080
 4   opls_180   1  DRG OAI 1   -0.36111  15.9994
 5   opls_182   1  DRG CAK 10.10638  12.0110
 6   opls_185   1  DRG HAB 20.02734   1.0080
 7   opls_185   1  DRG HAG 20.02734   1.0080
 8   opls_711   1  DRG CAM 20.00235  12.0110
 9   opls_777   1  DRG HAF 30.00857   1.0080
10   opls_777   1  DRG HAH 30.00857   1.0080
11   opls_711   1  DRG CAJ 30.00235  12.0110
12   opls_777   1  DRG HAC 30.00857   1.0080
13   opls_777   1  DRG HAA 30.00857   1.0080

[ bonds ]
; ai  aj  fuc0, c1, ...
   1   2   10.109284512.00.109284512.0 ;   HAD  CAL
   2   3   10.109284512.00.109284512.0 ;   CAL  HAE
   2   4   10.141267776.00.141267776.0 ;   CAL  HAI
   2  11   10.152217568.00.152217568.0 ;   CAL  CAJ
   4   5   10.141267776.00.141267776.0 ;   OAI  CAK
   5   6   10.109284512.00.109284512.0 ;   CAK  HAB
   5   7   10.109284512.00.109284512.0 ;   CAK  HAG
   5   8   10.151234304.00.151234304.0 ;   CAK  CAM
   8   9   10.108284512.00.108284512.0 ;   CAM  HAF
   8  10   10.108284512.00.108284512.0 ;   CAM  HAH
   8  11   10.150217568.00.150217568.0 ;   CAM  CAJ
  11  12   10.108284512.00.108284512.0 ;   CAJ  HAC
  11  13   10.108284512.00.108284512.0 ;   CAJ  HAA

[ pairs ]
; ai  aj  fuc0, c1, ...
   1   5   1   ;   HAD  CAK
   1   8   1   ;   HAD  CAM
   1  12   1   ;   HAD  HAC
   1  13   1   ;   HAD  HAA
   2   6   1   ;   CAL  HAB
   2   7   1   ;   CAL  HAG
   2   9   1   ;   CAL  HAF
   2  10   1   ;   CAL  HAH
   3   5   1   ;   HAE  CAK
   3   8   1   ;   HAE  CAM
   3  12   1   ;   HAE  HAC
   3  13   1   ;   HAE  HAA
   4   9   1   ;   OAI  HAF
   4  10   1   ;   OAI  HAH
   4  12   1   ;   OAI  HAC
   4  13   1   ;   OAI  HAA
   5  12   1   ;   CAK  HAC
   5  13   1   ;   CAK  HAA
   6   9   1   ;   HAB  HAF
   6  10   1   ;   HAB  HAH
 6   9   1   ;   HAB  HAF
   6  10   1   ;   HAB  HAH
   6  11   1   ;   HAB  CAJ
   7   9   1   ;   HAG  HAF
   7  10   1   ;   HAG  HAH
   7  11   1   ;   HAG  CAJ
   9  12   1   ;   HAF  HAC
   9  13   1   ;   HAF  HAA
  10  12   1   ;   HAH  HAC
  10  13   1   ;   HAH  HAA

[ angles ]
; ai  aj  ak  fuc0, c1, ...
   1   2   3   1107.8   276.1107.8   276.1 ;   HAD  CAL  HAE
   1   2   4   1109.5   292.8109.5   292.8 ;   HAD  CAL  OAI
   1   2  11   1110.7   313.8109.5   397.5 ;   HAD  CAL  CAJ
   3   2   4   1109.5   292.8109.5   292.8 ;   HAE  CAL  OAI
   3   2  11   1110.7   313.8110.7   313.8 ;   HAE  CAL  CAJ
   4   2  11   1109.5   292.8109.5   292.8 ;   OAI  CAL  CAJ
   2   4   5   1109.5   502.0109.5   502.0 ;   CAL  OAI  CAK
   4   5   6   1109.5   292.8109.5   292.8 ;   OAI  CAK  HAB
   4   5   7   1109.5   292.8109.5   292.8 ;   OAI  CAK  HAG
   4   5   8   1109.5   292.8109.5   292.8 ;   OAI  CAK  CAM
   6   5   7   1107.8   276.1107.8   276.1 ;   HAB  CAK  HAG
   6   5   8   1110.7   313.8110.7   313.8 

Re: [gmx-users] : Incorrect number of parameters - found 4, expected 6 or 12.

2008-09-10 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



Morteza Khabiri wrote:

Dear justin,

I have made the itp file on a basis of chapter 5 of gromacs. Every things
seems fine. my itp file for opls is as follow:



Seems fine is your own evaluation, but if grompp is giving you errors about an 
incorrect topology, then indeed it is not.  Did grompp tell you a line number 
that caused the error?  My guess would be yes.  If you want free help for 
solving this, you have to make it easy.  What was the line?  What is on that line?


-Justin


;
[ moleculetype ]
; Name nrexcl
DRG  3

[ atoms ]
;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1   opls_185   1  DRG HAD 10.02734   1.0080
 2   opls_182   1  DRG CAL 10.10638  12.0110
 3   opls_185   1  DRG HAE 10.02734   1.0080
 4   opls_180   1  DRG OAI 1   -0.36111  15.9994
 5   opls_182   1  DRG CAK 10.10638  12.0110
 6   opls_185   1  DRG HAB 20.02734   1.0080
 7   opls_185   1  DRG HAG 20.02734   1.0080
 8   opls_711   1  DRG CAM 20.00235  12.0110
 9   opls_777   1  DRG HAF 30.00857   1.0080
10   opls_777   1  DRG HAH 30.00857   1.0080
11   opls_711   1  DRG CAJ 30.00235  12.0110
12   opls_777   1  DRG HAC 30.00857   1.0080
13   opls_777   1  DRG HAA 30.00857   1.0080

[ bonds ]
; ai  aj  fuc0, c1, ...
   1   2   10.109284512.00.109284512.0 ;   HAD  CAL
   2   3   10.109284512.00.109284512.0 ;   CAL  HAE
   2   4   10.141267776.00.141267776.0 ;   CAL  HAI
   2  11   10.152217568.00.152217568.0 ;   CAL  CAJ
   4   5   10.141267776.00.141267776.0 ;   OAI  CAK
   5   6   10.109284512.00.109284512.0 ;   CAK  HAB
   5   7   10.109284512.00.109284512.0 ;   CAK  HAG
   5   8   10.151234304.00.151234304.0 ;   CAK  CAM
   8   9   10.108284512.00.108284512.0 ;   CAM  HAF
   8  10   10.108284512.00.108284512.0 ;   CAM  HAH
   8  11   10.150217568.00.150217568.0 ;   CAM  CAJ
  11  12   10.108284512.00.108284512.0 ;   CAJ  HAC
  11  13   10.108284512.00.108284512.0 ;   CAJ  HAA

[ pairs ]
; ai  aj  fuc0, c1, ...
   1   5   1   ;   HAD  CAK
   1   8   1   ;   HAD  CAM
   1  12   1   ;   HAD  HAC
   1  13   1   ;   HAD  HAA
   2   6   1   ;   CAL  HAB
   2   7   1   ;   CAL  HAG
   2   9   1   ;   CAL  HAF
   2  10   1   ;   CAL  HAH
   3   5   1   ;   HAE  CAK
   3   8   1   ;   HAE  CAM
   3  12   1   ;   HAE  HAC
   3  13   1   ;   HAE  HAA
   4   9   1   ;   OAI  HAF
   4  10   1   ;   OAI  HAH
   4  12   1   ;   OAI  HAC
   4  13   1   ;   OAI  HAA
   5  12   1   ;   CAK  HAC
   5  13   1   ;   CAK  HAA
   6   9   1   ;   HAB  HAF
   6  10   1   ;   HAB  HAH
 6   9   1   ;   HAB  HAF
   6  10   1   ;   HAB  HAH
   6  11   1   ;   HAB  CAJ
   7   9   1   ;   HAG  HAF
   7  10   1   ;   HAG  HAH
   7  11   1   ;   HAG  CAJ
   9  12   1   ;   HAF  HAC
   9  13   1   ;   HAF  HAA
  10  12   1   ;   HAH  HAC
  10  13   1   ;   HAH  HAA

[ angles ]
; ai  aj  ak  fuc0, c1, ...
   1   2   3   1107.8   276.1107.8   276.1 ;   HAD  CAL  HAE
   1   2   4   1109.5   292.8109.5   292.8 ;   HAD  CAL  OAI
   1   2  11   1110.7   313.8109.5   397.5 ;   HAD  CAL  CAJ
   3   2   4   1109.5   292.8109.5   292.8 ;   HAE  CAL  OAI
   3   2  11   1110.7   313.8110.7   313.8 ;   HAE  CAL  CAJ
   4   2  11   1109.5   292.8109.5   292.8 ;   OAI  CAL  CAJ
   2   4   5   1109.5   502.0109.5   502.0 ;   CAL  OAI  CAK
   4   5  

[gmx-users] regarding xpm2ps?

2008-09-10 Thread minnale
  
I have converted .xpm (which generated from *g_hbond) to .eps by using xpm2ps 
command, after finished the running of this command showed 

There are 1 matrices in .xpm
Matrix 0 is 37501 x 1
Auto tick spacing failed for X-axis, guessing 2
Auto tick spacing for X-axis: major 2, minor 0.4
Auto tick spacing failed for Y-axis, guessing 0
Auto tick spacing for Y-axis: major 0, minor nan
Set the x-size of the box to 0.011
Set the y-size of the box to 0.011

1.is it mean that set the box x and y sizes to 0.111 by using -bx and -by 
options. 
2.How can I execute this .eps for getting map?
Could please suggest me
Thanks in advance.___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] regarding xpm2ps?

2008-09-10 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



minnale wrote:
 
I have converted .xpm (which generated from *g_hbond) to .eps by using 
xpm2ps command, after finished the running of this command showed


There are 1 matrices in .xpm
Matrix 0 is 37501 x 1
Auto tick spacing failed for X-axis, guessing 2
Auto tick spacing for X-axis: major 2, minor 0.4
Auto tick spacing failed for Y-axis, guessing 0
Auto tick spacing for Y-axis: major 0, minor nan
Set the x-size of the box to 0.011
Set the y-size of the box to 0.011

1.is it mean that set the box x and y sizes to 0.111 by using -bx and 
-by options.


You've got problems somewhere.  Did you specify an .m2p file with -di?  What was 
your command line?



2.How can I execute this .eps for getting map?


An .eps file can be opened by a number of programs - pretty much anything that 
can read a PDF (at least, on Linux and Mac), or Gimp.


-Justin


Could please suggest me
Thanks in advance.



578x38_banner2.gif 
http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/click.cgi/www.rediff.com/signature-default.htm/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2606998_2599290/2602379/1?PARTNER=3OAS_QUERY=null





___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


--


Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] : Incorrect number of parameters - found 4, expected 6 or 12.

2008-09-10 Thread Morteza Khabiri
Dear Justin,

thanks for your help. The last lines of my grompp are:

checking input for internal consistency...
calling /lib/cpp...
processing topology...
Generated 332520 of the 332520 non-bonded parameter combinations
Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 0.5
Generated 332520 of the 332520 1-4 parameter combinations
Cleaning up temporary file grompp3eQvh0
---
Program grompp, VERSION 3.3.1
Source code file: toppush.c, line: 1180

Fatal error:
Incorrect number of parameters - found 4, expected 6 or 12.


Thank you very much in advance for your free help.

Your sincerely,

Morteza

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] : Incorrect number of parameters - found 4, expected 6 or 12.

2008-09-10 Thread Florian Dommert

* Justin A. Lemkul [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-10 05:46:07 -0400]:




Morteza Khabiri wrote:

Dear justin,
I have made the itp file on a basis of chapter 5 of gromacs. Every things
seems fine. my itp file for opls is as follow:


Seems fine is your own evaluation, but if grompp is giving you errors 
about an incorrect topology, then indeed it is not.  Did grompp tell you a 
line number that caused the error?  My guess would be yes.  If you want free 
help for solving this, you have to make it easy.  What was the line?  What 
is on that line?


-Justin


;
[ moleculetype ]
; Name nrexcl
DRG  3
[ atoms ]
;   nr  type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge mass
 1   opls_185   1  DRG HAD 10.02734   1.0080
 2   opls_182   1  DRG CAL 10.10638  12.0110
 3   opls_185   1  DRG HAE 10.02734   1.0080
 4   opls_180   1  DRG OAI 1   -0.36111  15.9994
 5   opls_182   1  DRG CAK 10.10638  12.0110
 6   opls_185   1  DRG HAB 20.02734   1.0080
 7   opls_185   1  DRG HAG 20.02734   1.0080
 8   opls_711   1  DRG CAM 20.00235  12.0110
 9   opls_777   1  DRG HAF 30.00857   1.0080
10   opls_777   1  DRG HAH 30.00857   1.0080
11   opls_711   1  DRG CAJ 30.00235  12.0110
12   opls_777   1  DRG HAC 30.00857   1.0080
13   opls_777   1  DRG HAA 30.00857   1.0080
[ bonds ]
; ai  aj  fuc0, c1, ...
   1   2   10.109284512.00.109284512.0 ;   HAD  CAL
   2   3   10.109284512.00.109284512.0 ;   CAL  HAE
   2   4   10.141267776.00.141267776.0 ;   CAL  HAI
   2  11   10.152217568.00.152217568.0 ;   CAL  CAJ
   4   5   10.141267776.00.141267776.0 ;   OAI  CAK
   5   6   10.109284512.00.109284512.0 ;   CAK  HAB
   5   7   10.109284512.00.109284512.0 ;   CAK  HAG
   5   8   10.151234304.00.151234304.0 ;   CAK  CAM
   8   9   10.108284512.00.108284512.0 ;   CAM  HAF
   8  10   10.108284512.00.108284512.0 ;   CAM  HAH
   8  11   10.150217568.00.150217568.0 ;   CAM  CAJ
  11  12   10.108284512.00.108284512.0 ;   CAJ  HAC
  11  13   10.108284512.00.108284512.0 ;   CAJ  HAA
[ pairs ]
; ai  aj  fuc0, c1, ...
   1   5   1   ;   HAD  CAK
   1   8   1   ;   HAD  CAM
   1  12   1   ;   HAD  HAC
   1  13   1   ;   HAD  HAA
   2   6   1   ;   CAL  HAB
   2   7   1   ;   CAL  HAG
   2   9   1   ;   CAL  HAF
   2  10   1   ;   CAL  HAH
   3   5   1   ;   HAE  CAK
   3   8   1   ;   HAE  CAM
   3  12   1   ;   HAE  HAC
   3  13   1   ;   HAE  HAA
   4   9   1   ;   OAI  HAF
   4  10   1   ;   OAI  HAH
   4  12   1   ;   OAI  HAC
   4  13   1   ;   OAI  HAA
   5  12   1   ;   CAK  HAC
   5  13   1   ;   CAK  HAA
   6   9   1   ;   HAB  HAF
   6  10   1   ;   HAB  HAH
 6   9   1   ;   HAB  HAF
   6  10   1   ;   HAB  HAH
   6  11   1   ;   HAB  CAJ
   7   9   1   ;   HAG  HAF
   7  10   1   ;   HAG  HAH
   7  11   1   ;   HAG  CAJ
   9  12   1   ;   HAF  HAC
   9  13   1   ;   HAF  HAA
  10  12   1   ;   HAH  HAC
  10  13   1   ;   HAH  HAA
[ angles ]
; ai  aj  ak  fuc0, c1, ...
   1   2   3   1107.8   276.1107.8   276.1 ;   HAD  CAL  
HAE
   1   2   4   1109.5   292.8109.5   292.8 ;   HAD  CAL  
OAI


Hello;

  the bond angles seem to be respondsible. You use function type 1. That
  means you just have a harmonic potential. To this end gromacs wants an
  equilibrium angle and a spring constant. You provide 4 numbers. I
  dont the funtions in mind. However for function 1, it shoudl probably
  look like :

 1   2  11   1 

Re: [gmx-users] : Incorrect number of parameters - found 4, expected 6 or 12.

2008-09-10 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



Morteza Khabiri wrote:

Dear Justin,

thanks for your help. The last lines of my grompp are:

checking input for internal consistency...
calling /lib/cpp...
processing topology...
Generated 332520 of the 332520 non-bonded parameter combinations
Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 0.5
Generated 332520 of the 332520 1-4 parameter combinations
Cleaning up temporary file grompp3eQvh0
---
Program grompp, VERSION 3.3.1
Source code file: toppush.c, line: 1180

Fatal error:
Incorrect number of parameters - found 4, expected 6 or 12.



The error is probably related to missing dihedral parameters.  Was your initial 
topology constructed by PRODRG?  It looks like it.  If so, the dihedral 
parameters will be for use with a GROMOS-type force field, so simply changing 
type to 3 will not suffice.  Have a look in ffoplsaabon.itp for the correct way 
to define an OPLS-AA dihedral with all the necessary parameters.


-Justin



Thank you very much in advance for your free help.

Your sincerely,

Morteza

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



--


Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: Re: [gmx-users] regarding xpm2ps?

2008-09-10 Thread minnale
I have issued the following command
xpm2s -f .xpm -o .eps
If I mention option -di with m2p it showed 

Fatal error:
Library file H_hbond.m2p not found in current dir nor in default directories.
(You can set the directories to search with the GMXLIB path variable)

Could tell me any suggestion 
Thanks alot


On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 Justin A.Lemkul wrote :


minnale wrote:
  I have converted .xpm (which generated from *g_hbond) to .eps by using 
 xpm2ps command, after finished the running of this command showed

There are 1 matrices in .xpm
Matrix 0 is 37501 x 1
Auto tick spacing failed for X-axis, guessing 2
Auto tick spacing for X-axis: major 2, minor 0.4
Auto tick spacing failed for Y-axis, guessing 0
Auto tick spacing for Y-axis: major 0, minor nan
Set the x-size of the box to 0.011
Set the y-size of the box to 0.011

1.is it mean that set the box x and y sizes to 0.111 by using -bx and -by 
options.

You've got problems somewhere.  Did you specify an .m2p file with -di?  What 
was your command line?

2.How can I execute this .eps for getting map?

An .eps file can be opened by a number of programs - pretty much anything that 
can read a PDF (at least, on Linux and Mac), or Gimp.

-Justin

Could please suggest me
Thanks in advance.



578x38_banner2.gif 
http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/click.cgi/www.rediff.com/signature-default.htm/[EMAIL
 PROTECTED]/2606998_2599290/2602379/1?PARTNER=3OAS_QUERY=null




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface 
or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

-- 

Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] regarding xpm2ps?

2008-09-10 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



minnale wrote:

I have issued the following command
xpm2s -f .xpm -o .eps
If I mention option -di with m2p it showed

Fatal error:
Library file H_hbond.m2p not found in current dir nor in default 
directories.

(You can set the directories to search with the GMXLIB path variable)

Could tell me any suggestion
Thanks alot



If you specify -di you need to give xpm2ps an actual .m2p file, an example of 
which is online:


http://www.gromacs.org/documentation/reference/online/m2p.html

-Justin



On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 Justin A.Lemkul wrote :
 
 
 minnale wrote:
   I have converted .xpm (which generated from *g_hbond) to .eps by 
using xpm2ps command, after finished the running of this command showed

 
 There are 1 matrices in .xpm
 Matrix 0 is 37501 x 1
 Auto tick spacing failed for X-axis, guessing 2
 Auto tick spacing for X-axis: major 2, minor 0.4
 Auto tick spacing failed for Y-axis, guessing 0
 Auto tick spacing for Y-axis: major 0, minor nan
 Set the x-size of the box to 0.011
 Set the y-size of the box to 0.011
 
 1.is it mean that set the box x and y sizes to 0.111 by using -bx and 
-by options.

 
 You've got problems somewhere.  Did you specify an .m2p file with 
-di?  What was your command line?

 
 2.How can I execute this .eps for getting map?
 
 An .eps file can be opened by a number of programs - pretty much 
anything that can read a PDF (at least, on Linux and Mac), or Gimp.

 
 -Justin
 
 Could please suggest me
 Thanks in advance.
 
 
 
 578x38_banner2.gif 
http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/click.cgi/www.rediff.com/signature-default.htm/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2606998_2599290/2602379/1?PARTNER=3OAS_QUERY=null

 
 
 
 
 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before 
posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www 
interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
 
 -- 
 
 Justin A. Lemkul
 Graduate Research Assistant
 Department of Biochemistry
 Virginia Tech
 Blacksburg, VA
 jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
 
 



578x38_banner2.gif 
http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/click.cgi/www.rediff.com/signature-default.htm/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2606998_2599290/2602379/1?PARTNER=3OAS_QUERY=null





___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


--


Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: Re: [gmx-users] regarding xpm2ps?

2008-09-10 Thread minnale
  

Thanks again Justin for your kind reply
I have given command like this
xpm2ps -f .xpm -o .eps -di .m2p
then it showing the following error

Fatal error:
Library file H_hbond.m2p not found in current dir nor in default directories.
(You can set the directories to search with the GMXLIB path variable)

Could please tell me how can I remedy this problem?
Thanks alot

On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 Justin A.Lemkul wrote :


minnale wrote:
I have issued the following command
xpm2s -f .xpm -o .eps
If I mention option -di with m2p it showed

Fatal error:
Library file H_hbond.m2p not found in current dir nor in default directories.
(You can set the directories to search with the GMXLIB path variable)


If you specify -di you need to give xpm2ps an actual .m2p file, an example of 
which is online:

http://www.gromacs.org/documentation/reference/online/m2p.html

-Justin

Could tell me any suggestion
Thanks alot


On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 Justin A.Lemkul wrote :
  
  
  minnale wrote:
I have converted .xpm (which generated from *g_hbond) to .eps by using 
 xpm2ps command, after finished the running of this command showed
  
  There are 1 matrices in .xpm
  Matrix 0 is 37501 x 1
  Auto tick spacing failed for X-axis, guessing 2
  Auto tick spacing for X-axis: major 2, minor 0.4
  Auto tick spacing failed for Y-axis, guessing 0
  Auto tick spacing for Y-axis: major 0, minor nan
  Set the x-size of the box to 0.011
  Set the y-size of the box to 0.011
  
  1.is it mean that set the box x and y sizes to 0.111 by using -bx and -by 
 options.
  
  You've got problems somewhere.  Did you specify an .m2p file with -di?  
 What was your command line?
  
  2.How can I execute this .eps for getting map?
  
  An .eps file can be opened by a number of programs - pretty much anything 
 that can read a PDF (at least, on Linux and Mac), or Gimp.
  
  -Justin
  
  Could please suggest me
  Thanks in advance.
  
  
  
  578x38_banner2.gif 
 http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/click.cgi/www.rediff.com/signature-default.htm/[EMAIL
  PROTECTED]/2606998_2599290/2602379/1?PARTNER=3OAS_QUERY=null
  
  
  
  
  ___
  gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
  http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
  Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
  Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www 
 interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
  
  -- 
  
  Justin A. Lemkul
  Graduate Research Assistant
  Department of Biochemistry
  Virginia Tech
  Blacksburg, VA
  jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
  http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
  
  



578x38_banner2.gif 
http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/click.cgi/www.rediff.com/signature-default.htm/[EMAIL
 PROTECTED]/2606998_2599290/2602379/1?PARTNER=3OAS_QUERY=null


-- 

Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] regarding xpm2ps?

2008-09-10 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



minnale wrote:
 


Thanks again Justin for your kind reply
I have given command like this
xpm2ps -f .xpm -o .eps -di .m2p
then it showing the following error

Fatal error:
Library file H_hbond.m2p not found in current dir nor in default 
directories.

(You can set the directories to search with the GMXLIB path variable)

Could please tell me how can I remedy this problem?


The error message is pretty explicit...does such a file exist?

-Justin


Thanks alot

On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 Justin A.Lemkul wrote :
 
 
 minnale wrote:
 I have issued the following command
 xpm2s -f .xpm -o .eps
 If I mention option -di with m2p it showed
 
 Fatal error:
 Library file H_hbond.m2p not found in current dir nor in default 
directories.

 (You can set the directories to search with the GMXLIB path variable)
 
 
 If you specify -di you need to give xpm2ps an actual .m2p file, an 
example of which is online:

 
 http://www.gromacs.org/documentation/reference/online/m2p.html
 
 -Justin
 
 Could tell me any suggestion
 Thanks alot
 
 
 On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 Justin A.Lemkul wrote :
   
   
   minnale wrote:
 I have converted .xpm (which generated from *g_hbond) to .eps 
by using xpm2ps command, after finished the running of this command showed

   
   There are 1 matrices in .xpm
   Matrix 0 is 37501 x 1
   Auto tick spacing failed for X-axis, guessing 2
   Auto tick spacing for X-axis: major 2, minor 0.4
   Auto tick spacing failed for Y-axis, guessing 0
   Auto tick spacing for Y-axis: major 0, minor nan
   Set the x-size of the box to 0.011
   Set the y-size of the box to 0.011
   
   1.is it mean that set the box x and y sizes to 0.111 by using -bx 
and -by options.

   
   You've got problems somewhere.  Did you specify an .m2p file with 
-di?  What was your command line?

   
   2.How can I execute this .eps for getting map?
   
   An .eps file can be opened by a number of programs - pretty much 
anything that can read a PDF (at least, on Linux and Mac), or Gimp.

   
   -Justin
   
   Could please suggest me
   Thanks in advance.
   
   
   
   578x38_banner2.gif 
http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/click.cgi/www.rediff.com/signature-default.htm/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2606998_2599290/2602379/1?PARTNER=3OAS_QUERY=null

   
   
   
 

   
   ___
   gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
   http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
   Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before 
posting!
   Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www 
interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
   
   -- 
   
   Justin A. Lemkul
   Graduate Research Assistant
   Department of Biochemistry
   Virginia Tech
   Blacksburg, VA
   jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
   http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
   
   
 
 
 
 578x38_banner2.gif 
http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/click.cgi/www.rediff.com/signature-default.htm/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2606998_2599290/2602379/1?PARTNER=3OAS_QUERY=null

 
 
 -- 
 
 Justin A. Lemkul
 Graduate Research Assistant
 Department of Biochemistry
 Virginia Tech
 Blacksburg, VA
 jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
 
 



578x38_banner2.gif 
http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/click.cgi/www.rediff.com/signature-default.htm/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2606998_2599290/2602379/1?PARTNER=3OAS_QUERY=null





___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


--


Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] problem with continuation of md

2008-09-10 Thread sarbani chattopadhyay
  Hi all,
  I had used the tpbconv command to give continuation run on a 2ns 
simulation. I had 
provided the previois trajectory file, energy file for this. However the 
continuation run had 
crashed due to power failure and I again had to give a rerun on it.

Everything seems to be working well but surprisingly I find that the 
coordinates of the atoms 
at 2ns , as found at the end of the 2ns simulation  and the coordinates of the 
atoms at 2ns at 
the start of the continuation run are different. This means that the run didn't 
start from the 
point at which ended. 

Can anyone suggest any reason for this?
Thanks in advance
Sarbani
  ___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] problem with continuation of md

2008-09-10 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



sarbani chattopadhyay wrote:

  Hi all,
  I had used the tpbconv command to give continuation run on a 
2ns simulation. I had
provided the previois trajectory file, energy file for this. However the 
continuation run had

crashed due to power failure and I again had to give a rerun on it.



I'm confused.  Which part crashed?  Start -- 2 ns, or the post-2ns time frame?

Please provide the exact commands you gave to tpbconv.

Everything seems to be working well but surprisingly I find that the 
coordinates of the atoms
at 2ns , as found at the end of the 2ns simulation  and the coordinates 
of the atoms at 2ns at
the start of the continuation run are different. This means that the run 
didn't start from the

point at which ended.


How did you make this determination?

-Justin



Can anyone suggest any reason for this?
Thanks in advance
Sarbani
 




578x38_banner2.gif 
http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/click.cgi/www.rediff.com/signature-default.htm/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2606998_2599290/2602379/1?PARTNER=3OAS_QUERY=null





___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


--


Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: Re: [gmx-users] problem with continuation of md

2008-09-10 Thread sarbani chattopadhyay
  The post 2ns run had crashed.

The commands were 
tpbconv -f 2ns.trr -e 2ns.edr -s 2ns.tpr -extend 1

When it crashed ,the command given was
tpbconv -f ext10ns.trr -s ext10ns.tpr -e ext10ns.edr -o leftrun.tpr


On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 Justin A.Lemkul wrote :


sarbani chattopadhyay wrote:
   Hi all,
   I had used the tpbconv command to give continuation run on a 2ns 
 simulation. I 
had
provided the previois trajectory file, energy file for this. However the 
continuation run 
had
crashed due to power failure and I again had to give a rerun on it.


I'm confused.  Which part crashed?  Start -- 2 ns, or the post-2ns time frame?

Please provide the exact commands you gave to tpbconv.

Everything seems to be working well but surprisingly I find that the 
coordinates of the 
atoms
at 2ns , as found at the end of the 2ns simulation  and the coordinates of 
the atoms at 
2ns at
the start of the continuation run are different. This means that the run 
didn't start from 
the
point at which ended.

How did you make this determination?

-Justin


Can anyone suggest any reason for this?
Thanks in advance
Sarbani
  


578x38_banner2.gif http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/click.cgi/
www.rediff.com/signature-default.htm/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2606998_2599290/2602379/1?PARTNER=3OAS_QUERY=null




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface 
or send it to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

-- 

Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] problem with continuation of md

2008-09-10 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



sarbani chattopadhyay wrote:

  The post 2ns run had crashed.

The commands were
tpbconv -f 2ns.trr -e 2ns.edr -s 2ns.tpr -extend 1

When it crashed ,the command given was
tpbconv -f ext10ns.trr -s ext10ns.tpr -e ext10ns.edr -o leftrun.tpr



So what you're saying then is that the coordinates that were the output from the 
first part (say, 2ns.gro) do not match those you find in ext10ns.tpr?  How did 
you make that determination?  Is the trajectory discontinuous?


-Justin



On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 Justin A.Lemkul wrote :
 
 
 sarbani chattopadhyay wrote:
   Hi all,
   I had used the tpbconv command to give continuation run 
on a 2ns simulation. I

had
 provided the previois trajectory file, energy file for this. However 
the continuation run

had
 crashed due to power failure and I again had to give a rerun on it.
 
 
 I'm confused.  Which part crashed?  Start -- 2 ns, or the post-2ns 
time frame?

 
 Please provide the exact commands you gave to tpbconv.
 
 Everything seems to be working well but surprisingly I find that the 
coordinates of the

atoms
 at 2ns , as found at the end of the 2ns simulation  and the 
coordinates of the atoms at

2ns at
 the start of the continuation run are different. This means that the 
run didn't start from

the
 point at which ended.
 
 How did you make this determination?
 
 -Justin
 
 
 Can anyone suggest any reason for this?
 Thanks in advance
 Sarbani
  
 

 
 578x38_banner2.gif http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/click.cgi/
www.rediff.com/signature-default.htm/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2606998_2599290/2602379/1?PARTNER=3OAS_QUERY=null
 
 
 
 
 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before 
posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www 
interface or send it to

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
 
 -- 
 
 Justin A. Lemkul
 Graduate Research Assistant
 Department of Biochemistry
 Virginia Tech
 Blacksburg, VA
 jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
 
 



578x38_banner2.gif 
http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/click.cgi/www.rediff.com/signature-default.htm/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2606998_2599290/2602379/1?PARTNER=3OAS_QUERY=null





___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


--


Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] regarding xpm2ps?

2008-09-10 Thread Martin Höfling
Am Mittwoch 10 September 2008 13:36:15 schrieb minnale:
 Thanks Martin
 yes executing of .eps means read out the file.

I am using the following very ugly shell-script to convert to bmp format:

#!/bin/bash
cat $1 | grep -v ^/\* Generated| grep -v ^/\* This| grep -v ^/\* title| 
grep -v ^/\* legend| grep -v ^/\* x-label| grep -v ^/\* y-label| 
grep -v ^/\* type | xpmtoppm | ppmtobmp  $2

On the bmp, I apply tools (convert/mogrify) from the imagemagick package to 
crop  convert to png. The png then can then be read in by my 
python/scipy/numpy scripts as a matrix.

Best

Martin
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] trjconv

2008-09-10 Thread rams rams
Hi Tsjerk,

It means the resulting trajectory is free from translational and rotational
degrees of freedom which I can use for the studies of internal dynamics i
suppose.

Ram.


On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Tsjerk Wassenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Ram,

 -fit rot+trans performs an ordinary least-squares fit using the
 reference structure provided with -s, removing rotational and
 translational degrees of freedom.

 Cheers,

 Tsjerk

 On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:47 PM, rams rams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Dear Users,
 
  I have a question about the option -fit in trjconv.
 
  The default option with -fit is none. If I use the option as rot+trans,
 does
  it mean that the rotational and translational motions are removed from
 the
  trajectory ? If not, is there any option in gromacs, to create a
  translational and rotational free trajectory from the original trajecotry
  file ? I also want to make sure the usage of the command:
 
  trjconv -f original trr -s .tpr -o rot_trans_free.trr -fit rot+trans
 
  Thanks in advance.
 
  Ram.
 
  ___
  gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
  http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
  Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
 posting!
  Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
  www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
 



 --
 Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
 Junior UD (post-doc)
 Biomolecular NMR, Bijvoet Center
 Utrecht University
 Padualaan 8
 3584 CH Utrecht
 The Netherlands
 P: +31-30-2539931
 F: +31-30-2537623
 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] Using gromacs for docking purpose

2008-09-10 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



vivek sharma wrote:

Hi Everybody,

I am running MD simulation for getting various conformation of a 
molecule, that can act as better receptor for docking purpose.

While doing so, I got a number of doubts.
Firstly what should be the range of time step I can keep in .mdp file 
(right now I am using .002 ps of time step, Can I increase it further ?)


That depends largely on your force field and whether or not you're applying 
constraints.  For protein simulations (with constraints), 1-2 fs is pretty 
standard; some UA lipid simulations use 4-5 fs.


My second question is for how long I should run my simulation to get 
various conformation (or what is the time interval that can be taken as 
in general after which biomolecule can change their conformation ?)


There is no simple answer to this question.  Sampling is always an issue in MD. 
 Some conformational changes occur on the nanosecond timescale, others in 
excess of several hundred ns, or even a few microseconds!  Perhaps your system 
alters its conformation rapidly, such that changes can be observed in a few ns, 
but that is for you to determine :)


How should I pick up various conformation from the mdrun that can make a 
sense ?




Probably the best idea (IMHO) is to run several simulations, each starting from 
different random velocities.  Run each for the same length of time and compare 
the results.  Do all the simulations wind up giving you the same thing?  Are 
there substantial differences in the conformations?


As for extracting conformations along a trajectory (using trjconv -dump), this 
may or may not be relevant.  What if a certain conformation occurs once for a 
single frame in one trajectory, but never again in ten other trajectories?  Do 
you care about that frame?  Probably not, based on reasonable sampling.  What if 
a certain conformation occurs a few times over a few trajectories?  How do you 
determine its relevance?  Such are the challenges of simulation.


You can use g_cluster to do RMSD clustering to determine which conformations are 
similar along the trajectory.  Whether or not any of these make sense is 
entirely up to you and what you know about your system :)


-Justin

I know the questions are not strictly related to gromacs. my apologies 
for putting such questions.


If anybody has insight into these questions, please reply.


With Thanks,
Vivek




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


--


Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: Re: [gmx-users] problem with continuation of md

2008-09-10 Thread sarbani chattopadhyay
  It seems that the trajectory is discontinuous. The coordinates in the pdb 
file generated 
from  the trajectory files show that  the model corresponding to 2ns in the 
2ns.pdb(at the 
last ) file is different from the model corresponding to 2ns in the 
10ns(extended).pdb( at 
the first)

Sarbani




On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 Justin A.Lemkul wrote :


sarbani chattopadhyay wrote:
   The post 2ns run had crashed.

The commands were
tpbconv -f 2ns.trr -e 2ns.edr -s 2ns.tpr -extend 1

When it crashed ,the command given was
tpbconv -f ext10ns.trr -s ext10ns.tpr -e ext10ns.edr -o leftrun.tpr


So what you're saying then is that the coordinates that were the output from 
the first part 
(say, 2ns.gro) do not match those you find in ext10ns.tpr?  How did you make 
that 
determination?  Is the trajectory discontinuous?

-Justin


On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 Justin A.Lemkul wrote :
  
  
  sarbani chattopadhyay wrote:
Hi all,
I had used the tpbconv command to give continuation run on a 
 2ns 
simulation. I
had
  provided the previois trajectory file, energy file for this. However the 
 continuation 
run
had
  crashed due to power failure and I again had to give a rerun on it.
  
  
  I'm confused.  Which part crashed?  Start -- 2 ns, or the post-2ns time 
 frame?
  
  Please provide the exact commands you gave to tpbconv.
  
  Everything seems to be working well but surprisingly I find that the 
 coordinates of 
the
atoms
  at 2ns , as found at the end of the 2ns simulation  and the coordinates 
 of the atoms 
at
2ns at
  the start of the continuation run are different. This means that the run 
 didn't start 
from
the
  point at which ended.
  
  How did you make this determination?
  
  -Justin
  
  
  Can anyone suggest any reason for this?
  Thanks in advance
  Sarbani

  
  578x38_banner2.gif http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/click.cgi/
www.rediff.com/signature-default.htm/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2606998_2599290/2602379/1?PARTNER=3OAS_QUERY=null
  
  
  

  
  ___
  gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
  http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
  Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
  Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www 
 interface or send it 
to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
  
  -- 
  
  Justin A. Lemkul
  Graduate Research Assistant
  Department of Biochemistry
  Virginia Tech
  Blacksburg, VA
  jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
  http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
  
  



578x38_banner2.gif http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/click.cgi/
www.rediff.com/signature-default.htm/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2606998_2599290/2602379/1?PARTNER=3OAS_QUERY=null




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface 
or send it to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

-- 

Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] Using gromacs for docking purpose

2008-09-10 Thread vivek sharma
Hi Justin,
Thank you very much for your quick reply It is really encouraging to get
such response
For the answer of third question, How can I assign different random velocity
?
Is it like assigning the different force-field ?
Please elaborate or suggest some reference if you can ?


With Thanks,
Vivek

2008/9/10 Justin A. Lemkul [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 vivek sharma wrote:

 Hi Everybody,

 I am running MD simulation for getting various conformation of a molecule,
 that can act as better receptor for docking purpose.
 While doing so, I got a number of doubts.
 Firstly what should be the range of time step I can keep in .mdp file
 (right now I am using .002 ps of time step, Can I increase it further ?)


 That depends largely on your force field and whether or not you're applying
 constraints.  For protein simulations (with constraints), 1-2 fs is pretty
 standard; some UA lipid simulations use 4-5 fs.

  My second question is for how long I should run my simulation to get
 various conformation (or what is the time interval that can be taken as in
 general after which biomolecule can change their conformation ?)


 There is no simple answer to this question.  Sampling is always an issue in
 MD.  Some conformational changes occur on the nanosecond timescale, others
 in excess of several hundred ns, or even a few microseconds!  Perhaps your
 system alters its conformation rapidly, such that changes can be observed in
 a few ns, but that is for you to determine :)

  How should I pick up various conformation from the mdrun that can make a
 sense ?


 Probably the best idea (IMHO) is to run several simulations, each starting
 from different random velocities.  Run each for the same length of time and
 compare the results.  Do all the simulations wind up giving you the same
 thing?  Are there substantial differences in the conformations?

 As for extracting conformations along a trajectory (using trjconv -dump),
 this may or may not be relevant.  What if a certain conformation occurs once
 for a single frame in one trajectory, but never again in ten other
 trajectories?  Do you care about that frame?  Probably not, based on
 reasonable sampling.  What if a certain conformation occurs a few times over
 a few trajectories?  How do you determine its relevance?  Such are the
 challenges of simulation.

 You can use g_cluster to do RMSD clustering to determine which
 conformations are similar along the trajectory.  Whether or not any of these
 make sense is entirely up to you and what you know about your system :)

 -Justin

  I know the questions are not strictly related to gromacs. my apologies for
 putting such questions.

 If anybody has insight into these questions, please reply.


 With Thanks,
 Vivek


 

 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
 posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
 interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


 --
 

 Justin A. Lemkul
 Graduate Research Assistant
 Department of Biochemistry
 Virginia Tech
 Blacksburg, VA
 jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

 
 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface
 or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] CPMD- QM MM simulation

2008-09-10 Thread Pradip Biswas
Hi Christian,

Thanks for your idea. I'll start writing up a short manual to make it
available in the QMMM website in the near future. Meanwhile, it will be
great if you and other users can contribute to this manual by writing up
small pieces mentioning the difficulties you faced and how you resolved;
particular suggestions for any problem with simulations, any particular
feature of this code that you would like to highlight/caution to the users,
etc. Your contributions will make the manual effective and valuable.

cheers,
pb.

On 9/8/08, Christian Seifert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi.

 Anyway, it would be nice to have a structured manual for the GMX/CPMD
 interface. The website http://www.tougaloo.edu/research/qmmm has just a
 few basic information and further information in this mailing list under
 http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2006-June/022329.html are not
 that easy to understand.

 A small guide on how to input new ions into the source code for users
 how normally do not deal with source code so much for ex. would be nice
 in such a manual. Or a picture of the MMlayer_radii and
 qmmmcoul_cutoff with some explanations... It takes a long time to find
 these things out by try and error and reading the source code.

 Christian.



 On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 09:29 +0200, Gerrit Groenhof wrote:
  Message: 1
   Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 15:48:12 -0700
   From: Chih-Ying Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: [gmx-users] CPMD- QM MM simulation
   To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
   Message-ID:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
  
   Hi
   I read some papers, which the authors use CPMD - QM MM simulation
   to reparametrize the force field parameters.
  
   But, they did not say the details.
   Could anyone explain this more here?
  
  Why don't you contact the authors?
 
  Gerrit


 --
 M. Sc. Christian Seifert
 Department of Biophysics
 University of Bochum
 ND 04/67
 44780 Bochum
 Germany
 Tel: +49 (0)234 32 28363
 Fax: +49 (0)234 32 14626
 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Web: http://www.bph.rub.de


 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] which force field for a protein-protein complex?

2008-09-10 Thread Alan
Short answer, try Amber99SB with Gaff.

Alan


 Message: 1
 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 15:06:21 +0200
 From:  Paula Gonz?lez-Rubio  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [gmx-users] which force field for a protein-protein complex?
 To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
 Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 Hello there,

 I would like to do a MD of a protein-protein complex (both with their
 ligands) so I'm looking for some advise regarding the best force field for
 simulate my system. For more details, it consists on a ADP-ribosylase
 (which
 ligand is the NAD) and a small G protein (GDP binded), we want to see what
 is the role of a loop in the formation of the complex and on the
 ADP-ribosilation of the small G protein.

 Does any one have a good idea of an appropiate force field for this kind of
 systems ? Do you think gromos 43A1 or ffgmx could be an option?

 Thanks a lot in advance!
 Paula


 -- ! NEW email !!

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 *** NEW ADDRESS **
 Paula GONZALEZ-RUBIO
 PhD Candidate
 DSIMB INTS, INSERM UMR-S726
 6 rue Alexandre Cabanel 75015 Paris
 Tel : +33(1) 44 49 30 00 Fax : +33(1) 47 34 74 31
 4th Floor. Room 401 Bis
 Web Site: http://www.dsimb.inserm.fr/
 https://paris7.jussieu.fr/Redirect/www.dsimb.inserm.fr/
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
 http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/attachments/20080905/e69b67f9/attachment-0001.html

 --


-- 
Alan Wilter S. da Silva, D.Sc. - CCPN Research Associate
Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge.
80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK.
http://www.bio.cam.ac.uk/~awd28
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] g_sdf reference configuration question

2008-09-10 Thread Matt Wyczalkowski
I'm getting odd behavior with the reference configuration generated by
g_sdf (v. 3.3.3).  I am wondering if this is a bug, and if the spatial
density profile is similarly affected.

My test system has simple, regular geometry: a glycine 15-mer held
frozen in a fully extended rod-like configuration, with water
solvent.  I wish to evaluate, for instance, the spatial distribution
of water O around the 15 instances of the glycine O.  My understanding
is that g_sdf will average the water oxygen SDF around the 15 sites to
yield one composite SDF -- is this correct?

However, the reference configuration, given by g_sdf -r, seems
incorrect when performing the SDF around more than one atom triplet.
Based on the documentation, Atom 1 (the GLY O) should be at the
origin, and Atom 2 (GLY C) should be offset along the Z-axis only.
When there is only one atom triplet (that is, performing sdf around
just one GLY O), this is in fact the case.  However, when performing
an SDF around more than one atom, this is no longer holds, and the
offset increases with increasing number of triplets.

Below I give the output of three reference .gro files illustrating
this.  In all cases, Atom 1 is GLY O, Atom 2 is GLY C, Atom 3 is GLY
CA; Atom 4 is Water OW.

My question is, first, should I expect the GLY O to lie at the origin
in all instances? Is this a bug, or user error?  And if this is a bug,
are the sdf data reliable?

Regards,

Matt
---
Matt Wyczalkowski
Doctoral Candidate, Biomedical Engineering
Pappu Lab: http://lima.wustl.edu
Washington University in St. Louis


Reference Configuration .gro files:
(constructed with, e.g.  g_sdf -f ../traj.xtc -n index-all.ndx -s
../GLY15Frozen.tpr -o OO-all -r OO-all -grid 2 2 2 -b 500 )

For one GLY residue:
Protein
  7
4  GLYN1   0.187   0.033  -0.090
4  GLYH2   0.041   0.046  -0.090
4  GLY   CA3  -0.000   0.193  -0.089
4  GLY  HA14   0.086   0.281  -0.088
4  GLY  HA25   0.243   0.119  -0.091
4  GLYC6  -0.000   0.000  -0.179  ;  OFFSET ALONG Z AXIS
4  GLYO7   0.000   0.000   0.000   ;  AT ORIGIN
   10.0   10.0   10.0


For two GLY residues:
Protein
  7
4  GLYN1   0.575  -0.257  -0.087
4  GLYH2   0.430  -0.244  -0.086
4  GLY   CA3   0.389  -0.097  -0.088
4  GLY  HA14   0.474  -0.009  -0.089
4  GLY  HA25   0.632  -0.171  -0.090
4  GLYC6   0.388  -0.291  -0.175
4  GLYO7   0.389  -0.288   0.005   ; NOT AT ORIGIN
   10.0   10.0   10.0

For all 15 GLY residues:
Protein
  7
2  GLYN1  -1.438   1.227  -0.102
2  GLYH2  -1.551   1.280  -0.097
2  GLY   CA3  -1.631   1.377  -0.104
2  GLY  HA14  -1.595   1.400  -0.112
2  GLY  HA25  -1.421   1.256  -0.109
2  GLYC6  -1.572   1.263  -0.123
2  GLYO7  -1.564   1.272  -0.064  ; NOT AT ORIGIN
   10.0   10.0   10.0
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Topology of tris-Naphthyl-Benzene

2008-09-10 Thread ROHIT MALSHE
Hi all ! 

Does anyone have the topology and coordinates of tris-naphthyl-benzene in bulk ?

I would be highly grateful if someone can share those with me. 

Thanks a lot in advance. 

__
Rohit Malshe  1112, Engineering 
Hall   Tel :001 608 262 3370
 
Graduate Student1415, Engineering 
Drive Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Chemical and Biological Engineering  Madison, WI.   
   
University of Wisconsin-Madison USA USA- 53726
__

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] S2 order parameters

2008-09-10 Thread rams rams
Dear users,

The S2 order parameters obtained by using g_chi, are they corresponds to the
Lipari_Szabo NMR order parameters for characterizing the internal motions?

Also it is mentioned in the manual that the obtained S2 parameter
corresponds to a dihedral and the generated plot is residue vs S2. Does it
mean that the S2 parameters are averaged on each residue ??

Thanks in advance.
Ram.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] which force field for a protein-protein complex?

2008-09-10 Thread Maximiliano Figueroa
I was working with protein complex, and after tests some FF, I could obtain
best results with oplss/aa

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Short answer, try Amber99SB with Gaff.

 Alan


 Message: 1
 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 15:06:21 +0200
 From:  Paula Gonz?lez-Rubio  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [gmx-users] which force field for a protein-protein complex?
 To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
 Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 Hello there,

 I would like to do a MD of a protein-protein complex (both with their
 ligands) so I'm looking for some advise regarding the best force field for
 simulate my system. For more details, it consists on a ADP-ribosylase
 (which
 ligand is the NAD) and a small G protein (GDP binded), we want to see what
 is the role of a loop in the formation of the complex and on the
 ADP-ribosilation of the small G protein.

 Does any one have a good idea of an appropiate force field for this kind
 of
 systems ? Do you think gromos 43A1 or ffgmx could be an option?

 Thanks a lot in advance!
 Paula


 -- ! NEW email !!

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 *** NEW ADDRESS **
 Paula GONZALEZ-RUBIO
 PhD Candidate
 DSIMB INTS, INSERM UMR-S726
 6 rue Alexandre Cabanel 75015 Paris
 Tel : +33(1) 44 49 30 00 Fax : +33(1) 47 34 74 31
 4th Floor. Room 401 Bis
 Web Site: http://www.dsimb.inserm.fr/
 https://paris7.jussieu.fr/Redirect/www.dsimb.inserm.fr/
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
 http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/attachments/20080905/e69b67f9/attachment-0001.html

 --


 --
 Alan Wilter S. da Silva, D.Sc. - CCPN Research Associate
 Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge.
 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK.
 http://www.bio.cam.ac.uk/~awd28 http://www.bio.cam.ac.uk/%7Eawd28

 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
 www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php