Re: Should a scanned image under Linux and Windows look similiar?
Thanks for your responses. I am a naive novice when it comes to scanners and images, ...which was my problem. When I turned off the RGB Defaults so that they could be adjusted, the Autoadjust feature worked very well. http://www.totalnetnh.net/~lamb/scan_linux.jpg http://www.totalnetnh.net/~lamb/scan_linux2.jpg Thanks, Larry ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Should a scanned image under Linux and Windows look similiar?
I am a naive novice when it comes to scanners and images, so maybe this is a ridiculous expectation, but I would think that a scanned image under Linux would look fairly close to one scanned under Windows, especially when run on the exact same hardware. Both XSane and the Windows software have default scan values that are almost identical. So why aren't the images almost identical? Here are the two images: http://www.totalnetnh.net/~lamb/scan_windows.jpg http://www.totalnetnh.net/~lamb/scan_linux.jpg The Windows scan is extremely close to the original photo. I have purposely omitted h/w and s/w specifics because I want to know if I have an unreasonable expectation. Thanks, Larry ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: Should a scanned image under Linux and Windows look similiar?
http://www.totalnetnh.net/~lamb/scan_windows.jpg http://www.totalnetnh.net/~lamb/scan_linux.jpg Well, the look the same except the linux one has NO red in it. it's like it got filtered out some how. Is it a 3 pass color scanner? ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss