Re: Missing gnote in l10n.gnome.org modules

2009-04-19 Thread Stéphane Raimbault
2009/4/18 Claude Paroz cla...@2xlibre.net:
 Le samedi 18 avril 2009 à 00:09 +0200, Christian Rose a écrit :
 On 4/17/09, Luca Ferretti elle@libero.it wrote:
  As per summary, could someone add this to list?

 Cryptic mail; took me a few seconds to figure out.

 Added now: http://l10n.gnome.org/module/gnote/

 Note that this module is a rewrite of Tomboy. Upload your ll.po from
 Tomboy on gnote vertimus, and most of the fuzzies of the merged file
 will consist in replacing Tomboy by Gnote.

 Claude

To speed up the process, you can also replace all occurrences of {0}
and {1} by %1% and %2% (naming of arguments) and [Tt]omboy by
[Gg]note.

I recommend you to keep the obsolete strings in the PO file because
the Tomboy plugins are not migrated to gnote yet (it's anticipated).

Stéphane
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Missing gnote in l10n.gnome.org modules

2009-04-19 Thread Stéphane Raimbault
2009/4/19 Stéphane Raimbault stephane.raimba...@gmail.com:
 2009/4/18 Claude Paroz cla...@2xlibre.net:
 Le samedi 18 avril 2009 à 00:09 +0200, Christian Rose a écrit :
 On 4/17/09, Luca Ferretti elle@libero.it wrote:
  As per summary, could someone add this to list?

 Cryptic mail; took me a few seconds to figure out.

 Added now: http://l10n.gnome.org/module/gnote/

 Note that this module is a rewrite of Tomboy. Upload your ll.po from
 Tomboy on gnote vertimus, and most of the fuzzies of the merged file
 will consist in replacing Tomboy by Gnote.

 Claude

 To speed up the process, you can also replace all occurrences of {0}
 and {1} by %1% and %2% (naming of arguments) and [Tt]omboy by
 [Gg]note.

 I recommend you to keep the obsolete strings in the PO file because
 the Tomboy plugins are not migrated to gnote yet (it's anticipated).

 Stéphane


I've just created the bug #579520 because gnote doesn't use
translation files for now.
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Damned-lies typo

2009-04-19 Thread Gil Forcada
I was to do it but I couldn't find it :(

Cheers,

El dv 17 de 04 de 2009 a les 17:33 +0200, en/na Claude Paroz va
escriure:
 Le vendredi 17 avril 2009 à 17:06 +0200, Gil Forcada a écrit :
  Hi,
  
  I found a typo:
  msgid This is a clone of the official version from the freedektop
  repository
  
  It should be freedesktop :)
 
 Gil, feel free to correct it yourself in the admin interface.
 
 Claude
 
-- 
gil forcada

[ca] guifi.net - una xarxa lliure que no para de créixer
[en] guifi.net - a non-stopping free network
bloc: http://gil.badall.net

___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Damned-lies typo

2009-04-19 Thread Claude Paroz
Le dimanche 19 avril 2009 à 20:06 +0200, Gil Forcada a écrit :
 I was to do it but I couldn't find it :(

In the comment field of the system-tools-backends module.

And please, avoid top-posting :-)

Claude

 El dv 17 de 04 de 2009 a les 17:33 +0200, en/na Claude Paroz va
 escriure:
  Le vendredi 17 avril 2009 à 17:06 +0200, Gil Forcada a écrit :
   Hi,
   
   I found a typo:
   msgid This is a clone of the official version from the freedektop
   repository
   
   It should be freedesktop :)
  
  Gil, feel free to correct it yourself in the admin interface.
  
  Claude
  

___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: network-manager-* modules and 0.7 branches

2009-04-19 Thread Claude Paroz
Le samedi 18 avril 2009 à 23:48 +0200, Luca Ferretti a écrit :
 Anybody knows if translation updates for network-manager-* modules
 should be performed only in master branch, or in
 NETWORKMANAGER_0_7 branch too? In past days I've seen some commits
 from mainteiners copying po from master to 0.7 branch, and I don't
 know if this is a task they reserve for themself.

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2009-March/msg00094.html

Claude

 PS any news about NetworkManager itself? I filed a bug with
 translation, but no reply until now :(


___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


intltool move

2009-04-19 Thread Rodney Dawes
Hey Everyone,

As some of you may have seen in my blog post[1], Danilo and I have
decided to move intltool over to Launchpad[2], as the project is not
specific to GNOME, and Launchpad gives us some features which none of
the other code hosting sites have. Particularly, there have been a fair
number of complaints about Launchpad Translations vs. upstream, and how
it is somewhat difficult to keep the two in line. One feature I have
been personally wanting to do for quite some time now, is to integrate
Launchpad Translations support into intltool, to make dealing with the
differences easier, or to make the problems go away entirely, for some.

The intltool product on bugzilla.gnome.org is now closed for new
reports, and the SVN module was moved over to svn-archive before the
gnome.org transition to git. The latest intltool code is already in a
bzr branch on Launchpad (lp:intltool) and, all new bugs should be
reported at http://bugs.launchpad.net/intltool/ from now on. There are
still a few open bugs in bugzilla, which Danilo or myself will deal
with as appropriate, by fixing, moving, or closing as wontfix.

If there were any status scripts, or tools, which were pulling intltool
from SVN, please update those to pull from the bzr branch now instead.

I hope the transition has been smooth (nobody's made loud noisy
complaints yet), and we can expand our user base outside of GNOME
through the efforts Danilo and myself are making with intltool. If
there are any problems, questions, or complaints, feel free to bug
either one of us on IRC, or via e-mail.

Thanks!

-- Rodney


___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Weird status for several modules and releases

2009-04-19 Thread Jorge González González
Hi,

since the migration to git I noticed several modules which status is
weird, for example there are two bug-buddy user-guides, both with 0
strings, like gok user manual, [1] and I also noticed few new
untranslated and fuzzy strings for old releases (both at UI and
manuals). I tried to update those but it says everything is up to date,
so I guess is a problem with DL/intltool. 

Also, at least one member of the Spanish team reported that the
migration of gnome-commander left many strings untranslated and fuzzy,
something I fixed uploading the last po he uploaded to DL, but this
issue has/will probably happen with other modules and teams.

Cheers.

[1] http://l10n.gnome.org/languages/es/gnome-2-28/doc/
-- 
Jorge González González alor...@gmail.com
Weblog: http://aloriel.no-ip.org
Fotolog: http://www.flickr.com/photos/aloriel

___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Do you like the ChangeLog

2009-04-19 Thread Kenneth Nielsen
I don't care whether we have changelogs or not, as long as it is the
same for all modules.

Regards Kenneth Nielsen

2009/4/17 Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de:
 Hi!

 We decided to remove the ChangeLog for source code changes on the anjuta
 and the gdl module and use git log instead. Do translaters prefer to
 keep po/ChangeLog or not?

 Thanks,
 Johannes

 ___
 gnome-i18n mailing list
 gnome-i18n@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Do you like the ChangeLog

2009-04-19 Thread Simos Xenitellis
ChangeLogs cause usability issues.

po/ChangeLog is a shared file between translators, so you get situations
that another translator just added to this file before you had the
change to commit.
This comes up as an error, and you have to spent a bit more time to fix.

In addition, in terms of usability, you try to limit the number of
steps to the those
that are really essential. In the case of ChangeLogs, you merely
duplicate the commit message.

As it was mentioned earlier, ChangeLogs are now out since the move to Git, so
the benefit of this discussion is to reiterate this message.

If a project tries to require ChangeLog entries (and manage to get it
through), will probably
end up with incomplete ChangeLogs.

Simos

On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Kenneth Nielsen k.nielse...@gmail.com wrote:
 I don't care whether we have changelogs or not, as long as it is the
 same for all modules.

 Regards Kenneth Nielsen

 2009/4/17 Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de:
 Hi!

 We decided to remove the ChangeLog for source code changes on the anjuta
 and the gdl module and use git log instead. Do translaters prefer to
 keep po/ChangeLog or not?

 Thanks,
 Johannes

 ___
 gnome-i18n mailing list
 gnome-i18n@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


 ___
 gnome-i18n mailing list
 gnome-i18n@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n