[DL] String additions to 'gnome-mines.master'

2018-10-04 Thread GNOME Status Pages
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
https://l10n.gnome.org.

There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-mines.master':

+ "_About Mines"

Note that this doesn't directly indicate a string freeze break, but it
might be worth investigating.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-mines/log/?h=master
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


[gnome-mines] Created branch gnome-3-30

2018-10-04 Thread Robert Roth
The branch 'gnome-3-30' was created pointing to:

 c120c64... Prepared release 3.30.1.1

___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: string freeze break for Builder 3.30

2018-10-04 Thread Christian Hergert
On 10/04/2018 02:37 AM, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> Do you have a schedule for the next release that will include the fix?

3.30.2 isn't for a few weeks, so I'll probably just wait until then
since we can ship a Flatpak with the fix immediately. As branch commits
come in, I generally spin up new flathub builds.

-- Christian
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: string freeze break for Builder 3.30

2018-10-04 Thread Alexandre Franke
Hi Christian,

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 9:37 PM Christian Hergert  wrote:
> On the gnome-builder-3-30 branch, I've included a fix for a scenario
> where we cause some bad things to happen in Gtk. To fix this properly, I
> had to introduce a couple of new strings.
>
> A new page is displayed while a previous editor session is restored. The
> new strings are:
>
>   Restoring previous session
>   Your previous session will be ready momentarily.
>
> Thanks for you attention and translations,

We know you have a history of not following the freeze and we
appreciate you telling us about it this time. That is not technically
how it’s supposed to work, as you should get approval from two
coordinators before you actually push the changes, but that hasn’t
stopped you so far. 

The fix is important, it’s only a couple of strings and you would most
probably have gotten approval anyway. For the sake
of validating the process and to encourage you to follow it in the
future, here’s approval 1/2.

Do you have a schedule for the next release that will include the fix?
It would help us a lot to know in what timeframe the translations need
to be done to ensure they are included as well.

Cheers,

--
Alexandre Franke
GNOME Hacker
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n