gnome-calendar switched from 'master' to 'main'
Just a quick heads up: gnome-calendar has switched the development branch name from 'master' to 'main'. The master branch has been locked, and will be deleted with the release of 43.alpha. With respect, Georges ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
[gnome-calendar] Created branch gnome-42
The branch 'gnome-42' was created. Summary of new commits: 45da797... Post-release version bump ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
[gnome-software] Created branch gnome-42
The branch 'gnome-42' was created pointing to: a593da6... Merge branch '1712-clicking-fedora-flathub-selection-does-n ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
gnome-control-center switched from 'master' to 'main'
Just a quick heads up: gnome-control-center has switched the development branch name from 'master' to 'main'. The master branch has been deleted. With respect, Georges ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
[DL]String additions to 'gnome-control-center.master'
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: https://l10n.gnome.org. There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-control-center.master': + "Multitasking;Multitask;Productivity;Customize;Desktop;Hot Corner;Workspaces;" Note that this doesn't directly indicate a string freeze break, but it might be worth investigating. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/commits/master ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: gnome-shell.main.pot is incorrect
Hi all, First, I have good news, and to prevent duplicating content, I received an answer from Andra Veri here: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/816 There will be a migration of the infrastructure in about two weeks that will make it easier to maintain the infrastructure, with more control from our side on the images we will deploy and will make it easier to deploy on two environments: testing and production. I deployed the new image based on Fedora 34 with an updated gettext here: https://l10n-testing.openshift.gnome.org Can you please tell me if everything is okay and then, we’ll probably push the image to production? Is this idea okay for you Claude? Regards, -- Guillaume Bernard Le lundi 25 avril 2022 à 18:31 +0200, Guillaume Bernard a écrit : > Hi, > > I updated the Dockerfile on oscp-testing but it seems we cannot replace the > FROM > instruction. Below is a extract of the first lines of the Docker build log. > > Replaced Dockerfile FROM image fedora:34 > Step 1/17 : FROM > quay.io/centos/centos@sha256:fc196b0e96ca8d0a7a06d768f1f6288478e5ae064c26c3626 > b2 > e6e9b6e6ebcf4 > > I suppose there’s something in OpenShift that forces some images that can be > used as base image, I don’t find anything in the options I can change. I > suppose > that I can only use the images located in Builds → Images. > > So, without help from Infrastructure team, I think I’m stuck there. I opened > an > issue on infrastructure: > https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/816 > ___ > gnome-i18n mailing list > gnome-i18n@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
[gnome-control-center] Created branch gnome-42
The branch 'gnome-42' was created. Summary of new commits: a95f8ec... Post-release version bump ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: gnome-shell.main.pot is incorrect
Hi all, First, I have good news, and to prevent duplicating content, I received an answer from Andra Veri here: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/816 There will be a migration of the infrastructure in about two weeks that will make it easier to maintain the infrastructure, with more control from our side on the images we will deploy and will make it easier to deploy on two environments: testing and production. I deployed the new image based on Fedora 34 with an updated gettext here: https://l10n-testing.openshift.gnome.org Can you please tell me if everything is okay and then, we’ll probably push the image to production? Is this idea okay for you Claude? Regards, -- Guillaume Bernard signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
