Re: String freeze break for gnome-software for 42.1

2022-04-27 Thread Claude Paroz

Le 25.04.22 à 18:36, Alexandre Franke a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:59 PM Philip Withnall > wrote:


Hi all,


Hey!

I had a draft ready on the same day you sent your request, but needed 
clarification. Pinged you in the Hackers room but didn’t get any 
response and then forgot about it.


Can we have a string freeze break for gnome-software to add more
information about file system permissions required by flatpak apps?
[…]

I realise you’re probably not going to be happy about this!


I’m actually happy that you approached this the right way and took us 
into account. Bonus points for the clear presentation and listing the 
strings so we don’t have to hunt them down. The timing is also not the 
worst, so not much to be unhappy about!


  1. Add these new translatable strings now, in time for the 42.1
release (this week). This means the bug will be fixed, but the strings
will likely not be translated in many languages.


That would have been 10 days for three strings that are not too complex, 
at a time when there isn’t much other activity in other modules. Looked 
relatively reasonable. I would not have beent against landing this right 
after you requested it. You said “this week” though, which threw me off. 
Considering you just bumped, I supposed you indeed meant 10 days from 
that date. Anyway, it’s too late for this.


  2. Add these new translatable strings after the 42.1 release, to give
more time for them to be translated ready for 42.2.


This one definitely looks great now.

  3. Don’t add these new strings on 42.x at all, and use the
inappropriate-but-already-existing “can read/write all your data”
string instead.


No, I don’t think this option is necessary at all. Worst case, we can go 
with option 2.


So here is approval 1/2 from i18n for option 2.


Sorry for the lag, approval 2/2,

Claude
--
www.2xlibre.net
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: gnome-shell.main.pot is incorrect

2022-04-27 Thread Claude Paroz

Le 26.04.22 à 18:47, Guillaume Bernard a écrit :

Hi all,

First, I have good news, and to prevent duplicating content, I received an
answer from Andra Veri here:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/816

There will be a migration of the infrastructure in about two weeks that will
make it easier to maintain the infrastructure, with more control from our side
on the images we will deploy and will make it easier to deploy on two
environments: testing and production.

I deployed the new image based on Fedora 34 with an updated gettext here:
https://l10n-testing.openshift.gnome.org

Can you please tell me if everything is okay and then, we’ll probably push the
image to production? Is this idea okay for you Claude?


Yes, looks like this instance has the 0.21 gettext version.
I'd be relieved if you could take the lead for the server side of 
things. Thanks!


Claude
--
www.2xlibre.net
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: gnome-control-center switched from 'master' to 'main'

2022-04-27 Thread Claude Paroz

Le 26.04.22 à 20:25, Georges Basile Stavracas Neto via gnome-i18n a écrit :

Just a quick heads up: gnome-control-center has switched the development
branch name from 'master' to 'main'. The master branch has been deleted.

With respect,
Georges


Thanks Georges, l10n.gnome.org was updated (for gnome-calendar, too).

Claude
--
www.2xlibre.net
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n