[DL]String additions to 'gnome-shell.main'
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: https://l10n.gnome.org. There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-shell.main': + "%A %B %-d" + "Click or press a key to unlock" + "Screen Lock disabled" + "Screen Locking requires the GNOME display manager." + "Swipe up to unlock" Note that this doesn't directly indicate a string freeze break, but it might be worth investigating. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/commits/main ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: gnome-shell.main.pot is incorrect
Hi all, Production instance of DL is now running on Fedora 34. Please send feebacks and open issues if no notice any kind of regression please. https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/damned-lies/-/issues Thanks! -- Guillaume Bernard Le jeudi 28 avril 2022 à 08:42 +0200, Guillaume Bernard a écrit : > And so, relieved you will be. I’m okay with this. I will undertake the > necessary > changes to prepare the shift from OpenShift 3 to 4 with DL and maintain the > stagging and production servers deployments. > > ___ > gnome-i18n mailing list > gnome-i18n@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break for gnome-software for 42.1
On Wed, 2022-04-27 at 22:46 +0200, Claude Paroz wrote: > Le 25.04.22 à 18:36, Alexandre Franke a écrit : > > *snip* > > No, I don’t think this option is necessary at all. Worst case, we > > can go > > with option 2. > > > > So here is approval 1/2 from i18n for option 2. > > Sorry for the lag, approval 2/2, Thanks! I’ve merged the changes for 42.2. Philip ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
[DL]String additions to 'gnome-software.gnome-42'
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: https://l10n.gnome.org. There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-software.gnome-42': + "Access arbitrary files" + "Can access arbitrary files on the file system" + "Can access arbitrary files" Note that this doesn't directly indicate a string freeze break, but it might be worth investigating. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/commits/gnome-42 ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: gnome-shell.main.pot is incorrect
And so, relieved you will be. I’m okay with this. I will undertake the necessary changes to prepare the shift from OpenShift 3 to 4 with DL and maintain the stagging and production servers deployments. -- Guillaume Bernard Le mercredi 27 avril 2022 à 09:21 +0200, Claude Paroz a écrit : > Le 26.04.22 à 18:47, Guillaume Bernard a écrit : > > Hi all, > > > > First, I have good news, and to prevent duplicating content, I received an > > answer from Andra Veri here: > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/816 > > > > There will be a migration of the infrastructure in about two weeks that will > > make it easier to maintain the infrastructure, with more control from our > > side > > on the images we will deploy and will make it easier to deploy on two > > environments: testing and production. > > > > I deployed the new image based on Fedora 34 with an updated gettext here: > > https://l10n-testing.openshift.gnome.org > > > > Can you please tell me if everything is okay and then, we’ll probably push > > the > > image to production? Is this idea okay for you Claude? > > Yes, looks like this instance has the 0.21 gettext version. > I'd be relieved if you could take the lead for the server side of > things. Thanks! > > Claude signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
