Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2022-09-14 Thread Daniel Mustieles García via gnome-i18n
2/2 from i18n

Thanks

El mié., 14 sept. 2022 19:26, Piotr Drąg via gnome-i18n <
gnome-i18n@gnome.org> escribió:

> śr., 14 wrz 2022 o 14:53 Florian Müllner via gnome-i18n
>  napisał(a):
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > I'd like to request a freeze break for
> >
> > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2485
> >
> > It adds context to an existing translation as requested by Alexandre.
> >
> > Besides approval, I'd also appreciate feedback that the added context
> > is actually helpful :-)
> >
>
> It is helpful, and here is 1/2 from i18n. :)
>
>
> --
> Piotr Drąg
> ___
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
>
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2022-09-14 Thread Piotr Drąg via gnome-i18n
śr., 14 wrz 2022 o 14:53 Florian Müllner via gnome-i18n
 napisał(a):
>
> Hey,
>
> I'd like to request a freeze break for
>
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2485
>
> It adds context to an existing translation as requested by Alexandre.
>
> Besides approval, I'd also appreciate feedback that the added context
> is actually helpful :-)
>

It is helpful, and here is 1/2 from i18n. :)


-- 
Piotr Drąg
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2022-09-14 Thread Jordi Mas
Hello,

I want to bring this localisation issue to our attention:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/5820

When this is fixed, new strings also will be available for translation, and
these strings are highly visible.

Regards

Jordi,

Missatge de Florian Müllner via gnome-i18n  del dia
dc., 14 de set. 2022 a les 14:53:

> Hey,
>
> I'd like to request a freeze break for
>
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2485
>
> It adds context to an existing translation as requested by Alexandre.
>
> Besides approval, I'd also appreciate feedback that the added context
> is actually helpful :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Florian
>
>
> ___
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
>
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome shell

2022-09-05 Thread Daniel Mustieles García via gnome-i18n
2/2 from i18n.

Thanks!

El lun, 5 sept 2022 a las 10:22, Alexandre Franke ()
escribió:

> On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 7:09 PM Florian Müllner 
> wrote:
> > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2467
> >
> > It adds an ellipsis to a menu item that should have it according to the
> HIG.
>
> Trivial enough. 1/2 from i18n.
>
> --
> Alexandre Franke
> GNOME Hacker
> ___
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
>
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome shell

2022-09-05 Thread Alexandre Franke
On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 7:09 PM Florian Müllner  wrote:
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2467
>
> It adds an ellipsis to a menu item that should have it according to the HIG.

Trivial enough. 1/2 from i18n.

-- 
Alexandre Franke
GNOME Hacker
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2020-03-19 Thread Piotr Drąg via gnome-i18n
2/2 from us, thanks!

czw., 19 mar 2020 o 13:16 Daniel Mustieles García via gnome-i18n
 napisał(a):
>
> +1 from i18n
>
> Thanks!
>
> El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 12:59, Florian Müllner () 
> escribió:
>>
>> Hey everyone!
>>
>> As you may know, we now have an official "Extensions" app for managing
>> gnome-shell extensions. Unfortunately we missed adding appdata for it,
>> so it doesn't show up in GNOME Software at all.
>>
>> I would like to address this for 3.36.1 as part of
>> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1081, but
>> it adds a new translatable string for the description:
>>
>> "GNOME Extensions handles updating extensions, configuring extension
>> preferences and removing or disabling unwanted extensions."
>>
>> That string has been heavily inspired by the release notes, so
>> hopefully it doesn't impose too much work on translators.
>>
>> Stay safe,
>> Florian
>>
>>
>> ___
>> gnome-i18n mailing list
>> gnome-i18n@gnome.org
>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
>
> ___
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n



-- 
Piotr Drąg
https://piotrdrag.fedorapeople.org
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2020-03-19 Thread Daniel Mustieles García via gnome-i18n
+1 from i18n

Thanks!

El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 12:59, Florian Müllner ()
escribió:

> Hey everyone!
>
> As you may know, we now have an official "Extensions" app for managing
> gnome-shell extensions. Unfortunately we missed adding appdata for it,
> so it doesn't show up in GNOME Software at all.
>
> I would like to address this for 3.36.1 as part of
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1081, but
> it adds a new translatable string for the description:
>
> "GNOME Extensions handles updating extensions, configuring extension
> preferences and removing or disabling unwanted extensions."
>
> That string has been heavily inspired by the release notes, so
> hopefully it doesn't impose too much work on translators.
>
> Stay safe,
> Florian
>
>
> ___
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
>
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2017-08-22 Thread Michael Catanzaro
This looks pretty self-contained, and I presume you originally sent the 
request a week and a half ago when we were earlier in the cycle. So +1 
of 2 from me.


Michael

___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2017-08-21 Thread Rui Tiago Cação Matos
[ Re-sending since it seems this didn't make it to the release team list ]

> Hi,
>
> I'd like to request a freeze break request for this gnome-shell UI addition:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783550 - it's basically an
> Alt+Tab style switcher to cycle through multi-monitor configurations
> on laptops.
>
> Thanks,
> Rui
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2017-08-18 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Rui Tiago Cação Matos <
tiagoma...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'd like to request a freeze break request for this gnome-shell UI
> addition:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783550 - it's basically an
> Alt+Tab style switcher to cycle through multi-monitor configurations
> on laptops.
>
>
I'm in favor, +1 from the release team
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

2017-03-20 Thread Florian Müllner
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:29 PM Piotr Drąg  wrote:

> By the way, I really like this feature. :)
>

Heh, thanks (and for the two +1s) - I'll push the patches after releasing
3.24.0 later today ...

Florian
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

2017-03-20 Thread Piotr Drąg
2017-03-20 17:17 GMT+01:00 Alexandre Franke :
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Florian Müllner  wrote:
>> Hey,
>
> Hi,
>
>> I would like to request a post-3.24.0 freeze break for
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780252, which introduces one new
>> string :
>>
>> If gnome-weather is installed but hasn't been used yet, so there's no
>> location to show a weather forecast for, we should display "Select a
>> location…" in the calendar drop-down.
>
> Sounds reasonable. +1/2.
>

2/2 from i18n.

By the way, I really like this feature. :)

Best regards,

-- 
Piotr Drąg
https://piotrdrag.fedorapeople.org
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

2017-03-20 Thread Alexandre Franke
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Florian Müllner  wrote:
> Hey,

Hi,

> I would like to request a post-3.24.0 freeze break for
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780252, which introduces one new
> string :
>
> If gnome-weather is installed but hasn't been used yet, so there's no
> location to show a weather forecast for, we should display "Select a
> location…" in the calendar drop-down.

Sounds reasonable. +1/2.

-- 
Alexandre Franke
GNOME Hacker & Foundation Director
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2017-03-01 Thread Javier Jardón
On 28 Feb 2017 19:02, "Florian Müllner"  wrote:

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:52 PM Matthias Clasen 
wrote:

> we don't have much else to show in that area, this cycle...maybe thats me
> wearing a marketing rather than rel-eng hat
>

I was afraid of mentioning the 'm' word, but that was indeed a main
motivator behind the push for finishing up those branches

___
gnome-doc-list mailing list
gnome-doc-l...@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list


2/2 for release team
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2017-02-28 Thread Florian Müllner
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:52 PM Matthias Clasen 
wrote:

> we don't have much else to show in that area, this cycle...maybe thats me
> wearing a marketing rather than rel-eng hat
>

I was afraid of mentioning the 'm' word, but that was indeed a main
motivator behind the push for finishing up those branches
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2017-02-28 Thread Matthias Clasen
fwiw, I'm +1 _because_ this is a visible improvement and new feature in
gnome shell - we don't have much else to show in that area, this
cycle...maybe thats me wearing a marketing rather than rel-eng hat
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2017-02-28 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 13:06 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Florian Müllner  g> wrote:
> > 
> > In my opinion, both items make for some nice polish improvements in
> > that area with low risk (the weather section is very isolated, and
> > the
> > visual refresh is mostly a style update), so they would make for a
> > good (while late) 3.24 addition.
> 
> I concur. +1 for the release team from me. 

I'm torn. I like the changes too: it looks like a good improvement. But
it's a pretty major UI change in a significant component of the desktop
shell, and going in very late in the release cycle. I'd prefer to save
it for 3.26 to give users more time to comment on the change. So I
won't give +1 myself, but I also won't block it if someone else wants
to give the second +1.

Michael
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2017-02-28 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Florian Müllner 
wrote:

>
>
> In my opinion, both items make for some nice polish improvements in
> that area with low risk (the weather section is very isolated, and the
> visual refresh is mostly a style update), so they would make for a
> good (while late) 3.24 addition.
>

I concur. +1 for the release team from me.
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

2013-10-10 Thread Piotr Drąg
2013/10/10 Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org:
 Oh my, it's this time of the year again ...

 When the new status menu work landed, the Notification switch that
 used to be in the user menu was removed, although according to the
 mockups[0] it should be included in the message tray menu - I'd like
 to land this[1] now for 3.10.1.

 At this point in time, this constitutes both a UI and string freeze
 break, though it restores functionality that has been around for quite
 some time (3.4?) and was only removed late this cycle, so I suspect
 that there are translations/documentation that can be resurrected.


It's a bit too late, but since we already accepted bigger changes, I
give 1/2 from i18n. Please note that this the last time I'm going to
approve a break in this cycle.

-- 
Piotr Drąg
http://raven.fedorapeople.org/
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

2013-10-10 Thread Javier Jardón
On 10 October 2013 15:38, Piotr Drąg piotrd...@gmail.com wrote:
 2013/10/10 Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org:
 Oh my, it's this time of the year again ...

 When the new status menu work landed, the Notification switch that
 used to be in the user menu was removed, although according to the
 mockups[0] it should be included in the message tray menu - I'd like
 to land this[1] now for 3.10.1.

 At this point in time, this constitutes both a UI and string freeze
 break, though it restores functionality that has been around for quite
 some time (3.4?) and was only removed late this cycle, so I suspect
 that there are translations/documentation that can be resurrected.


 It's a bit too late, but since we already accepted bigger changes, I
 give 1/2 from i18n. Please note that this the last time I'm going to
 approve a break in this cycle.

+1 for release team


-- 
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

2013-10-10 Thread Petr Kovar
Piotr Drąg piotrd...@gmail.com, Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:38:42 +0200:

 2013/10/10 Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org:
  Oh my, it's this time of the year again ...
 
  When the new status menu work landed, the Notification switch that
  used to be in the user menu was removed, although according to the
  mockups[0] it should be included in the message tray menu - I'd like
  to land this[1] now for 3.10.1.
 
  At this point in time, this constitutes both a UI and string freeze
  break, though it restores functionality that has been around for quite
  some time (3.4?) and was only removed late this cycle, so I suspect
  that there are translations/documentation that can be resurrected.
 
 
 It's a bit too late, but since we already accepted bigger changes, I
 give 1/2 from i18n. Please note that this the last time I'm going to
 approve a break in this cycle.

2/2 for i18n. 

Florian, please try to push the change ASAP so that translators have
enough time to get their translations updated for the point release.

Thank you,
Petr Kovar
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

2013-10-10 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Javier Jardón jjar...@gnome.org wrote:



 +1 for release team


Second approval for the release team
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2013-03-01 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Cosimo Cecchi cosimo.cec...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi all,

 This cycle we redesigned the Shell overview, hiding the message tray by
 default from the view.
 The original design also added a new messages indicator to make the tray
 more discoverable, but it didn't make it in time for 3.7.90. Bug 687797 [1]
 contains a patchset that adds the indicator.
 Patches have been reviewed already and the request comes from the design
 team. OK to commit this?

 [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687787

Could you attach a screenshot to the bug ? That makes it much easier
to judge such requests...
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2013-03-01 Thread Cosimo Cecchi
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Matthias Clasen

Could you attach a screenshot to the bug ? That makes it much easier
 to judge such requests...


Yeah I forgot about it...attached a screenshot now.

Thanks,
Cosimo
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2013-03-01 Thread Frederic Peters
Cosimo Cecchi wrote:

 This cycle we redesigned the Shell overview, hiding the message tray by
 default from the view.
 The original design also added a new messages indicator to make the tray
 more discoverable, but it didn't make it in time for 3.7.90. Bug 687797 [1]
 contains a patchset that adds the indicator.
 Patches have been reviewed already and the request comes from the design
 team. OK to commit this?

1 of 2 for the release team.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687787#c26 says:

  As for the style, I think it's best to leave that for Jakub or Allan
  to tweak - right now it's using a simple light gray to transparent
  gradient.

It would be really great if those potential changes could also happen
soon.


Fred
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2013-03-01 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Cosimo Cecchi cosimo.cec...@gmail.com wrote:

.
 Patches have been reviewed already and the request comes from the design
 team. OK to commit this?

Thanks for the screenshot, looks good to me; I'll give an approval for
the release team
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2011-10-17 Thread Matthias Clasen
In case it is still needed, I'm fine with these changes, second
release team approval.
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2011-10-14 Thread Gabor Kelemen

2011-10-13 21:20 keltezéssel, Johannes Schmid írta:

Hi!

I think we discussed that already for the original break request, so 1
of 2 from i18n.


Important enough for me, i18n approval 2/2.

Regards
Gabor Kelemen
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2011-10-13 Thread Javier Jardón
On 13 October 2011 15:03, Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org wrote:
 So I'd like to request a UI freeze break for the addition of context
 menus (screenshot attached) and a string freeze break for the four
 strings introduced in the patch (Copy, Paste, Show Text, Hide
 Text).

+1 from me, thanks for complete this for 3.2.1

-- 
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2011-10-13 Thread Shaun McCance
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 16:03 +0200, Florian Müllner wrote:
 On mar, 2011-09-20 at 16:30 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
  On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org 
  wrote:
   On lun, 2011-09-19 at 15:39 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
  
   It's a -1 from me. A small visual incoherence is better then feature
   regression. Better wait 3.4 for a proper solution.
  
   I'm less worried about visual incoherence here, but rather about wrong
   usage of the switch widget[0], which might get picked up by application
   authors.
  
  And I assume we don't have checkboxes for shell dialogs...:-(
  
  I am not too worried about the 'feature' that we are temporarily losing 
  here.
  I assume we can get context menus (and thus the ability to show
  passwords) in 3.2.1, Florian ?
 
 I'm not sure everyone is aware, but Owen was uncomfortable with the
 feature regression, so I backed out for 3.2 despite release team
 approval. I'm bringing it up again for 3.2.1, as the context menu patch
 is now ready to land[0] (but obviously requires another freeze break).
 
 So I'd like to request a UI freeze break for the addition of context
 menus (screenshot attached) and a string freeze break for the four
 strings introduced in the patch (Copy, Paste, Show Text, Hide
 Text).

It doesn't appear we mention the switch in the help, so this won't
invalidate anything. I would like to add a note about right-clicking
to see the password to step 2 in net-wireless-connect.page. I can't
do that now, because gnome-user-docs is frozen for 3.2.1.

I'll give a docs team approval, with the understanding that we won't
add the note in the help until 3.2.2.

--
Shaun


___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2011-10-13 Thread Shaun McCance
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 16:03 +0200, Florian Müllner wrote:
 On mar, 2011-09-20 at 16:30 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
  On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org 
  wrote:
   On lun, 2011-09-19 at 15:39 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
  
   It's a -1 from me. A small visual incoherence is better then feature
   regression. Better wait 3.4 for a proper solution.
  
   I'm less worried about visual incoherence here, but rather about wrong
   usage of the switch widget[0], which might get picked up by application
   authors.
  
  And I assume we don't have checkboxes for shell dialogs...:-(
  
  I am not too worried about the 'feature' that we are temporarily losing 
  here.
  I assume we can get context menus (and thus the ability to show
  passwords) in 3.2.1, Florian ?
 
 I'm not sure everyone is aware, but Owen was uncomfortable with the
 feature regression, so I backed out for 3.2 despite release team
 approval. I'm bringing it up again for 3.2.1, as the context menu patch
 is now ready to land[0] (but obviously requires another freeze break).
 
 So I'd like to request a UI freeze break for the addition of context
 menus (screenshot attached) and a string freeze break for the four
 strings introduced in the patch (Copy, Paste, Show Text, Hide
 Text).

Just to be sure: We're only talking about gnome-shell's password prompt
here, and not the password entry on the Wireless Security tab when you
edit a connection, right?

--
Shaun


___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2011-10-13 Thread Florian Müllner
On jue, 2011-10-13 at 13:09 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
 Just to be sure: We're only talking about gnome-shell's password prompt
 here, and not the password entry on the Wireless Security tab when you
 edit a connection, right?

Right.

___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

2011-10-13 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi!

I think we discussed that already for the original break request, so 1
of 2 from i18n.

Regards,
Johannes

___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n