Regarding gtk+, gtk+-ui and gtk+-properties
Hi all, Given that we currently lack the time (speaking for myself at least) wouldn't make sense to just revert the splitting of gtk+ into to modules and put back the gtk+ one? Comments welcome :) Happy translating, Gil -- Gil Forcada [ca] guifi.net - una xarxa lliure que no para de créixer [en] guifi.net - a non-stopping free network bloc: http://gil.badall.net planet: http://planet.guifi.net ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Regarding gtk+, gtk+-ui and gtk+-properties
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Gil Forcada gforc...@gnome.org wrote: Hi all, Given that we currently lack the time (speaking for myself at least) wouldn't make sense to just revert the splitting of gtk+ into to modules and put back the gtk+ one? Comments welcome :) I approve this suggestion. -- Alexandre Franke ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Regarding gtk+, gtk+-ui and gtk+-properties
Hi, I've read the following bug tickets: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680843 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686027 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695009 On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Alexandre Franke alexandre.fra...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Gil Forcada gforc...@gnome.org wrote: Hi all, Given that we currently lack the time (speaking for myself at least) wouldn't make sense to just revert the splitting of gtk+ into to modules and put back the gtk+ one? Comments welcome :) I approve this suggestion. For now, it would be better to get back to the old module page. The current incomplete po files can cause problems. Thanks. -- Jiro Matsuzawa E-mail: jmatsuz...@gnome.org matsuzawa...@gmail.com GPG Key ID: 0xECC442E9 GPG Key Fingerprint: E086 C14A 869F BB0E 3541 19EB E370 B08B ECC4 42E9 ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
