RE: Understanding the branches

2013-09-19 Thread Victor Ibragimov
Dear Rafael,

 

Thank you for detailed message! I just want to make sure all Tajik translation 
are committed correctly, so we do not miss a word for the next release.

I will continue to commit translations to master only and to a 'gnome-3-10' 
git branch if information about it available on the Damned Lies.

 

Kind regards,

Victor

 

 

From: Rafael Ferreira [mailto:rafael.f...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 18 сентябр 2013 с. 19:31
To: Victor Ibragimov
Cc: Piotr Drąg; gnome-i18n
Subject: Re: Understanding the branches

 

I believe it is interesting to commit to 'gnome-3-10' git branch (always with 
cherry-pick to 'master') in the situations of GNOME 3.10 is not release yet or 
minor releases (e.g. 3.10.1) are to be released.

 

As you mentioned, some modules doesn't have a 'gnome-3-10' git branch. I'm not 
sure why, but, for you as a translator/coordinator, it means that you have to 
commit to 'master' only.

 

There are other exceptions that have different names of git branch. Gtk+, for 
example, have git branch names like 'gtk-3-8'.

 

Releated to your question, yes. You should translate branches available in 
Damned Lies. On the other side, If Damned Lies don't show a 'gnome-3-10' git 
branch, this git branch is probably not ready for translators or doesn't even 
exist.

 

 

 

2013/9/18 Victor Ibragimov victor.ibragi...@gmail.com

gnome-online-accounts, gnome-photos and gnome-terminal committed to both 
master and gnome-3-10. And it seems to be that gnome-3-10 is not yet 
available for all modules.

When you suggest to commit to both master and gnome-3-10 do you mean that 
is possible to commit to both branches just when gnome-3-10 is shown under 
the Branch on Damned Lies site as a reference?

 

Victor

 

From: Rafael Ferreira [mailto:rafael.f...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 17 сентябр 2013 с. 20:43
To: Victor Ibragimov
Cc: Piotr Drąg; gnome-i18n
Subject: Re: Understanding the branches

 

 

 

2013/9/17 Victor Ibragimov victor.ibragi...@gmail.com

Regarding the branches or to make sure I correctly understand the branches:

What is the difference between the master and development (for example, GNOME 
3.10 (development)), and old stable?
If translations or updates are committed to gnome-3-6 now - is this a waste of 
time, as gnome-3-6 will not be released anymore?
What if translations and updates are committed only to gnome-3-10? or/and only 
to master? or why to commit to both gnome-3-10 and master?

Thank you,
Victor

 

A 'gnome-3-10'  git branch is planned to be released together with GNOME 3.10. 
The 'master' is the latest git branch ever of a module - every future new 
branch will be forked from 'master' (e.g. 'gnome-3-12' would be a fork of 
'master').

 

Commiting translations to gnome-3-6 is waste of time at the moment, because a 
commit would only be of any of use if the software will have a new release. So, 
for example, Gtk+ 3.6.0 won't be releasing another minor version adn therefore 
it wouldn't make sense wasting translation effort on it. Obsolete, in resume.

 

Commit translations only to 'master' and not to 'gnome-3-10' will result in 
your translation NOT being available in GNOME 3.10 -- which I think is not a 
good idea. Commit translations only to 'gnome-3-10' and not to 'master' will 
result in the translations being available in GNOME 3.10, however your lastest 
ever translation state will be out-of-dated -- your effort in GNOME 3.10 
wouldn't be available in GNOME 3.12, for example.

 

So, best you can do right now (close to a new GNOME release) is to commit to 
'gnome-3-10' git branch and, then, run a git cherry-pick (more information in 
the URL mentioned by Piotr).

 

Cheers,

Rafael Ferreira

 

___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


RE: Understanding the branches

2013-09-18 Thread Victor Ibragimov
gnome-online-accounts, gnome-photos and gnome-terminal committed to both 
master and gnome-3-10. And it seems to be that gnome-3-10 is not yet 
available for all modules.

When you suggest to commit to both master and gnome-3-10 do you mean that 
is possible to commit to both branches just when gnome-3-10 is shown under 
the Branch on Damned Lies site as a reference?

 

Victor

 

From: Rafael Ferreira [mailto:rafael.f...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 17 сентябр 2013 с. 20:43
To: Victor Ibragimov
Cc: Piotr Drąg; gnome-i18n
Subject: Re: Understanding the branches

 

 

 

2013/9/17 Victor Ibragimov victor.ibragi...@gmail.com

Regarding the branches or to make sure I correctly understand the branches:

What is the difference between the master and development (for example, GNOME 
3.10 (development)), and old stable?
If translations or updates are committed to gnome-3-6 now - is this a waste of 
time, as gnome-3-6 will not be released anymore?
What if translations and updates are committed only to gnome-3-10? or/and only 
to master? or why to commit to both gnome-3-10 and master?

Thank you,
Victor

 

A 'gnome-3-10'  git branch is planned to be released together with GNOME 3.10. 
The 'master' is the latest git branch ever of a module - every future new 
branch will be forked from 'master' (e.g. 'gnome-3-12' would be a fork of 
'master').

 

Commiting translations to gnome-3-6 is waste of time at the moment, because a 
commit would only be of any of use if the software will have a new release. So, 
for example, Gtk+ 3.6.0 won't be releasing another minor version adn therefore 
it wouldn't make sense wasting translation effort on it. Obsolete, in resume.

 

Commit translations only to 'master' and not to 'gnome-3-10' will result in 
your translation NOT being available in GNOME 3.10 -- which I think is not a 
good idea. Commit translations only to 'gnome-3-10' and not to 'master' will 
result in the translations being available in GNOME 3.10, however your lastest 
ever translation state will be out-of-dated -- your effort in GNOME 3.10 
wouldn't be available in GNOME 3.12, for example.

 

So, best you can do right now (close to a new GNOME release) is to commit to 
'gnome-3-10' git branch and, then, run a git cherry-pick (more information in 
the URL mentioned by Piotr).

 

Cheers,

Rafael Ferreira

___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Understanding the branches

2013-09-18 Thread Rafael Ferreira
I believe it is interesting to commit to 'gnome-3-10' git branch (always
with cherry-pick to 'master') in the situations of GNOME 3.10 is not
release yet or minor releases (e.g. 3.10.1) are to be released.

As you mentioned, some modules doesn't have a 'gnome-3-10' git branch. I'm
not sure why, but, for you as a translator/coordinator, it means that you
have to commit to 'master' only.

There are other exceptions that have different names of git branch. Gtk+,
for example, have git branch names like 'gtk-3-8'.

Releated to your question, yes. You should translate branches available in
Damned Lies. On the other side, If Damned Lies don't show a 'gnome-3-10'
git branch, this git branch is probably not ready for translators or
doesn't even exist.




2013/9/18 Victor Ibragimov victor.ibragi...@gmail.com

 gnome-online-accounts, gnome-photos and gnome-terminal committed to
 both master and gnome-3-10. And it seems to be that gnome-3-10 is not yet
 available for all modules.

 When you suggest to commit to both master and gnome-3-10 do you mean
 that is possible to commit to both branches just when gnome-3-10 is shown
 under the Branch on Damned Lies site as a reference?

 ** **

 Victor

 ** **

 *From:* Rafael Ferreira [mailto:rafael.f...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* 17 сентябр 2013 с. 20:43
 *To:* Victor Ibragimov
 *Cc:* Piotr Drąg; gnome-i18n
 *Subject:* Re: Understanding the branches

 ** **

 ** **

 ** **

 2013/9/17 Victor Ibragimov victor.ibragi...@gmail.com

 Regarding the branches or to make sure I correctly understand the branches:

 What is the difference between the master and development (for example,
 GNOME 3.10 (development)), and old stable?
 If translations or updates are committed to gnome-3-6 now - is this a
 waste of time, as gnome-3-6 will not be released anymore?
 What if translations and updates are committed only to gnome-3-10? or/and
 only to master? or why to commit to both gnome-3-10 and master?

 Thank you,
 Victor

 ** **

 A 'gnome-3-10'  git branch is planned to be released together with GNOME
 3.10. The 'master' is the latest git branch ever of a module - every future
 new branch will be forked from 'master' (e.g. 'gnome-3-12' would be a fork
 of 'master').

 ** **

 Commiting translations to gnome-3-6 is waste of time at the moment,
 because a commit would only be of any of use if the software will have a
 new release. So, for example, Gtk+ 3.6.0 won't be releasing another minor
 version adn therefore it wouldn't make sense wasting translation effort on
 it. Obsolete, in resume.

 ** **

 Commit translations only to 'master' and not to 'gnome-3-10' will result
 in your translation NOT being available in GNOME 3.10 -- which I think is
 not a good idea. Commit translations only to 'gnome-3-10' and not to
 'master' will result in the translations being available in GNOME 3.10,
 however your lastest ever translation state will be out-of-dated -- your
 effort in GNOME 3.10 wouldn't be available in GNOME 3.12, for example.

 ** **

 So, best you can do right now (close to a new GNOME release) is to commit
 to 'gnome-3-10' git branch and, then, run a git cherry-pick (more
 information in the URL mentioned by Piotr).

 ** **

 Cheers,

 Rafael Ferreira

___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Understanding the branches

2013-09-17 Thread Rafael Ferreira
2013/9/17 Victor Ibragimov victor.ibragi...@gmail.com

 Regarding the branches or to make sure I correctly understand the branches:

 What is the difference between the master and development (for example,
 GNOME 3.10 (development)), and old stable?
 If translations or updates are committed to gnome-3-6 now - is this a
 waste of time, as gnome-3-6 will not be released anymore?
 What if translations and updates are committed only to gnome-3-10? or/and
 only to master? or why to commit to both gnome-3-10 and master?

 Thank you,
 Victor


A 'gnome-3-10'  git branch is planned to be released together with GNOME
3.10. The 'master' is the latest git branch ever of a module - every future
new branch will be forked from 'master' (e.g. 'gnome-3-12' would be a fork
of 'master').

Commiting translations to gnome-3-6 is waste of time at the moment, because
a commit would only be of any of use if the software will have a new
release. So, for example, Gtk+ 3.6.0 won't be releasing another minor
version adn therefore it wouldn't make sense wasting translation effort on
it. Obsolete, in resume.

Commit translations only to 'master' and not to 'gnome-3-10' will result in
your translation NOT being available in GNOME 3.10 -- which I think is not
a good idea. Commit translations only to 'gnome-3-10' and not to 'master'
will result in the translations being available in GNOME 3.10, however your
lastest ever translation state will be out-of-dated -- your effort in GNOME
3.10 wouldn't be available in GNOME 3.12, for example.

So, best you can do right now (close to a new GNOME release) is to commit
to 'gnome-3-10' git branch and, then, run a git cherry-pick (more
information in the URL mentioned by Piotr).

Cheers,
Rafael Ferreira
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Understanding the branches

2013-09-16 Thread Victor Ibragimov
Regarding the branches or to make sure I correctly understand the branches:

What is the difference between the master and development (for example, GNOME 
3.10 (development)), and old stable?
If translations or updates are committed to gnome-3-6 now - is this a waste of 
time, as gnome-3-6 will not be released anymore?
What if translations and updates are committed only to gnome-3-10? or/and only 
to master? or why to commit to both gnome-3-10 and master?

Thank you,
Victor

-Original Message-
From: Piotr Drąg [mailto:piotrd...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 17 сентябр 2013 с. 00:01
To: Victor Ibragimov
Cc: gnome-i18n
Subject: Re: Tajik language: gnome-terminal

2013/9/16 Victor Ibragimov victor.ibragi...@gmail.com:
 Thank you so much - I have already updated and committed it to 100%.
 Could you please, check what is wrong with gnome-photos it should be 100% 
 as well.
 Seems to be the statistics for files with gnome-3-10 are not updated 
 automatically.


It seems to me that you are committing only to master branches. Here you can 
find instructions on how to use branches correctly:

https://wiki.gnome.org/TranslationProject/GitHowTo#Working_with_branches

--
Piotr Drąg
http://raven.fedorapeople.org/

___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n