Re: nobreak-fade.el v.8

2014-06-11 Thread Emanuel Berg
Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca writes:

 IIRC {\bf foo} has been deprecated in LaTeX (in favor
 of \textbf{foo}) since the appearance of LaTeX2e.

Yeah? What was the reason for that? How is {\bf foo}
inferior? This is the second time today this happened,
I seem to be totally outdated... - but {\bf foo} works
with both pdflatex and xelatex (which I got from the
Debian Jessie repositories). I prefer that form as it
is quicker to type and has a more encapsulated
syntax. But I'll start using \textbf{foo} if you in
just one sentence or so can tell me what the gain would
be.

-- 
underground experts united:
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
___
gnu-emacs-sources mailing list
gnu-emacs-sources@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-emacs-sources


Re: nobreak-fade.el v.8

2014-06-11 Thread Ivan Andrus
On Jun 11, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Emanuel Berg embe8...@student.uu.se wrote:

 Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca writes:
 
 IIRC {\bf foo} has been deprecated in LaTeX (in favor
 of \textbf{foo}) since the appearance of LaTeX2e.
 
 Yeah? What was the reason for that? How is {\bf foo}
 inferior? This is the second time today this happened,
 I seem to be totally outdated... - but {\bf foo} works
 with both pdflatex and xelatex (which I got from the
 Debian Jessie repositories). I prefer that form as it
 is quicker to type and has a more encapsulated
 syntax. But I'll start using \textbf{foo} if you in
 just one sentence or so can tell me what the gain would
 be.

\textbf and friends handle italic correction for you and are able to be nested, 
e.g., \textit{\textbf{blah}} is bold and italic.  See also 
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/41681/correct-way-to-bold-italicize-text.
  I know that’s two sentences (now three), but I’m feeling generous today. :-)

-Ivan
___
gnu-emacs-sources mailing list
gnu-emacs-sources@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-emacs-sources