I think that I am in a somewhat similar position to Mike. My Linux
machines happen to be virtual machines that are, for me, test cases for
older hardware with modest resources. When I looked into flatpak it
appeared that it would use a lot more resources yet would be tricky to set
up some functions that involve interfaces for example to external hardware
such that I just wasn't ready to make the intellectual investment in
learning to use flatpak. Someone would still have to sell me on using
flatpak.
On Wed, May 8, 2024, 7:17 PM Adrien Monteleone <
adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net> wrote:
> Any opposition to using flatpak? You wouldn't have to wait.
>
> Regards,
> Adrien
>
> On 5/8/24 3:18 AM, v@scottsonline.org.uk wrote:
> > That could explain things. Unfortunately, I can't (readily) install 4.13
> > on mint - even the latest mint 21.3 has libraries too old for the deb's
> > off the website. But thanks for the info - at least I can look forward
> > to the next mint upgrade that should sort things. Meanwhile, I can
> > muddle through :-{
> >
> > Thanks to you and to Adrien for replying.
> >
> >
>
> ___
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user@gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>
___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
