Re: [GNC] Match transaction accounts better?

[David Carlson]

Check under Preferences > Online Banking to verify that Use Bayesian
Matching is checked and, as Greg mentioned, make the corrections during the
import process to be sure that the training actually happens.  Also, there
was a change when the release 3.x series came out that may cause all the
old training to disappear when you transition in, so some re-training will
be required.

David Carlson

On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 12:22 PM Greg Feneis  wrote:

> While the matcher is displaying your records, click on a record to correct
> it.  This is how the matcher learns how to match better.  It's a
> statistical matching algorithm I believe, so you correcting one incorrectly
> matched record won't always immediately fix a matching error tendency.
> Just keep correcting consistently and the matcher should catch on.
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Greg Feneis 
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 10:08 AM .  wrote:
>
> >How can I get GC to better recognize which accounts certain
> >transactions belong too.
> >
> >For example;  Giant Supermarket should always have the account "Food"
> >matched to it.  However, when importing a QFX file into GC it matches
> >this to "imbalanced".
> >
> >What should I do?
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >Carl W.
> > ___
> > gnucash-user mailing list
> > gnucash-user@gnucash.org
> > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> > If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
> > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
> > -
> > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
> >
> ___
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user@gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
> -
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>


-- 
David Carlson
___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

Re: [GNC] Match transaction accounts better?

[Greg Feneis]

While the matcher is displaying your records, click on a record to correct
it.  This is how the matcher learns how to match better.  It's a
statistical matching algorithm I believe, so you correcting one incorrectly
matched record won't always immediately fix a matching error tendency.
Just keep correcting consistently and the matcher should catch on.




Kind regards,

Greg Feneis 




On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 10:08 AM .  wrote:

>How can I get GC to better recognize which accounts certain
>transactions belong too.
>
>For example;  Giant Supermarket should always have the account "Food"
>matched to it.  However, when importing a QFX file into GC it matches
>this to "imbalanced".
>
>What should I do?
>
>Thanks
>
>Carl W.
> ___
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user@gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
> -
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>
___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.