Manual for GnuPG 1.4.4
Hello ! Here, you can download the manual for GnuPG 1.4.4 formated in a printable way, in 12 pages: http://users.skynet.be/laurent.jumet/MyMan_GnuPG-144.pdf -- Laurent Jumet KeyID: 0xCFAF704C ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: How to verify the file was successfully encrypted...
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 10:59:52AM -0600, Benny Helms wrote: On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 12:25 +0200, Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote: On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 01:38:23PM -0600, Benny Helms wrote: snip What is your actual threat model here? The simplest answer is to check gpg's rc after the encryption run. Before deleting original file, I must make certain encrypted version is in good shape so I can open it at a later date and obtain data. If it is broken, I'm in deep monkey muffins. That's the threat model. If I read this thread right you actually wnt to make a decryption and compare the results and you do _not_ want to keep the private key on that machine. Could you do something creative with --show-session-key to be able to decrypt each file once w.o. risking your private key? HTH //Samuel ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [Sks-devel] key too large?
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Peter Palfrader wrote: I wonder if my key is too large for SKS to like: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg --send 94c09c7f gpg: sending key 94C09C7F to hkp server keyserver.noreply.org gpgkeys: HTTP post error 22: url returned error 500 gpgkeys: no KEY 94c09c7f END found gpg: keyserver internal error gpg: keyserver send failed: keyserver error If so, maybe we could patch SKS to allow larger keys? *sigh* Actually this appears to be a GnuPG problem? ./keyserver/gpgkeys_hkp.c: fprintf(console,gpgkeys: no KEY %s END found\n,keyid); -- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [Sks-devel] key too large?
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, David Shaw wrote: On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 12:32:39AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Peter Palfrader wrote: I wonder if my key is too large for SKS to like: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg --send 94c09c7f gpg: sending key 94C09C7F to hkp server keyserver.noreply.org gpgkeys: HTTP post error 22: url returned error 500 gpgkeys: no KEY 94c09c7f END found gpg: keyserver internal error gpg: keyserver send failed: keyserver error If so, maybe we could patch SKS to allow larger keys? *sigh* Actually this appears to be a GnuPG problem? Version? At least for the recent code, It's very hard to see how you got that error. The code just doesn't flow that way. gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.4-cvs, looks like a snapshot built around April 5th, probably r4114. I don't see the problem on a different host with what is quite likely r4189. -- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [Sks-devel] key too large?
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 01:12:10AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, David Shaw wrote: On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 12:32:39AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Peter Palfrader wrote: I wonder if my key is too large for SKS to like: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg --send 94c09c7f gpg: sending key 94C09C7F to hkp server keyserver.noreply.org gpgkeys: HTTP post error 22: url returned error 500 gpgkeys: no KEY 94c09c7f END found gpg: keyserver internal error gpg: keyserver send failed: keyserver error If so, maybe we could patch SKS to allow larger keys? *sigh* Actually this appears to be a GnuPG problem? Version? At least for the recent code, It's very hard to see how you got that error. The code just doesn't flow that way. gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.4-cvs, looks like a snapshot built around April 5th, probably r4114. I don't see the problem on a different host with what is quite likely r4189. There are no meaningful changes in gpgkeys_hkp between those two revisions. Can you reproduce this with --keyserver-options use-temp-files keep-temp-files and send me the temp file? David ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
