Re: Office Outlook 2003 and GnuPG
Hi! Am Dienstag, den 01.04.2008, 17:29 -0600 schrieb Allen Schultz: > What is the recommended frontend/plugin to Office Outlook 2003 I think the one coming with gpg4win is fine? I am running Office 2007 at work in the meantime but AFAIR I used it when we still had 2003. And I definitely did never have a "full auto" mode enabled. cu, Sven ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: sign a public key ?
Phibee Network Operation Center wrote: > John Clizbe a écrit : >> Phibee Network Operation Center wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> i use this for crypt a tar archives: >>> >>> /usr/bin/gpg --recipient Stefan --encrypt /tmp/backup.tgz >>> can i write for all time a "Y" or what is the exact process ? >>> >> /usr/bin/gpg --batch --yes --recipient Stefan --encrypt /tmp/backup.tgz >> > Thanks for your answer, but i have read the man and tested this solution ... > > i have a : > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# /usr/bin/gpg --batch --yes --recipient Stefan > --encrypt > /tmp/backup.tgz > gpg: DCC8B9Z4: Rien ne dit que la clé appartient vraiment à l'utilisateur > nommé. > gpg: /tmp/backup.tgz: encryption failed: clé publique inutilisable Try signing his key with a local signature: gpg --edit-key Stefan lsign or adding the --always-trust option to the command-line /usr/bin/gpg --batch --yes --always-trust --recipient Stefan \ --encrypt /tmp/backup.tgz I think a local sig is the better option. -- John P. Clizbe Inet: JPClizbe (a) tx DAWT rr DAHT con Ginger Bear Networks hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net "Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Dr Seuss, "Oh the Places You'll Go" signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: sign a public key ?
John Clizbe a écrit : Phibee Network Operation Center wrote: Hi i use this for crypt a tar archives: /usr/bin/gpg --recipient Stefan --encrypt /tmp/backup.tgz can i write for all time a "Y" or what is the exact process ? /usr/bin/gpg --batch --yes --recipient Stefan --encrypt /tmp/backup.tgz From the man page: --batch --no-batch Use batch mode. Never ask, do not allow interactive com- mands. --no-batch disables this option. --yes Assume "yes" on most questions. --no Assume "no" on most questions. Thanks for your answer, but i have read the man and tested this solution ... i have a : [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# /usr/bin/gpg --batch --yes --recipient Stefan --encrypt /tmp/backup.tgz gpg: DCC8B9Z4: Rien ne dit que la clé appartient vraiment à l'utilisateur nommé. gpg: /tmp/backup.tgz: encryption failed: clé publique inutilisable Failed :=< ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Office Outlook 2003 and GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Allen Schultz wrote: > What is the recommended frontend/plugin to Office Outlook 2003 for > GnuPG that will allow the user (my friend in this case) to manually > select Encrypt/Sign rather than have it automatically do that on all > his messages. He wants that choice. I found one with it hiding in the > Tools menu, but he wants it visible while writing/typing the message. Why not try GPGshell: http://www.jumaros.de/rsoft/index.html This will provide both a Tray Tool, Key Management & the ability to Encrypt/Decrypt Files. JOHN ;) Timestamp: Tuesday 01 Apr 2008, 22:07 --400 (Eastern Daylight Time) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.5.0-svn4732: (MingW32) Comment: Public Key at: http://tinyurl.com/8cpho Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: https://www.gswot.org Comment: Homepage: http://tinyurl.com/yzhbhx iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJH8uqFAAoJEBCGy9eAtCsPXIkH/35ewbdZCfKIH5aBGOMp1yOV +2SlKh0y3zPwjXwt4OtM8LFETMkHUsXbKlh9V18/cbaJmiPIJAjk33tW1jqJmmTi Lhu8V9EbXjCBazMe0R36VBrEckLjfDRDLPEqUt0kTmSo42eniAa9jnMTAvcRjHZd WeB1Z0hvoMv3VQzgOJ7cq/Aw48di94kjyNvPtsTco7625h9QdPkxWWbIVQ9ffJtu WPyU/ig1NoYAah1GIiLkgSDEPkV39fWs5b0zvcYOFxZyUwkJBI/3r0tPOfzgR3JK d29aI71DfPNsGEVgvuJhUwr5FwwZeZMznMf8UX/qyT5SvHJhANq4DcDXNUuA1BM= =e3ly -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: sign a public key ?
Phibee Network Operation Center wrote: > Hi > > i use this for crypt a tar archives: > > /usr/bin/gpg --recipient Stefan --encrypt /tmp/backup.tgz > can i write for all time a "Y" or what is the exact process ? /usr/bin/gpg --batch --yes --recipient Stefan --encrypt /tmp/backup.tgz From the man page: --batch --no-batch Use batch mode. Never ask, do not allow interactive com- mands. --no-batch disables this option. --yes Assume "yes" on most questions. --no Assume "no" on most questions. -- John P. Clizbe Inet: JPClizbe (a) tx DAWT rr DAHT con Ginger Bear Networks hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net "Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Dr Seuss, "Oh the Places You'll Go" signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Office Outlook 2003 and GnuPG
What is the recommended frontend/plugin to Office Outlook 2003 for GnuPG that will allow the user (my friend in this case) to manually select Encrypt/Sign rather than have it automatically do that on all his messages. He wants that choice. I found one with it hiding in the Tools menu, but he wants it visible while writing/typing the message. Allen ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
sign a public key ?
Hi i use this for crypt a tar archives: /usr/bin/gpg --recipient Stefan --encrypt /tmp/backup.tgz i use the public key of stefan for crypt, but when i start he request all time a "o" (Yes) and say me (sorry in french) : === [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# /usr/bin/gpg --recipient Stefan --encrypt /tmp/backup.tgz gpg: DCC8B9Z4: Rien ne dit que la clé appartient vraiment à l'utilisateur nommé. pub 2048g/DCC8B9Z4 2008-03-25 Stefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Empreinte de la clé principale: XX Empreinte de la sous-clé: XX Il n'est PAS certain que la clé appartient à la personne nomée dans le nom d'utilisateur. Si vous savez *vraiment* ce que vous faites, vous pouvez répondre oui à la prochaine question. Utiliser cette clé quand même ? (o/N) He said that it's not sure that th key are the key of Stefan . can i write for all time a "Y" or what is the exact process ? thanks for your help ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Whirlpool Hash
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 09:47:58AM -0500, Kevin Hilton wrote: > Has anyone written a patch that would allow whirlpool as an available > hash algorithm for use with gnupg? Not that I know of. Note that Whirlpool is not specified for OpenPGP, so that is a major barrier. There is a project to add Whirlpool to OpenPGP going on at the moment (also the Camellia cipher, by the way). When that happens, Whirlpool makes more sense than it does now. David ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Whirlpool Hash
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 16:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Has anyone written a patch that would allow whirlpool as an available > hash algorithm for use with gnupg? Whirlpool is not specified by OpenPGP and thus not supported by gpg. FWIW, Libgcrypt has support for Whirlpool and thus can be used by other applications (e.g. S/MIME as supported by gpgsm) Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Auschnahme regelt ein Bundeschgesetz. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Whirlpool Hash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Kevin Hilton wrote: > Has anyone written a patch that would allow whirlpool as an available > hash algorithm for use with gnupg? The addition of Whirlpool would require the effective 'patching' of 11 Files. I am fooling with it in My spare time but haven't completed it as yet. I haven't devoted much time to this as there would be very few instances where it would be practical to implement. What would be accomplished by using a Hash that would prevent anyone from verifying My Sig? JOHN ;) Timestamp: Tuesday 01 Apr 2008, 12:11 --400 (Eastern Daylight Time) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.5.0-svn4732: (MingW32) Comment: Public Key at: http://tinyurl.com/8cpho Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: https://www.gswot.org Comment: Homepage: http://tinyurl.com/yzhbhx iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJH8l8GAAoJEBCGy9eAtCsP6fgIAIVgRvdeMXSty+3/EFcMQBhs 2I3u3eVCeEeX4gxP+LZO6zJ+fiCOgRYJ3/Fq6bJ6HhUFQjTC3hBeTamdPbjlzQHC xkvb90VBllqfP7cMN5kYJYZBEChfbsjn9IyZ+97+gyhlBpKMXVroRvykz9iSNRPe OUYeFkcVIk9V3YilGoVGlWE9kjunQ8TZFmHGaK75ntpZAIkOdm2vgW+fE1xIYacu 3SYuxBS3VidcTvAOVtVILsmKnwr95+9aCOP8ymum7ZUa2CdDUgPVp0wgUeZDBQla tCJPB9SkIesF0AwvdGVrBnuZWzbFa1ewOZON1r6eQtagdX2RiC9vPPLO0tXJcuI= =qGpS -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Whirlpool Hash
Let us know when you are done with the patch. I'd be interested in trying it out -- that would make one person who could verify your signature! ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Whirlpool Hash
Has anyone written a patch that would allow whirlpool as an available hash algorithm for use with gnupg? -- Kevin Hilton ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: gpg-agent/ssh-add asking for passphrase at first usage
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:17:59AM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > some years ago I did create a nice "gpg-agent --enable-ssh-support" > > setup that would register ssh keys with the agent, but the agent > > would only ask for the passphrase when ssh would try a connection. > > > > Now I upgraded my system and this doesn't work anymore. > > What exactly doesn't work? You don't get any password prompt for > either your ssh nor gpg keys? Or you get the prompt for both now > instead of having your ssh key automatically added? Or something else > entirely? I tried to explain, but maybe the mail was too long: Previously, right after logging in I would see the keys with ssh-add -l, but I would only be asked for the passphrase on their first usage. Now they are not listed and if I try to add them I'm asked for the pssphrase immediately. > > Now my questions are: > [...] > > - *why* did it break with the update? The old system has gnupg 2.0.8 > > and the new one 2.0.9. But the Changelog doesn't indicate anything > > that would make these two behave differently. > > Is the new system running another agent, like the seahorse agent? I > think that might be on by default now, and it provides similar > functionlity to gpg-agent and ssh-agent. Maybe it's causing problems? I'm invoking gpg-agent directly in the ssh-agent replacment scrip (see my OP). -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpOxSFEFMmqj.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Siemens card reader
Hi, I've tried a Siemens S26361-F1260-L801 internal USB card reader with an OpenPGP card. Siemens claims the reader is CCID compatible. After the usual fix of the permissions for the device, "gpg --card-status" works perfectly, but with "gpg --clearsign foo" I get: $ gpg --clearsign foo gpg: Bisher erstellte Signaturen: 8307 Bitte geben Sie die PIN ein [Verarbeitete Signaturen: 8307] gpg: ccid_transceive failed: (0x10009) gpg: apdu_send_simple(0) failed: card inactive gpg: Beglaubigung fehlgeschlagen: Allgemeiner Fehler gpg: foo: clearsign failed: Allgemeiner Fehler Any hint? Thanks, Reinhard ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
RDFAuth: a sketch of a simple authentication protol
Dear GNU-PG users and experts, I recently posted a proposal for a very simple HTTP based protocol to build on GPG web of trust concepts by combining these with the linked data network [1] effect of the semantic web, and simple REST architecture concepts. Here is the introduction [[ Here is a proposal for an authentication scheme that is even simpler than OpenId, more secure, more RESTful, with fewer points of failure and fewer points of control, that is needed in order to make Open Distributed Social Networks with privacy controls possible. ]] http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/rdfauth_sketch_of_a_buzzword I am not a cryptography expert, but I make essential use of PGP in this sketch, so I was looking for feedback from this community, as well as REST and HTTP experts. I know there is something really powerful lying here to be discovered. Please give us feedback and ideas for improvements. Or just let us know that we are wrong. Any feedback is welcome :-) Henry [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linked_Data Home page: http://bblfish.net/ ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
