adele
Hello! I'm Jerome from France, GPG user and cryptoparty organizer in Marseille. I just joined the list! It seems to be a very friendly place. I would like to make a french speaking adele (The friendly GPG Robot) available to the community of french speaking GPG evangelists and beginners. Is there a source code or a recipe available somewhere? Is it written in english? If everything is in german, it's ok, i have basic skills in german, and with a little help from the community, I'll manage to clone and translate the robot. But I don't have the skill and time to write another one from scratch. The only information about Adele I could find about are those two messages: First message by Werner (2007): http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-de/2007-March/000149.html saying that it's not a free software. Second message by Bernhard Reiter (2009) http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/gpg4win-devel/2009-September/000869.html asking about the development of a free software replacement robot. English speaking Adele say it's made by www.g-n-u.de I guess i'll have to contact them also. Do you have more information? Thank you. jérôme -- GPG fingerprint E063 9B6A 3892 84A4 74FE AB0E EF73 E6DA 5836 B81A www.cryptoparty.fr signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Docs central, with 'Email Self-Defence'
Dear Bernhard, hello everyone, On 06.06.2014 11:36, Bernhard Reiter wrote: > Thus I've started http://wiki.gnupg.org/documentation and did a > first entry for the new CC-BY-(SA) short guide from the FSF. I > could use more critical review, so if you read it or other > documents, please add a link or a comment. Do you know if there are translations of the fsf-guide planned? Cheers, --rr ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [Announce] A new Beta of GnuPG 2.1 is now available
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:31, bernh...@intevation.de said: > A dependency diagram would be cool to have! :) That is easy. Build in this order: speedo_spkgs = \ libgpg-error npth libgcrypt \ zlib libiconv gettext \ libassuan libksba gnupg \ libffi glib pkg-config \ gpgme \ libpng \ gdk-pixbuf atk pixman cairo pango gtk+ \ pinentry gpa For just gnupg this is sufficient: speedo_spkgs = \ libgpg-error npth libgcrypt \ zlib libiconv gettext \ libassuan libksba gnupg If you need gpgme with glib support you need to install a glib-dev package first or build everything up to gpgme. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Docs central, with 'Email Self-Defence'
Hi, On Sunday 08 June 2014 at 17:49:41, Suspekt wrote: > I have some links about key creation and gpg in general that I would > provide of course. the problem is, that I don't know if/how correct they > are because I am not that into gpg yet. Some blogposts are rather old, > which can mean they are no longer up to date but doesn't have to. I > don't want to spread outdated/incorrect information so how to proceed? > That said, adding them to the wiki directly doesn't seem to be ideal... please still add them and possibly add a date and if you are unsure just add the fact that you are unsure because of reason X. I agree with the other writers: We must first make good information available! And then we can point out other people to this central place which is easier to keep uptodate. Hypertext is very suited for this, because the knowledge and desires of users will be very different, so they can jump from level to level if they want to learn more. A wiki is well suited because it shall make it easier for more people to contribute and write, but keep a consolidated (brief) version in the end. Best, Bernhard > > Thus I've started > >http://wiki.gnupg.org/documentation > > and did a first entry for the new CC-BY-(SA) short guide from the FSF. > > I could use more critical review, so if you read it or other documents, > > please add a link or a comment. > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users -- www.intevation.de/~bernhard (CEO)www.fsfe.org (Founding GA Member) Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, Germany; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998 Owned and run by Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [Announce] A new Beta of GnuPG 2.1 is now available
On Friday 06 June 2014 at 17:39:44, Werner Koch wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 13:22, bernh...@intevation.de said: > > Seriously for Werner (and some others) it is hard to know > > at what point information is missing where by whom. > > Actually I know the problem. GnuPG-2 requires a lot of libraries and > they all need to be build and installed in a certain order. A dependency diagram would be cool to have! :) > This far more labor intensive that ./configure && make install. > speedo.mk has been written to make building more convenient. Bernhard -- www.intevation.de/~bernhard (CEO)www.fsfe.org (Founding GA Member) Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, Germany; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998 Owned and run by Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Docs central, with 'Email Self-Defence'
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 01:56:34AM +0200, Hauke Laging wrote: > Am So 08.06.2014, 20:59:41 schrieb Peter Lebbing: [snip] > > > I recommend that all qualified people do the same when encountering > > > bad articles. > > > > The problem lies in "qualified". I think the authors of the bad advice > > consider themselves qualified, for instance. Otherwise why are they > > giving advice. > > I understand the guess but that is at least not my experience. If I tell > authors about their mistakes they are usually happy that I help them > improve their article. > > Maybe the main reason for writing is not feeling qualified but the wish > to help. Or they feel there are people even less qualified than they > themselves and write for those but do not believe that they are close to > the upper end of knowledge. Maybe the reaction depends on how they > assess the knowledge of the one who tries to correct them. The from > address of those of my emails may help there. ;-) From time to time I will try to explain something, convinced that I am *not* the best choice to explain it, in the hope that someone more knowledgable will correct my errors. I figure that, if I trot out my limited knowledge, I may help someone to understand just a bit, and I too may learn something in the process. > I suggest: Just give it a try. That is my suggestion as well. -- Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mw...@iupui.edu Machines should not be friendly. Machines should be obedient. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: New user needs some help
Hi Kristian, I've fixed inaccuracies in the Hockeypuck total key count. Hockeypuck now uses an exact row count, updated in the background every few hours (at release hockeypuck_1.0.1~a2~dev20140609+8e0dfc6). keys.cmarstech.com has been updated to this latest version, which is available in the unstable PPA, ppa:hockeypuck/unstable. I'll be proposing this fix along with a few others into trusty/universe soon. Apologies for any confusion this has caused. -Casey On 06/05/2014 05:24 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 06/06/2014 12:09 AM, Werner Koch wrote: >> On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 20:09, hol...@cox.net said: >>> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 03:26:16AM -0400, Cpp wrote: Dear GnuPG users, As part of the ResetTheNet campaign I decided to start using email encryption. I am a relatively new user of gpg, who is looking forward to using it for secure communication. >>> >>> This is not a critism, but with who do you plan on communicating >>> using encryption? Absolutely no one I know uses it or is >>> remotely > >> Well, with 8 new keys in the last 7 days there is at least some >> hope to find someone to send send encrypted messages. > >> Kristian: Is spike at the right side of the charts at >> https://sks-keyservers.net/status/key_development.php a bug? > > > Its not a bug in the crawler software, however the spike occurred in > [0] that reports to be 73,350 keys ahead of the rest of the pool, so > I'm trying to get a confirmation from the operator what it is about. I > expect it is an issue with that server (running Hockeypuck) but won't > remove the data unless I get a confirmation. It would just be re-added > on next key count check, so if it is an error it will have to be > fixed, or I will have to put the server in the global exclude list. > And if it is not in error, we need to get the keys distributed out to > there rest of the pool. > > References > [0] https://sks-keyservers.net/status/info/keys.cmarstech.com > > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
