Re: Problems with GPGME returning "Not Implemented" or "Configuration error"
Hey Werner, No worries – I know how busy things can get around a release. Jeff On 3/4/17, 7:01 AM, "Werner Koch" wrote: Hi Jeff, On Fri, 3 Mar 2017 19:04, jeste...@microsoft.com said: > Anyone have any thoughts on this? Soneone of us will get back to you on Monday. We have been pretty busy with the 2.1.19 release the last week. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [Announce] GnuPG 2.1.19 released
On Fri, 3 Mar 2017 18:28, thomas.jaro...@intra2net.com said: > The support for multiple card readers sounds very promising. Indeed, I do not anymore need to open the door to the server room to change the card several times during release preparing (the commit key and the releasing signing key are on different cards). Caveat: You need to take to enter the right PIN for the right card. This was the reason why the prompts have been reworked to print the serial number of the card and the Name stored on the card. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. pgpJGbwAl87nV.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Problems with GPGME returning "Not Implemented" or "Configuration error"
Hi Jeff, On Fri, 3 Mar 2017 19:04, jeste...@microsoft.com said: > Anyone have any thoughts on this? Soneone of us will get back to you on Monday. We have been pretty busy with the 2.1.19 release the last week. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. pgpVR0dwXXhYr.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: export-minimal doesn't affect export-secret-key?
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 16:26, pe...@digitalbrains.com said: > I'd like to add to the bug report that I also observe this behaviour > with GnuPG 1.4.18 on Debian jessie/stable (package 1.4.18-7+deb8u3) and > GnuPG 2.0.26 on the same (package 2.0.26-6+deb8u1). So it is not just 2.1. FWIW, it has been fixed in 2.1.19. Fixing it in the other branches will likely not happen because over there a lot of code needs duplication. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. pgpjkhrg2uCuU.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
