Re: Stupid Symantec

2018-03-16 Thread Phil Susi
On 3/16/2018 9:16 AM, Steven Maddox wrote:
> I get the impression they want the decryption happening on the end users
> machines.
> 
> Presumably so that if any users got the idea to just 'upload' a file
> online - it'd be the encrypted version of that file.  Course someone can
> just get around that by opening an encrypted file - then just saving it
> to a new local location :D

Since it is automatically decrypted when opened, the uploaded file would
be decrypted.



___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Stupid Symantec

2018-03-16 Thread Phil Susi
On 3/16/2018 9:15 AM, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> How does that work when the decryption key is on the client?

I don't think it is on the client.  The private key is stored on the
server and is decrypted when you log in.  At least I think that's how it
works.  I've never actually tried using EFS on a server.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Stupid Symantec

2018-03-16 Thread Phil Susi
On 3/16/2018 4:11 AM, Steven Maddox wrote:
> Yeah I just use LUKS on my PC to protect local files, but this is (as
> above) for files on SMB/Windows shares... sorry for not mentioning that
> sooner.

I believe you can enable EFS on the windows server and it will handle
decrypting the file before sending it over SMB.  Then you don't need any
special software or configuration on the clients.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Stupid Symantec

2018-03-15 Thread Phil Susi
On 3/15/2018 11:26 AM, Steven Maddox wrote:
> The desktop portion of that software has an OS/kernel level driver that
> watches if you're trying to open a PGP encrypted file... then decrypts
> it on the fly and finally passes it to the application that'd normally
> open it.  

> Anyway I can either continue to bitterly rant or convince my employers
> to switch product.  Does GnuPG have a similar kernel module/driver for
> an as-you-open-a-file type experience?

Windows has this feature built in already, why not just use that?


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: "right to be forgotten" nonsense

2018-01-16 Thread Phil Susi
On 1/15/2018 10:24 PM, listo factor via Gnupg-users wrote:
> If there is merit to the principle that an Internet server operator
> can not keep publicly serving private data over the objections of
> the owner (the same as today, after many battles, he can no longer

There isn't merit.  It became public, not private, the moment you
published it.  I have the right to free speech, the EU be damned.  Are
these numbnuts going to demand that libraries black out newspaper
articles on microfilm because they mention someone that doesn't like the
coverage of themselves?  Sure, I molested children 5 years ago, but I
have the "right to be forgotten" so when anyone searches for my name on
the Internet they won't find out.  Give me a break.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Why does import refuse to merge a new subkey?

2017-11-02 Thread Phil Susi
On 11/2/2017 3:04 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 02/11/17 16:58, Phil Susi wrote:
>> Why is this?
> 
> What version of GnuPG is this? It's a well-known limitation of GnuPG 1.4
> and 2.0, but my 2.1.18 allows me to add secret subkeys through --import.

Looks like I've still got 1.4.20 on one machine ( when I usually forget
to run gpg2 instead of just gpg ) but 2.0.28 on another also did it I'm
pretty sure.  I guess I'll try again and make sure to use a recent gpg2.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Why does import refuse to merge a new subkey?

2017-11-02 Thread Phil Susi
Whenever my subkeys expire and I have to generate a new one, I try to
import the keys on my less secure machines and gpg stupidly refuses to
update the already existing key with the new subkey.  I have to delete
the key, then import to get the new subkey into the keyring.  Why is this?


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users