Re: Questions about generating keys
Oskar L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yahoo! has a nice free service called AddressGuard. [...] Spamgourmet¹ has offered this and more since October 2000. Footnotes: ¹ http://www.spamgourmet.com/ -- Steven E. Harris ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: OpenPGP and usability
Werner Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My conclusion is that X- was never required by the standard and that after the 19 years the IETF realized that there was no need for it. Thank you for the detailed explanation. -- Steven E. Harris ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: OpenPGP and usability
Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In RFC 822 there was X-, in RFC 2822 it has been removed. April 2001? Apparently this RFC had not yet been published in the cave within which I must be living. once you want to standardize an experimental header, you have to break the deployment of that header. Right, and you're usually obligated to then support two headers: the experimental one, and the standardized one, which may have changed from the experimental one by way of standardization going beyond canonizing existing practice. -- Steven E. Harris ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: OpenPGP and usability
Werner Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, the X prefix is not anymore required for user defined headers. Was there some change in this prescription? If so, from where? I hadn't heard about X- falling from use. -- Steven E. Harris ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
