Re: Test mail to gnupg.u...@seibercom.net

2010-06-11 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Friday 11 June 2010 at 4:36:34 PM, in
, Jerry wrote:


> Evidently, the list manager employed here strips off
> any "Reply-To:" header and then fails to replace it
> with one that points to the list. Fortunately, not all
> mailing lists are configured in a similar manner.

> Fortunately, using claws-mail, I am able to circumvent
> that problem (in most cases). I would assume that other
> MUAs would have a similar configuration option.

I was told the etiquette for this list was to reply to the list and
also cc your reply to the person whose message you are replying to. So
I set up my reply template to do just that. (-;


- --
Best regards

MFPAmailto:expires2...@ymail.com

During an eruption - move away from the volcano - not towards it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQCVAwUBTBJqXqipC46tDG5pAQrlEgP/WIEi22+pknXDqNYivuu8RyTJFt5P6Joj
esMhouJwbPm+64aPTZscypQRPZIbXSIASh6eoVyAPWk8Cafi+C/84n66EiL3+ubZ
v3UeYlZg+bX22ahkBIsoZakI6FdKui9cHxhbI8oNi4AvN/cLvNBMujHCkKm9V3rJ
zkJDpQUDJHY=
=xGOI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Test mail to gnupg.u...@seibercom.net

2010-06-11 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:14:29 -0400
Jean-David Beyer  articulated:

> Jerry wrote (in part):
> 
> > 
> > Which reminds me; there is a request at the end of every post I
> > make. Would it be to much of an imposition for you to honor that
> > request?
> > 
> > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
> > Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
> 
> 
> I looked at the headers, and there is no Reply-To header in the
> e-mail I received from the list. An entire page of headers, but not
> that one.
> 
> Even if Reply-To was a header, it would be too much to honor it
> unless my e-mailer honored it automatically (perhaps it does).
> Because some lists to which I subscribe automatically reply to the
> lists, and some automatically reply to the original sender, and I
> cannot remember which is which. I know asking any particular list to
> change is not worth the trouble; each list has its own policy and
> unwilling to change. I try to remember which is which. It is
> sometimes suggested to hit Reply-All, but this results in the
> original poster's getting two replies. I particularly hate this
> method as I then reply to which ever one I get first, usually direct
> to the author, thinking he wants a private reply since he sent it to
> me privately. Then a little later I get one from the list, and it is
> usually too much trouble to send another reply to the list. I wish
> all lists were set up so a reply to a message from the list went back
> to the list, but there is no point asking that from a list that does
> things another way.

Evidently, the list manager employed here strips off any "Reply-To:"
header and then fails to replace it with one that points to the list.
Fortunately, not all mailing lists are configured in a similar manner.

Fortunately, using claws-mail, I am able to circumvent that problem (in
most cases). I would assume that other MUAs would have a similar
configuration option.

-- 
Jerry
gnupg.u...@seibercom.net

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__

That's always the way when you discover
something new; everyone thinks you're crazy.

Evelyn E. Smith


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Test mail to gnupg.u...@seibercom.net

2010-06-11 Thread Jean-David Beyer

Jerry wrote (in part):



Which reminds me; there is a request at the end of every post I make.
Would it be to much of an imposition for you to honor that request?

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.



I looked at the headers, and there is no Reply-To header in the e-mail I 
received from the list. An entire page of headers, but not that one.


Even if Reply-To was a header, it would be too much to honor it unless 
my e-mailer honored it automatically (perhaps it does). Because some 
lists to which I subscribe automatically reply to the lists, and some 
automatically reply to the original sender, and I cannot remember which 
is which. I know asking any particular list to change is not worth the 
trouble; each list has its own policy and unwilling to change. I try to 
remember which is which. It is sometimes suggested to hit Reply-All, but 
this results in the original poster's getting two replies. I 
particularly hate this method as I then reply to which ever one I get 
first, usually direct to the author, thinking he wants a private reply 
since he sent it to me privately. Then a little later I get one from the 
list, and it is usually too much trouble to send another reply to the 
list. I wish all lists were set up so a reply to a message from the list 
went back to the list, but there is no point asking that from a list 
that does things another way.


--
  .~.  Jean-David Beyer  Registered Linux User 85642.
  /V\  PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine   241939.
 /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jerseyhttp://counter.li.org
 ^^-^^ 08:05:01 up 35 days, 16:00, 3 users, load average: 4.46, 4.45, 4.45



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Test mail to gnupg.u...@seibercom.net

2010-06-11 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:33:23 -0400
Jameson Rollins  articulated:


> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 06:27:12 -0400, Jerry 
> wrote:
> > I am assuming that you wanted me to reply to this message. Its
> > intended purpose was not overly clear. At least not to me, but then
> > again I have not had my second cup of coffee this morning.
> 
> I think if he had wanted you to respond to it he would have asked you
> to respond to it.

Perhaps, then again, perhaps not. As a lifelong sports official,
everything is considered legal unless specifically barred by a formal
rule.

In any case, I am not the only subscriber who replied to his post. I
was simply following the lead of other responders before me.

Which reminds me; there is a request at the end of every post I make.
Would it be to much of an imposition for you to honor that request?

-- 
Jerry
gnupg.u...@seibercom.net

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
People that are really very weird can get into sensitive positions and
have a tremendous impact on history.

Dan Quayle
US Republican politician (1947 - )



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Test mail to gnupg.u...@seibercom.net

2010-06-11 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 06:27:12 -0400, Jerry  wrote:
> I am assuming that you wanted me to reply to this message. Its intended
> purpose was not overly clear. At least not to me, but then again I have
> not had my second cup of coffee this morning.

I think if he had wanted you to respond to it he would have asked you to
respond to it.

jamie.


pgpzBRIvtD0Pu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Test mail to gnupg.u...@seibercom.net

2010-06-11 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:37:34 +0200
Werner Koch  articulated:


> Hi!
> 
> One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an
> automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster.  The
> owner of the ticketing system at secure.mpcustomer.com does not
> respond to any of our queries to send us more information on the mails
> triggering the posting.  Thus we need to send these test mails in the
> hope to figure out the culprit.
> 
> Sorry for the inconvenience,
> 
>   Werner
> 

I am assuming that you wanted me to reply to this message. Its intended
purpose was not overly clear. At least not to me, but then again I have
not had my second cup of coffee this morning.

-- 
Jerry
gnupg.u...@seibercom.net

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__

As you grow older, you will still do foolish things,
but you will do them with much more enthusiasm.

The Cowboy


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users