Re: Evolution locks up when sending large pgp signed file

2009-12-09 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:53:24 -0600, Chris wrote:

> ago to Mandriva 2010, Evolution 2.28.1 and Gnome 2.28. When trying to
> send a signed message with a file over approximately 40k Evo will lockup
> and have to be killed. Not signing the message allows any size file to

I am pretty sure that this is an Evo problem. 

However you may check whether there is a Pinentry somewhere hidden
behind the Evo window.  This is a new problem I have not yet
investigated; see .


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Can't import valid GPG keys in Ubuntu

2009-12-09 Thread Jim Dever
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Mario Castelán Castro wrote:

> 
> Hi, I think than keys got imported sucefully but please do not write
> personal messages for technical support, write it to list (Or with
> carbon copy to list).

I'm sure he meant to reply to the list.  Unfortunately this list doesn't
generate a "Reply-To" back to the list so if one just hits "Reply" it
goes back to the original sender and not to the list.  I've been called
on this before until I realized what was happening.

If anyone on the list knows who to contact to get this fixed it would be
greatly appreciated.  Or if I'm totally missing something... please tell me!

Thanks

Jim
- --

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iEYEAREDAAYFAksgTYoACgkQygKI8gBpGS56sACg2XjETgv2KYfSRcNwru02a77f
D6cAoN8K0yXXf9JAt70MmRozsMhx/b/q
=/Rbc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Can't import valid GPG keys in Ubuntu

2009-12-09 Thread Todd Zullinger
Jim Dever wrote:
> I'm sure he meant to reply to the list.  Unfortunately this list
> doesn't generate a "Reply-To" back to the list so if one just hits
> "Reply" it goes back to the original sender and not to the list.
> I've been called on this before until I realized what was happening.
>
> If anyone on the list knows who to contact to get this fixed it
> would be greatly appreciated.  Or if I'm totally missing
> something... please tell me!

Any list configuration inquiries should be sent to the list owner.
The list owners are listed on the listinfo page, included in the
footer of each post.

That said, it's likely intentional that the list does not munge the
Reply-To header.  For much more than you may care to read, check out:

Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

Reply-To Munging Considered Useful
http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml

And perhaps even:

Reply-To Munging Still Considered Harmful. Really.
http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html

It's sad that relatively few mail clients have proper list-reply
functionality.  But if you use one that does, it's easy to forget why
folks regularly ask for Reply-To munging. :)

-- 
ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~
The sunshine bores the daylights out of me.
Chasing shadows moonlight mystery.



pgpOx2AdDQZZw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Can't import valid GPG keys in Ubuntu

2009-12-09 Thread Jim Dever
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Todd Zullinger wrote:

> Any list configuration inquiries should be sent to the list owner.
> The list owners are listed on the listinfo page, included in the
> footer of each post.

Thanks for the pointer!


> That said, it's likely intentional that the list does not munge the
> Reply-To header.  For much more than you may care to read, check out:

Will do.  Didn't realize there were reasons why doing that might not be
desirable in cases.  Seems to be done on ever other list I've seen
except this one so I'm curious enough to read your links as to why.


> It's sad that relatively few mail clients have proper list-reply
> functionality.  But if you use one that does, it's easy to forget why
> folks regularly ask for Reply-To munging. :)

Ok I'll bite.  Which one does handle it properly?  I did notice that
doing a reply all on your message sent it back to the list.  Reply All
on most messages go back to the sender with a CC: to the list.  Anyway
I'll hush since this is off-topic.  Thanks for the education!

- --
Jim

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iEYEAREDAAYFAksgdvMACgkQygKI8gBpGS6BmgCfdcFU0z50jAVi2wF9RodfnNWq
j1cAoNEwUgrfZO98FveGtIqu4I7R/kBy
=irtT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users