Sorry, no, we do not have a lawyer. You could contact the FSF
(http://www.fsf.org), but it is not likely they can help you either. You will
probably have to hire a lawyer who is knowledgable about copyright law yourself.
Adam
On Mar 6, 2014, at 10:58 AM, Peter Smith petersmith0...@gmail.com wrote:
Adam,
Thank you for the information, but I would like to take a legal advice on
GNUstep licensing, whom I have to write? Does your developer society have an
accessible lawyer?
Peter
On 22 February 2014 01:26, Adam Fedor fe...@gnu.org wrote:
I am not a lawyer, so if you want a real legal opinion, you should talk to a
lawyer
My informal (not legal advice) opinion would be that if you are not
distributing GNUstep then you don't have any requirements under the license.
The GPL and LGPL are both distribution licenses - if you are just allowing
people to use it remotely without distributing the code or the resulting
software then there are no requirements to do anything.
Adam
On Feb 21, 2014, at 6:27 AM, Peter Smith petersmith0...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Madam or Sir,
I represent the group of developers, who are in charge of creating a
cloud-based product. The soft we intend to develop is considered to be
proprietary, and the potential business model based on revenue from end-user
per stream.
The name of the library we interested in is “gnustep”.
In fact, I would like to find out if the business model we are going to use
requires any special conditions of licensing; if it does, it would be great
to know from you the details.
I am looking forward to hear from you asap.
Best regards,
Peter
___
Gnustep-webmasters mailing list
Gnustep-webmasters@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-webmasters
___
Gnustep-webmasters mailing list
Gnustep-webmasters@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-webmasters
