[GOAL] Re: RCUK Open Access Feedback

2012-03-19 Thread Tim Brody
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 21:28 +0900, Andrew A. Adams wrote:
 David Prosser wrote:
  Say I wanted to data mine 10,000 articles.  I'm at a university, but I am c=
  o-funded by a pharmaceutical company and there is a possibility that the re=
  search that I'm doing may result in a new drug discovery, which that compan=
  y will want to take to market.  The 10,000 articles are all 'open access', =
  but they are under CC-BY-NC-SA licenses.  What mechanism is there by which =
  I can contact all 10,000 authors and gain permission for my research?
 
 
 The intent of CC-NC is that one cannot take the original material, re-mix it 
 (or even just as-is) and sell the resulting new work. It does not mean that 
 the information it contains cannot be used in a commercial setting, but that 
 the expression it contains cannot be used in a commercial setting. A simple 
 example is that a CC-NC licensed book cannot be recorded as an audio play 
 which is then sold. If one makes an audio book it must be available for free. 
 However, copies of a CC-NC book can be distributed to students who are paying 
 for a course in English literature as one of the books studied.

I don't understand this concern about 'NC' (non-commercial). I
understood that the give-away open access literature was given-away by
authors precisely because the motivation for publishing publicly funded
research is not for direct commercial gain. Instead, authors derive
impact from others reading and citing their work.

If a company were to create and sell an audio version of a research work
then that increases the author's impact. That doesn't preclude someone
else creating a for-free audio version, nor readers accessing the
original self-archived or gold-OA text version.

OA is not about anti-capitalism - if someone can take the resource (OA
research literature), add value and re-sell it (with suitable
attribution) then that can only be to the advantage of authors and
readers.

-- 
Tim Brody

School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton
Southampton
SO17 1BJ
United Kingdom

Email: tdb2 at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 7698
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : 
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20120319/5d1bd3a8/attachment.bin
 


[GOAL] Re: RCUK Open Access Feedback

2012-03-19 Thread Jan Velterop
I agree with Tim. Doesn't the 'NC' in CC-BY-NC just mean I can't make money 
from it and I would resent it if you could ?

Jan Velterop

   ? ?  ? ? ?   ? ? ?  ? ?
**
Drs Johannes (Jan) Velterop, CEO
Academic Concept Knowledge Ltd. (AQnowledge)
+44 7525 026 991 (mobile)
+44 1483 579 525 (landline UK)
+31 70 75 33 789 (landline NL)
Skype: Villavelius
Email: velterop at aqnowledge.com
velterop at gmail.com
aqnowledge.com




On 19 Mar 2012, at 11:37, Tim Brody wrote:

 On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 21:28 +0900, Andrew A. Adams wrote:
 David Prosser wrote:
 Say I wanted to data mine 10,000 articles.  I'm at a university, but I am c=
 o-funded by a pharmaceutical company and there is a possibility that the re=
 search that I'm doing may result in a new drug discovery, which that compan=
 y will want to take to market.  The 10,000 articles are all 'open access', =
 but they are under CC-BY-NC-SA licenses.  What mechanism is there by which =
 I can contact all 10,000 authors and gain permission for my research?
 
 
 The intent of CC-NC is that one cannot take the original material, re-mix it 
 (or even just as-is) and sell the resulting new work. It does not mean that 
 the information it contains cannot be used in a commercial setting, but that 
 the expression it contains cannot be used in a commercial setting. A simple 
 example is that a CC-NC licensed book cannot be recorded as an audio play 
 which is then sold. If one makes an audio book it must be available for 
 free. 
 However, copies of a CC-NC book can be distributed to students who are 
 paying 
 for a course in English literature as one of the books studied.
 
 I don't understand this concern about 'NC' (non-commercial). I
 understood that the give-away open access literature was given-away by
 authors precisely because the motivation for publishing publicly funded
 research is not for direct commercial gain. Instead, authors derive
 impact from others reading and citing their work.
 
 If a company were to create and sell an audio version of a research work
 then that increases the author's impact. That doesn't preclude someone
 else creating a for-free audio version, nor readers accessing the
 original self-archived or gold-OA text version.
 
 OA is not about anti-capitalism - if someone can take the resource (OA
 research literature), add value and re-sell it (with suitable
 attribution) then that can only be to the advantage of authors and
 readers.
 
 -- 
 Tim Brody
 
 School of Electronics and Computer Science
 University of Southampton
 Southampton
 SO17 1BJ
 United Kingdom
 
 Email: tdb2 at ecs.soton.ac.uk
 Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 7698
 ___
 GOAL mailing list
 GOAL at eprints.org
 http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20120319/1766ca1a/attachment.html
 


[GOAL] Re: RCUK Open Access Feedback

2012-03-19 Thread Tim Brody
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 21:28 +0900, Andrew A. Adams wrote:
 David Prosser wrote:
  Say I wanted to data mine 10,000 articles.  I'm at a university, but I am c=
  o-funded by a pharmaceutical company and there is a possibility that the re=
  search that I'm doing may result in a new drug discovery, which that compan=
  y will want to take to market.  The 10,000 articles are all 'open access', =
  but they are under CC-BY-NC-SA licenses.  What mechanism is there by which =
  I can contact all 10,000 authors and gain permission for my research?
 
 
 The intent of CC-NC is that one cannot take the original material, re-mix it 
 (or even just as-is) and sell the resulting new work. It does not mean that 
 the information it contains cannot be used in a commercial setting, but that 
 the expression it contains cannot be used in a commercial setting. A simple 
 example is that a CC-NC licensed book cannot be recorded as an audio play 
 which is then sold. If one makes an audio book it must be available for free. 
 However, copies of a CC-NC book can be distributed to students who are paying 
 for a course in English literature as one of the books studied.

I don't understand this concern about 'NC' (non-commercial). I
understood that the give-away open access literature was given-away by
authors precisely because the motivation for publishing publicly funded
research is not for direct commercial gain. Instead, authors derive
impact from others reading and citing their work.

If a company were to create and sell an audio version of a research work
then that increases the author's impact. That doesn't preclude someone
else creating a for-free audio version, nor readers accessing the
original self-archived or gold-OA text version.

OA is not about anti-capitalism - if someone can take the resource (OA
research literature), add value and re-sell it (with suitable
attribution) then that can only be to the advantage of authors and
readers.

-- 
Tim Brody

School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton
Southampton
SO17 1BJ
United Kingdom

Email: t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 7698



[ Part 1.2, This is a digitally signed message part ]
[ Application/PGP-SIGNATURE (Name: signature.asc) 501 bytes. ]
[ Unable to print this part. ]


[ Part 2: Attached Text ]

___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal



[GOAL] Re: RCUK Open Access Feedback

2012-03-19 Thread Jan Velterop
I agree with Tim. Doesn't the 'NC' in CC-BY-NC just mean I can't make money
from it and I would resent it if you could ?
Jan Velterop

               – –  • • •   • • •  – –
**
Drs Johannes (Jan) Velterop, CEOAcademic Concept Knowledge Ltd. (AQnowledge)
+44 7525 026 991 (mobile)
+44 1483 579 525 (landline UK)
+31 70 75 33 789 (landline NL)
Skype: Villavelius
Email: velte...@aqnowledge.com
velte...@gmail.com
aqnowledge.com




On 19 Mar 2012, at 11:37, Tim Brody wrote:

  On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 21:28 +0900, Andrew A. Adams wrote:
David Prosser wrote:

  Say I wanted to data mine 10,000 articles.
   I'm at a university, but I am c=

  o-funded by a pharmaceutical company and
  there is a possibility that the re=

  search that I'm doing may result in a new
  drug discovery, which that compan=

  y will want to take to market.  The 10,000
  articles are all 'open access', =

  but they are under CC-BY-NC-SA licenses.
   What mechanism is there by which =

  I can contact all 10,000 authors and gain
  permission for my research?



The intent of CC-NC is that one cannot take the original
material, re-mix it

(or even just as-is) and sell the resulting new work. It
does not mean that

the information it contains cannot be used in a
commercial setting, but that

the expression it contains cannot be used in a
commercial setting. A simple

example is that a CC-NC licensed book cannot be recorded
as an audio play

which is then sold. If one makes an audio book it must
be available for free.

However, copies of a CC-NC book can be distributed to
students who are paying

for a course in English literature as one of the books
studied.


  I don't understand this concern about 'NC' (non-commercial). I
  understood that the give-away open access literature was
  given-away by
  authors precisely because the motivation for publishing publicly
  funded
  research is not for direct commercial gain. Instead, authors derive
  impact from others reading and citing their work.

  If a company were to create and sell an audio version of a research
  work
  then that increases the author's impact. That doesn't preclude
  someone
  else creating a for-free audio version, nor readers accessing the
  original self-archived or gold-OA text version.

  OA is not about anti-capitalism - if someone can take the resource
  (OA
  research literature), add value and re-sell it (with suitable
  attribution) then that can only be to the advantage of authors and
  readers.

  --
  Tim Brody

  School of Electronics and Computer Science
  University of Southampton
  Southampton
  SO17 1BJ
  United Kingdom

  Email: t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
  Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 7698
  ___
  GOAL mailing list
  GOAL@eprints.org
  http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal





[ Part 2: Attached Text ]

___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal