I suspect that there are a number of members of the AAP that would prefer to
indicate their disapproval by simply not 'signing on' ... I think it is safe to
assume that silence is disapproval.
Dana L. Roth
Millikan Library / Caltech 1-32
1200 E. California Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91125
626-395-6423 fax 626-792-7540
dzr...@library.caltech.edu
http://library.caltech.edu/collections/chemistry.htm
-Original Message-
From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of
Andrew A. Adams
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 6:18 PM
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: MIT Press does not support Research Works Act
Perhaps those of us with contacts in other academic presses (particularly the
major ones such as Oxford, Cambridge, Chicago...) could press their contacts
to push for a disavowal from there, as well. They might also look at how such
AAP lobbying and press releases is working in so diametrically opposed a
fashion to parts of their interests (though I understand that such
organisations have multiple facets and why MIT Press feels unable to drop its
membership over this particular individual issue).
--
Professor Andrew A Adams a...@meiji.ac.jp
Professor at Graduate School of Business Administration, and
Deputy Director of the Centre for Business Information Ethics
Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan http://www.a-cubed.info/
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
