Re: [Goanet] CACOPHANY IN A CAANSO
On 10 February 2010 13:48, Mario Goveia wrote: > > >> From: Frederick Noronha > RESPONSE: Now why does Mario believe he has the monopoly on the truth? > Rather who decides what is the truth?? > > Mario responds: > > > > Untruths include Bosco's snide insinuation that I have a monoply on the > truth, whereas all I have been doing is exposing the truth, whereas Bosco, > Gabe and Fred seem to have understood little of what was said in this > discussion, based on their factless comments, and Gabe's baseles and abusive > attacks on me without a single specific comment mentioned that he disagreed > with. > > Does Bosco dispute this? > RESPONSE: Bosco might not dispute this but I do.here it is in your own words:- Quote This is exactly what I, the big DADA (a la Idi Amin) and lone voice of reason, truth and peace on Goanet have been suggesting all along that NRGs and RGs should be doing. Unquote. Unfortunately you cannot remember what you wrote yesterday - sometimes, what you wrote the same day! Now it is there for all to see; you claim it is a snide remark re your monopoly on truth and there you have it, claiming to be the lone voice of truth...being the lone voice of truth is not a monopoly? Not only that, you throw in a monopoly of lone voice of reason and peace, for good measure. There really is no point, as you will now go and twist what you have written! Your reputation preceeds you, ouch! Haven't you got anything better to do, other than bug people here, day in and day out? -- DEV BOREM KORUM Gabe Menezes.
Re: [Goanet] CACOPHANY IN A CAANSO
>> From: Frederick Noronha >> >> Guys, some unsolicited advice: at some point in the debate, one or >> both (unlikely!) will have to give up on last-wordism :-) > > Mario observes: > > The last word in a public forum should always be some semblance of the truth. Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:58:22 -0500 From: Bosco D RESPONSE: Now why does Mario believe he has the monopoly on the truth? Rather who decides what is the truth?? Mario responds: It is very sad when one has to explain to an adult how to tell the difference between a truth and a falsehood. Anyway, let me try, based only on the unnecessary firefight on NRGs versus RGs, first started by Samir by attacking Rajan's citizenship, later joined by Tony D'Sa. The truth is when I said in the NRG Vs RG discussion that NRGs are not the problem in Goa, but rather rampant corruption between politicians and the businessmen who they are in cahoots with. Does Bosco dispute this? The truth is when I listed what NRGs like Carmen, Rajan, Arwin, George, Anil had done for Goa at their own time and expense in response to the attacks against them and all NRGs. Does Bosco dispute this? The truth is when I appealed for NRGs and RGs to make common cause against the corruption that was making a mess in Goa rather than two RGs attacking all NRGs. Does Bosco dispute this? Untruths include attacks against "foren" NRGs by impugning their motives, credentials, citizenship, countries they live in, etc. and saying they have no standing in Goa. Does Bosco dispute that Samir said this in so many words? Untruths include Tony D'Sa a) joining Samir in attacking "foren" NRGs and claiming that "we and only we", i.e. RGs, can solve the problems in Goa, b) claiming that the mess in Goa is imaginary, c) abusing me with accusations of falsehoods when I intervened to blunt their attack, and d) then piously proclaiming that everyone should work together after Selma and Vivian intervened. Does Bosco dispute that Tony did this? Untruths include Bosco's snide insinuation that I have a monoply on the truth, whereas all I have been doing is exposing the truth, whereas Bosco, Gabe and Fred seem to have understood little of what was said in this discussion, based on their factless comments, and Gabe's baseles and abusive attacks on me without a single specific comment mentioned that he disagreed with. Does Bosco dispute this?
Re: [Goanet] CACOPHANY IN A CAANSO
Mario wrote: > Just like the Cockney Loudmouth, these impotent comments show no > understanding of the discussion, which is pretty amazing coming f > from "foren" NRGs who were the butt of the attacks from some RGs afraid > they were losing the limelight on doing things for Goa. Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:58:14 + From: Gabe Menezes Better to be a Cockney loud mouth than a sniveling, whining whippet..self agrandising, good for nothing so and so. One who allegedly know all things about everything! There aint no one better on Goanet.oooh, go on and on, it becomes not a chore but a bore. Mario reponds: Does this mean that Gabe is admitting to being one himself? Don't his abusive comments shown above fit far more closely with adjectives like "sniveling and whining"? Besides, he seems unable to engage in an adult discussion by specifically picking what he disagrees with and explaining why. I guess he thinks he can bully people with his abuse, which probably works in some circles that he associates with in the east end of London.
Re: [Goanet] CACOPHANY IN A CAANSO
>> From: Frederick Noronha >> >> Guys, some unsolicited advice: at some point in the debate, one or >> both (unlikely!) will have to give up on last-wordism :-) > > Mario observes: > > The last word in a public forum should always be some semblance of the truth. RESPONSE: Now why does Mario believe he has the monopoly on the truth? Rather who decides what is the truth?? Perhaps he forgets Dubya-Em-Dee:-) - B
Re: [Goanet] CACOPHANY IN A CAANSO
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:05:56 +0530 From: Frederick Noronha Guys, some unsolicited advice: at some point in the debate, one or both (unlikely!) will have to give up on last-wordism :-) Mario observes: The last word in a public forum should always be some semblance of the truth. Now, if the following epiphany exhibited by Mr. D'Sa means what it says, that discussion will have ended. Because of your previous comments which showed no cognizance of the discussion that had been taking place you may not have noticed that the guy who started the attack has broken it off, no doubt convinced by the error of his ways and a new found appreciation of NRGs and RGs working together regardless of their domicile and citizenship. Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:45:29 +0530 From: Tony de Sa "Turn your firepower on the real enemy. Rogues desecrating the land of our forefathers?" Mario observes: By jove! Do you think he's finally got it?
Re: [Goanet] CACOPHANY IN A CAANSO
On 7 February 2010 10:06, Mario Goveia wrote: > Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 15:07:52 -0500 > Where were these guys when "foren" NRGs were under attack? Talk about > impotence. > > Just like the Cockney Loudmouth, these impotent comments show no > understanding of the discussion, which is pretty amazing coming from "foren" > NRGs who were the butt of the attacks from some RGs afraid they were losing > the limelight on doing things for Goa. > > RESPONSE: Better to be a Cockney loud mouth than a sniveling, whining whippet..self agrandising, good for nothing so and so. One who allegedly know all things about everything! There aint no one better on Goanet.oooh, go on and on, it becomes not a chore but a bore. -- DEV BOREM KORUM Gabe Menezes.
Re: [Goanet] CACOPHANY IN A CAANSO
Guys, some unsolicited advice: at some point in the debate, one or both (unlikely!) will have to give up on last-wordism :-) -- Frederick Noronha Columnist :: journalism :: editing :: alt.publishing :: photography :: blogging
Re: [Goanet] CACOPHANY IN A CAANSO
As has been discussed in this forum earlier, if you have no wish to read a particular post then please hit the delete button. By what justification do your own inept ramblings on birth control for instance "Turn your firepower on the real enemy. Rogues desecrating the land of our forefathers?" So you can ramble on at will on Goanet and others should stay mum? Stick to your role of an English sacaram only where you have authority. -- Tony de Sa tonyd...@gmail.com M : +91 9975 162 897 Ph. : +91 832 2470 148 ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v
Re: [Goanet] CACOPHANY IN A CAANSO
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 15:07:52 -0500 From: "bo...@goanet.org" From: Xanno Moidecar > Please cease and desist. Turn your firepower on the real enemy. > Rogues desecrating the land of our forefathers. RESPONSE: Certainly you know they are impotent; consequently cannot train their firepower where you are directing them to. > Stop this cacophony in a caanso. RESPONSE: Seconded. Mario is usually boring (repetitive) to read once he has sent in two posts on any topic. Mario asks: Inability to understand what is going on must surely be boring. Cacophony in a caanso? Where were these guys when "foren" NRGs were under attack? Talk about impotence. Just like the Cockney Loudmouth, these impotent comments show no understanding of the discussion, which is pretty amazing coming from "foren" NRGs who were the butt of the attacks from some RGs afraid they were losing the limelight on doing things for Goa.
Re: [Goanet] CACOPHANY IN A CAANSO
Hi Xannea, I agree with you... except when you sound so proprietorial and call it the "land of our forefathers". In their times, didn't "our forefathers" too expropriate this land from someone else? FN PS: Alternatively, do you believe in the man-originated-in-Goa version? On 6 February 2010 17:22, Xanno Moidecar wrote: > It certainly is a storm in a tea cup. RG versus NRG. Both sides in > this impotent imbroglio are hitting out with zeal and indeed > venom; forgetting that the bitter tit for tat is nothing but scoring > of multiple own goals. > While they are at it the real villains are left unscathed to > merrily carry on with the mercenary and malicious destruction > and pillage of Goem. > Please cease and desist. Turn your firepower on the real > enemy. Rogues desecrating the land of our forefathers. > Stop this cacophony in a caanso.
[Goanet] CACOPHANY IN A CAANSO
It certainly is a storm in a tea cup. RG versus NRG. Both sides in this impotent imbroglio are hitting out with zeal and indeed venom; forgetting that the bitter tit for tat is nothing but scoring of multiple own goals. While they are at it the real villains are left unscathed to merrily carry on with the mercenary and malicious destruction and pillage of Goem. Please cease and desist. Turn your firepower on the real enemy. Rogues desecrating the land of our forefathers. Stop this cacophony in a caanso. Sincerely Xanno Moidecar
