Re: [Goanet] When Rajya Sabha nominee of Goa speaks...????
Well said Manuel !! I agree with you absolutely No one but Frederick could put it/them in better Ingerji, and if I may say so .you. Bravo!! jc
[Goanet] When Rajya Sabha nominee of Goa speaks...????
Fredericks comments to JC's points are so bang on that no one could put them in better Ingerji. Twisting and turning doesn't change the nature of the snake. It only goes to prove that a snake is a snake and that its bite is mostly poisonous changes in forums is only another twist to gain a better position to bite. Manuel (Eddie) Tavares.
Re: [Goanet] When Rajya Sabha nominee of Goa speaks...????
FN, I just wanted you to post the goanet rules again... just to see if they
are in line with the below!!
Or is it, that PLACE calling is allowed and No NAME calling...
Best
S
On 9 June 2013 10:05, Frederick FN Noronha wrote:
The ten levels of debate in a JC argument:
* Argue decently.
* Reply with questions.
* Name-call childishly.
* Defend friends, if necessarily angrily.
* Cite Andamans, Daman Bridge, Siddhis, and a few other all-time favourites.
* Take your debate to other lists, suitably masalafied
* Remember one comment made 758 days ago.
* Blast your education, school/college you attended.
* Proffer advice on ethics of journalism, the subject you teach, the
culture in agriculture, etc, etc, etc...
* Question your language ("English is not an easy language" or some such
logic)
If you 'graduate' to 8, 9 or 10, it means you're doing pretty well in the
debate. On the other hand, get stuck in meaningless papi karma of
question-replies-question or
I-said-you-said-that-he-said-but-she-did-not-say means you're getting stuck
somewhere between the Bermuda triangle and the Bahamas cyclones.
Definitely not a good place to be...
Re: [Goanet] When Rajya Sabha nominee of Goa speaks...????
You missed out his constant DEBT - Deranged-Endless-Baby-Talk !
Didn't some irritated folk call him a constipated-unending-nonsense-talker??
> From: Frederick FN Noronha
> Subject: Re: [Goanet] When Rajya Sabha nominee of Goa speaks...
> The ten levels of debate in a JC argument:
>
> * Argue decently.
> * Reply with questions.
> * Name-call childishly.
> * Defend friends, if necessarily angrily.
> * Cite Andamans, Daman Bridge, Siddhis, and a few other all-time favourites.
> * Take your debate to other lists, suitably masalafied
> * Remember one comment made 758 days ago.
> * Blast your education, school/college you attended.
> * Proffer advice on ethics of journalism, the subject you teach, the
> culture in agriculture,
> etc, etc, etc...
> * Question your language ("English is not an easy language" or some such
> logic)
>
> If you 'graduate' to 8, 9 or 10, it means you're doing pretty well in the
> debate. On the other hand, get stuck in meaningless papi karma of
> question-replies-question or
> I-said-you-said-that-he-said-but-she-did-not-say means you're getting stuck
> somewhere between the Bermuda triangle and the Bahamas cyclones. Definitely
> not a good place to be...
>
> FN
Re: [Goanet] When Rajya Sabha nominee of Goa speaks...????
FN-ji
Wahtta dhiss? Hey Ram!
Lino
From: Frederick FN Noronha फ्रेड्रिक नोरोन्या *فريدريك نورونيا
To: "Goa's premiere mailing list, estb. 1994!"
Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2013 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Goanet] When Rajya Sabha nominee of Goa speaks...
On 9 June 2013 18:46, Jose Colaco wrote:
>
> The Ingraji in you posts is quite REVILING.
The ten levels of debate in a JC argument:
* Argue decently.
* Reply with questions.
* Name-call childishly.
* Defend friends, if necessarily angrily.
* Cite Andamans, Daman Bridge, Siddhis, and a few other all-time favourites.
* Take your debate to other lists, suitably masalafied
* Remember one comment made 758 days ago.
* Blast your education, school/college you attended.
* Proffer advice on ethics of journalism, the subject you teach, the
culture in agriculture,
etc, etc, etc...
* Question your language ("English is not an easy language" or some such
logic)
If you 'graduate' to 8, 9 or 10, it means you're doing pretty well in the
debate. On the other hand, get stuck in meaningless papi karma of
question-replies-question or
I-said-you-said-that-he-said-but-she-did-not-say means you're getting stuck
somewhere between the Bermuda triangle and the Bahamas cyclones. Definitely
not a good place to be...
FN
FN +91-832-2409490 or +91-9822122436 f...@goa-india.org
Re: [Goanet] When Rajya Sabha nominee of Goa speaks...????
Dear FN,
Why Thank you Sirjee for that list.
Would you please, dear Sir, care to now state your levels of debate?
You may, if you wish, exclude the following:
1: Break the very rules of posting - which you have on Goanet "rules"
page, while imposing them selectively.
2: Allow some to post bogus stuff about women and children
(repeatedly) (Toronto) without allowing a timely response .
3: FWD erroneous anti-Portuguese stuff (Siddhi), claim to have been
involved in the 'encouragement' of the post, then deny that you had
anything to do with it.
4: Get very sensitive about legitimate criticism of one's "love to
love" historian whose error was recently pointed out.
5: Censors posts critical of one's former bosses who wrote erroneous
posts and pointedly refused to correct herself.
Now: Since you brought it up: I hope why some posts are copied to GX
(set up by Santosh Helekar). Precisely because FN censors posts and
appropriate response without reason.
I hope you are not suggesting that the anti-women, anti-one political
party only, foul (or is it fowl) posts which you have been allowing
should not be challenged.
jc
NOT very sure IF this post will meet your rather interesting post
which, I believe, "opened the door" so to speak.
ps: I trust this is NOT the first time you have heard about your
Salazarism, and that I am not the only person who criticizes you of
non-benevolent dictatorship.
Over to you Sirjee
On 9 June 2013 10:05, Frederick FN Noronha wrote:
The ten levels of debate in a JC argument:
* Argue decently.
* Reply with questions.
* Name-call childishly.
* Defend friends, if necessarily angrily.
* Cite Andamans, Daman Bridge, Siddhis, and a few other all-time favourites.
* Take your debate to other lists, suitably masalafied
* Remember one comment made 758 days ago.
* Blast your education, school/college you attended.
* Proffer advice on ethics of journalism, the subject you teach, the
culture in agriculture, etc, etc, etc...
* Question your language ("English is not an easy language" or some such logic)
If you 'graduate' to 8, 9 or 10, it means you're doing pretty well in
the debate. On the other hand, get stuck in meaningless papi karma of
question-replies-question or
I-said-you-said-that-he-said-but-she-did-not-say means you're getting
stuck somewhere between the Bermuda triangle and the Bahamas cyclones.
Definitely not a good place to be...
[Goanet] When Rajya Sabha nominee of Goa speaks...????
I think, time has come for Atypical, self-appointed, self-styled Officer on Special Duty (OSD) for MP Shantaram Naik to MODIfy himself or else he might continue to suffer from NANOnia along with his master - Shantaram Naik! I think OSD should re-read what he has posted (message appended below)for correctness of using word "YOU." U. G. Barad On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 Jose Colaco cola...@gmail.com wrote, in reply to my message appended herein below: The Ingraji in you posts is quite REVILING. Jc My message: Message: 1 Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 16:08:52 +0530 From: "U. G. Barad" To: Subject: [Goanet] When Rajya Sabha nominee of Goa speaks... I can't expect any better answer(s) from a self-appointed, self-styled Officer on Special Duty(OSD) for MP Shantaram Naik! This new OSD to MP through his reply indicates that he too is suffering from "NAMOnia" ...U. G. Barad
Re: [Goanet] When Rajya Sabha nominee of Goa speaks...????
On 9 June 2013 18:46, Jose Colaco wrote:
>
> The Ingraji in you posts is quite REVILING.
The ten levels of debate in a JC argument:
* Argue decently.
* Reply with questions.
* Name-call childishly.
* Defend friends, if necessarily angrily.
* Cite Andamans, Daman Bridge, Siddhis, and a few other all-time favourites.
* Take your debate to other lists, suitably masalafied
* Remember one comment made 758 days ago.
* Blast your education, school/college you attended.
* Proffer advice on ethics of journalism, the subject you teach, the
culture in agriculture,
etc, etc, etc...
* Question your language ("English is not an easy language" or some such
logic)
If you 'graduate' to 8, 9 or 10, it means you're doing pretty well in the
debate. On the other hand, get stuck in meaningless papi karma of
question-replies-question or
I-said-you-said-that-he-said-but-she-did-not-say means you're getting stuck
somewhere between the Bermuda triangle and the Bahamas cyclones. Definitely
not a good place to be...
FN
FN +91-832-2409490 or +91-9822122436 f...@goa-india.org
Re: [Goanet] When Rajya Sabha nominee of Goa speaks...????
Dokterji, The Ingraji in you posts is quite REVILING. jc -excerpts [C] On Jun 9, 2013, at 6:38 AM, "U. G. Barad" wrote: I can't expect any better answer(s) from a self-appointed, self-styled Officer on Special Duty(OSD) for MP Shantaram Naik! This new OSD to MP through his reply indicates that he too is suffering from "NAMOnia" [B] commented: I agree. Shantaram Naik does not REVILE enough. Would it be too REVILING if I had suggested that some among us (like me for instance) should consider writing only in Marathi? [A]. On Jun 8, 2013, at 3:31 AM, "U. G. Barad" wrote: 1: When Raja Sabha nominee Shantaram Naik speaks he conceals more than he REVILES
[Goanet] When Rajya Sabha nominee of Goa speaks...????
I can't expect any better answer(s) from a self-appointed, self-styled Officer on Special Duty(OSD) for MP Shantaram Naik! This new OSD to MP through his reply indicates that he too is suffering from "NAMOnia" U. G. Barad On Sat, 8 Jun 2013 Jose Colaco cola...@gmail.com wrote: COMMENT: Re1: I agree. Shantaram Naik does not REVILE enough. Re2: That is surely a false accusation. Somebody (even if you are playing Lusophonic Basketball, Table Tennis or Kabbadi) please tell us that the money was actually spent upgrading the Hospicio in Margao. re3: I agree One wrong certainly makes another Wrong Right. Would it be too REVILING if I had suggested that some among us (like me for instance) should consider writing only in Marathi? Yes Yes .Jusht only. jc
