As far as a layman's view is concerned, I say that the Allahabad HC
judgment really
stinks.
Why?
If the title suit was in progress (having being filed before 6 Dec 1992, the
suit should have been kept in the cold storage until the Babri Mosque was
rebuilt in its entirety and its GLORY by the VHP, RSS, Advani Co,
including the cremated Narashima Rao, etc ( with costs to their own/personal
accounts)
Only then the HC could go and impose it's wisdom of the division of the
Ayodhya property into 3 individual parts or whatever.
The Allahabad HC, as according to me, has stitched a robe without using the
traditional thread and the sewing needle, a made to order outfit, perhaps
using the now freely available 'quick-fix'.
How could the learned justices allow the culprits of the demolition of the
Babri Masjid to go scot free, even if the title suit has no terms of
reference
w.r.t. the demolition?
The Justices are totally and complete suspects of being the hired tailors to
do the job of stitching a robe to fit the artificial future of India.
Law should be the Law. This has into been done in this case.
That is why India will never become the super power that it aspires to be.
Because the cooks do not know the basics of cooking.
Another example: It only takes 7 days to do a job which was given 7 years to
complete.
'The CWG .. This is according to the Honourable CM of Delhi.
The question asked here is: 'Where was she sleeping all this while'???
With Kalmadi???
And all of a sudden she happens to get up from the wrong side of the
BED?
Cheers
floriano
goasuraj
9890470896
ww.goasu-raj.org
PS: I don't ( as a citizen of this country) care who these justices are and
what they think of my (layman's) pronouncement. At the end of the day I
shall still call them the hired tailors hired to stitch an acceptale robe
for India. Is this their job as a judiciary? giving us the verbal
diaohhrea in the form of a judgment which runs into thousands of pages?
However, I do wish there was a 'SOLOMON' born in this miserable country
called INDIA [ Goa please be excluded - as it is a potential full-fledged
NATION to be, whether the invaders and the collaborators like it or not.
And Goa's boundaries shall not be messed-up to accommodate greater GOA by
political and senseless idiots. 'Political Idiots'-wanting to safe-guard
their winning innings with the help of the migrant votes, who fear that the
Goan vote will go against them, and the 'senseless idiots' who get up and
sit down as according to the tune played by these obnoxious politicians, for
obvious reasons.
:-))
PS2: If the Passport Officer of Goa is instructed to withdraw my Indian
Passport, so be it. I do not need it. Because my GOAN PASSPORT is already
ready.
:-))
--- Original Message -
From: Santosh Helekar chimbel...@yahoo.com
To: estb. 1994!Goa's premiere mailing list goanet@lists.goanet.org
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 2:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Goanet] Ayodhya verdict
It is quite likely that there are many religious structures in India that
were built on top of the sacred sites or relics of other religions. Do we
want this verdict to be a legal precedent to demolish all the existing
structures and rebuild the original ones?
Cheers,
Santosh
--- On Sat, 10/2/10, Rajan P. Parrikar parri...@yahoo.com wrote:
To Goanet -
Under Goanet News Reader a certain admin has been posting
tracts by well known Marxists trying to discredit the
verdict. No points
for guessing who it is. O the joy!
A friend of mine well versed in Indian history, Tamil as
well as
Sanskrit sent me the following email this morning (by the
way, 'historian'
Romila Thapar does not know squat about Sanskrit yet
claims
to be an 'expert' on ancient India. Marxists can be
quite funny
at times).
A Tamil newspaper here published excerpts from the
archaeological
findings at Ayodhya (dig was done in 2003, at the behest of
the
court). Fascinating. I wish they do a full
blown excavation there.
Accdg to the ASI report, the place has been inhabited
continuously for
more than 2000 years. The dig found layers going back to
early BC,
Gupta and medieval periods (11-12). I wish someone
makes a movie.
p.s. The Hindu dismissed the whole body of arch. evidence
by a
single word - tainted. Tainted by what I wonder?
p.p.s. Irfan Habib and R. Thapar lament that the court
placed too much
emphasis on archaeology. Are these people deluded or am I
too naive?
Regards,
r
