[google-appengine] Re: ERROR: (gcloud.app.deploy) Error Response: [4] Timed out waiting for the flex deployment to become network provisioned.

2018-03-06 Thread 'Jordan (Cloud Platform Support)' via Google App Engine
For any Google-end issues it is recommended to report this to the 
engineering team by opening a Public Issue Tracker report 
. 

Before you file the report, ensure you are running the latest GCloud by 
performing a "gcloud components update 
". Then 
attempt to deploy again but this time with the "--verbosity=debug" and 
"--no-user-output-enabled" options and attach the full output to the Public 
Issue Tracker report. 

- Note that Google Groups is reserved for general product discussions and 
not for reporting Google-end issues and feature requests. All further 
communications about this issue should occur in your Public Issue Tracker 
report. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/770f9791-8096-4c72-b998-701f4c81055b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] Re: Hey Guys can't deploy app engine after update to endpoints V2.

2018-03-06 Thread 'Jordan (Cloud Platform Support)' via Google App Engine
This looks like an Android Studio specific error. As a workaround you can 
simply deploy using the 'gcloud app deploy 
' command in the 
path location of your module's (now called 'service') app.yaml or 
appengine-web.xml file. 

If the deployment cannot find this configuration file it will result in the 
error you are experiencing. Just ensure you have the latest GCloud 
installed by running 'gcloud components update 
' before 
deploying.  

- Note that Google Groups is for general product discussions and not for 
technical support. It is recommended to post further detailed questions 
 to Stack Overflow 
 using the supported 
Cloud and Android Studio tags. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/0ebf8d9b-dc65-444f-ae3c-f50b76854918%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] Re: Does 1 service = 1 instance (thus potentially cost more)?

2018-03-06 Thread Mihail Russu
Your app isn't limited by one instance whether you have one or more 
services up (i.e. the more traffic you get - the more instances wil be 
fired up even if you only have one service).

Anyways, yes, you are correct - adding additional services will require new 
/ separate instances to be running so in many cases it will slightly 
increase the cost.

On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 10:58:55 PM UTC+2, asmith26 wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I am trying to determine if I should break my GAE project from one service 
> to multiple smaller services.
>
> Does each service added cost 1 more instance hour? Looking at the 
> following chart, it would indicate it might:
>
> [image: Hierarchy graph of services/versions/instances]
>
> Thus I am wondering if 1 app running only 1 instance would be cheaper than 
> running multiple services?
>
> Many thanks for any help in advance!
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/0d70476e-0799-4d14-a3bc-1d97c4fc5aa0%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [google-appengine] Re: Does 1 service = 1 instance (thus potentially cost more)?

2018-03-06 Thread Mihail Russu
If it’s a large & complex app - it might make sense to split some parts of its 
code into separate logical services.

And yeah, a smaller app probably would load a lot faster than a complex one so 
I don’t think that would have anything to do with bandwidth costs but would 
definitely help with reducing the latency on launching new instances.

Also, you might want to look into microservices ( 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microservices 
 ) where the approach is to split 
the app into as many small micro app as possible in order to make the 
development of the app easier...

> On Mar 6, 2018, at 11:43 PM, asmith26  wrote:
> 
> Thank you for your answer - can I ask what the advantages of multiple 
> services app are on a single service (default) app? Perhaps if a particular 
> service is requested multiple times, and that service is significantly 
> smaller that a single service app, it may be cheaper due to smaller bandwidth 
> costs??
> 
> Many thanks again for your help!
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 9:18:46 PM UTC, Mihail Russu wrote:
> Your app isn't limited by one instance whether you have one or more services 
> up (i.e. the more traffic you get - the more instances wil be fired up even 
> if you only have one service).
> 
> Anyways, yes, you are correct - adding additional services will require new / 
> separate instances to be running so in many cases it will slightly increase 
> the cost.
> 
> On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 10:58:55 PM UTC+2, asmith26 wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> I am trying to determine if I should break my GAE project from one service to 
> multiple smaller services.
> 
> Does each service added cost 1 more instance hour? Looking at the following 
> chart, it would indicate it might:
> 
> 
> 
> Thus I am wondering if 1 app running only 1 instance would be cheaper than 
> running multiple services?
> 
> Many thanks for any help in advance!
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
> Groups "Google App Engine" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-appengine/XbnuBOaniwc/unsubscribe 
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com 
> .
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/0de117aa-caa3-4afb-9227-1dc7ab18ec59%40googlegroups.com
>  
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/5F831CF4-39F5-4A0F-AF4A-09FEA6C37974%40russu.net.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] Re: GAE local debugging of Spring application

2018-03-06 Thread 'Katayoon (Cloud Platform Support)' via Google App Engine
I recommend that you upgrade your App Engine SDK to the latest version 
 
(1.9.63) and if the issue still persists, open a case in Public issue 
Tracker . Meanwhile, 
you may migrate to the Cloud SDK-based Maven plugin 
 
which should address this issue.

On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 2:52:12 AM UTC-5, Andrey Hudyakov wrote:
>
> Updating Maven and Java 8 to the latest versions didn't help also. Still 
> getting the same error.
>
> четверг, 1 марта 2018 г., 21:16:41 UTC+5 пользователь Yannick (Cloud 
> Platform Support) написал:
>>
>> Hello Andrey, to clarify I meant that Maven itself should be updated.
>>
>> On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 4:19:06 AM UTC-5, Andrey Hudyakov wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello, Yannick!
>>>
>>> Yes, I use maven. Updated to the latest version of Spring Framework 4 
>>> and still getting the same error. I forgot to say that this application 
>>> works fine in Google Cloud after deploy. The problem is reproducing only 
>>> when starting app in local debug mode. I use Google App Engine SDK 1.9.60.
>>> Thank you for help!
>>>
>>> вторник, 27 февраля 2018 г., 23:53:53 UTC+5 пользователь Yannick (Cloud 
>>> Platform Support) написал:

 Hello, are you developing using Maven? If so, could you please try to 
 update it to the latest release? Doing so has resolved this issue for 
 others.

 On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 9:02:02 AM UTC-5, Andrey Hudyakov 
 wrote:
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've developed a web application based on Spring Framework 4 and local 
> debugging had worked fine on Java 7 but after migrated to Java 8 I've got 
> an exception on startup
>
> SEVERE: Context initialization failed
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: java.lang.reflect.Parameter is a 
> restricted class. Please see the Google  App Engine developer's guide for 
> more details.
> at 
> com.google.appengine.tools.development.agent.runtime.Runtime.reject(Runtime.java:50)
> at 
> org.springframework.core.StandardReflectionParameterNameDiscoverer.getParameterNames(StandardReflectionParameterNameDiscoverer.java:56)
> at 
> org.springframework.core.PrioritizedParameterNameDiscoverer.getParameterNames(PrioritizedParameterNameDiscoverer.java:65)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.ConstructorResolver.autowireConstructor(ConstructorResolver.java:182)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.autowireConstructor(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1143)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBeanInstance(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1046)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:510)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:482)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory$1.getObject(AbstractBeanFactory.java:305)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.getSingleton(DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.java:230)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.doGetBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:301)
> at 
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.getBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:201)
> at 
> org.springframework.context.support.PostProcessorRegistrationDelegate.invokeBeanFactoryPostProcessors(PostProcessorRegistrationDelegate.java:120)
> at 
> org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.invokeBeanFactoryPostProcessors(AbstractApplicationContext.java:674)
> at 
> org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.refresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:519)
> at 
> org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoader.configureAndRefreshWebApplicationContext(ContextLoader.java:446)
> at 
> org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoader.initWebApplicationContext(ContextLoader.java:328)
> at 
> org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderListener.contextInitialized(ContextLoaderListener.java:107)
> at 
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.callContextInitialized(ContextHandler.java:843)
> at 
> 

[google-appengine] Re: Does 1 service = 1 instance (thus potentially cost more)?

2018-03-06 Thread asmith26
Thank you for your answer - can I ask what the advantages of multiple 
services app are on a single service (default) app? Perhaps if a particular 
service is requested multiple times, and that service is significantly 
smaller that a single service app, it may be cheaper due to smaller 
bandwidth costs??

Many thanks again for your help!


On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 9:18:46 PM UTC, Mihail Russu wrote:
>
> Your app isn't limited by one instance whether you have one or more 
> services up (i.e. the more traffic you get - the more instances wil be 
> fired up even if you only have one service).
>
> Anyways, yes, you are correct - adding additional services will require 
> new / separate instances to be running so in many cases it will slightly 
> increase the cost.
>
> On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 10:58:55 PM UTC+2, asmith26 wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I am trying to determine if I should break my GAE project from one 
>> service to multiple smaller services.
>>
>> Does each service added cost 1 more instance hour? Looking at the 
>> following chart, it would indicate it might:
>>
>> [image: Hierarchy graph of services/versions/instances]
>>
>> Thus I am wondering if 1 app running only 1 instance would be cheaper 
>> than running multiple services?
>>
>> Many thanks for any help in advance!
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/0de117aa-caa3-4afb-9227-1dc7ab18ec59%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] Re: Does 1 service = 1 instance (thus potentially cost more)?

2018-03-06 Thread 'Katayoon (Cloud Platform Support)' via Google App Engine


I would like to add that here 

 
you can find how instances are managed in App Engine and how you are billed 

 
for them. 


On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 3:58:55 PM UTC-5, asmith26 wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I am trying to determine if I should break my GAE project from one service 
> to multiple smaller services.
>
> Does each service added cost 1 more instance hour? Looking at the 
> following chart, it would indicate it might:
>
> [image: Hierarchy graph of services/versions/instances]
>
> Thus I am wondering if 1 app running only 1 instance would be cheaper than 
> running multiple services?
>
> Many thanks for any help in advance!
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/e7c1a9e5-9f56-4651-a348-2ea80c614f8d%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [google-appengine] Re: Does 1 service = 1 instance (thus potentially cost more)?

2018-03-06 Thread asmith26
Many thanks for your responses and help!!

On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 9:51:11 PM UTC, Mihail Russu wrote:
>
> If it’s a large & complex app - it might make sense to split some parts of 
> its code into separate logical services.
>
> And yeah, a smaller app probably would load a lot faster than a complex 
> one so I don’t think that would have anything to do with bandwidth costs 
> but would definitely help with reducing the latency on launching new 
> instances.
>
> Also, you might want to look into microservices ( 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microservices ) where the approach is to 
> split the app into as many small micro app as possible in order to make the 
> development of the app easier...
>
> On Mar 6, 2018, at 11:43 PM, asmith26  
> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your answer - can I ask what the advantages of multiple 
> services app are on a single service (default) app? Perhaps if a particular 
> service is requested multiple times, and that service is significantly 
> smaller that a single service app, it may be cheaper due to smaller 
> bandwidth costs??
>
> Many thanks again for your help!
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 9:18:46 PM UTC, Mihail Russu wrote:
>>
>> Your app isn't limited by one instance whether you have one or more 
>> services up (i.e. the more traffic you get - the more instances wil be 
>> fired up even if you only have one service).
>>
>> Anyways, yes, you are correct - adding additional services will require 
>> new / separate instances to be running so in many cases it will slightly 
>> increase the cost.
>>
>> On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 10:58:55 PM UTC+2, asmith26 wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> I am trying to determine if I should break my GAE project from one 
>>> service to multiple smaller services.
>>>
>>> Does each service added cost 1 more instance hour? Looking at the 
>>> following chart, it would indicate it might:
>>>
>>> [image: Hierarchy graph of services/versions/instances]
>>>
>>> Thus I am wondering if 1 app running only 1 instance would be cheaper 
>>> than running multiple services?
>>>
>>> Many thanks for any help in advance!
>>>
>>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
> Google Groups "Google App Engine" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-appengine/XbnuBOaniwc/unsubscribe
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com .
> To post to this group, send email to google-a...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/0de117aa-caa3-4afb-9227-1dc7ab18ec59%40googlegroups.com
>  
> 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/296b7fb6-9ca7-43f6-97d9-97f034754350%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] Does 1 service = 1 instance (thus potentially cost more)?

2018-03-06 Thread asmith26
Hi there,

I am trying to determine if I should break my GAE project from one service 
to multiple smaller services.

Does each service added cost 1 more instance hour? Looking at the following 
chart, it would indicate it might:

[image: Hierarchy graph of services/versions/instances]

Thus I am wondering if 1 app running only 1 instance would be cheaper than 
running multiple services?

Many thanks for any help in advance!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/4122068a-8b04-44ea-9440-d74465fa330e%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] Re: Managed SSL DNS Error

2018-03-06 Thread 'Fady (Google Cloud Platform)' via Google App Engine


A possibility would be that your DNS configuration of your domain does not 
include the A / CNAME resource records or that they need to be updated. You 
may refer to this help article 

 
about it. Furthermore, to verify/troubleshoot/enable managed SSL 
certificates you may refer to this document 
.
 
I hope this helps.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/704d00d3-58c1-4b35-83e3-7defb259bb7c%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] Re: Does 1 service = 1 instance (thus potentially cost more)?

2018-03-06 Thread Attila-Mihaly Balazs
Just to add to that: some reasons to use multiple services regardless if 
you want to structure your app as microservices or not:

- on GAE standard instance types and scaling mechanisms are tied together. 
So if you need F instance types for some part of the workload and B types 
for some other part, you need to create separate services
- if you need to run multiple languages (ie. some part of your system is in 
Java and some part is in Python), those can live together in the same 
project but they need to be different services

Cheers,
Attila

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/e7dd0b03-c095-4ff3-8e03-fae09fe92c70%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] Hey Guys can't deploy app engine after update to endpoints V2.

2018-03-06 Thread Guy Dviri



if there's any expert that can help me overcome this issue.
much appreciated.
Guy.
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/23b7be71-bc3d-41b2-b771-90ba6d98e3ff%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] Re: gcloud datastore export

2018-03-06 Thread Ani Hatzis

You could load the Cloud Datastore export files that you have stored in 
Cloud Storage directly into BigQuery .

You can do this manually or automate it. Yesterday I learned about this shell 
script  that someone has done.

Once the data is in BigQuery, you can not only do the usual queries or Data 
Studio reporting etc., but also export the data, see Exporting Table Data 
 (web 
user-interface, command-line, or API).


On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 10:47:07 UTC+1, alex wrote:
>
> Is there any way how to convert files generated by 
>
>gcloud datastore export
>
> to human readable format (fx csv or json)?
>
> I tried -format, but it is used for formatting command response 
> (logically) 
>
> tx, 
> alex
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/0c0f3fef-330f-4564-921b-6e1af073fbc3%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] ERROR: (gcloud.app.deploy) Error Response: [4] Timed out waiting for the flex deployment to become network provisioned.

2018-03-06 Thread Zakaria Andy
I have a problem when I deployed my java application on app-enigine using 
google cloud sdk. When I take a long time to wait deployment process, I get 
error message which indicate was my deployment is failure. Below the error 
message, please help me solve the problem, thank you

[INFO] ERROR: (gcloud.app.deploy) Error Response: [4] Timed out waiting for 
the flex deployment to become network provisioned.
[ERROR] Error: gcloud app command with exit code : 1
[INFO] 

[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] 

[INFO] Total time: 27:33 min
[INFO] Finished at: 2018-03-06T19:16:02+07:00
[INFO] Final Memory: 26M/238M
[INFO] 

[ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
com.google.appengine:gcloud-maven-plugin:2.0.9.133.v20161104:deploy 
(default-cli) on project kofera-builder-adwords-worker: Error: gcloud app 
command exit code is: 1 -> [Help 1]
[ERROR] 
[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e 
switch.
[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[ERROR] 
[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, 
please read the following articles:
[ERROR] [Help 1] 
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/a61c1614-c9ff-4733-a06b-a86a924775df%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] Re: gcloud datastore export

2018-03-06 Thread 'George (Cloud Platform Support)' via Google App Engine
You may consider the Cloud Datastore to Cloud Storage Text feature 
,
 
in beta stage, a template implemented as a batch pipeline. It allows you to 
choose a GQL query that specifies which entities to grab. For example, 
SELECT * FROM MyKind.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/f55b1d7c-b049-4cef-acd2-7066de4da295%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] gcloud datastore export

2018-03-06 Thread alex
Is there any way how to convert files generated by 

   gcloud datastore export

to human readable format (fx csv or json)?

I tried -format, but it is used for formatting command response (logically) 

tx, 
alex

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/8823b6a2-4d66-47b2-b559-b18c4b30e370%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.