Re: RequestFactory / collections
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Magno Machado magn...@gmail.com wrote: But only foo got persisted, not it's bars RequestFactory itself doesn't persist anything, it just synchronizes the object graph between client server. How exactly you would persist a Foo, a list of Bars, and the relationship is dependent on what data storage you are using, so there needs to be logic inside the persist() method of Foo, that persists not only the Foo, but any relationships and their objects. If you inspect Foo.getItems() inside the Foo's persist() method, a list of Bars should be there, that's where RequestFactory's part ends. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: RequestFactory / collections
Yeah, realized the diff mechanism takes care of what problems I was thinking of shortly after posting, doh. It does mean, you can set a relationship you never retrieved with with(), but you can not un-set (null) a relationship unless you retrieved it, of course, who cares..! (and I didn't check this) On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: No, RF does a diff between the object you retrieved (unmodifiable, passed to context.edit(obj)) and the one you're editing (returned from context.edit(obj)) at the time you fire() your context, and sends that diff over the wire. If you didn't retrieve a property and fills it on the client-side, it'll see that you filled it and will send it to the server. The only exception is ValueProxy: every single property in a ValueProxy is sent, no diff is made, each ValueProxy instance is a distinct value. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/szisuiWUylIJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: too much code: GWT Development with Activities and Places
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:13 PM, magnum p.magnow...@gmail.com wrote: view implementations ... but honestly I'd rather have a smart view / presenter class that wires everything together. The processing is delegated to event bus or other handler that processes the business logic. There's nothing stopping you doing this, you can use a UiBinder template and backing class as a combined view/presenter. You will of course lose the decoupling of views/presenters the MVP framework is bringing to the table, and its advantages. I havn't read the MVP docs in a while, but it should probably be better explained that its just *one* way of doing GWT development, not *the* way, and your free to use part of it, none of it, all of it, depending on what you actually need. As a newcomer to GWT (and Java!) I spent a lot of time on it when starting out, as it was the most prominent documentation on how to do certain things (views and 'pages'/places in particular) for very little net gain. For simple apps, using UiBinder and attaching the resulting widget to the page manually lets you actually get to the meat of your application much faster and with much much less complexity. You can always refactor to MVP later.. (though that doesn't sound fun) anyway just my 2cents, maybe with better tooling there would be fewer of these 'MVP is too complex' threads. And on tooling, and RequestFactory, the new annotation processor is great, compile time validation really helps (I am manually writing my proxies) but I was disappointed to see that the 'RPC tooling' is only for Android Apps. Are we expecting to see GPE provide Proxy/RequestContext generation in the future for non-android apps? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: install problem help me thanks
Download the latest gwt 2.4.0 sdk from the link http:// code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/detail? name=gwt-2.4.0.zip. Extract the gwt-2.4.0 zip file to the desired directory. In eclipse IDE configure your corresponding gwt sdk. File-- New-- WebApplication Project--configure sdk --Add --Installation directory using Browse button. S. Abraham www.DataStoreGwt.com Persist objects directly in GAE On Sep 23, 11:19 am, wisdom white pkmsys...@gmail.com wrote: when I install gwt the eclipse shows me a error like: An error occurred while collecting items to be installed session context was:(profile=epp.package.jee, phase=org.eclipse.equinox.internal.p2.engine.phases.Collect, operand=, action=). No repository found containing: osgi.bundle,com.springsource.javax.jms, 1.1.0 anyone can tell me what should i do thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
RequestFactory Android - handling different app versions
Howdy,
I'm looking into using RequestFactory to backup my game's data to
AppEngine. Is it possible to have different versions of the client
app, with different EntityProxies, safely make requests?
For example:
Version 1:
MyProxy
{
getX()
getY()
}
Version 2:
{
getX();
// getY() is removed
}
Once the server is updated to version 2, it seems that all clients
running version 1 will no longer be able to make requests (i get
Internal Server Error.
Getting your users to update isn't always easy on Android. Is there
any way around this? Or do I just have to be careful to never remove
methods once I've added them to my entities and their proxies?
Thanks!
Chad
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Split panel
Hi, I want to create a page in GWT that contain 2 parts.One for input and second with results. The input part should be device to 3. 2 parts that contain label,text box and in the middle several checkbox and button. How can it be done ? Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
show [ERROR] Element may only contain a single child element, GWT Binder error problem in gwt 2.3.0
I am having the problem when I compile my project. I send the code segement. Advance thanks. ui:UiBinder xmlns:ui='urn:ui:com.google.gwt.uibinder' xmlns:g='urn:import:com.google.gwt.user.client.ui' g:DockLayoutPanel ui:field=dock1 g:north size=25 g:FlowPanel g:Button ui:field=saveSave/ g:Button /g:FlowPanel /g:north g:center g:FlowPanel ui:field=panel1 g:Button ui:field=button1Mark1/ g:Button g:Button ui:field=button2Mark2/ g:Button /g:FlowPanel g:VerticalPanel ui:field=panel2 g:TextArea ui:field=textArea / /g:VerticalPanel /g:center /g:DockLayoutPanel /ui:UiBinder -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Edit an object in a List without a ListEditor
Your editor for ConfigProxy would be a ValueAwareEditor. It'll receive the ConfigProxy in setValue so you could push the LanguageProxy to a widget of your choice (actually you could even use a sub editor driver). In the flush method, you'd manually flush the LanguageProxy to the ConfigProxy. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/x5tG5S8MZvkJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: show [ERROR] Element may only contain a single child element, GWT Binder error problem in gwt 2.3.0
Each section of a DockLayoutPanel may only contain one Widget, you have two in your center, you'll need to put panel1 and panel2, inside a container panel, and have that as the widget in center. On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Brito britoscho...@gmail.com wrote: I am having the problem when I compile my project. I send the code segement. Advance thanks. ui:UiBinder xmlns:ui='urn:ui:com.google.gwt.uibinder' xmlns:g='urn:import:com.google.gwt.user.client.ui' g:DockLayoutPanel ui:field=dock1 g:north size=25 g:FlowPanel g:Button ui:field=saveSave/ g:Button /g:FlowPanel /g:north g:center g:FlowPanel ui:field=panel1 g:Button ui:field=button1Mark1/ g:Button g:Button ui:field=button2Mark2/ g:Button /g:FlowPanel g:VerticalPanel ui:field=panel2 g:TextArea ui:field=textArea / /g:VerticalPanel /g:center /g:DockLayoutPanel /ui:UiBinder -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
RequestFactory Android - handling different app versions
I think this is exactly what ServiceLayerDecorator is made for. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/WeDE-BZwoN4J. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: RequestFactory / collections
AFAIK, the list is copied when set into the proxy (so that it can be proxied itself). You should add to foo.getBars() instead. (and by foo only got persisted, I suppose you're saying that getBars() returns null or an empty list in your persist() method, and/or that setBars() is never called?) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/GY5l-Q1DvvAJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: too much code: GWT Development with Activities and Places
On Saturday, September 24, 2011 12:48:02 PM UTC+2, Aidan OK wrote: I havn't read the MVP docs in a while, but it should probably be better explained that its just *one* way of doing GWT development, not *the* way, and your free to use part of it, none of it, all of it, depending on what you actually need. GWT is a toolkit, not a framework, so it cannot be otherwise. You're free to not use widgets at all too (I believe most GWT-Query projects do not use widgets); and you could, technically, even replace the whole JRE emulation with your own (except for Longs probably). And BTW, MVP is a design pattern, and there's no one single way of implementing it (the MVP articles in the GWT doc makes it kind of clear). And the fact that Activities and Places (which people sometimes erroneously call MVP framework) are quite new makes it clear that it's not the way to build GWT apps: there must have been ways to do it before they're introduced! Are we expecting to see GPE provide Proxy/RequestContext generation in the future for non-android apps? See https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-plugin-eclipse/L4rzC5xnzW4/discussion -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/oKfby3zLqUcJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
TextCell in Cell Table
Can I add Text Cell in Cell Table . I extended TextCellbut later realzied
cant add cellTable.addColumn(MyTextCell,Col Name)
public class MyTextCell extends TextCell
{
public MyTextCell () { super(); }
public void render(Context context, SafeHtml value, SafeHtmlBuilder sb)
{
if (value != null) {
//Ren der logic
}
}
}
I just realized
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Custom cell, not responding to mouse clicks
I have a CellTable with a custom cell that extends AbstractCell and overrides the render method for displaying its data. The problem is that I can't click inside the actual cell to select it, I have to click somewhere outside the cell. The default color change on mouse hover also does not work within the actual cell. I am using a SingleSelectionModel to display a popup when I select something in the cell table. What do I need to do to make my cell respond to clicks and handle the mouse over effect? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/g1Vf-3l_JfUJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
How to override default clean.css styles?
Hello, GWT seems to override some of the body tag styling I want to apply, how can I set styles in a way that they are not overriden or modify the clean.css file? I can't find the clean.css file anywhere in the project. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: too much code: GWT Development with Activities and Places
On Sep 24, 2011, at 8:53 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday, September 24, 2011 12:48:02 PM UTC+2, Aidan OK wrote: I havn't read the MVP docs in a while, but it should probably be better explained that its just *one* way of doing GWT development, not *the* way, and your free to use part of it, none of it, all of it, depending on what you actually need. GWT is a toolkit, not a framework, so it cannot be otherwise. You're free to not use widgets at all too (I believe most GWT-Query projects do not use widgets); and you could, technically, even replace the whole JRE emulation with your own (except for Longs probably). And BTW, MVP is a design pattern, and there's no one single way of implementing it (the MVP articles in the GWT doc makes it kind of clear). And the fact that Activities and Places (which people sometimes erroneously call MVP framework) are quite new makes it clear that it's not the way to build GWT apps: there must have been ways to do it before they're introduced! Are we expecting to see GPE provide Proxy/RequestContext generation in the future for non-android apps? See https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-plugin-eclipse/L4rzC5xnzW4/discussion -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/oKfby3zLqUcJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
CellTable styles incorrectly on IE9
If I take the example code directly from the GWT API docs for CellTable (i.e. the code for an entry point module that creates and displays a contact table with a manual list), the table that is displayed has no formatting whatsoever on IE9. It is just simple left- justified text with no styling and nothing is selectable. If I replace the CellTable with a DataGrid, only the paging control displays. On Chrome and Firefox these appear to work. I have tried all combinations of styling, tried replacing the CellTable.Resources with my own styling, etc., etc. and it never works. Is there a trick to making the new data widgets style properly on IE9? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: CellTable styles incorrectly on IE9
IE9 is supported sinde GWT 2.3.0, what version of GWT are you use? 2011/9/24 drtman drt...@gmail.com If I take the example code directly from the GWT API docs for CellTable (i.e. the code for an entry point module that creates and displays a contact table with a manual list), the table that is displayed has no formatting whatsoever on IE9. It is just simple left- justified text with no styling and nothing is selectable. If I replace the CellTable with a DataGrid, only the paging control displays. On Chrome and Firefox these appear to work. I have tried all combinations of styling, tried replacing the CellTable.Resources with my own styling, etc., etc. and it never works. Is there a trick to making the new data widgets style properly on IE9? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: CellTable styles incorrectly on IE9
I am using the latest, i.e. 2.4.0, and the latest version of the eclipse plugin (just updated last night). Perhaps it's a some setting in IE9, but I have tried turning compatibility view on/off, putting the IE=9 meta tag in the html loader file, and a variety of other things, but it's just broken. I am using IE 9.0.8112.16421. On Sep 24, 8:14 pm, Juan Pablo Gardella gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com wrote: IE9 is supported sinde GWT 2.3.0, what version of GWT are you use? 2011/9/24 drtman drt...@gmail.com If I take the example code directly from the GWT API docs for CellTable (i.e. the code for an entry point module that creates and displays a contact table with a manual list), the table that is displayed has no formatting whatsoever on IE9. It is just simple left- justified text with no styling and nothing is selectable. If I replace the CellTable with a DataGrid, only the paging control displays. On Chrome and Firefox these appear to work. I have tried all combinations of styling, tried replacing the CellTable.Resources with my own styling, etc., etc. and it never works. Is there a trick to making the new data widgets style properly on IE9? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Edit an object in a List without a ListEditor
Your editor for ConfigProxy would be a ValueAwareEditor. It'll receive the ConfigProxy in setValue so you could push the LanguageProxy to a widget of your choice (actually you could even use a sub editor driver). In the flush method, you'd manually flush the LanguageProxy to the ConfigProxy. Thanks, this explains the crux of ValueAwareEditor! When will ValueAwareEditor#onPropertyChange called?? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/fhrzebxYT-sJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
[gwt-contrib] Makes sure the RenderablePanel inherits all attributes from the PotentialElement when realizing ... (issue1556805)
Reviewers: rjrjr,
Description:
Makes sure the RenderablePanel inherits all attributes from the
PotentialElement when realizing the Element.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1556805/
Affected files:
M user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/PotentialElement.java
M user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/RenderablePanel.java
Index: user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/PotentialElement.java
===
--- user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/PotentialElement.java (revision
10670)
+++ user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/PotentialElement.java (working
copy)
@@ -16,9 +16,11 @@
package com.google.gwt.user.client.ui;
import com.google.gwt.core.client.JavaScriptObject;
+import com.google.gwt.dom.builder.client.DomBuilderFactory;
+import com.google.gwt.dom.builder.shared.ElementBuilder;
+import com.google.gwt.dom.builder.shared.HtmlBuilderFactory;
+import com.google.gwt.dom.builder.shared.HtmlElementBuilder;
import com.google.gwt.dom.client.Element;
-import com.google.gwt.dom.builder.shared.HtmlElementBuilder;
-import com.google.gwt.dom.builder.shared.HtmlBuilderFactory;
/**
* EXPERIMENTAL and subject to change. Do not use this in production code.
@@ -78,9 +80,25 @@
* the builder
* @return a propertly configured {@link HtmlElementBuilder} instance
*/
- public static HtmlElementBuilder createBuilderFor(Element
potentialElement) {
+ public static HtmlElementBuilder createHtmlBuilderFor(Element
potentialElement) {
PotentialElement el = PotentialElement.as(potentialElement);
HtmlElementBuilder builder = HtmlBuilderFactory.get().trustedCreate(
+el.getTagName());
+el.mergeInto(builder);
+return builder;
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Creates an {@link ElementBuilder} instance inheriting all attributes
+ * set for the given PotentialElement.
+ *
+ * @param potentialElement assumed to be a PotentialElement, used as
basis for
+ * the builder
+ * @return a propertly configured {@link ElementBuilder} instance
+ */
+ public static ElementBuilder createDomBuilderFor(Element
potentialElement) {
+PotentialElement el = PotentialElement.as(potentialElement);
+ElementBuilder builder = DomBuilderFactory.get().trustedCreate(
el.getTagName());
el.mergeInto(builder);
return builder;
@@ -164,7 +182,7 @@
* prototype. Do this by severing the __proto__ link, allowing us to
iterate
* only on the fields set in this specific instance.
*/
- private native void mergeInto(HtmlElementBuilder builder) /*-{
+ private native void mergeInto(ElementBuilder builder) /*-{
var savedProto = this.__proto__;
var tagName = this.tagName;
var gwtResolve = this.__gwt_resolve;
Index: user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/RenderablePanel.java
===
--- user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/RenderablePanel.java (revision
10670)
+++ user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/RenderablePanel.java (working
copy)
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@
@Override
public SafeHtml render(RenderableStamper stamper) {
-HtmlElementBuilder builder =
PotentialElement.createBuilderFor(getElement());
+HtmlElementBuilder builder =
PotentialElement.createHtmlBuilderFor(getElement());
stamper.stamp(builder);
builder.html(getInnerHtml()).end();
@@ -229,18 +229,8 @@
* that may have been added to the panel.
*/
private void buildAndInitDivContainer() {
-// TODO(rdcastro): Use the same technique as in render() above.
-
-// Build the div that'll container the panel's HTML.
-Element element = Document.get().createDivElement();
-element.setInnerHTML(getInnerHtml().asString());
-
-// TODO(rdcastro): Implement something like
-// element.mergeFrom(getElement());
-String styleName = getStyleName();
-if (styleName != null) {
- element.setClassName(styleName);
-}
+Element element = PotentialElement.createDomBuilderFor(getElement())
+.html(getInnerHtml()).finish();
setElement(element);
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
