Fwd:
http://baroniebanden.nl/vgvrxmy.php -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: ListEditor adding immutable object from another RequestFactory request.
On Friday, January 4, 2013 5:40:59 PM UTC+1, salk31 wrote: I'm not sure of the contract with a ListEditor. If I fetch an object using a different RequestContext is it my responsibility to make it editable in the editors RequestContext before adding to the list? The problem I'm having is that if I don't then when adding to the ListEditor the method AbstractEditorDelegate$ChainR,S.attach(R, S) line: 83 will grab a mutable copy so the item editor will have a different instance to the one in the list... This seems bad. IIRC, if you pass an immutable proxy to the RequestFactoryEditorDriver, the ListEditor will be given a list of immutable proxies, and each item editor will then be given a mutable copy. So should I do listEditor.getList().add(requestContext.edit(newThing)) ? I always prefer explicitly edit()ing my proxies rather than let this responsibility to the editor driver, so I'd rather do it that way, but I don't think this is a must-do. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/pnakbQ54v30J. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: ListEditor adding immutable object from another RequestFactory request.
Thanks Thomas, Explicit edit()ing does seem good as then the developer is aware that there will be two versions of the same object. What was catching me out is that the mutable copy is not equal() to its original, so remove from the list didn't work if I used the wrong reference. My only niggle with this is that the Editor/RequestFactory framework sometimes does this for you so not a nice simple always pass editable proxies for the Editor framework to use... This seems quite a nasty gotcha for ListEditor with RequestFactory? Presumably the complication is that ListEditor should not be coupled to RequestFactory usage. Do you think it would be worth me raising a ticket for some javadoc comments at least? ListEditor have something like NB If using with RequestFactory then item Editors may be passed references to mutable copies of items added to the List btw Have I done something wrong trying to get this tiny patch through http://www.gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1636803/ ? I love GWT so it would be nice to help even if it is just fixing typos in the Javadoc. Sam On Saturday, January 5, 2013 11:29:45 AM UTC, Thomas Broyer wrote: On Friday, January 4, 2013 5:40:59 PM UTC+1, salk31 wrote: I'm not sure of the contract with a ListEditor. If I fetch an object using a different RequestContext is it my responsibility to make it editable in the editors RequestContext before adding to the list? The problem I'm having is that if I don't then when adding to the ListEditor the method AbstractEditorDelegate$ChainR,S.attach(R, S) line: 83 will grab a mutable copy so the item editor will have a different instance to the one in the list... This seems bad. IIRC, if you pass an immutable proxy to the RequestFactoryEditorDriver, the ListEditor will be given a list of immutable proxies, and each item editor will then be given a mutable copy. So should I do listEditor.getList().add(requestContext.edit(newThing)) ? I always prefer explicitly edit()ing my proxies rather than let this responsibility to the editor driver, so I'd rather do it that way, but I don't think this is a must-do. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/O73SvLw8peUJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Problems with Windows 8, JDK 7, GWT 2.5 and GWT Designer, Eclipse 3.7, and Tomcat 6. Do NOT use JDK 7.
Happy New Year, everyone. I bought a Samsung ultrabook this Thanksgiving. Downloaded and installed this toolset (all 64-bit), and started doing some new code development. I run the code all in Eclipse up to last night. Then I run into issues when I tried to build the war and run it in Tomcat. First the GWT compile never completes. It hangs on Compiling 6 permutations. Then Tomcat won't start. It hangs at the very beginning try to initialize SSL engine. If I change the server.xml to not use SSL, it complains about not able to open the sockets on various ports. After spending many hours last night trying to figure out whether Windows 8 has some services using these ports without success, I finally give up. Uninstalled JDK7 and installed JDK 6. Both problems are resolved. I don't know if the JDK problem is with the Windows 8 platform only. I have seen others saying they can compile GWT 2.5 and run Tomcat 6 with JDK 7, while others saying not. So just want to share this with the group, in case you run into the same problem. Colin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/S6oobZh8pZ8J. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Problems with Windows 8, JDK 7, GWT 2.5 and GWT Designer, Eclipse 3.7, and Tomcat 6. Do NOT use JDK 7.
The problem is winzoz. Regards Inviato da iPhone Il giorno 05/gen/2013, alle ore 14:52, colin colinzhao...@yahoo.com ha scritto: Happy New Year, everyone. I bought a Samsung ultrabook this Thanksgiving. Downloaded and installed this toolset (all 64-bit), and started doing some new code development. I run the code all in Eclipse up to last night. Then I run into issues when I tried to build the war and run it in Tomcat. First the GWT compile never completes. It hangs on Compiling 6 permutations. Then Tomcat won't start. It hangs at the very beginning try to initialize SSL engine. If I change the server.xml to not use SSL, it complains about not able to open the sockets on various ports. After spending many hours last night trying to figure out whether Windows 8 has some services using these ports without success, I finally give up. Uninstalled JDK7 and installed JDK 6. Both problems are resolved. I don't know if the JDK problem is with the Windows 8 platform only. I have seen others saying they can compile GWT 2.5 and run Tomcat 6 with JDK 7, while others saying not. So just want to share this with the group, in case you run into the same problem. Colin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/S6oobZh8pZ8J. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Code Splitting Simple Example Still getting Thrown into Left Overs
I would greatly appreciate some input here. I am trying to use the below
references to implement Code Splitting w/ Activities/Place/GIN
HOWEVER, I can't get anything to work. Not even a simple solution which I
'think' should be working regardless of my current implementation for
A/P+GIN...
Thomas' ActivityAsyncProxy https://gist.github.com/3038878 (This is the
method I am trying to use)
Other References:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5129
My Hope is that I am doing something blatantly wrong. I have a simple Split
Point that creates a string and custom widget (very simple) and shows a
PopupPanel. However it still gets thrown into the Left overs.
My end goal is the complete solution to MVP/GIN (which originally didn't
work so I thought I'd try this simple solution - no luck so I'm coming to
you guys:)
I've attached a piece of the Compile Report and including the below links
for better reference:
https://github.com/ashtonthomas/gwt-async-mvp-gin
https://github.com/ashtonthomas/gwt-async-mvp-gin/blob/master/src/io/ashton/async/client/app/Application.java
http://www.ashtonthomas.com/compile-report.zip
Button b = new Button(Click Me, new ClickHandler() {
@Override
public void onClick(ClickEvent event) {
GWT.runAsync(Application.class, new RunAsyncCallback() {
@Override
public void onSuccess() {
String sp3 = 3sp33sp
33sp33sp33sp33sp33sp33sp33sp33sp33sp33sp33spp3;
VerticalPanel vp = new VerticalPanel();
vp.add(new InlineLabel(sp3));
MySPTestWidget t = new MySPTestWidget(); // Simple Composite
with unique string to test SP
vp.add(t);
PopupPanel p = new PopupPanel();
p.setWidget(vp);
p.center();
}
@Override
public void onFailure(Throwable reason) {
Window.alert(SP Application Failed);
}
});
}
});
Any thoughts on why the simple (and possibly the ultimate goal of
MVP/GIN-CodeSplitting) is not working?
https://github.com/ashtonthomas/gwt-async-mvp-gin
Thanks very much in advance!
-Ashton
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/pEAOAya9oH4J.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
attachment: GwtSPCompileReport.jpg
Fwd:
http://residuoeletronicodobrasil.com.br/fymgeio.php -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Unable to intregrate gwt-ext with gwt 2.5
Unable to intregrate gwt-ext with gwt 2.5 can u please help it out -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/BO0TafDBJvUJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
GWT Calendar API 3 CalendarEntryPoint.java insertEvent returns Bad Request Cntx
CalendarEntryPoint.java works except for the insertEvent which is giving me a Bad Request Cntx as it is presented in the example. onModuleLoad, login, and getCalendarId work as expected, but the insertEvent returns Bad Request Cntx: com.google.api.gwt.services.calendar.shared.Calendar_EventsContextImpl@40 The event in the example when printed as event.toString returns: com.google.api.gwt.services.calendar.shared.model.EventAutoBean_com_google_web_bindery_requestfactory_shared_impl_EntityProxyCategory_com_google_web_bindery_requestfactory_shared_impl_ValueProxyCategory_com_google_web_bindery_requestfactory_shared_impl_BaseProxyCategory$2@9386df6b Please, Please help me here. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/D7G_IPdZUAQJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
