How to load a JRE-dependent/non-compile-mode-supported class in GWT Dev Mode
For a particular GWT module, I'm able to solve a problem in compiled mode by manipulating the JS object representing the Java object. (Specifically, I need to clone the object, so I simply create a new JS object, copy the properties from the original JS object, and assign a new hash value.) I've tested this an it works OK. Since that approach (that I use in compiled mode) doesn't work in Dev Mode, I want to use Object.clone(), which is available in Dev Mode, to perform the clone operation. However, I'm not sure how to accomplish this as every approach I try hits a problem. - I can't seem to use deferred binding (i.e. GWT.create() and replace with in the module gwt.xml file), for two reasons: 1. Even in Dev Mode, when I replace a class using replace with, the class I swap in seems not to be able to use JRE-only methods, such as reflection or Object.clone. I get an error that the source code for the method is not available. I don't want this class compiled, but it seems to want to compile it to JS. 2. If I solve #1, then I have to figure out how to get the replace with to be conditional based on being in dev mode. I'm using ant to build the compiled-mode stuff and I'm using Eclipse to run dev mode. Is there way to make this automatic so I can use the same module gwt.xml in Eclipse and for an ant build? I guess I'd need an ant property that automatically is set by compiled but not by development mode, or vice versa? - I also tried simply using new Foo() (rather than GWT.create() and deferred binding), placing the JS-copying/GWT-compile-friendly version of Foo in the normal location. This works for GWT compiled mode obviously. Then for Dev Mode, I add a new source directory to the class path in Eclipse and stick a different class Foo there that uses the JRE-only APIs (such as Object.clone). However, this hits the same problem as deferred binding - I still get an error that the source code is not available for various APIs I use in that version of Foo (e.g. reflection APIs). Right now, I've managed to use the Eclipse expression panel to manually load the JRE-version of Foo I mentioned above (in the special class path segment). So I know it's possible for it to coexist with other Dev Mode classes, but how do I load it programmatically as part of starting GWT DevMode class? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: How to load a JRE-dependent/non-compile-mode-supported class in GWT Dev Mode
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 8:53:39 AM UTC+1, Benjamin Bitdiddle wrote: For a particular GWT module, I'm able to solve a problem in compiled mode by manipulating the JS object representing the Java object. (Specifically, I need to clone the object, so I simply create a new JS object, copy the properties from the original JS object, and assign a new hash value.) I've tested this an it works OK. Since that approach (that I use in compiled mode) doesn't work in Dev Mode, I want to use Object.clone(), which is available in Dev Mode, to perform the clone operation. However, I'm not sure how to accomplish this as every approach I try hits a problem. - I can't seem to use deferred binding (i.e. GWT.create() and replace with in the module gwt.xml file), for two reasons: 1. Even in Dev Mode, when I replace a class using replace with, the class I swap in seems not to be able to use JRE-only methods, such as reflection or Object.clone. I get an error that the source code for the method is not available. I don't want this class compiled, but it seems to want to compile it to JS. 2. If I solve #1, then I have to figure out how to get the replace with to be conditional based on being in dev mode. I'm using ant to build the compiled-mode stuff and I'm using Eclipse to run dev mode. Is there way to make this automatic so I can use the same module gwt.xml in Eclipse and for an ant build? I guess I'd need an ant property that automatically is set by compiled but not by development mode, or vice versa? - I also tried simply using new Foo() (rather than GWT.create() and deferred binding), placing the JS-copying/GWT-compile-friendly version of Foo in the normal location. This works for GWT compiled mode obviously. Then for Dev Mode, I add a new source directory to the class path in Eclipse and stick a different class Foo there that uses the JRE-only APIs (such as Object.clone). However, this hits the same problem as deferred binding - I still get an error that the source code is not available for various APIs I use in that version of Foo (e.g. reflection APIs). Right now, I've managed to use the Eclipse expression panel to manually load the JRE-version of Foo I mentioned above (in the special class path segment). So I know it's possible for it to coexist with other Dev Mode classes, but how do I load it programmatically as part of starting GWT DevMode class? It seems like you're looking for super-source and @GwtScriptOnly. In your standard source location you'll put the class you want to use in DevMode, then in the super-source (you have to declare a super-source path=super / in your gwt.xml) you put the version of the class you want to use in web mode, and you annotate it with @com.google.gwt.core.client.GwtScriptOnly (note: that class only exists in super-source too, so you won't find it by auto-complete in your IDE). See http://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/DevGuideOrganizingProjects.html#DevGuideModuleXml This is used in many places in GWT if you need examples: WeakMapping, StringCase, SafeHtmlHostedModeUtils, etc. (that said, I suspect you're doing something Wrong™ if you need this for Object.clone(), and you'd better try to find an alternative) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: How to load a JRE-dependent/non-compile-mode-supported class in GWT Dev Mode
Thanks for the quick response. I haven't tried it yet, but will soon. I want to use Object.clone() because I have a situation where I need to create a (shallow) duplicate of a Java class that differs from the original only by virtue of pointing to a different JS object (with one member). *The class may be one I have no control over, such as something user writes*, so I can't insist that it implement any particular API. (I guess the ideal situation would be to have my root class A implement myClone(), which clones by just calling a constructor for that class with the right arguments, and then require that any class B that a user writes to extend A override myClone(). However, I don't think I can require that.) On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 3:19:29 AM UTC-6, Thomas Broyer wrote: On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 8:53:39 AM UTC+1, Benjamin Bitdiddle wrote: For a particular GWT module, I'm able to solve a problem in compiled mode by manipulating the JS object representing the Java object. (Specifically, I need to clone the object, so I simply create a new JS object, copy the properties from the original JS object, and assign a new hash value.) I've tested this an it works OK. Since that approach (that I use in compiled mode) doesn't work in Dev Mode, I want to use Object.clone(), which is available in Dev Mode, to perform the clone operation. However, I'm not sure how to accomplish this as every approach I try hits a problem. - I can't seem to use deferred binding (i.e. GWT.create() and replace with in the module gwt.xml file), for two reasons: 1. Even in Dev Mode, when I replace a class using replace with, the class I swap in seems not to be able to use JRE-only methods, such as reflection or Object.clone. I get an error that the source code for the method is not available. I don't want this class compiled, but it seems to want to compile it to JS. 2. If I solve #1, then I have to figure out how to get the replace with to be conditional based on being in dev mode. I'm using ant to build the compiled-mode stuff and I'm using Eclipse to run dev mode. Is there way to make this automatic so I can use the same module gwt.xml in Eclipse and for an ant build? I guess I'd need an ant property that automatically is set by compiled but not by development mode, or vice versa? - I also tried simply using new Foo() (rather than GWT.create() and deferred binding), placing the JS-copying/GWT-compile-friendly version of Foo in the normal location. This works for GWT compiled mode obviously. Then for Dev Mode, I add a new source directory to the class path in Eclipse and stick a different class Foo there that uses the JRE-only APIs (such as Object.clone). However, this hits the same problem as deferred binding - I still get an error that the source code is not available for various APIs I use in that version of Foo (e.g. reflection APIs). Right now, I've managed to use the Eclipse expression panel to manually load the JRE-version of Foo I mentioned above (in the special class path segment). So I know it's possible for it to coexist with other Dev Mode classes, but how do I load it programmatically as part of starting GWT DevMode class? It seems like you're looking for super-source and @GwtScriptOnly. In your standard source location you'll put the class you want to use in DevMode, then in the super-source (you have to declare a super-source path=super / in your gwt.xml) you put the version of the class you want to use in web mode, and you annotate it with @com.google.gwt.core.client.GwtScriptOnly (note: that class only exists in super-source too, so you won't find it by auto-complete in your IDE). See http://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/DevGuideOrganizingProjects.html#DevGuideModuleXml This is used in many places in GWT if you need examples: WeakMapping, StringCase, SafeHtmlHostedModeUtils, etc. (that said, I suspect you're doing something Wrong™ if you need this for Object.clone(), and you'd better try to find an alternative) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
RemoteLogging without RPC
Hi, We distribute our mobile application as a GWT mobile web application and as PhoneGap-wrapped native apps. We update our mobile web application on a daily base, and - based on it - create once per month a new version of the PhoneGap native apps. We like to use GWT Remote Logging ( http://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/DevGuideLogging.html#Remote_Logging) but I fail to see how this can work with the PhoneGap app. The PhoneGap app should log to the same end point like the mobile web app. Whenever we update the mobile web app, the calls from the PhoneGap app can't be deserialized at the server side because the versions don't match any longer. What's the best approach for Remote Logging in a GWT-PhoneGap app? Are there ways to use REST calls instead of RPC calls? Any libraries out there? Many thanks! Ron -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: How to load a JRE-dependent/non-compile-mode-supported class in GWT Dev Mode
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 3:19:29 AM UTC-6, Thomas Broyer wrote: On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 8:53:39 AM UTC+1, Benjamin Bitdiddle wrote: For a particular GWT module, I'm able to solve a problem in compiled mode by manipulating the JS object representing the Java object. (Specifically, I need to clone the object, so I simply create a new JS object, copy the properties from the original JS object, and assign a new hash value.) I've tested this an it works OK. Since that approach (that I use in compiled mode) doesn't work in Dev Mode, I want to use Object.clone(), which is available in Dev Mode, to perform the clone operation. However, I'm not sure how to accomplish this as every approach I try hits a problem. - I can't seem to use deferred binding (i.e. GWT.create() and replace with in the module gwt.xml file), for two reasons: 1. Even in Dev Mode, when I replace a class using replace with, the class I swap in seems not to be able to use JRE-only methods, such as reflection or Object.clone. I get an error that the source code for the method is not available. I don't want this class compiled, but it seems to want to compile it to JS. 2. If I solve #1, then I have to figure out how to get the replace with to be conditional based on being in dev mode. I'm using ant to build the compiled-mode stuff and I'm using Eclipse to run dev mode. Is there way to make this automatic so I can use the same module gwt.xml in Eclipse and for an ant build? I guess I'd need an ant property that automatically is set by compiled but not by development mode, or vice versa? - I also tried simply using new Foo() (rather than GWT.create() and deferred binding), placing the JS-copying/GWT-compile-friendly version of Foo in the normal location. This works for GWT compiled mode obviously. Then for Dev Mode, I add a new source directory to the class path in Eclipse and stick a different class Foo there that uses the JRE-only APIs (such as Object.clone). However, this hits the same problem as deferred binding - I still get an error that the source code is not available for various APIs I use in that version of Foo (e.g. reflection APIs). Right now, I've managed to use the Eclipse expression panel to manually load the JRE-version of Foo I mentioned above (in the special class path segment). So I know it's possible for it to coexist with other Dev Mode classes, but how do I load it programmatically as part of starting GWT DevMode class? It seems like you're looking for super-source and @GwtScriptOnly. In your standard source location you'll put the class you want to use in DevMode, then in the super-source (you have to declare a super-source path=super / in your gwt.xml) you put the version of the class you want to use in web mode, and you annotate it with @com.google.gwt.core.client.GwtScriptOnly (note: that class only exists in super-source too, so you won't find it by auto-complete in your IDE). See http://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/DevGuideOrganizingProjects.html#DevGuideModuleXml This is used in many places in GWT if you need examples: WeakMapping, StringCase, SafeHtmlHostedModeUtils, etc. (that said, I suspect you're doing something Wrong™ if you need this for Object.clone(), and you'd better try to find an alternative) Thanks for the quick response. I haven't tried it yet, but will soon. I want to use Object.clone() because I have a situation where I need to create a (shallow) duplicate of a Java class that differs from the original only by virtue of pointing to a different JS object (with one member). *The class may be one I have no control over, such as something user writes*, so I can't insist that it implement any particular API. (I guess the ideal situation would be to have my root class A implement myClone(), which clones by just calling a constructor for that class with the right arguments, and then require that any class B that a user writes to extend A override myClone(). However, I don't think I can require that.) [Yikes. It seems as if I can't edit my own post. :-)] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Server-side message exchange
Hi, I'm trying to create a mechanism to exchange messages using a separate broker. In other words, I have a message broker and I need to let my server know when a message is arrived. What is the best way to do that? I'd also need to send messages through that broker too, so this should be a two-way message exchange Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Server-side message exchange
http://erraiframework.org/ ? 2014-02-25 12:25 GMT+01:00 Aldo Neto tumo...@gmail.com: Hi, I'm trying to create a mechanism to exchange messages using a separate broker. In other words, I have a message broker and I need to let my server know when a message is arrived. What is the best way to do that? I'd also need to send messages through that broker too, so this should be a two-way message exchange Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Error in expanding GWT Tree
Hi, in my WebApp I use a GWT Tree. I have made a Button, when you klick
this button the whole tree should be expanded / closed.
But when I click the button sometimes a TreeItem does not close. When I
debug this I can see that the open state is not changed but I called the
method treeItem.setState(open).
So I don't know why this isn't changed in my TreeItem.
Any suggests ?
Thanks in advance.
Here is my onClick Method:
* public void onClick( ClickEvent event )*
* {*
*Object source = event.getSource();*
*if ( source.equals( getView().getButtonBaumEinAusKlappen() ) )*
*{*
* for ( int i = 0; i getView().getTree().getItemCount(); i++ )*
* {*
*TreeItem myTreeItem = getView().getTree().getItem( i );*
*if(myTreeItem.getChildCount()0)*
* getView().getTree().expandAll( myTreeItem, !expandState );*
*myTreeItem.setState( !expandState );*
*int andkw = 5;*
* }*
* expandState = !expandState;*
*}*
*}*
and here is my epandAll method:
* public void expandAll( TreeItem item, boolean expand )*
* {*
*for ( int i = 0; i item.getChildCount(); i++ )*
*{*
* // do action here*
* TreeItem childTreeItem = item.getChild( i );*
* childTreeItem.setState( expand );*
* // recursive call for current node.*
* expandAll( childTreeItem, expand );*
*}*
* }*
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
GWT and SVG, the 125th... :-)
Hi,
I have been searching for SVG support in GWT for an long time.
Now I have found something that seems to be exactly what I am looking for:
http://svgjs.com/
- It's lightweight.
- It supports importing SVG files.
- The demo shows all the features I need (simple drawings, svg import,
events)
- It seems to support the most important browsers.
The only thing is that it's a raw JS-library.
How would you integrate it into a GWT project?
Consider the following (JS`?) code:
var draw = SVG('drawing').size(300, 300)
var rect = draw.rect(100, 100).attr({ fill: '#f06' })
How could you encapsulate this into a java method called drawRect?
Do you know this library and what do you think?
Thanks
Magnus
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: GWT and SVG, the 125th... :-)
Also have a look at http://snapsvg.io/
2014-02-25 14:31 GMT+01:00 Magnus alpineblas...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I have been searching for SVG support in GWT for an long time.
Now I have found something that seems to be exactly what I am looking for:
http://svgjs.com/
- It's lightweight.
- It supports importing SVG files.
- The demo shows all the features I need (simple drawings, svg import,
events)
- It seems to support the most important browsers.
The only thing is that it's a raw JS-library.
How would you integrate it into a GWT project?
Consider the following (JS`?) code:
var draw = SVG('drawing').size(300, 300)
var rect = draw.rect(100, 100).attr({ fill: '#f06' })
How could you encapsulate this into a java method called drawRect?
Do you know this library and what do you think?
Thanks
Magnus
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: GWT and SVG, the 125th... :-)
Also have a look at http://snapsvg.io/ Oh that looks pretty cool. Worth a bookmark :) -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
GWT compiling tools: is there any way to get the graph of inherited modules? Even a simple flat list would be fine :-)
Hi all, I am in the process of switching linker to Cross-Site-Iframe in order to obtain the compatibility with superdevmode, so I'd like to locate and remove the script tags from the modules I'm inheriting from (since this linker doesn't support them). Now I'm just wondering if there's an easy way to obtain from the gwt compiler or other tools the *graph of inherited modules* (possibly transitive). It would be really useful in order to avoid having to manually read every inherited module to find additional inherited modules and so on. Also, having a clear graph of this kind of dependencies would be a good check tool especially when you depend on 3rd party modules. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: GWT compiling tools: is there any way to get the graph of inherited modules? Even a simple flat list would be fine :-)
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 3:25:47 PM UTC+1, Davide Cavestro wrote: Hi all, I am in the process of switching linker to Cross-Site-Iframe in order to obtain the compatibility with superdevmode, so I'd like to locate and remove the script tags from the modules I'm inheriting from (since this linker doesn't support them). Now I'm just wondering if there's an easy way to obtain from the gwt compiler or other tools the *graph of inherited modules* (possibly transitive). It would be really useful in order to avoid having to manually read every inherited module to find additional inherited modules and so on. Also, having a clear graph of this kind of dependencies would be a good check tool especially when you depend on 3rd party modules. I once wrote a tiny tool that does just that: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/1210 Or you could just compile with -logLevel DEBUG and grep for Loading inherited module -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: GWT compiling tools: is there any way to get the graph of inherited modules? Even a simple flat list would be fine :-)
Not officially I think, but in GWT's code review tool there is a patch lingering around for a long time: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/1210/ Not sure if it needs a little love again to work with GWT 2.6 but its probably a good starting point. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Different border for different cells
Like title i would like to have different border for different cells in the
same table.. I tried it but it doesn't work
.table, .table td {
border: thin groove;
}
.cell1 {
}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Different border for different cells
cell1{
border: 5px solid;
}
why it isn't working?
Thanks
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Davide Micheletti d.michelett...@gmail.com
wrote:
Like title i would like to have different border for different cells in
the same table.. I tried it but it doesn't work
.table, .table td {
border: thin groove;
}
.cell1 {
}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: GWT and SVG, the 125th... :-)
Yes, it's cool! :-) But what about my question? :-) How to embed JS within GWT? Thanks Magnus -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: GWT and SVG, the 125th... :-)
There's two general approaches: 1) Write large JSNI methods that do all the interaction in Javascript 2) Use GWT's JavaScriptObject, subclass the library's objects, and write small JSNI methods that wrap individual methods of the JS object. There's supposed to be better JS interop coming in GWT 3.0, but that's a ways off. There's a number of GWT/JS wrappers out there that you could use as examples (Google Maps and Google Earth come to mind). On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 11:45:10 AM UTC-5, Magnus wrote: Yes, it's cool! :-) But what about my question? :-) How to embed JS within GWT? Thanks Magnus -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: GWT and SVG, the 125th... :-)
Should cover the most: http://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/DevGuideCodingBasicsJSNI.html Personally I use ClientBundle + (External)TextResource + ScriptInjector to inject the JS code into the browser. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: GWT and SVG, the 125th... :-)
Thanks, it covers most of the stuff relating to embed JS within Java code... But one important thing seems to be missing at the first sight: How to include a whole JS library into the GWT project and access its methods... Magnus -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Server-side message exchange
Iteresting. Do you know if it works with ActiveMQ or RabbitMQ for sending/receiving messages to Android devices? Thanks On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Alain Ekambi jazzmatad...@gmail.comwrote: http://erraiframework.org/ ? 2014-02-25 12:25 GMT+01:00 Aldo Neto tumo...@gmail.com: Hi, I'm trying to create a mechanism to exchange messages using a separate broker. In other words, I have a message broker and I need to let my server know when a message is arrived. What is the best way to do that? I'd also need to send messages through that broker too, so this should be a two-way message exchange Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: GWT and SVG, the 125th... :-)
I have already said how to load it into the browser, so not sure what you mean. If you mean code completion in your IDE I have no idea how well Eclipse handles it. In IntelliJ it works pretty well. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Development Mode will not be supported in Firefox 27+
Would anyone like to follow up the last comment on the bugzilla thread, where a FF dev claims that: Most C++ JSAPI usage in extensions can in fact be replaced by a combination of privileged script and the debugger APIs I assume we wouldn't be seeing this thread if that was really true as you guys would have just updated the plugin. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Development Mode will not be supported in Firefox 27+
I'm not sure there's much to discuss. Firefox 27 is already released, and we do want to move off of Dev Mode sooner or later for other reasons. I don't feel comfortable asking them to bring back an API that they never officially supported anyway and it seems unlikely that they'd agree. Running Firefox 24 seems like an acceptable workaround. Regarding the Firefox-specific debugger API's, I'm not sure it's worth even figuring out if it's feasible or not since our plan is to move to Super Dev Mode. But if someone wants to take a look then go ahead. - Brian On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Benjamin Bitdiddle benbitdiddl...@gmail.com wrote: Would anyone like to follow up the last comment on the bugzilla thread, where a FF dev claims that: Most C++ JSAPI usage in extensions can in fact be replaced by a combination of privileged script and the debugger APIs I assume we wouldn't be seeing this thread if that was really true as you guys would have just updated the plugin. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit/QSEjbhhHB4g/unsubscribe . To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: GWT compiling tools: is there any way to get the graph of inherited modules? Even a simple flat list would be fine :-)
We have an issue similar to it where we want to move to xsi frame linker but what if you have third party dependent modules which have script tag in their module XML. Did anyone face the same issue and solved it? On Tuesday, 25 February 2014, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote: Not officially I think, but in GWT's code review tool there is a patch lingering around for a long time: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/1210/ Not sure if it needs a little love again to work with GWT 2.6 but its probably a good starting point. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','google-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com'); . To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.comjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com'); . Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: GWT and SVG, the 125th... :-)
Ok, this must be the method with ClientBundle. I missed this. It seems that you can also simply include it in the module xml: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-web-toolkit/_7NnUCR4vD0 Magnus -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: GWT and SVG, the 125th... :-)
Hi,
including a script tag in the module xml did not work for me:
The Cross-Site-Iframe linker does not support script tags in the gwt.xml
files
Using ClientBundle works.
However, what is still missing is the connection between the JS objects and
the GWT widgets.
Consider the initial example:
var draw = SVG('drawing').size(300, 300)
var rect = draw.rect(100, 100).attr({ fill: '#f06' })
I can execute this code. But how can I place the drawing it creates into a
GWT widget, e. g. a FlowPanel?
FlowPanel p = new FlowPanel ();
myClientBundle.executeJSCode();
p.add(???); // how to connect it???
Thanks
Magnus
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: GWT compiling tools: is there any way to get the graph of inherited modules? Even a simple flat list would be fine :-)
I've seen that SmartGWT provided the *NoScript* flavour for their modules, i.e. instead of inheriting from *SmartGwt* you inherit from *SmartGwtNoScript.* I've seen also adding set-configuration-property name='xsiframe.failIfScriptTag' value='FALSE'/ to your .gwt.xml file works (as suggested by the compiler). 2014-02-26 3:20 GMT+01:00 Srini v gvssrini...@gmail.com: We have an issue similar to it where we want to move to xsi frame linker but what if you have third party dependent modules which have script tag in their module XML. Did anyone face the same issue and solved it? On Tuesday, 25 February 2014, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote: Not officially I think, but in GWT's code review tool there is a patch lingering around for a long time: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/1210/ Not sure if it needs a little love again to work with GWT 2.6 but its probably a good starting point. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit/QLdcqcXXMtk/unsubscribe . To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: GWT and SVG, the 125th... :-)
One solution could be to create a GWT widget based on a DIV element and
call the JSNI in the onLoad method.
I did something similar with a Google Map widget.
Have a look at
https://github.com/emitrom/Pilot/blob/master/Pilot/src/com/emitrom/pilot/maps/client/GMapWidget.java
2014-02-26 4:58 GMT+01:00 Magnus alpineblas...@gmail.com:
Hi,
including a script tag in the module xml did not work for me:
The Cross-Site-Iframe linker does not support script tags in the gwt.xml
files
Using ClientBundle works.
However, what is still missing is the connection between the JS objects
and the GWT widgets.
Consider the initial example:
var draw = SVG('drawing').size(300, 300)
var rect = draw.rect(100, 100).attr({ fill: '#f06' })
I can execute this code. But how can I place the drawing it creates into a
GWT widget, e. g. a FlowPanel?
FlowPanel p = new FlowPanel ();
myClientBundle.executeJSCode();
p.add(???); // how to connect it???
Thanks
Magnus
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[gwt-contrib] Running multiple browsers in parallel via GWTTestCase
I have been doing some ongoing work to do simplifications on the testing infra and one of my important goals is to have a simpler contract with tests and test drivers. This is important for maintaining the infra as we are really having hard time to understand the code. I was able to delete plenty of code earlier and now I hit another 'feature' that's not used at all in Google and GWT-SDK itself. This is ability to run the tests in multiple browsers together in parallel. There is plenty of infrastructure code to support this use case. This requires browsers to start in sync together via the driver and then the tests get executed together. In Google side we never used this feature (at least in our newer infrastructure) and doesn't look like it will be used for several reasons: 1. Running tests together will the flakiness dramatically as at least will be more likely to fail. 2. Some of the speed gains will be lost anyway due to sync-start of browsers. 3. We usually use testfarms instead of GWT test infra to launch and drive browsers. As you can't really run many different browser in single machine and I expect that's quite common for other developers as well if they run multi-browser tests. In such cases it is even more complication to do such integration. 4. Last and not the least; not even sure if it is working properly. So with the motto of simpler is better, I'm going to get rid of the code but first would like to see if anybody strongly depends on this feature. - Goktug -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[gwt-contrib] Re: Running multiple browsers in parallel via GWTTestCase
I have used that a few times with -runStyle Manual (e.g. -runStyle Manual:3 and you open the given URL in Firefox, Chrome and Internet Explorer) That said, I haven't used it much so I don't really care; but you'll have to make sure you update the ManualRunStyle when removing that feature. I think HtmlUnitRunStyle also supports it (e.g. -runStyle HtmlUnit:FF17,IE9,Chrome) On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 8:44:00 PM UTC+1, Goktug Gokdogan wrote: I have been doing some ongoing work to do simplifications on the testing infra and one of my important goals is to have a simpler contract with tests and test drivers. This is important for maintaining the infra as we are really having hard time to understand the code. I was able to delete plenty of code earlier and now I hit another 'feature' that's not used at all in Google and GWT-SDK itself. This is ability to run the tests in multiple browsers together in parallel. There is plenty of infrastructure code to support this use case. This requires browsers to start in sync together via the driver and then the tests get executed together. In Google side we never used this feature (at least in our newer infrastructure) and doesn't look like it will be used for several reasons: 1. Running tests together will the flakiness dramatically as at least will be more likely to fail. 2. Some of the speed gains will be lost anyway due to sync-start of browsers. 3. We usually use testfarms instead of GWT test infra to launch and drive browsers. As you can't really run many different browser in single machine and I expect that's quite common for other developers as well if they run multi-browser tests. In such cases it is even more complication to do such integration. 4. Last and not the least; not even sure if it is working properly. So with the motto of simpler is better, I'm going to get rid of the code but first would like to see if anybody strongly depends on this feature. - Goktug -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
