date:20141030

Displaying Byte Array content as a file in GWT

2014-10-30 Thread Kumar Gaurav

Hi,
 
I'm new to GWT so need kind help to resolve my problem. I've a requirement 
where on click of a button I need to invoke a web service which in turn is 
returning me a Base64 encoded byte array. My requirement is to open this 
byte array as document i.e. PDF, excel etc without converting it into file 
and store it in some location.
 
Kindly help !!
 
Thanks,
Kumar

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Upload a file using Drag and Drop on the Browse button in the Browser

2014-10-30 Thread Surinaidu Majji

Hello All,
We are using file upload from the gwt but i want to upload the file by drag 
and drop in the browser. It is working fine with chrome browser but not 
working with Firefox because in Chrome it is showing choose File and 
Firefox it is showing Browse option. How can i upload the file in the 
Firefox browser by Drag and drop?

Thanks in advance.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: datebox popup position

2014-10-30 Thread Jeppe Hansen

Unbelievable that there is no nice way to specify where the popup should 
appear. 
Any way, I made a simple work around that I would like to share with you:


// This is a hack to have the popup shown above the text field.
private static void addPositionAdjustHandlers(DateBox dateBox) {
dateBox.getTextBox().addClickHandler(new ClickHandler() {
@Override
public void onClick(ClickEvent event) {
adjustPosition(dateBox);
}
});
dateBox.getTextBox().addFocusHandler(new FocusHandler() {
@Override
public void onFocus(FocusEvent event) {
adjustPosition(dateBox);
}
});
dateBox.getTextBox().addKeyDownHandler(new KeyDownHandler() {
@Override
public void onKeyDown(KeyDownEvent event) {
adjustPosition(dateBox);
}
});

}

private static void adjustPosition(DateBox dateBox) {
int top = - (dateBox.getDatePicker().getElement().getAbsoluteBottom() - 
dateBox.getDatePicker().getElement().getAbsoluteTop());
dateBox.getDatePicker().getElement().setAttribute(style, visibility: 
visible; overflow: visible; position: absolute; left: 0px; top: + top 
+px;);
}



/ Jeppe

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

UoBinder Database store

2014-10-30 Thread baczeklu

Hello, 
Is it possible to store uiBinder in the database and read it from there? 

Regards,
Łukasz Bączek

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: UoBinder Database store

2014-10-30 Thread Juan Pablo Gardella

Yes, why not? But GWT needs to compile it. What do you want to do?

On 30 October 2014 09:28, bacze...@poczta.fm wrote:

 Hello,
 Is it possible to store uiBinder in the database and read it from there?

 Regards,
 Łukasz Bączek

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: datebox popup position

2014-10-30 Thread Vassilis Virvilis

I don't know if your popup is a PopupPanel or a DialogBox. Here are my
observations anyway...

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/web$20toolkit$20virvilis$20dialogbox/google-web-toolkit/tZ79yCvgNuU/HeXX9eAGeJ4J

Vassilis


On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Jeppe Hansen jeppewell...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Unbelievable that there is no nice way to specify where the popup should
 appear.
 Any way, I made a simple work around that I would like to share with you:


 // This is a hack to have the popup shown above the text field.
 private static void addPositionAdjustHandlers(DateBox dateBox) {
 dateBox.getTextBox().addClickHandler(new ClickHandler() {
 @Override
 public void onClick(ClickEvent event) {
 adjustPosition(dateBox);
 }
 });
 dateBox.getTextBox().addFocusHandler(new FocusHandler() {
 @Override
 public void onFocus(FocusEvent event) {
 adjustPosition(dateBox);
 }
 });
 dateBox.getTextBox().addKeyDownHandler(new KeyDownHandler() {
 @Override
 public void onKeyDown(KeyDownEvent event) {
 adjustPosition(dateBox);
 }
 });

 }

 private static void adjustPosition(DateBox dateBox) {
 int top = - (dateBox.getDatePicker().getElement().getAbsoluteBottom() -
 dateBox.getDatePicker().getElement().getAbsoluteTop());
 dateBox.getDatePicker().getElement().setAttribute(style, visibility:
 visible; overflow: visible; position: absolute; left: 0px; top: + top
 +px;);
 }



 / Jeppe

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




-- 
Vassilis Virvilis

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Unexpected internal compiler error when trying out 2.7.0-RC1

2014-10-30 Thread Martijn Wijns

When trying out 2.7.0-RC1 I get the following error after a page refresh:

 [ERROR] Unexpected internal compiler error
java.lang.AssertionError
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1407)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1414)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1414)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:1186)
at 
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java:1020)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1226)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:1191)
at 
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java:1020)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1226)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:1191)
at 
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java:1020)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
at 
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java:1010)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1206)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:1188)
at 
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java:1020)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
at 
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java:1010)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
at 
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java:1010)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
at 
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java:1010)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
at 
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java:1010)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
at 
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java:1010)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
at 
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java:1010)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
at

Editor Framework for Polymorphic types

2014-10-30 Thread Arpit

Details in this SO 
post: 
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26656370/gwt-editor-framework-for-polymorphic-types

Main issue with the approach mentioned in above question is that driver is 
not passing same ConstraintViolations given to it. When violations reach 
individual widgets (textbox, etc) their number is already doubled or 
tripled depending on number of @Path() annotations present in the view.

Appreciate any help.

Thanks.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: GWT 2.7.0 RC1 available

2014-10-30 Thread Matt Wallis

Hi Daniel.

I'm now using 2.7.0-rc1, and incremental compilation is working (Hoorah!). 
I'm launching the codeserver from the command line (mvn 
gwt:run-codeserver), and running the in-browser compilation from Chrome 
using new bookmarklets. So far so good.

However, if I add a new source file, it is not found by incremental 
compilation. As a work-around, I restart the codeserver (which causes a 
full recompilation), and then next time I compile from within the browser, 
another full compilation is also necessary. Then finally, after 2 full 
recompilations, I'm back with the benefits of incremental compilation. 

Is this to be expected, or does it indicate that I don't have things 
configured properly? If this is the expected/current behaviour, then is 
there a better work-around (that does not require 2 full recompilations)?

Best regards,
Matt.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Initiate sending over RPC from the server side

2014-10-30 Thread Larry L


Hello,

I'm new to GWT RPC. I need to write something that I subscribe on the 
client side then on the server side it can send data to client whenever 
there is update.
As I read from the tutorial, I make a Service interface and a ServiceAsync 
interface on the client, and a ServiceImpl on the server side that 
implements Service.

And then, on the client side I just call service.xxx and catch the return 
from my AsyncCallback.
This is like I trigger the event from the client side and pull some data 
from the server side.

Is there a way to push the data from the server side and send the data to 
every client that subscribes it?

Thanks,
Larry

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Initiate sending over RPC from the server side

2014-10-30 Thread Peter Donald

Hi,

We have built several systems like this where we want to push data to
clients from the server. The client is responsible for subscribing to a
channel possibly with filters in place. Rather than use GWT-RPC we have
tended to move to using raw messages that are typically json blobs. We have
used 4 basic strategies depending on the clients supported and the
application requirements. The strategies are;

1. WebSockets
2. Server-Sent Events
3. Long polling
4. Periodic Polling

I had a poke around and found a good stack overflow answer to this (See [1])

When we faced the same issues, we ended up putting together a couple
of libraries
to help with in GWT.

* websockets: https://github.com/realityforge/gwt-websockets
* Server-sent Events: https://github.com/realityforge/gwt-eventsource
* Polling: https://github.com/realityforge/gwt-webpoller (Warning this
API is not yet at 1.0 status)

The tricky part is actually managing the channels and messages sequencing
in each channel but we never got arounf to releasing our code for that part
of the problem.

HTH

[1]
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11077857/what-are-long-polling-websockets-server-sent-events-sse-and-comet

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Larry L weije...@gmail.com wrote:

Hello,

I'm new to GWT RPC. I need to write something that I subscribe on the
client side then on the server side it can send data to client whenever
there is update.
As I read from the tutorial, I make a Service interface and a ServiceAsync
interface on the client, and a ServiceImpl on the server side that
implements Service.

And then, on the client side I just call service.xxx and catch the return
from my AsyncCallback.
This is like I trigger the event from the client side and pull some data
from the server side.

Is there a way to push the data from the server side and send the data
to every client that subscribes it?

Thanks,
Larry

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Cheers,

Peter Donald

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: GWT 2.7.0 RC1 available

2014-10-30 Thread Matt Wallis


On 30/10/2014 16:38, Matt Wallis wrote:


However, if I add a new source file, it is not found by incremental 
compilation.

Update: Now I can't repeat this, having added another new source file.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google 
Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: GWT 2.7.0 RC1 available

2014-10-30 Thread Daniel Kurka

There is no need to start the codeserver directly anymore, its now started 
by default when you launch the old dev mode.
And you do not need to use the bookmarklets in that mode anymore. It just 
recompiles automatically.

See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpCSbj36O44


On Thursday, October 30, 2014 7:29:47 PM UTC+1, Matt Wallis wrote:

 On 30/10/2014 16:38, Matt Wallis wrote: 
  
  However, if I add a new source file, it is not found by incremental 
  compilation. 
 Update: Now I can't repeat this, having added another new source file. 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Initiate sending over RPC from the server side

2014-10-30 Thread Larry L

This looks great. I'll try around.
Thank you!

We also prefer json format because it's flexible to pass around.
And our first solution was periodically polling, which is bad at peak hours
and off hours, although there are always go-around.

On Thursday, October 30, 2014 2:22:55 PM UTC-4, Peter Donald wrote:

Hi,

1. WebSockets
2. Server-Sent Events
3. Long polling
4. Periodic Polling

I had a poke around and found a good stack overflow answer to this (See
[1])

When we faced the same issues, we ended up putting together a couple of
libraries
to help with in GWT.

The tricky part is actually managing the channels and messages sequencing
in each channel but we never got arounf to releasing our code for that part
of the problem.

HTH

[1]
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11077857/what-are-long-polling-websockets-server-sent-events-sse-and-comet

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Larry L weij...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:

Hello,

I'm new to GWT RPC. I need to write something that I subscribe on the
client side then on the server side it can send data to client whenever
there is update.
As I read from the tutorial, I make a Service interface and a
ServiceAsync interface on the client, and a ServiceImpl on the server side
that implements Service.

And then, on the client side I just call service.xxx and catch the return
from my AsyncCallback.
This is like I trigger the event from the client side and pull some data
from the server side.

Is there a way to push the data from the server side and send the data
to every client that subscribes it?

Thanks,
Larry

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
To post to this group, send email to google-we...@googlegroups.com
javascript:.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Cheers,

Peter Donald

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Initiate sending over RPC from the server side

2014-10-30 Thread Jens



 And our first solution was periodically polling, which is bad at peak 
 hours and off hours, although there are always go-around.


Also take a look at async servlets of Servlet 3.0 spec if you create long 
polling connections in order to save server resources.

-- J.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: UoBinder Database store

2014-10-30 Thread Łukasz Bączek


Hello,
He needs to find or write a library that will allow you to dynamically 
change the GXT windows like it does Acris for GWT project.


Acris does not support GXT.

I asked whether GWT UIBinder can be stored in the database because I 
thought that the current version does not require recompilation after 
changing UIBinder.


Regards,
LB

W dniu 30.10.2014 o 13:49, Juan Pablo Gardella pisze:

Yes, why not? But GWT needs to compile it. What do you want to do?

On 30 October 2014 09:28, bacze...@poczta.fm 
mailto:bacze...@poczta.fm wrote:


Hello,
Is it possible to store uiBinder in the database and read it from
there?

Regards,
Łukasz Bączek
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Groups Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
mailto:google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
mailto:google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
mailto:google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com 
mailto:google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.

Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google 
Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: UoBinder Database store

2014-10-30 Thread David Nouls

Watch out with gxt licensing when you allow users to modify screen leyouts. 
Sencha  sees this as a developer and your user needs to pay for a license. I 
had to remove GXT from a project for such a case.

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Łukasz Bączek bacze...@poczta.fm
wrote:

 Hello,
 He needs to find or write a library that will allow you to dynamically 
 change the GXT windows like it does Acris for GWT project.
 Acris does not support GXT.
 I asked whether GWT UIBinder can be stored in the database because I 
 thought that the current version does not require recompilation after 
 changing UIBinder.
 Regards,
 LB
 W dniu 30.10.2014 o 13:49, Juan Pablo Gardella pisze:
 Yes, why not? But GWT needs to compile it. What do you want to do?

 On 30 October 2014 09:28, bacze...@poczta.fm 
 mailto:bacze...@poczta.fm wrote:

 Hello,
 Is it possible to store uiBinder in the database and read it from
 there?

 Regards,
 Łukasz Bączek
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Google Web Toolkit group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
 send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 mailto:google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
 mailto:google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups Google Web Toolkit group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
 mailto:google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to 
 google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com 
 mailto:google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Upload a file using Drag and Drop on the Browse button in the Browser

2014-10-30 Thread Surinaidu Majji

I found one of the library 
from https://github.com/laaglu/lib-gwt-file-test, Please tell me can i use 
this for my above purpose.

On Thursday, October 30, 2014 5:05:17 PM UTC+5:30, Surinaidu Majji wrote:

 Hello All,
 We are using file upload from the gwt but i want to upload the file by 
 drag and drop in the browser. It is working fine with chrome browser but 
 not working with Firefox because in Chrome it is showing choose File and 
 Firefox it is showing Browse option. How can i upload the file in the 
 Firefox browser by Drag and drop?

 Thanks in advance.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

2014-10-30 Thread confile

When I use GWT 2.7RC1 with GTW-PhoneGap and run the codeserver I get the
following output from the code server:

Turning off precompile in incremental mode.
Super Dev Mode starting up
workDir:
/var/folders/xh/1xkfq26532j97q23qw5pdhs4gn/T/gwt-codeserver-7573159147938212004.tmp

Does this mean anything? Is it a problem if precompile is turned off or
does it mean that incremental compile is not working?

Best
Michael

Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014 01:04:15 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kurka:

Hi all,

I just build the GWT 2.7.0 RC1 and pushed it to maven central. The
complete SDK is also available from here http://goo.gl/npqEUR.

Please start testing and let us know if you run into any trouble. You can
either reply to this thread on gwt-contrib
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/google-web-toolkit-contributors or
file a bug https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/entry.

We are planing to release this as GWT 2.7.0 if we do not here about any
serious issues within the next two weeks. The release notes
http://www.gwtproject.org/release-notes.html#Release_Notes_2_7_0_RC1
for RC1 will be made available shortly after this notice, in the mean time
you can take a look at the review for the release notes
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/10031/.

Daniel,
on behalf of the GWT team

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/48ac86bf-3422-4472-9532-574442707f4d%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[gwt-contrib] Upgrade 2.7 beta1 to rc1 - browser refresh and change detection not working

2014-10-30 Thread Matic Petek

Hi,
  I have just update to RC1 and now if I click refresh button (Chrome), 
code change on disk is not detected and recompile (increment compile) is 
not performed. We also have compile link on our start page to perform SDM 
recompile (base on Brien suggestion from GWT.create) and it still works - 
recompile is done with increment compile. 
  Any idea how to debug what's wrong? Thank you.
Regards,
  Matic

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT 
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/a2a650e1-3148-47ae-a3c1-a3e05a07670c%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7 JsInterop Handle static JavaScript Functions

2014-10-30 Thread Cristian Rinaldi

I have been testing JsInterop for a while, and is very promising ... 
The issue of static functions is something I have asked, and we have to 
wait Java support 8 and the new JSNI too. 
@confile, if you want to look at a couple of projects on which I am working:


   - gwt-jscore https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jscore
   - gwt-jquery https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jquery
   - gwt-playground 
   https://github.com/csrinaldi/samples-of-gwt/tree/master/gwt-playground


 probably when Elemental 2.0 has been implemented, gwt-jscore will not be 
necessary. 
 
 gwt-used-playgroud use jscore and a simple implementation of gwt-jquery, 
with suport of Event and Promise...

 For create object I use for the moment a Factory Class, and for emulate 
static method, by example, Object.observe, I have a two interface, see: JS 
Factory Class 
https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jscore/blob/master/src/main/java/com/workingflows/js/jscore/client/factory/JS.java
 
and Browser Factory Class 
https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jscore/blob/master/src/main/java/com/workingflows/js/jscore/client/factory/Browser.java,
 if 
not the best solution, but until this all implemented works for me.

Hope you helps.


El sábado, 4 de octubre de 2014 12:18:08 UTC-3, confile escribió:

 Consider the following static JavaScript function: 

 THREE.ImageUtils = {
loadTexture: function (url) { ... }

 }

 The way I use to create the static function with JsInterop is to create an 
 interface for ImageUtils and then create an inner abstract class MyStatic 
 which contains the static methods implemented with JSNI.

 Here is an example of the above class: 

 @JsType
 public interface ImageUtils {

 public static abstract class MyStatic {
  
 public static native Texture create(String url) /*-{
 return new $wnd.THREE.ImageUtils.loadTexture(url);
 }-*/; 
  }

 }


 I don't think this is the best solution. Is there a better way to handle 
 static functions with JsInterop?



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT 
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c8c8404e-addb-43e6-8560-b2a48cfca93e%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

2014-10-30 Thread Jens



 Turning off precompile in incremental mode.
 Super Dev Mode starting up
workDir: 
 /var/folders/xh/1xkfq26532j97q23qw5pdhs4gn/T/gwt-codeserver-7573159147938212004.tmp


 Does this mean anything? Is it a problem if precompile is turned off or 
 does it mean that incremental compile is not working?


That's fine. Precompilation is turned off intentionally as it can sometimes 
cause SDM to not detect just a single permutation.

-- J.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT 
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c471fef0-a36d-4b55-924d-a532515cd601%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[gwt-contrib] Re: Upgrade 2.7 beta1 to rc1 - browser refresh and change detection not working

2014-10-30 Thread Jens

I assume you have deployed an old module.nocache.js file. Try a clean 
start by deleting your /war/modulename folder and restart DevMode. A new 
module.nocache.js file should be generated (could take a bit as the 
CodeServer needs to start before this file gets generated) which 
automatically recompiles your app each time you refresh the browser.

-- J

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT 
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/0254ed3a-fbff-4b8f-b7f3-31997d32c2d4%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Upgrade 2.7 beta1 to rc1 - browser refresh and change detection not working

2014-10-30 Thread Colin Alworth

It is also possible that there is a stale copy of .java resources on your
classpath, such as in target/classes/ for a maven project - we've seen that
get in the way as well. Make sure that either target/classes/ isn't on your
classpath, or that it doesn't have another (stale) copy of whatever you are
trying to compile.
On Thu Oct 30 2014 at 10:40:52 AM Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote:

I assume you have deployed an old module.nocache.js file. Try a clean
start by deleting your /war/modulename folder and restart DevMode. A new
module.nocache.js file should be generated (could take a bit as the
CodeServer needs to start before this file gets generated) which
automatically recompiles your app each time you refresh the browser.

-- J

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
GWT Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/0254ed3a-fbff-4b8f-b7f3-31997d32c2d4%40googlegroups.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/0254ed3a-fbff-4b8f-b7f3-31997d32c2d4%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CADcXZMwR3WUSpEvVoGfW%2BYo%2B2LW_vMinRKJyxUsu4bW_hHROjQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Certain gwtar files seem to be way too large in GWT 2.7

2014-10-30 Thread Thomas Broyer



On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 8:58:07 PM UTC+1, Daniel Kurka wrote:

 Jens and I talked offline.

 Since gwttars are only relevant for the prod compile and do not impact SDM 
 compile times, we don't really need them anymore. They are not used within 
 Google and we do not want to maintain them going foward.
 So I suggest we deprecate them with GWT 2.7 and disable them and remote 
 them going forward.


I think I already proposed it some time ago (after someone told me that 
Google doesn't actually use them) and got some feedback that they make 
their build faster.
A quick search in the groups gave 
me https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/O8HaPzExxhc/X16AnKZI2JAJ, 
but nothing more.

  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT 
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/9088707a-5e74-4d31-a9d1-bc700ce81b7e%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Cell widgets and GSS

2014-10-30 Thread 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors

I think we should not provide these files as of yet. If someone wants to
make the transition right now they can easily use the converter with these
files and convert them to gss themselves.
I think we want to make that transition once GSS is default (or about to be
default) inside of Google as a testing ground.

-Daniel

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Julien Dramaix julien.dram...@gmail.com
wrote:

If GSS was the default, we would have shipped only .gss files.
What I want is to provide the .gss files for people using GSS and want to
override some style class of cell widgets. We have this case at Arcbees
where css guys want to use their existing mixins to style CellTable.

On Wed Oct 29 2014 at 6:49:46 PM 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT Contributors
google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com wrote:

The original idea to make the GSS default was to ship .gss files next to
.css files and let the generator automatically use the file with the gss
extension.
We can probably ship the gss files but I think it is optional at this
point.

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Julien Dramaix julien.dram...@gmail.com
wrote:

Now that GSS will be shipped in GWT 2.7 as an experimental feature, I'm
wondering if we shouldn't provide GSS files for all existing CssResource
interfaces present in GWT. The idea is to keep the associated .css files
and use them by default but also to provide GSS files in order that people
can use GSS to style their widgets.

Let take the cell widgets (CelTable, CellList...) as example. If you
want to override default style, you do something like:

public interface TableResources extends CellTable.Resources {
interface Style extends CellTable.Style {
}

@Override
@Source({ CellTable.Style.DEFAULT_CSS, css/table.css})
Style cellTableStyle();
}

In this case, it's impossible to use GSS because you cannot mix .css and
.gss files on the same resource. So the only mean to use GSS is to first
convert manually the default css file to gss and include it in your
application or start from scratch.

So I would like that GWT provides these gss files that user can use in
their @Source annotations in order to override the default style.

What do you guys think ?

Julien

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups GWT Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D6To8pLn%3D0EmgLRQdByrx_m0-CURafkr7FhZRMwxGXbqg%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D6To8pLn%3D0EmgLRQdByrx_m0-CURafkr7FhZRMwxGXbqg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
GWT Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAN%3DyUA3wT52nZHx-9BZ3PcgjXAXMaPQZLdD4gJcnb%2BJpAsOxhw%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAN%3DyUA3wT52nZHx-9BZ3PcgjXAXMaPQZLdD4gJcnb%2BJpAsOxhw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
GWT Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D7vYxNejFdDC1jZnDHe-ft6xjsrP39jT%2Bf0zCnpgxVsxQ%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D7vYxNejFdDC1jZnDHe-ft6xjsrP39jT%2Bf0zCnpgxVsxQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Google Germany GmbH
*Dienerstr. 12*
*80331 München*

Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Katherine Stephens

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CALLujipc1i4hYFt%3D8Oan%3DfFDjspvFk6uYbOuYk-YJXC4Ce3R6Q%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Certain gwtar files seem to be way too large in GWT 2.7

2014-10-30 Thread Jens



 I think I already proposed it some time ago (after someone told me that 
 Google doesn't actually use them) and got some feedback that they make 
 their build faster.
 A quick search in the groups gave me 
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/O8HaPzExxhc/X16AnKZI2JAJ, 
 but nothing more.


Does anybody know how much compile time is actually saved by using gwtar 
files? I have no idea and generally I don't care if a production compile 
takes 10 or 15 minutes.

It is just a bit unfortunate that the build file needs to be in sync with 
GWT module inheritance but maybe it is possible to write a gwtar tool that 
always does the right thing based on the given module inheritance (naive 
thoughts: generate a gwtar per graph clique or start with a defined module 
and do a breadth first traversal to generate one gwtar per module). Then 
users who want to use that feature could run the tool, but the GWT build 
would not do so by default. Or GWT does continue to generate them but 
packages the result in a different jar that is an optional dependency.

At the end I am only interested in having small SDK download sizes as I use 
SNAPSHOT builds in private projects. So I am also fine with just getting 
rid of gwtar files.

-- J.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT 
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/a137e122-7e2e-45dc-9e04-76fca0270e59%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Cell widgets and GSS

2014-10-30 Thread Julien Dramaix

ok. I will do that in an external third party library

On Thu Oct 30 2014 at 6:19:58 PM 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors
google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com wrote:

-Daniel

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Julien Dramaix julien.dram...@gmail.com
wrote:

On Wed Oct 29 2014 at 6:49:46 PM 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT Contributors
google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com wrote:

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Julien Dramaix
julien.dram...@gmail.com wrote:

Let take the cell widgets (CelTable, CellList...) as example. If you
want to override default style, you do something like:

public interface TableResources extends CellTable.Resources {
interface Style extends CellTable.Style {
}

@Override
@Source({ CellTable.Style.DEFAULT_CSS, css/table.css})
Style cellTableStyle();
}

In this case, it's impossible to use GSS because you cannot mix .css
and .gss files on the same resource. So the only mean to use GSS is to
first convert manually the default css file to gss and include it in your
application or start from scratch.

So I would like that GWT provides these gss files that user can use in
their @Source annotations in order to override the default style.

What do you guys think ?

Julien

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups GWT Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to
google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D6To8pLn%3D0EmgLRQdByrx_m0-CURafkr7FhZRMwxGXbqg%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D6To8pLn%3D0EmgLRQdByrx_m0-CURafkr7FhZRMwxGXbqg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups GWT Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAN%3DyUA3wT52nZHx-9BZ3PcgjXAXMaPQZLdD4gJcnb%2BJpAsOxhw%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAN%3DyUA3wT52nZHx-9BZ3PcgjXAXMaPQZLdD4gJcnb%2BJpAsOxhw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D7vYxNejFdDC1jZnDHe-ft6xjsrP39jT%2Bf0zCnpgxVsxQ%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D7vYxNejFdDC1jZnDHe-ft6xjsrP39jT%2Bf0zCnpgxVsxQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Google Germany GmbH
*Dienerstr. 12*
*80331 München*

Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Katherine Stephens

Re: [gwt-contrib] Cell widgets and GSS

2014-10-30 Thread 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT Contributors

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Julien Dramaix julien.dram...@gmail.com
wrote:

If GSS was the default, we would have shipped only .gss files.

That's not true. We will still have a release where GSS is default and css
is supported but deprecated that requires css files to be there.

What I want is to provide the .gss files for people using GSS and want to
override some style class of cell widgets. We have this case at Arcbees
where css guys want to use their existing mixins to style CellTable.

On Wed Oct 29 2014 at 6:49:46 PM 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT Contributors
google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com wrote:

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Julien Dramaix julien.dram...@gmail.com
wrote:

Let take the cell widgets (CelTable, CellList...) as example. If you
want to override default style, you do something like:

public interface TableResources extends CellTable.Resources {
interface Style extends CellTable.Style {
}

@Override
@Source({ CellTable.Style.DEFAULT_CSS, css/table.css})
Style cellTableStyle();
}

So I would like that GWT provides these gss files that user can use in
their @Source annotations in order to override the default style.

What do you guys think ?

Julien

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups GWT Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D6To8pLn%3D0EmgLRQdByrx_m0-CURafkr7FhZRMwxGXbqg%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D6To8pLn%3D0EmgLRQdByrx_m0-CURafkr7FhZRMwxGXbqg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
GWT Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAN%3DyUA3wT52nZHx-9BZ3PcgjXAXMaPQZLdD4gJcnb%2BJpAsOxhw%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAN%3DyUA3wT52nZHx-9BZ3PcgjXAXMaPQZLdD4gJcnb%2BJpAsOxhw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
GWT Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D7vYxNejFdDC1jZnDHe-ft6xjsrP39jT%2Bf0zCnpgxVsxQ%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D7vYxNejFdDC1jZnDHe-ft6xjsrP39jT%2Bf0zCnpgxVsxQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAN%3DyUA0NPT7BoVbnVDaazqi%2B5raebnKLn89pRzb%3DVnhtCb71Dw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

2014-10-30 Thread 'Roberto Lublinerman' via GWT Contributors

There seems that some assertions in UnifyAST are not being satisfied in
incremental SDM but it runs fine (and correctly) if you turn off assertions.

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:53 PM, jay j...@thegindins.com wrote:

 I grabbed the RC and switched to use it from my IntelliJ project.

 When starting my run configuration using SDM, all seems well until the
 compiler dies (see below). What can I do to provide more information to
 help track this down? (Sorry, I cannot make the code available...)


 // Lots and lots of:
 //  Resolving ...
 //Found type ''
 //  Resolving method ...

  Finding entry point classes
  Assimilating generated source
 Generated source files...
com.google.gwt.lang.com_00046ao_00046foo_
 00046MyGwtModule_00045DEV__EntryMethodHolder
  Adding '1' new generated units
 Compiling...
Compilation completed in 0.00 seconds
 Added 1 units to cache since last cleanup.
 Removing invalidated units
 Wrote 1 units to persistent cache.
  [ERROR] Unexpected internal compiler error
 java.lang.AssertionError
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1407)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1414)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1414)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:
 1186)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1020)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1226)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:
 1191)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1020)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1226)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:
 1191)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1020)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1010)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1206)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:
 1188)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1020)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1010)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1010)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1010)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
  at

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Upgrade 2.7 beta1 to rc1 - browser refresh and change detection not working

2014-10-30 Thread Matic Petek

Jens Colin
Thank you for your help. The problem is really module.nocache.js file (or
batter - generated js files), the behaviour is for my a litter strange :
1) my Ant file looks like this :
target name=superdevmode_main depends=javac description=Run Super Dev
Mode
java failonerror=true fork=true
classname=com.google.gwt.dev.codeserver.CodeServer
...
arg value=-workDir/
arg value=./war/
arg value=com.mycompany.mymodule/
/java
/target
Because I set workDir parameter, I think at first startup I should get
mymodule folder inside war folder and two basic files
(metakockamain.nocache.js, metakockamain.recompile.nocache.js) for first
startup. Unfortunately I still get temporary folder
com.mycompany.mymodule/compile-1/ with expected files. No
/war/mymodule/ folder.
2) OK, I manually copy com.mycompany.mymodule/compile-1/war/mymodule/*
into /war/mymodule/
3) We are using ImageBundle and we need image sprite files. That is why I
copy com.mycompany.mymodule/compile-2/war/mymodule/* into /war/mymodule/
and now browser refresh has stop working.

Two thinks in upper description does not compute for me :
(1) why *.js files are not generated in workDir folder
(3) if I copy *.js files from after increment compile folder into
/war/mymodule/, whay browser refresh has stop working.

Thank you,
Regards,
Matic

On Thursday, October 30, 2014 4:43:14 PM UTC+1, Colin Alworth wrote:

-- J

https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/0254ed3a-fbff-4b8f-b7f3-31997d32c2d4%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/e917eb3a-2c5d-4df2-b1fe-174e62f000c5%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Upgrade 2.7 beta1 to rc1 - browser refresh and change detection not working

2014-10-30 Thread Matic Petek

Jens Colin
Thank you for your help. The problem is really module.nocache.js file (or
batter - generated js files), the behaviour is for my a litter strange :
1) my Ant file looks like this :
target name=superdevmode_main depends=javac description=Run Super Dev
Mode
java failonerror=true fork=true
classname=com.google.gwt.dev.codeserver.CodeServer
...
arg value=-workDir/
arg value=./war/
arg value=com.mycompany.mymodule/
/java
/target
Because I set workDir parameter, I think at first startup I should get
mymodule folder inside war folder and two basic files
(mymodule.nocache.js, mymodule.recompile.nocache.js) for first startup.
Unfortunately I still get temporary folder
com.mycompany.mymodule/compile-1/ with expected files. No
/war/mymodule/ folder.
2) OK, I manually copy com.mycompany.mymodule/compile-1/war/mymodule/*
into /war/mymodule/
3) We are using ImageBundle and we need image sprite files. That is why I
copy com.mycompany.mymodule/compile-2/war/mymodule/* into /war/mymodule/
and now browser refresh has stop working.

Thank you,
Regards,
Matic

On Thursday, October 30, 2014 4:43:14 PM UTC+1, Colin Alworth wrote:

-- J

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/a6055f65-85f6-483c-9db0-832d8e19ea17%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

2014-10-30 Thread jay

I'll give that a try...

Will the issue be handled before the final release?

jay

On Thursday, October 30, 2014 11:47:54 AM UTC-7, Roberto Lublinerman wrote:

 There seems that some assertions in UnifyAST are not being satisfied in 
 incremental SDM but it runs fine (and correctly) if you turn off assertions.

 On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:53 PM, jay j...@thegindins.com javascript: 
 wrote:

 I grabbed the RC and switched to use it from my IntelliJ project.

 When starting my run configuration using SDM, all seems well until the 
 compiler dies (see below). What can I do to provide more information to 
 help track this down? (Sorry, I cannot make the code available...)


 // Lots and lots of:
 //  Resolving ...
 //Found type ''
 //  Resolving method ...

  Finding entry point classes
  Assimilating generated source
 Generated source files...
com.google.gwt.lang.com_00046ao_00046foo_
 00046MyGwtModule_00045DEV__EntryMethodHolder
  Adding '1' new generated units
 Compiling...
Compilation completed in 0.00 seconds
 Added 1 units to cache since last cleanup.
 Removing invalidated units
 Wrote 1 units to persistent cache.
  [ERROR] Unexpected internal compiler error
 java.lang.AssertionError
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1407)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1414)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1414)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:
 1186)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1020)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1226)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:
 1191)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1020)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1226)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:
 1191)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1020)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1010)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1206)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:
 1188)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1020)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1010)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1010)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1010)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

2014-10-30 Thread confile

I compared my GWT-PhoneGap written in GWT 2.6.1 which switching to GWT 
2.7beta. Here are my experience. I feel that loading of data especially 
images are much slower in GWT 2.7 than in GWT 2.6.1. I tested it on an 
iPhone 5. Due to the delay in loading the app feels slow and scrolling does 
not work smouth.

Michael 



Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014 16:37:38 UTC+1 schrieb Jens:

 Turning off precompile in incremental mode.
 Super Dev Mode starting up
workDir: 
 /var/folders/xh/1xkfq26532j97q23qw5pdhs4gn/T/gwt-codeserver-7573159147938212004.tmp


 Does this mean anything? Is it a problem if precompile is turned off or 
 does it mean that incremental compile is not working?


 That's fine. Precompilation is turned off intentionally as it can 
 sometimes cause SDM to not detect just a single permutation.

 -- J.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT 
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/9574bc95-abd7-4c08-bf6d-58f20c2fa6f3%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7 JsInterop Handle static JavaScript Functions

2014-10-30 Thread confile

@Christian: 

1. What does gwt-jscore do?

2. as Ray Cromwell suggested in this post In general, native DOM elements 
== no $wnd prefix, JS libraries loaded in host page == $wnd prefix 

   This means your JQueryElement 
https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jquery/blob/master/src/main/java/com/workingflows/js/jquery/client/api/JQueryElement.java
 should 
be: 

@JsType(prototype = $wnd.jQuery)
public interface JQueryElement { ... }

What do you think?


Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014 16:27:17 UTC+1 schrieb Cristian Rinaldi:

 I have been testing JsInterop for a while, and is very promising ... 
 The issue of static functions is something I have asked, and we have to 
 wait Java support 8 and the new JSNI too. 
 @confile, if you want to look at a couple of projects on which I am 
 working:


- gwt-jscore https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jscore
- gwt-jquery https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jquery
- gwt-playground 
https://github.com/csrinaldi/samples-of-gwt/tree/master/gwt-playground


  probably when Elemental 2.0 has been implemented, gwt-jscore will not be 
 necessary. 
  
  gwt-used-playgroud use jscore and a simple implementation of gwt-jquery, 
 with suport of Event and Promise...

  For create object I use for the moment a Factory Class, and for emulate 
 static method, by example, Object.observe, I have a two interface, see: JS 
 Factory Class 
 https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jscore/blob/master/src/main/java/com/workingflows/js/jscore/client/factory/JS.java
  
 and Browser Factory Class 
 https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jscore/blob/master/src/main/java/com/workingflows/js/jscore/client/factory/Browser.java,
  if 
 not the best solution, but until this all implemented works for me.

 Hope you helps.


 El sábado, 4 de octubre de 2014 12:18:08 UTC-3, confile escribió:

 Consider the following static JavaScript function: 

 THREE.ImageUtils = {
loadTexture: function (url) { ... }

 }

 The way I use to create the static function with JsInterop is to create 
 an interface for ImageUtils and then create an inner abstract class 
 MyStatic which contains the static methods implemented with JSNI.

 Here is an example of the above class: 

 @JsType
 public interface ImageUtils {

 public static abstract class MyStatic {
  
 public static native Texture create(String url) /*-{
 return new $wnd.THREE.ImageUtils.loadTexture(url);
 }-*/; 
  }

 }


 I don't think this is the best solution. Is there a better way to handle 
 static functions with JsInterop?



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT 
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/eca70063-0bfa-4725-b959-bb5692c81545%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

2014-10-30 Thread 'Roberto Lublinerman' via GWT Contributors

Yes. Will be fixed before final release.

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:23 PM, jay j...@thegindins.com wrote:

 I'll give that a try...

 Will the issue be handled before the final release?

 jay

 On Thursday, October 30, 2014 11:47:54 AM UTC-7, Roberto Lublinerman wrote:

 There seems that some assertions in UnifyAST are not being satisfied in
 incremental SDM but it runs fine (and correctly) if you turn off assertions.

 On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:53 PM, jay j...@thegindins.com wrote:

 I grabbed the RC and switched to use it from my IntelliJ project.

 When starting my run configuration using SDM, all seems well until the
 compiler dies (see below). What can I do to provide more information to
 help track this down? (Sorry, I cannot make the code available...)


 // Lots and lots of:
 //  Resolving ...
 //Found type ''
 //  Resolving method ...

  Finding entry point classes
  Assimilating generated source
 Generated source files...
com.google.gwt.lang.com_00046ao_00046foo_
 00046MyGwtModule_00045DEV__EntryMethodHolder
  Adding '1' new generated units
 Compiling...
Compilation completed in 0.00 seconds
 Added 1 units to cache since last cleanup.
 Removing invalidated units
 Wrote 1 units to persistent cache.
  [ERROR] Unexpected internal compiler error
 java.lang.AssertionError
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1407)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1414)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1414)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:
 1186)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1020)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1226)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:
 1191)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1020)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1226)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:
 1191)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1020)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1010)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1206)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:
 1188)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1020)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1010)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1010)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:
 1595)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552)
  at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.
 java:1010)
  at

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

2014-10-30 Thread 'Brian Slesinsky' via GWT Contributors

Release notes are here:
http://www.gwtproject.org/release-notes.html#Release_Notes_2_7_0_RC1

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT 
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CA%2B%2BRBT_uQFBC4AxBZSLdrmCixZH8b0VWNfsE1PU%3DWzwdW3MdNA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

2014-10-30 Thread 'Ray Cromwell' via GWT Contributors

I am not aware of any changes in 2.7 that should effect performance
loading images. Are you running on iOS7 or iOS8? Daniel would probably
be best able to help you. Are you talking about SuperDevMode loading
performance, or fully optimized compile loading performance?

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:27 PM, confile
michael.gorsk...@googlemail.com wrote:
I compared my GWT-PhoneGap written in GWT 2.6.1 which switching to GWT
2.7beta. Here are my experience. I feel that loading of data especially
images are much slower in GWT 2.7 than in GWT 2.6.1. I tested it on an
iPhone 5. Due to the delay in loading the app feels slow and scrolling does
not work smouth.

Michael

Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014 16:37:38 UTC+1 schrieb Jens:

Turning off precompile in incremental mode.
Super Dev Mode starting up
workDir:
/var/folders/xh/1xkfq26532j97q23qw5pdhs4gn/T/gwt-codeserver-7573159147938212004.tmp

Does this mean anything? Is it a problem if precompile is turned off or
does it mean that incremental compile is not working?

That's fine. Precompilation is turned off intentionally as it can
sometimes cause SDM to not detect just a single permutation.

-- J.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAPVRV7dXFx1SYtYRLCJCe0V%3DBu%3Du3B6_VXe1jN5thhFOAE8OnA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

38 matches

Mail list logo