[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8 RC1 Help with testing

2016-07-19 Thread 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors
Hi all,

we have build the preliminary GWT 2.8.0-rc1 version and now need help with
DOA testing (making sure its not dead on arrival).

We are currently missing testers for:

Linux / Chrome
Windows 7 / IE8/IE9
Windows 7 / IE 10
Windows 7 / IE 11

If you are interested in spending ~1h in testing the new GWT release,
please reach out to me.

-Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CALLujipOWx590QLZs0OKED12%2BW5jKmNsnY1zQw0XshxyY5yM6w%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Setting Width of a TextBox inside LayoutPanel

2016-07-19 Thread Chris Odd
Hello all,

I have a LayoutPanel with one widget added to it (a TextBox).   I want to 
make the TextBox's width equal to the LayoutPanel's width.

I thought this would work, but it does not (the TextBox is much narrower 
than the LayoutPanel's width):

LayoutPanel pnl = new LayoutPanel();
TextBox tb = new TextBox();
pnl.add(tb);

pnl.setWidgetLeftWidth(tb, 0, Unit.PCT, 100, Unit.Pct);

Any idea why it doesn't work?  Or ideas for a better approach?


Thanks

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: GWT RPC in GWT 3.0+

2016-07-19 Thread cloud450
I was contrasting the blog post to the presentations Ray/Daniel have given 
in the past, hence the Singular example preceding what you are quoting.  
These are on youtube and I've also attended their presentations in person.

I'm not trying to argue the compilation efficiency of GWT-RPC or get an 
explanation of why it is so slow or say there aren't alternatives.  If I am 
giving off those impressions, I apologize.

I am attempting to point out (poorly I suppose) that the value of the 
feature largely stems from one's perspective or point of view.  When one 
uses GWT-RPC, one trades the compile-hit for the functionality.  Similarly 
with SOYC reports or massive numbers of permutations, you can generate 
them, however they incur a time/space cost.  These are choices, they have 
costs, and my point has largely been to let the users decide if the 
trade-offs fit their needs or not. (Please don't explain how SOYC/Perms 
don't impact incremental compile!)

Most of the GWT-RPC criticism here (and in the blog post) are purely 
technical detail about some of its shortcomings and its impact on 
incremental compile.  From the detailed technical point of view, 
Daniel/Thomas make accurate observations and there is not much to discuss.  
However, at the feature level of GWT-RPC, given its flaws/quirks, many 
folks would still opt to use it in at least some situations with the cost 
it incurs.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[gwt-contrib] Re: Current snapshots failing with JDK 7

2016-07-19 Thread Thomas Broyer


On Sunday, July 3, 2016 at 2:30:52 PM UTC+2, Jens wrote:
>
> Hm maybe something like
>
>
> https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/commit/3586e7bc10777c7d479889a5f20927cbf2aceb97
>
> is needed for SerializedLambda as well?
>

Revisiting this while smoke-testing pre-RC1; looks like you were right: we 
need to stub SerializedLambda too. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/2eea6945-7c3d-45c5-9468-46d144776e36%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.