Re: Pros Cons for RequestFactory Vs GWT RPC mechanism
That's a little misleading in that RequestFactory useage requires a considerable amount of scaffolding code. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/8rYh7qQBQlkJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Pros Cons for RequestFactory Vs GWT RPC mechanism
After digging into both, I'm moving towards GWTEventservice: http://code.google.com/p/gwteventservice/. RequestFactory seems best fitted to CRUD operations on specific model entities and does offer much under the covers in supporting those operations. Combined with UIBinder and Editors, it's pretty painless creating small-scale, simple apps. For large-scale projects, IMHO, *far *too much scaffolding code just to move POJOs back and forth. It was also a bit of a pain getting integrated with Spring and Guice, though I'm sure that pain will be alleviated as the releases progress. http://code.google.com/p/spring4gwt/ -- this may be of interest if you're Spring-based. May be of interest even if not. :-) If you're dealing with one application, particularly a small one, I'd go with RequestFactory. I have to deal with 6 rather large applications, with 5 different databases. Even though I don't use any two at the same time (JTA), I'm finding neither Guice Persist nor RequestFactory really fits well and failover is still problematic. As a result, I find it best to simply push POJO events back and forth between the UI and the Server. SOC for me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/AxZRy4vSZTgJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Re : Re: Client/Server serialization/deserialization for using Hibernate with GWT
+1. Top of my wish list. No offense Devs, but RequestFactory requires too much scaffolding chaff. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT MVP
Nicely done, David. +1 On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:39 AM, David Chandler drfibona...@google.comwrote: Thanks for the vote of confidence, but let me suggest that some of the confusion around MVP results from overloading the term (I bear some of the blame here, sorry). Three key ideas of MVP proper are 1. Views are interfaces (so they can be tested without GWTTestCase, among other reasons) 2. Presenters are POJOs that contain no Widgets 3. Views and presenters refer to each other only via interfaces (and in the original style of MVP, a presenter may call methods on the view interface, but not the other way around) Ray Ryan's famous I/O talk in 09 also mentioned place/history management and the Command pattern, which are very useful ideas but not part of MVP proper. Various 3rd party MVP frameworks offered all these capabilities together as MVP and the GWT docs refer to Activities and Places as the MVP framework, but they're really not MVP proper, which has no doubt led to some confusion. GWT's Activities and Places offer place/history management, but require no View or Presenter classes so you are free to create your own or use one of the 3rd party frameworks for these. I'm sure the community will have further recommendations :-) HTH, /dmc On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:48 AM, -sowdri- sow...@gmail.com wrote: Better to use MVP with activities and places as suggested by official GWT team. Thanks, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- David Chandler Developer Programs Engineer, Google Web Toolkit w: http://code.google.com/ b: http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/ t: @googledevtools -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT Developper plugin without internet connection
Actually, I'm in the same boat, so a clear how to would rock. As a contractor, it's rare that I could just download something. More often it's a case of sending some group representative a url, they download, virus check, security check, check-check, then if it passes, copy it out to a network area where I can snag it and manually install it. So, some kind of stand-alone install would rock. BTW, while I'm here, just saying: Maven is a total no go. What's up with the insidious inclusion of that beast in GWT? On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:07 PM, guymage gdon...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, This link only contains files for eclipse plugin installation, not for the web browser plugin ? On 7 avr, 22:12, Juan Pablo Gardella gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com wrote: Seehttp://code.google.com/intl/es/eclipse/docs/install-from-zip.html http://www.google.com/url?sa=Dq=http://code.google.com/intl/es/eclip... Juan 2011/4/6 guymage gdon...@gmail.com Hi, I'm working on a computer which does not have any internet connection. I try to install the GWT Developper plugin for IE on this computer but it does not work because the installer (GwtDevPluginSetup.exe) tries to find the latest plugin version on the google web site. Is there any way to directly download the installer (gwt-dev- plugin.msi ?) ? Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Book that covers latest GWT release
I picked up the most from using GWT Designer (Windows Builder or something back then) with MyEclipse, but I had a clue about UI programming with OOP languages (not saying you don't, btw :-). The GWT wiki was a fantastic reference by itself, but I also found Google Web Toolkit Applications by Ryan Dewsbury a great point solution reference. http://tinyurl.com/425o9j3 * * The videos above rocked as well. On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Vicky solid@gmail.com wrote: Team, I was looking at all the Books reference provided on GWT site at http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/books.html. I did not see any of the books that covers the latest GWT releases. I looked in Ryan Dewsbury's Google Web Toolkit Application, but found the content to be stale when Ryan started describing about very first application in the book. Is there any other book that is missing from your list that is most up to date, or there is none? Thanks, Vicky -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: MVP vs PureMVC
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/6a47d4ac1bb9a3b3 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/6a47d4ac1bb9a3b3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDuhR18-EdM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDuhR18-EdMHope those url's work, if you haven't seen them already. I'm leery of what you might mean by pureMVC as like more IT concepts, it can get muddled: MVP being no exception. I've implemented or worked with a bunch of MVC implementations, J2EE and otherwise. MVP is worth the effort required to move to it, though, like MVC, there is no pure implementation of it. David Chandler gives a great synopsis of it in the first url: Ray Ryan's video is the second. No MVC implementation I've worked with since 1988 has been easy or less than onerous to test, really at any level. There is always too much inbreeding of the layers. MVP doesn't solve this, but can, if done right. With MVP, I typically get 90%+ code coverage on unit tests. I can't get anywhere near that with standard J2EE Best Practices MVC. On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Rodolphe Gomes rodolphe.go...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, I am still having doubts between integrating MVP or PureMVC. Does anyone has any production experience - drawbacks ? Thanks a lot -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT MVP
No offense to the other posters, but I wouldn't go anywhere near platform or mvp4g right off. Just confuses the issue. Having recently been where you're at, I'd go here first: http://martinfowler.com/eaaDev/uiArchs.html. That should shed more light on why MVP is of interest period. Humble View is definitely an item to read. I had to implement The Humble Dialog Box with gwt-presenter and all unit/integration tests before I groked just the _why_ of why I'd want to pursue MVP. As of this post, I have checked out gwt-platform, mvp4g, Guice 2.0 and Guice 3.0 MVP -- still haven't decided the direction I'm headed. IMHO, Schilly was right in that the code muddles the theoretical discussions or visa-versa. MVP is a concept. The frameworks are based upon that, but they possess different implementations based upon the concept. Good luck! On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Alex alex...@gmail.com wrote: I've been looking into GWT and MVP recently and to be honest I'm very confused. My project involves around 40 different pages / individual views, or whatever the correct terminology is. I've been reading tutorials that follow Model-View-Presenter and others that use Activities and Places. Which one should I be using? Many thanks, Alex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: gmail/facebook like chat -asp.net
Sorry, but, snicker. Good luck with that. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:00 PM, nacho vela.igna...@gmail.com wrote: I think that there's betters places to ask what you need. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Real-time app: best approach
400mb? :-) That would be a general design/implementation issue: not GWT specific. Regardless of frameworks, there needs to be paged requests from UI to server and server to Db. Play with request and cache sizes to get memory footprint -vs- performance balanced where you want. Good luck! On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:50 AM, remuera brain...@web.de wrote: Hello, I've developed an app using GWT 2.1 and GXT 2.2.1 and having these problems: 1) It is a real-time app (data update 4 times a second!) and I want to update a grid/table with about 80 lines. The data is not that large, some doubles and a string. 2) The user should be able to generate a report with a lot of data, that should be displayed in a pure HTML table (up to 5000 rows). My solution right now works not bad, but the memory usage is huge (around 400 MB!). I would like to hear your recommendations on these two requirements. How would you implement them? The app should be as performant as possible with using GWT and GXT (if possible). I am deploying it on a Tomcat 6. Thank you in advance! Tim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Dropping support for ie6?
-1 dropping ie6. Not aware how huge that customer base still is? It sux, but is what it is. On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Peter Ondruska peter.ondru...@gmail.comwrote: +1 for dropping ie6 +1/2 for ie9 ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Best practises in automatic test and deployment
Mark, I would imagine the process you need to develop will dictate your tools. If you're just using InteliJ, you need to get Maven, Ant, or whatever building you project outside it first. That choice might dictate which app server you use to test. On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Mark van Veen mark.vanv...@gmail.comwrote: Hi there, thanks a lot for your suggestions I will have a look at it! Mark PS: I searched my mailing on the webinterface at google groups but couldnt find it. Now I answered via gmail - is there a problem with the web interface? 2010/12/1 Ray Tayek rta...@ca.rr.com At 06:10 AM 12/1/2010, you wrote: ... I am looking for some good tools which help me with deploying my application automaticly in a tomcat test server and later on the production server. ... What I am still missing is a automatic way of generating war files which are deployed on the test server(with different properties like db connection and user) ,,, if you are not already aware of it, this may be of interest: http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/deployer-howto.html#Deploying_using_the_Client_Deployer_Package thanks --- co-chair http://ocjug.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Mark van Veen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: How to handle application state ?
Mittal, by query, I believe Jeff means retrieve the user information from wherever you stored after the initial server retrieval: the cookie or the Session/Servlet state. On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Mittal mitt...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, its application state for a User. Why do I need to query server information every time for a user, I think I should able to create client side object such as UserProfile, populate it from server side once user logs in and then pass client side UserProfile object where its required such as Header or Navigation pages. - Mittal On Dec 6, 9:47 am, Jeff Schwartz jefftschwa...@gmail.com wrote: In your case the state you want to preserve seems to be associated with a particular user, not the application, so you can use either cookies or servlet session state to persist the information when the user logs in and you can then query the information when displaying tabs or reacting to other user interface events. Jeff On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Mittal mitt...@gmail.com wrote: Here's the use case we are dealing with, SSO token shall be received by GWT application. SSO token shall have user profile and role information. Once I have read SSO token, I would like to use User Profile information to be available in header page and Role information in navigation page to control who see's what in terms of functionality (tabs). How do I store or hold token information as an application state ? - Mittal -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com google-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- *Jeff Schwartz* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
