from:"Travis Camechis"

Re: GWTRuby? How to communicate?

2012-09-22 Thread Travis Camechis

My guess is that you would set up restful services on the server in ruby
and use the request builder in gwt to send Json
On Sep 22, 2012 8:04 PM, darkflame darkfl...@gmail.com wrote:

 I am a prettyy experienced GWT developer, but have no knowledge of
 Ruby...has anyone used them together?

 I am on shared hosting which doesn't support servlets, so my only
 server side options are php or ruby. Id normally use php, but ruby
 seems to have a better supported lib I want to use for Jabber
 communication.

 Ergo, I need to learn Ruby, but I dont want to bother unless I can
 still leverage my gwt skills for the front end.

 Thanks for any pointers/feedback.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Call for action: Time to rethink a road-map and more frequent updates for GWT.

2012-04-20 Thread Travis Camechis

One thing for sure is that the code base is still being actively developed
if you look at the activity on the repository.  It will be curious to see
how much talk there will be about GWT at this years Google IO.

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:50 AM, b0b pujos.mich...@gmail.com wrote:

 The biggest problem with web frameworks is that you have no visiblity into
 their future.
 And the fact that sometimes Google does not hesisate to can products
 doesn't help.

 The is very must unlike say J2EE which existed 10 years ago and that you
 can mostly be guaranteed will still exist in 10 years because
 so much production critical code use it in the industry.

 Being open source helps a bit, but there's many Open Source projects that
 just die because noone work on it.
 And we all know that code that isn't regularly
 maintained/modernized/updated just dies and become irrelevant.

 Athough I do not think GWT risk being abandonned soon, who knows in which
 state it will eb in 2 or 3 years ?




 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/mXcfTwGGCc4J.

 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Call for action: Time to rethink a road-map and more frequent updates for GWT.

2012-04-20 Thread Travis Camechis

that is probably not a good sign.

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Roger Studner rstud...@gmail.com wrote:

 I believe there are a total of … 0.. sessions about GWT.

 Roger

 On Apr 20, 2012, at 8:18 AM, Travis Camechis wrote:

 One thing for sure is that the code base is still being actively developed
 if you look at the activity on the repository.  It will be curious to see
 how much talk there will be about GWT at this years Google IO.

 On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:50 AM, b0b pujos.mich...@gmail.com wrote:

 The biggest problem with web frameworks is that you have no visiblity
 into their future.
 And the fact that sometimes Google does not hesisate to can products
 doesn't help.

 The is very must unlike say J2EE which existed 10 years ago and that you
 can mostly be guaranteed will still exist in 10 years because
 so much production critical code use it in the industry.

 Being open source helps a bit, but there's many Open Source projects that
 just die because noone work on it.
 And we all know that code that isn't regularly
 maintained/modernized/updated just dies and become irrelevant.

 Athough I do not think GWT risk being abandonned soon, who knows in which
 state it will eb in 2 or 3 years ?




 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/mXcfTwGGCc4J.

 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: GWT integration with Spring services

2012-01-26 Thread Travis Camechis

Spring Roo can help do this although it uses Request Factory as the
communication method.

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Umesh upadhyay.um...@gmail.com wrote:

 How to integrate GWT with spring. Is there an archetype in maven which
 can be used to build the structure of Sring, GWT, JPA

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: GWT communication with REST

2012-01-09 Thread Travis Camechis

You should be able to use GWT RequestBuilder along with the GWT's JSON
support.  That is how I have done it in the past.

On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:05 PM, sonyt...@gmail.com sonyt...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,
 I am very new to GWT. I am trying to learn how i can communicate using
 REST instead of RPC .

 I am planning to use spring mvc as model view controller and REST API .
 Any body have any sample code or link please share with me
 Regards

  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: MVP framework(s) doubt

2011-11-26 Thread Travis Camechis

I have used GWTP a project I worked on and loved it.  It doesn't require
all the boiler plate code that you have to write use the
ActivitiesAndPlaces model.

On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:42 AM, vehdra music veh...@gmail.com wrote:

 I am creating a GWT application using GWT MVP as described here
 (
 http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideMvpActivitiesAndPlaces.html
 ) only that instead of ClientFactory I am using Gin.

 I started nice, but now that I have many entities with List  Edit
 views, activities and places, my project is growing a lot and I having
 perfomance issues.

 I know about code splitting, but I care about is, is performant to
 have for example a EditPlace, ListPlace, EditActivity  ListActivity
 for  every model that I need to work in my app? For example, if I only
 have Foo model I will have:

 FooEditPlace
 FooEditActivity
 FooEditView
 FooEditViewImpl
 FooEditView.ui.xml

 FooListPlace
 FooListActivity
 FooListView
 FooListViewImpl
 FooListView.ui.xml

 Ten files for only editing / listing one model :) And I have to edit /
 list about 17 models in my app right now...

 I don't know if I doing the things in the right way. Is it normally
 to have many files in a big GWT project using the GWT Activities 
 Places fw?

 OTOS I was looking to another frameworks like gwtp, mvp4g, guit, every
 one seems to be nice and have cool features, but I believe (just
 believe, I didn't try anyone of this fw yet) that they are reinvent
 the wheel. Or I am wrong and I can take avantage of using one of this
 fw in my app?

 What are you experiences? Am I doing wrong in the Activities 
 Places way? Am I using it right and I just have to use code spliting
 to have better performance? Or should I use gwtp, mvp4g or guit?

 Thanks in advance ;)

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

New GWT theme

2011-09-09 Thread Travis Camechis

Wasn't there a new theme created for GWT 2.3 ? Clear or Clean? Something
along those lines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: New GWT theme

2011-09-09 Thread Travis Camechis

yeah, that is it.  I found it as soon as I sent the email.

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Qian Qiao qian.q...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 03:51, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com wrote:
  Wasn't there a new theme created for GWT 2.3 ? Clear or Clean? Something
  along those lines.

 I guess you mean com.google.gwt.user.theme.clean.Clean

 -- Joe

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Nobody is using Struts1 with GWT successfully?

2011-04-27 Thread Travis Camechis

agreed

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Adligo sc...@adligo.com wrote:

 I would recommend not using Struts with GWT, Struts (and Spring MVC)
 are web 1.0 technologies.   I would recommend using RPC for actions
 that need to talk to the server using googles nice RPC framework.
If you have a mashup (old Struts app that you want to add GWT to)
 I would suggest taking a large scale refactoring approach and write
 new functionality in GWT (with RPC) and keep the old Struts jsp
 code.   Then when you have done a fair amount of GWT start refactoring
 the old Struts jsp code to GWT as you are asked to maintain (change)
 parts of it.

 Cheers,
 Scott

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Announcing GPE/GWT 2.2 RC1

2011-02-08 Thread Travis Camechis

At some point in a project you have to move on, plus it hasn't been removed
yet, just deprecated.

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Christian Goudreau
goudreau.christ...@gmail.com wrote:

Well knowing that Java 7 is expected to be released mid
2011http://www.developer.com/java/java-7-and-8-begin-to-take-shape-whats-in-whats-out.html,
I think that it's just normal to deprecated older versions. Btw, I don't
understand why people keep Gwt up to date, but not Java ?

Way to go Gwt dev !

Cheers,

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Ümit uemit.se...@gmail.com wrote:

Do I need a new version of gin for this release? I am asking because I get
following error if I try to compile a project which works fine with GWT
2.1.1 with the new release?

java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: Found interface
com.google.gwt.core.ext.typeinfo.JClassType, but class was expected
at
com.google.gwt.inject.rebind.GinjectorGeneratorImpl.validateInjectorClass(GinjectorGeneratorImpl.java:84)

thanks in advance
cheers

Ümit

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
Christian Goudreau
www.arcbees.com

Re: Announcing GWT-Platform 0.5

2011-01-31 Thread Travis Camechis

Awesome. This definitely has turned out to be a great release. I will do my
best to try and help support the spring side of things as well as any other
things that I could potentially aid.

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:29 AM, PhilBeaudoin
philippe.beaud...@gmail.comwrote:

We just released version 0.5 of the GWT-Platform framework:
http://gwtplatform.com

GWTP is one of the most popular MVP framework for GWT and is being
used in many production applications. It sports a simple annotation-
based API that makes it very easy to design web apps with nested
views, tabbed presenters, history support, and many other features.
Native support for code splitting and lazy loading ensures your app
loads very quickly even if you have a large number of presenters.

GWTP also includes a command pattern, annotation processors to
generate tedious GWT boilerplate, as well as a component to simplify
localization.

Highlights of release 0.5 include:
* Full support for Spring in the serveer-side dispatcher
* Client-side queuing, caching and handling of commands
* User-customizable tabs for tabbed presenters
* Now using the GWT 2.1 event bus (More use of GWT 2.1 MVP classes
coming soon...)

I hope you enjoy this release! Don't hesitate to join us on the GWTP
forum:
https://groups.google.com/group/gwt-platform

Cheers,

Philippe

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: gwt + spring security

2010-12-22 Thread Travis Camechis

create a SuccessAuthenticationHandler and FailureAuthenticationHandler

public class AjaxSuccessAuthenticationHandler implements
AuthenticationSuccessHandler {

@Override
public void onAuthenticationSuccess(HttpServletRequest request,
HttpServletResponse response, Authentication authentication)
throws IOException, ServletException {
HttpServletResponseWrapper responseWrapper = new HttpServletResponseWrapper(
response);

Writer out = responseWrapper.getWriter();
MapString, Object authResponse = new HashMapString, Object();
authResponse.put(success, true);
authResponse.put(user, SecurityContextHolder.getContext()
.getAuthentication().getName());
ListString authorities = new ArrayListString();
for (GrantedAuthority auth : SecurityContextHolder.getContext()
.getAuthentication().getAuthorities()) {
authorities.add(auth.getAuthority());
}
authResponse.put(authorities, authorities);
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.writeValue(out, authResponse);
out.close();

}

}


public class AjaxAuthenticationFailureHandler implements
AuthenticationFailureHandler {

@Override
public void onAuthenticationFailure(HttpServletRequest request,
HttpServletResponse response, AuthenticationException exception)
throws IOException, ServletException {
HttpServletResponseWrapper responseWrapper = new
HttpServletResponseWrapper(response);
Writer out = responseWrapper.getWriter();
out.write({ success: false, errors:{reason: 'Login failed. Try
again.'}} );
out.close();
}

}

And your spring Security Context File

beans:bean
class=org.springframework.security.web.authentication.UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter
id=usernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter
beans:property name=authenticationManager ref=authenticationManager /
beans:property name=filterProcessesUrl value=/j_spring_security_check
/
beans:property name=authenticationSuccessHandler
ref=successHandler /
beans:property name=authenticationFailureHandler
ref=failureHandler /
/beans:bean

beans:bean id=successHandler
class=mil.jtcoic.tb.epik.bender.server.security.AjaxSuccessAuthenticationHandler
/

beans:bean id=failureHandler
class=mil.jtcoic.tb.epik.bender.server.security.AjaxAuthenticationFailureHandler
/
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Alberto albya...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Travis,

  Is there any way that you can provide examples of your solution?

 Thanks !

 On Dec 21, 8:19 am, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com wrote:
  instead of using that I created my own custom Spring Security
  SuccessHandlers and Failure Handlers that returns JSON back to the
 client.
   I then let the client handle the place management based on
  success:true/false.  At this point I can also send credentials back in
 the
  JSON as well.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:15 AM, asianCoolz second.co...@gmail.com
 wrote:
   I use gwt requestBuilder to query server result, if server-side spring
   checked user is not authenticated, it will forward to form-login
   login-page=/gwtapplication.html#!login   , but gwt is not
   forwarded to that page.  see below
 
   requestBuilder.setCallback(new RequestCallback() {
 
  @Override
  public void onError(final Request request, final Throwable
   exception) {
  resultCallback.onFailure(exception);
  }
 
  @Override
  public void onResponseReceived(final Request request,
  final Response response) {
 
  if(response.getHeader(Content-
   Type).toLowerCase().equals(text/html.toLowerCase()))
  {
 
  //response.getText() is
  /**
Expires Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT
Set-Cookie JSESSIONID=1emk892yva1e9;Path=/
Locationhttp://
 127.0.0.1:/gwtapplication.html#!login
   Content-Length 0
   Server Jetty(6.1.x)
 
 **/
 
  }
 
  }
  });
 
   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
   Google Web Toolkit group.
   To post to this group, send email to
 google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
 cr...@googlegroups.com
   .
   For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: gwt + spring security

2010-12-21 Thread Travis Camechis

instead of using that I created my own custom Spring Security
SuccessHandlers and Failure Handlers that returns JSON back to the client.
 I then let the client handle the place management based on
success:true/false.  At this point I can also send credentials back in the
JSON as well.

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:15 AM, asianCoolz second.co...@gmail.com wrote:

 I use gwt requestBuilder to query server result, if server-side spring
 checked user is not authenticated, it will forward to form-login
 login-page=/gwtapplication.html#!login   , but gwt is not
 forwarded to that page.  see below


 requestBuilder.setCallback(new RequestCallback() {

@Override
public void onError(final Request request, final Throwable
 exception) {
resultCallback.onFailure(exception);
}

@Override
public void onResponseReceived(final Request request,
final Response response) {


if(response.getHeader(Content-
 Type).toLowerCase().equals(text/html.toLowerCase()))
{


//response.getText() is
/**
  Expires Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT
  Set-Cookie JSESSIONID=1emk892yva1e9;Path=/
  Location http://127.0.0.1:/gwtapplication.html#!login
 Content-Length 0
 Server Jetty(6.1.x)

   **/


}


}
});

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: To smart GWT or not

2010-12-01 Thread Travis Camechis

To me the worst part about the third party frameworks is that the widgets
can get slow and clunky or they don't follow the GWT ways making it hard to
implement MVP.

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Baloe nielsba...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi all,

 I wonder, is there anyone using Smart GWT? Or, any other (Sencha)
 product? We are struggling with the poor widgets included with GWT and
 it looks like my boss is not going to accept to spend more time on how
 to get these GWT widgets into place. And we need more advanced widgets
 as well.

 Thanks!
 NielsBaloe

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: To smart GWT or not

2010-12-01 Thread Travis Camechis

which would be nice, just a matter of when. They seem to be a little slow
with the GWT releases.

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:29 PM, nino ekambi jazzmatad...@googlemail.comwrote:

It looks like sencha is planing to go the GWT way in the version 3 of
their library
http://www.slideshare.net/darrellmeyer/ext-gwt-30

2010/12/1 Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com

To me the worst part about the third party frameworks is that the widgets
can get slow and clunky or they don't follow the GWT ways making it hard to
implement MVP.

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Baloe nielsba...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi all,

I wonder, is there anyone using Smart GWT? Or, any other (Sencha)
product? We are struggling with the poor widgets included with GWT and
it looks like my boss is not going to accept to spend more time on how
to get these GWT widgets into place. And we need more advanced widgets
as well.

Thanks!
NielsBaloe

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: To smart GWT or not

2010-12-01 Thread Travis Camechis

this is true.

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Ivan Chappel chappel.i...@gmail.comwrote:

You do realize that with every release Ext-GWT essentially creates a new
product breaking all previous API's. If they're trying to get closer to GWT,
then why not use GWT itself. Why pay for a product when you can use GWT for
free. By the time they plan on a release, there will be little or no value
it adds over core GWT.

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:29 PM, nino ekambi
jazzmatad...@googlemail.comwrote:

It looks like sencha is planing to go the GWT way in the version 3 of
their library
http://www.slideshare.net/darrellmeyer/ext-gwt-30

2010/12/1 Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com

To me the worst part about the third party frameworks is that the widgets
can get slow and clunky or they don't follow the GWT ways making it hard to
implement MVP.

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Baloe nielsba...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi all,

Thanks!
NielsBaloe

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Announcing GWT 2.1

2010-10-28 Thread Travis Camechis

AWESOME

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Christian Goudreau
goudreau.christ...@gmail.com wrote:

Hell yeah !

Good work !

Cheers,

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:12 PM, David Chandler drfibona...@google.comwrote:

GWT 2.1 is here!

http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/2010/10/announcing-final-release-of-gwt-21.html

--
David Chandler
Developer Programs Engineer, Google Web Toolkit
http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/

--
Christian Goudreau
www.arcbees.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Announcing GWT 2.1

2010-10-28 Thread Travis Camechis

might be one a similar to a problem I had where you get a pile of errors but
they didn't really effect anything. Turned out it was something with the
GWT-USER.jar that came with eclipse plugin. Swapped it out with one from
maven and all the errors went away.

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Christian Goudreau
goudreau.christ...@gmail.com wrote:

Btw, it seem to be an eclipse plugin problem... Since I can run the app
even with those ... 30 errors. It's kinda anoying though.

Cheers,

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Christian Goudreau
goudreau.christ...@gmail.com wrote:

How come do I get this message ? The doc hasn't changed about MenuBar,
even content assist of eclipse propose MenuItem inside MenuBar.

Widget com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.MenuItem is not a subclass of GWTs
Widget class

Cheers,

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.comwrote:

AWESOME

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Christian Goudreau
goudreau.christ...@gmail.com wrote:

Hell yeah !

Good work !

Cheers,

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:12 PM, David Chandler drfibona...@google.com
wrote:

GWT 2.1 is here!

http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/2010/10/announcing-final-release-of-gwt-21.html

--
David Chandler
Developer Programs Engineer, Google Web Toolkit
http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
Christian Goudreau
www.arcbees.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
Christian Goudreau
www.arcbees.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: GWT-Platform spring integration

2010-10-27 Thread Travis Camechis

Yeah but it generates everything using the Requestfactory which is completey
different than dispatch

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Stefan Bachert stefanbach...@yahoo.dewrote:

 Hi,

 you could play with Spring Roo.
 My last try with Roo was not successful with non trivial cases,
 however, Spring Roo probably does generate the best Spring integration
 (but using aspectJ)

 Stefan Bachert
 http://gwtworld.de


 On 25 Okt., 23:47, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:
  Does anyone have an example of using the Spring support for dispatch
  that has been integrated into GWT-Platform?  I am having trouble
  getting the client to hit the server ( 404 error ).
 
  Thanks

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: GWT Maven gwt:compile issue

2010-10-11 Thread Travis Camechis

I figured it out. I had to modify the resources section to include the
module xml file ( it was getting left out ) along with the source code for
the module. All is happy now.

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:09 PM, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:

I am using the new maven plugin (http://google-web-
toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/2.1.0.M3/gwt/maven) that is being used in
the new 2.1 development. I have setup a multi module maven project
where one of the modules contains a GWT module that contains mainly
just shared object between server / client. Another GWT module that
is the actual client and server. The problem I am having is when
building the client project from the command line with the gwt:compile
it cannot find the gwt module for the other project ( get the did you
forget to an inherit a module ouput ). When building through eclipse
everything works fine ( guess its using more of the eclipse
classpath ). Anyone have any suggestions on this?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: GWT-Platform with GWT 2.1

2010-10-08 Thread Travis Camechis

I don't think so. They are introducing there new Concept of the
RequestFactory in this release. Could be wrong though.

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Slava Lovkiy slava.lov...@gmail.com wrote:

I wonder if upcoming GWT 2.1 release will contain dispatcher from
gwtp ?

On Sep 30, 9:38 am, Christian Goudreau goudreau.christ...@gmail.com
wrote:
There's no big plan for now, since features are moving a lot in trunk of
Gwt, but I can assure you that we will include every Gwt core features
that
we can.

Cheers,

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does anyone know what the plan is for GWT-Platform with the upcoming
2.1
release? Will GWT-Platform integrate the new features or some of
them?

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Bayard Randel
k...@bestpractice.net.nzwrote:

Yes, I'm currently working on a GWTP project using 2.1M3 without any
issues.

On Sep 30, 9:01 am, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:
We currently looking at starting a new project. I like what GWT 2.1
provides. Does anyone know if you can use GWT-PLATFORM with 2.1M3+?
The main thing we would like to use if using GWT-Platform is the
Cell
widgets.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
google-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com

.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
google-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com

.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
Christian Goudreauwww.arcbees.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Where can I find documentation to GWT MVP comming with version 2.1

2010-10-08 Thread Travis Camechis

Requestfactory in its current form is perfect if your just manipulating
entities(finderrs, insert, delete, modify) but not dealing with lots of
business logic on the server side.   I believe in GWT 2.1.1 it will probably
be a pretty good replacement as it will add features like caching and being
able to hook to any service objects instead of just entities.

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Jeff Larsen larse...@gmail.com wrote:

 David,

 Can you explain some of the benifits/drawbacks of using the
 RequestFactory vs gwt-dispatch. I haven't taken the time to really
 investigate the new RequestFactory, but currently I've got gwt-
 dispatch wired into my app, I'm just curious if the RequestFactory
 paradigm will be better for my current usecase.

 -Jeff

 On Oct 8, 12:31 am, Rud rudmerr...@gmail.com wrote:
  Okay, got it to work but it feels ugly.
 
  In my 'east' I put a class SimpleDisplayUi which is a UiBinder class.
  Its ui.xml just has a SimplePanel.
 
  The trick was in SimpleDisplayUi.showActivityWidget(IsWidget widget)
  to do
 
  simplePanel.setWidget(widget.asWidget());
 
  It seems there are two many layers from DockLayoutPanel  to 'east' to
  SimpleDisplayUi to SimplePanel and finally to the actual panel(s) that
  can be changed.
 
  There are a Activity classes that seem superfluous like SimpleActivity
  just to create SimpleDisplayUi. It doesn't get created or called.
 
  I'll look at cleaning this up but getting SimpleDisplayUi working was
  painful so I'm not sure there is much leeway. Just look at its
  declaration:
 
  public class SimpleDisplayUi extends Composite implements
  SimpleActivity.SimpleDisplayUi, Display { }
 
  Rudhttp://mysticlakesoftware.com

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: GWT-Platform with GWT 2.1

2010-10-06 Thread Travis Camechis

How stable is the trunk version? Thinking about building it from scratch at
least until .5 so I can begin taking advantage of the spring features.

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Philippe Beaudoin
philippe.beaud...@gmail.com wrote:

Spring support is planned for release 0.5 (e.t.a. early November)

Philippe

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you have to use Guice on the server side in order to use Dispatch or
can
you use Spring on the server side?

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Brendan Doherty
bren...@propertysimplified.com wrote:

Here are a few discussions on the differences.

http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-platform/browse_frm/thread/862cab91ccb28d40/cfa2e17fa2a510cc

http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-platform/browse_frm/thread/4c00e59dc139ccdf/759eb3a5a6fa67ff

http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-platform/browse_frm/thread/7ae934e754089102/d885c122233faa32

There are so many features in gwt-platform, it would be hard to
summarise here. You should check out the wiki
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-platform/wiki/LibraryOverview

On Sep 30, 12:25 pm, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com wrote:
understand. We are mainly trying to figure out which MVP framework to
start
with but not sure which one would be the wise decision. Can you tell
me
some of the benefits of GWTP over 2.1 MVP are?

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Christian Goudreau

goudreau.christ...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no big plan for now, since features are moving a lot in
trunk
of
Gwt, but I can assure you that we will include every Gwt core
features
that
we can.

Cheers,

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Travis Camechis
camec...@gmail.comwrote:

Does anyone know what the plan is for GWT-Platform with the
upcoming
2.1
release? Will GWT-Platform integrate the new features or some of
them?

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Bayard Randel
k...@bestpractice.net.nzwrote:

Yes, I'm currently working on a GWTP project using 2.1M3 without
any
issues.

On Sep 30, 9:01 am, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:
We currently looking at starting a new project. I like what GWT
2.1
provides. Does anyone know if you can use GWT-PLATFORM with
2.1M3+?
The main thing we would like to use if using GWT-Platform is the
Cell
widgets.

google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
cr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
Christian Goudreau
www.arcbees.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
You received this message

Re: GWT-Platform with GWT 2.1

2010-10-06 Thread Travis Camechis

good point. I forgot about the CI server.

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Christian Goudreau
goudreau.christ...@gmail.com wrote:

You should take a look at the CI builds instead, they are already build
from trunk.

As soon that spring feature will be in trunk, our automatic CI server will
build the project for you.

ContinuousIntegration

https://code.google.com/p/gwt-platform/wiki/ContinuousIntegration

Cheers,

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.comwrote:

How stable is the trunk version? Thinking about building it from scratch
at least until .5 so I can begin taking advantage of the spring features.

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Philippe Beaudoin
philippe.beaud...@gmail.com wrote:

Spring support is planned for release 0.5 (e.t.a. early November)

Philippe

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you have to use Guice on the server side in order to use Dispatch or
can
you use Spring on the server side?

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Brendan Doherty
bren...@propertysimplified.com wrote:

Here are a few discussions on the differences.

http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-platform/browse_frm/thread/862cab91ccb28d40/cfa2e17fa2a510cc

http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-platform/browse_frm/thread/4c00e59dc139ccdf/759eb3a5a6fa67ff

http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-platform/browse_frm/thread/7ae934e754089102/d885c122233faa32

There are so many features in gwt-platform, it would be hard to
summarise here. You should check out the wiki
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-platform/wiki/LibraryOverview

On Sep 30, 12:25 pm, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com wrote:
understand. We are mainly trying to figure out which MVP framework
to
start
with but not sure which one would be the wise decision. Can you
tell me
some of the benefits of GWTP over 2.1 MVP are?

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Christian Goudreau

goudreau.christ...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no big plan for now, since features are moving a lot in
trunk
of
Gwt, but I can assure you that we will include every Gwt core
features
that
we can.

Cheers,

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Travis Camechis
camec...@gmail.comwrote:

Does anyone know what the plan is for GWT-Platform with the
upcoming
2.1
release? Will GWT-Platform integrate the new features or some
of
them?

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Bayard Randel
k...@bestpractice.net.nzwrote:

Yes, I'm currently working on a GWTP project using 2.1M3 without
any
issues.

On Sep 30, 9:01 am, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:
We currently looking at starting a new project. I like what
GWT
2.1
provides. Does anyone know if you can use GWT-PLATFORM with
2.1M3+?
The main thing we would like to use if using GWT-Platform is
the
Cell
widgets.

--
Christian Goudreau
www.arcbees.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http

Re: GWT-Platform with GWT 2.1

2010-10-06 Thread Travis Camechis

Good to know.

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Philippe Beaudoin
philippe.beaud...@gmail.com wrote:

Latest features are not super stable. (We plan a change in
ClientActionHandler's API soon.) But the bulk of it is fairly stable.
We use the trunk in production.

Philippe

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com
wrote:
good point. I forgot about the CI server.

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Christian Goudreau
goudreau.christ...@gmail.com wrote:

You should take a look at the CI builds instead, they are already build
from trunk.
As soon that spring feature will be in trunk, our automatic CI server
will
build the project for you.
ContinuousIntegration
https://code.google.com/p/gwt-platform/wiki/ContinuousIntegration
Cheers,

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com
wrote:

How stable is the trunk version? Thinking about building it from
scratch
at least until .5 so I can begin taking advantage of the spring
features.

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Philippe Beaudoin
philippe.beaud...@gmail.com wrote:

Spring support is planned for release 0.5 (e.t.a. early November)

Philippe

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you have to use Guice on the server side in order to use Dispatch
or can
you use Spring on the server side?

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Brendan Doherty
bren...@propertysimplified.com wrote:

Here are a few discussions on the differences.

http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-platform/browse_frm/thread/862cab91ccb28d40/cfa2e17fa2a510cc

http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-platform/browse_frm/thread/4c00e59dc139ccdf/759eb3a5a6fa67ff

http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-platform/browse_frm/thread/7ae934e754089102/d885c122233faa32

There are so many features in gwt-platform, it would be hard to
summarise here. You should check out the wiki
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-platform/wiki/LibraryOverview

On Sep 30, 12:25 pm, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com wrote:
understand. We are mainly trying to figure out which MVP
framework
to
start
with but not sure which one would be the wise decision. Can you
tell me
some of the benefits of GWTP over 2.1 MVP are?

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Christian Goudreau

goudreau.christ...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no big plan for now, since features are moving a lot in
trunk
of
Gwt, but I can assure you that we will include every Gwt core
features
that
we can.

Cheers,

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Travis Camechis
camec...@gmail.comwrote:

Does anyone know what the plan is for GWT-Platform with the
upcoming
2.1
release? Will GWT-Platform integrate the new features or
some
of
them?

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Bayard Randel
k...@bestpractice.net.nzwrote:

Yes, I'm currently working on a GWTP project using 2.1M3
without any
issues.

On Sep 30, 9:01 am, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:
We currently looking at starting a new project. I like
what
GWT
2.1
provides. Does anyone know if you can use GWT-PLATFORM
with
2.1M3+?
The main thing we would like to use if using GWT-Platform
is
the
Cell
widgets.

--
Christian Goudreau
www.arcbees.com

google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr

Re: GWT-Platform with GWT 2.1

2010-10-05 Thread Travis Camechis

Do you have to use Guice on the server side in order to use Dispatch or can
you use Spring on the server side?

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Brendan Doherty
bren...@propertysimplified.com wrote:

Here are a few discussions on the differences.

http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-platform/browse_frm/thread/862cab91ccb28d40/cfa2e17fa2a510cc

http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-platform/browse_frm/thread/4c00e59dc139ccdf/759eb3a5a6fa67ff

http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-platform/browse_frm/thread/7ae934e754089102/d885c122233faa32

There are so many features in gwt-platform, it would be hard to
summarise here. You should check out the wiki
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-platform/wiki/LibraryOverview

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Christian Goudreau

goudreau.christ...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no big plan for now, since features are moving a lot in trunk
of
Gwt, but I can assure you that we will include every Gwt core features
that
we can.

Cheers,

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com
wrote:

Does anyone know what the plan is for GWT-Platform with the upcoming
2.1
release? Will GWT-Platform integrate the new features or some of
them?

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Bayard Randel
k...@bestpractice.net.nzwrote:

Yes, I'm currently working on a GWTP project using 2.1M3 without any
issues.

On Sep 30, 9:01 am, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:
We currently looking at starting a new project. I like what GWT
2.1
provides. Does anyone know if you can use GWT-PLATFORM with
2.1M3+?
The main thing we would like to use if using GWT-Platform is the
Cell
widgets.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
cr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
cr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
Christian Goudreau
www.arcbees.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
cr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: GWT-Platform with GWT 2.1

2010-09-30 Thread Travis Camechis

Thanks for you response.  I think we will use GWTP along with 2.1M3+ so we
can take advantage of the cell widgets.  Hopefully in doing so I will also
be able to make contributions to GWTP.

Travis Camechis
Software Engineer

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:01 PM, PhilBeaudoin
philippe.beaud...@gmail.comwrote:

 One good place to start are Thomas Broyer article on 2.1 MVP in case
 you haven't read them already:
 http://tbroyer.posterous.com/gwt-21-places
 http://tbroyer.posterous.com/gwt-21-places-part-ii
 http://tbroyer.posterous.com/gwt-21-activities
 http://tbroyer.posterous.com/gwt-21-activities-nesting-yagni

 I have never tried writing a complete app using 2.1 MVP classes, so my
 analysis here is mostly based on the above articles and the javadoc.
 As a result, I'm pretty sure there are some mistakes and I'd be more
 than happy to listen to corrections from people who have used the 2.1
 MVP clases.

 If you don't have the time to read what follows my conclusion is that:
 - 2.1 MVP is closer to the metal and will need you to write more
 code ;
 - 2.1 MVP takes the stance that presenter hierarchies are not
 desirable, GWTP takes the opposite stance ;
 - GWTP MVP's have more features out-of-the-box ;
 - 2.1 MVP are still meant to sit behind a 3rd party tool, i.e.
 SpringRoo or (eventually) GWTP.

 1) Place mechanism

 GWTP tries to make places really easy. A simple annotation is often
 all you need to get your presenter to respond to a place. If you need
 parameters your parse them in your presenter's prepareFromRequest()
 method. This handles the 95% use case in a few lines of code. For the
 exceptional situations where you want to do something else than reveal
 a presenter on a place request (reveal non-nested presenters, trigger
 an action, ...), you will have to go through the event bus.

 GWTP shadows each of your presenter with an automatically generated
 proxy (hurray for GWT's generators!). This is a light weight class
 that listens on the event bus even before the presenter has been
 instantiated. As a result GWTP's will always lazily load your
 presenter. An annotation also makes it trivial to have your presenter
 sit behind a GWT code splitting point. As a bonus, this proxy is the
 perfect place for your presenter to listen to events that may be of
 interest to him before it's instantiated.

 In GWT 2.1, places are a subsystem entirely decoupled from the MVP
 layer. You connect them via the ActivityManager and ActivityMapper,
 which lets you lazily load or code split your presenters. The
 ActivityManager and ActivityMapper are not generated for you however,
 you have to maintain them manually. If you want your presenter to
 listen to other events before it's instantiated, then you will
 probably also have to create a proxy manually (or accept that your
 presenter is not lazily instantiated).

 Some features are offered by both framework (i.e. user confirmation
 before navigation), but GWTP places offers more features out-of-the-
 box:
 - Gatekeepers makes it very easy to implement a right management
 mechanism client-side. For example, you can make a presenter
 accessible only to the admin, another one only to logged in users,
 etc.
 - Hierarchical places make it easy to implement breadcrumbs or a back
 to what I was doing before link

 2) Presenters (Called activities in 2.1)

 GWTP offers two different concepts: Presenters, which are singletons
 and PresenterWidget which can be non-singleton. These can be nested in
 one another, offering a powerful set of cascading lifecycle hooks that
 you can override: onBind, onReveal, onReset, onHide and onUnbind.
 These are cascading in the sense that a call to onHide on a parent
 presenter will cause onHide to be called on the child presenters. It
 makes it easy to organize your app logically.

 This ability to nest presenters doesn't imply higher coupling since
 the nesting is entirely done via the event bus. A parent presenter
 does not know who is child are until they are connected and vice-
 versa. This makes it very easy to reorganize your app layout, either
 dynamically or based on the configuration. For example, you can make a
 different hierarchical layout for your mobile version.

 Activities in 2.1 takes the stance that presenter nesting is not
 required. This means, for one thing, that you will have to think in
 advance as to how you want to split your screen in display regions.
 Modifying the layout within one presenter means you have to modify the
 global screen layout. This also means that you cannot get cascading
 effects: you will have to manually stop all the presenters that need
 to go away when you navigate.

 For me, this last point is the most important turn off. In my
 experience, building reusable components in the form of
 PresenterWidgets (widgets with a nice separation between logic and
 view) is really useful. In GWT 2.1 you would have to do these
 manually, and to manually hook them to the lifecycle methods of your
 presenter

Re: GWT-Platform with GWT 2.1

2010-09-29 Thread Travis Camechis

Does anyone know what the plan is for GWT-Platform with the upcoming 2.1
release?   Will GWT-Platform integrate the new features or some of them?

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Bayard Randel k...@bestpractice.net.nzwrote:

 Yes, I'm currently working on a GWTP project using 2.1M3 without any
 issues.

 On Sep 30, 9:01 am, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:
  We currently looking at starting a new project.  I like what GWT 2.1
  provides.  Does anyone know if you can use GWT-PLATFORM with 2.1M3+?
  The main thing we would like to use if using GWT-Platform is the Cell
  widgets.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: GWT-Platform with GWT 2.1

2010-09-29 Thread Travis Camechis

understand. We are mainly trying to figure out which MVP framework to start
with but not sure which one would be the wise decision. Can you tell me
some of the benefits of GWTP over 2.1 MVP are?

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Christian Goudreau
goudreau.christ...@gmail.com wrote:

There's no big plan for now, since features are moving a lot in trunk of
Gwt, but I can assure you that we will include every Gwt core features that
we can.

Cheers,

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.comwrote:

Does anyone know what the plan is for GWT-Platform with the upcoming 2.1
release? Will GWT-Platform integrate the new features or some of them?

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Bayard Randel
k...@bestpractice.net.nzwrote:

Yes, I'm currently working on a GWTP project using 2.1M3 without any
issues.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
Christian Goudreau
www.arcbees.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Show case example of the new Data Presentation Widget?

2010-09-21 Thread Travis Camechis

You can look at the expenses app.  Right now it you have to look at the SVN
repository in order to look at it.  Its under trunk/samples.  I believe it
will eventually in up in the showcase examples.

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:58 PM, skippy al.leh...@fisglobal.com wrote:

 I would like to see a working example of the GWT 2.1 Data Presentation
 Widget.

 Is there a scrollbar that does not include the hearer?

 Does it/can it work liks the FlexTables today?

 I have asked several time on this topic, but nobody seems to know.
 Is this not ready for the enterprise?

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Show case example of the new Data Presentation Widget?

2010-09-21 Thread Travis Camechis

yep the expenses app uses them along with the new MVP framework.

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Gal Dolber gal.dol...@gmail.com wrote:

I am almost sure there are some examples in the showcase on trunk

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.comwrote:

You can look at the expenses app. Right now it you have to look at the
SVN repository in order to look at it. Its under trunk/samples. I believe
it will eventually in up in the showcase examples.

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:58 PM, skippy al.leh...@fisglobal.com wrote:

I would like to see a working example of the GWT 2.1 Data Presentation
Widget.

Is there a scrollbar that does not include the hearer?

Does it/can it work liks the FlexTables today?

I have asked several time on this topic, but nobody seems to know.
Is this not ready for the enterprise?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
Guit: Elegant, beautiful, modular and *production ready* gwt applications.

http://code.google.com/p/guit/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Expenses Sample project

2010-09-08 Thread Travis Camechis

I just did a fresh maven build it ran successfully. I did get some errors
due to javax.validation problems but the build still ran. Make sure your up
to date as well as your GWT_TOOLS.

On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:58 AM, superdama zack...@gmail.com wrote:

Travis,

Good for mvn compile, no good for mvn gwt:compile.
Any advice?

On Sep 7, 10:07 am, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com wrote:
try running tools/scripts/maven_script.sh from the root of the GWT
checkout. This will build a current copy of GWT and them to your local
maven repo. You should then be able to do a mvn compile, mvn
gwt:compile, mvn gw:run.

On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 9:08 AM, superdama zack...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,

I got the same issue. Still don't know how to solve the problem.
Frustrating.

-Zack

On Aug 25, 9:22 pm, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone know why I would get this error when trying to run the
samples/expensesapp via maven.

: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/datanucleus/
PersistenceConfiguration
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class
com.google.gwt.sample.expenses.server.domain.EMF

I am running this by using these commands.

mvncompilemvngwt:compilemvngwt:run

I also tried to usemvngae:run but get the same error.

This is the sample project in the trunk of the GWT samples area.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
cr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Expenses Sample project

2010-09-07 Thread Travis Camechis

try running tools/scripts/maven_script.sh from the root of the GWT
checkout. This will build a current copy of GWT and them to your local
maven repo. You should then be able to do a mvn compile, mvn
gwt:compile, mvn gw:run.

On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 9:08 AM, superdama zack...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi guys,

I got the same issue. Still don't know how to solve the problem.
Frustrating.

-Zack

On Aug 25, 9:22 pm, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone know why I would get this error when trying to run the
samples/expensesapp via maven.

: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/datanucleus/
PersistenceConfiguration
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class
com.google.gwt.sample.expenses.server.domain.EMF

I am running this by using these commands.

mvncompilemvngwt:compilemvngwt:run

I also tried to usemvngae:run but get the same error.

This is the sample project in the trunk of the GWT samples area.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: [gwt-contrib] expenses sample POM file

2010-09-01 Thread Travis Camechis

Will you be able to use both RequestFactory and RPC at the same time?  For
example using some third party API's may still require RPC.

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:

 It was probably a premature move, though the sample will likely require Roo
 trunk pretty soon. In the meantime, does it work okay if you bump the
 requirement down to Roo 1.1M3?

 rjrjr

 On Aug 28, 2010 7:45 AM, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:
  Commit r8664 updated the expenses sample to use the Roo 1.1M4
  annotations jar which does not exist in the maven repos. The only way
  to get that jar currently is to build roo and doing a manual import
  into a local maven repo? Is this the intent or should it be fixed?
 
  --
  http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

  --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Push back roo to a released version. (issue832801)

2010-09-01 Thread Travis Camechis

wouldn't it be 1.1.0M3 instead of M2?

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:58 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:

 On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:56 PM,  rj...@google.com wrote:
  Push back roo to a released version.

 LGTM

 --
 Bob Vawter
 Google Web Toolkit Team

 --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Push back roo to a released version. (issue832801)

2010-09-01 Thread Travis Camechis

gotcha

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:

 I know that M2 works.

 On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.comwrote:

 wouldn't it be 1.1.0M3 instead of M2?

 On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:58 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:

 On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:56 PM,  rj...@google.com wrote:
  Push back roo to a released version.

 LGTM

 --
 Bob Vawter
 Google Web Toolkit Team

 --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


  --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


  --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] compile error when attempting to build expenses app VIA maven

2010-09-01 Thread Travis Camechis

gotcha, that took care of it.  I guess this was to help out with there new
maven approach.  Pretty cool

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:15 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:

 On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:08 PM, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:
  I am getting lots of errors when attempting to do a mvn compile on the
  expenses app.

 I just got through this.

 From trunk, run ./tools/scripts/maven_script.sh


 --
 Bob Vawter
 Google Web Toolkit Team

 --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Using Request Factory with a Service Layer

2010-08-30 Thread Travis Camechis

Is the Request Factory going to in some way be a replacement for normal RPC
or are there some cases where you have to use RPC still?

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:


 On 30 août, 20:22, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:
  Is there a way yet in GWT 2.1 to use the Request Factory to talk with
  a non Entity object on the Server side such as a a Service/Business
  logic class?  I believe this was talked about in the wave

 No, not yet in M3. It's planned for M4 though:
 https://jira.springsource.org/browse/ROO-1186

 --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Re: gwt 2.1.0 m3 compilation error

2010-08-25 Thread Travis Camechis

try
http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/2.1.0.M3/eclipse/plugin/3.5/

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Rokesh rjan...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi,

I'm giving gwt2.1 m3 a try with my current code (http://
twiggered.appspot.com), which was built with gwt 2.1 m2).
I had to change some things in order to get rid of the compilation
errors:

-ListDataProvider and ListViewAdapter
- SimplePager (not a generic anymore)

and some other API changes.

The thing is, I got this corrected and now I'm trying to redeploy it
on appengine
and I get a compilation error (without stacktrace).

The session data is like this

eclipse.buildId=unknown
java.version=1.6.0_20
java.vendor=Apple Inc.
BootLoader constants: OS=macosx, ARCH=x86, WS=cocoa, NL=en_US
Framework arguments: -product org.eclipse.epp.package.jee.product -
keyring /Users/rjankie/.eclipse_keyring -showlocation
Command-line arguments: -os macosx -ws cocoa -arch x86 -product
org.eclipse.epp.package.jee.product -keyring /Users/
x/.eclipse_keyring -showlocation

Can I still use the plugins of m2 in eclipse ?
Unfortunately I haven't seen a page like
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/download_2_1_m2.html
for the m3 build (with updates on the eclipse (deploy)plugin).

The plugin for devmode in the browser reacts like this

Cross-site hosted mode not yet implemented. See issue
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2079

I really want to give this m3 a try, but so far it's not a success.

Hope to hear from you guys soon.

Rokesh

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT Trunk failing to build

2010-08-25 Thread Travis Camechis

Yeah, I did send it 5 days and yeah it has been fixed, However, I am still
getting a failed build.  Looks like the JPA class are somehow not on the
classpath.

 package javax.persistence does not exist on all Domain objects.

during the compile of the samples/expenses app

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:

 Did you really send this five days ago? I only just received it. I believe
 this issue has been fixed?

 On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:50 AM, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:

 I did an update earlier and now GWT is failing to build.

 error samples/expenses/war does not exist

 --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


  --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT Trunk failing to build

2010-08-25 Thread Travis Camechis

no prob, just wanted to make sure it wasn't something I was doing or if it
was a real problem

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:

 Oops. That's the kind of thing that lead us to pull that sample out of M3
 at the last minute. I apologize for the broken build, we'll get right on it.

 On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.comwrote:

 Yeah, I did send it 5 days and yeah it has been fixed, However, I am still
 getting a failed build.  Looks like the JPA class are somehow not on the
 classpath.

  package javax.persistence does not exist on all Domain objects.

 during the compile of the samples/expenses app

 On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:

 Did you really send this five days ago? I only just received it. I
 believe this issue has been fixed?

 On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:50 AM, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:

 I did an update earlier and now GWT is failing to build.

 error samples/expenses/war does not exist

 --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


  --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


  --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


  --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT Trunk failing to build

2010-08-25 Thread Travis Camechis

everything appears to be up to date.  I have the issue on two different
machines.  My steps for compiling are ANT CLEAN, ANT.

I had been building fine up until the expenses move from bikeshed to
samples.

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:

 Actually, it's working for us here. Is your tools directory stale?

 On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.comwrote:

 no prob, just wanted to make sure it wasn't something I was doing or if it
 was a real problem

 On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:

 Oops. That's the kind of thing that lead us to pull that sample out of M3
 at the last minute. I apologize for the broken build, we'll get right on it.

 On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.comwrote:

 Yeah, I did send it 5 days and yeah it has been fixed, However, I am
 still getting a failed build.  Looks like the JPA class are somehow not on
 the classpath.

  package javax.persistence does not exist on all Domain objects.

 during the compile of the samples/expenses app

 On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:

 Did you really send this five days ago? I only just received it. I
 believe this issue has been fixed?

 On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:50 AM, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:

 I did an update earlier and now GWT is failing to build.

 error samples/expenses/war does not exist

 --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


  --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


  --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


  --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


  --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


  --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT Trunk failing to build

2010-08-25 Thread Travis Camechis

Where are the JPA libraries supposed to exist?

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Bart Guijt bgu...@gmail.com wrote:

 I am experiencing the same issue(s) - see my Hudson logs here (
 http://hudson.purpleware.org/job/GWT/). This is TRUNK, FWIW.

 Bart.

 On 25 aug 2010, at 25 aug, 19:08, Travis Camechis wrote:

  everything appears to be up to date.  I have the issue on two different
 machines.  My steps for compiling are ANT CLEAN, ANT.
 
  I had been building fine up until the expenses move from bikeshed to
 samples.
 
  On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
  Actually, it's working for us here. Is your tools directory stale?
 
  On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  no prob, just wanted to make sure it wasn't something I was doing or if
 it was a real problem
 
  On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
  Oops. That's the kind of thing that lead us to pull that sample out of M3
 at the last minute. I apologize for the broken build, we'll get right on it.
 
  On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Yeah, I did send it 5 days and yeah it has been fixed, However, I am
 still getting a failed build.  Looks like the JPA class are somehow not on
 the classpath.
 
   package javax.persistence does not exist on all Domain objects.
 
  during the compile of the samples/expenses app
 
  On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
  Did you really send this five days ago? I only just received it. I
 believe this issue has been fixed?
 
  On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:50 AM, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:
  I did an update earlier and now GWT is failing to build.
 
  error samples/expenses/war does not exist
 
  --
  http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
 
 
  --
  http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
 
 
  --
  http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
 
 
  --
  http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
 
 
  --
  http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
 
 
  --
  http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
 
 
  --
  http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

 --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT Trunk failing to build

2010-08-25 Thread Travis Camechis

Trunk is now building fine

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Freeland Abbott fabb...@google.com wrote:

 I think I fixed this at r8644... building GWT (with ant) will no longer
 compile the expenses sample; however, the code for it, including the maven
 pom.xml, is incorporated into the distro zip where folks can build it
 themselves, with maven, auto-fetching the various dependencies.

 I love having multiple build systems...



 On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Kevin Jin k...@google.com wrote:

 It's confirmed. GWT engineers are working on it (by removing expense
 from the list of samples to be built from default Ant targets).
 Expense can be built with Maven 2.2.1 at the mean time.
 The required libs are supposed to be in tools, but GWT team decided to
 not add them to tools (I guess because the appengine jars are
 changing).

 On Aug 25, 12:39 pm, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com wrote:
  Where are the JPA libraries supposed to exist?
 
  On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Bart Guijt bgu...@gmail.com wrote:
   I am experiencing the same issue(s) - see my Hudson logs here (
  http://hudson.purpleware.org/job/GWT/). This is TRUNK, FWIW.
 
   Bart.
 
   On 25 aug 2010, at 25 aug, 19:08, Travis Camechis wrote:
 
everything appears to be up to date.  I have the issue on two
 different
   machines.  My steps for compiling are ANT CLEAN, ANT.
 
I had been building fine up until the expenses move from bikeshed to
   samples.
 
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Actually, it's working for us here. Is your tools directory stale?
 
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Travis Camechis 
 camec...@gmail.com
   wrote:
no prob, just wanted to make sure it wasn't something I was doing or
 if
   it was a real problem
 
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com
 wrote:
Oops. That's the kind of thing that lead us to pull that sample out
 of M3
   at the last minute. I apologize for the broken build, we'll get right
 on it.
 
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Travis Camechis 
 camec...@gmail.com
   wrote:
Yeah, I did send it 5 days and yeah it has been fixed, However, I am
   still getting a failed build.  Looks like the JPA class are somehow
 not on
   the classpath.
 
 package javax.persistence does not exist on all Domain objects.
 
during the compile of the samples/expenses app
 
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com
 wrote:
Did you really send this five days ago? I only just received it. I
   believe this issue has been fixed?
 
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:50 AM, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:
I did an update earlier and now GWT is failing to build.
 
error samples/expenses/war does not exist
 
--
   http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
 
--
   http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
 
--
   http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
 
--
   http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
 
--
   http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
 
--
   http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
 
--
   http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
 
   --
  http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

 --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


  --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Re: Request Factory with Service objects

2010-08-19 Thread Travis Camechis

so after taking a look at the idea behind the requestFactory and using
Service Objects instead of mapping directly to a domain object there will be
a RequestFactoryServletHelper on the server side that will decide if it
should go to a Domain Object or an actual Service object based on a client
side annotation of @Service(Foo.class) or another annotation for a Domain
Object. Am I understanding that correctly and if so has this been
implemented yet in GWT 2.1 trunk ?

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:

On 13 août, 18:07, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:
How does the new RequestFactory work with with actual Service Objects
on the server. Not everything is a simple CRUD operation and you
definitely do not want to through everything into the entity object.
Does RequestFactory work with service objects? If so can someone show
a quick example on how that works with DTO concept and such?

The design doc is here
https://wave.google.com/wave/waveref/googlewave.com/w+WU4iAICkI

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

45 matches

Mail list logo