Re: GWT and JDK questions
> I tried using @Deprecated (since="2.0", forRemoval=true) and got > compilation errors, then i found out that the GWT default JRE emulation > uses JDK8 java.lang.Deprecated which may or may not have been the culprit > to my issues. > So i asked to get confirmation by the community. > While you can use Java 11 syntax, the emulated JRE API is on Java 8 level, see: https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/issues/9547 -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/e961cf23-78e5-49ff-9c66-4b8c88b7fba7o%40googlegroups.com.
Re: GWT and JDK questions
Thank you for answers. I tried using @Deprecated (since="2.0", forRemoval=true) and got compilation errors, then i found out that the GWT default JRE emulation uses JDK8 java.lang.Deprecated which may or may not have been the culprit to my issues. So i asked to get confirmation by the community. Thanks again! Best regards On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 1:34:11 PM UTC+1 t.br...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 1:30:33 PM UTC+1, Martin Nguyen wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have some questions regarding version upgrades, hopefully anyone can >> help me with some answers. >> >> 1. Am i correct in thinking that GWT2.9.0 does not support the syntax of >> JDK9 or higher? >> > > No. > You can use up to Java 11 syntax. > > >> 2. Can i use Java11 with GWT2.9.0 to compile my application? >> > > Yes. > > Fwiw, the answers to these questions are in > http://www.gwtproject.org/release-notes.html#Release_Notes_2_9_0, in the > highlights: > > Added support for Java language levels 9, 10, and 11. > > […] The release was tested and found to work cross platform when run > with Java 8, 11, and 14. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/a4f1b231-b061-4472-9fb4-dbe6b6819eabn%40googlegroups.com.
Re: GWT and JDK questions
On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 1:30:33 PM UTC+1, Martin Nguyen wrote: > > Hi, > > I have some questions regarding version upgrades, hopefully anyone can > help me with some answers. > > 1. Am i correct in thinking that GWT2.9.0 does not support the syntax of > JDK9 or higher? > No. You can use up to Java 11 syntax. > 2. Can i use Java11 with GWT2.9.0 to compile my application? > Yes. Fwiw, the answers to these questions are in http://www.gwtproject.org/release-notes.html#Release_Notes_2_9_0, in the highlights: > Added support for Java language levels 9, 10, and 11. > […] The release was tested and found to work cross platform when run with Java 8, 11, and 14. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/db463c62-4827-4536-a064-d5248e6cea0fo%40googlegroups.com.
GWT and JDK questions
Hi, I have some questions regarding version upgrades, hopefully anyone can help me with some answers. 1. Am i correct in thinking that GWT2.9.0 does not support the syntax of JDK9 or higher? 2. Can i use Java11 with GWT2.9.0 to compile my application? Thanks in advance! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/7e9a6ffb-6ce7-414e-92b4-bc4b6de7952fn%40googlegroups.com.
