RequestFactory Considered Mostly Harmless

2010-07-07 Thread Jeff
I've spent a bit of time over last five days reviewing the
RequestFactory and I have to say it rocks.  I started with the
STS-2.3.3-M1 roo generated projects and just kept digging into what
was driving them.  I found a few waves and have been reading through
the code reviews and commits, but perhaps you could answer a few
questions to help my research?

How much is different between what's in the bikeshed project in
gwt-2.1.0-M1 and the M2 classes (small, medium, large)?  I do see a
few interfaces have been removed (ServerOperation and ServerType) - I
just haven't had time to do a deep comparison.  I would suppose it is
safe to just use M2 for playing with this new API?

The best overview I've found was on this wave:
https://wave.google.com/wave/?pli=1#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%2BWU4iAICkI

Of course I'm eager to see this all come together.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: RequestFactory Considered Mostly Harmless

2010-07-07 Thread Thomas Broyer


On 7 juil, 11:12, Jeff jeffery.caldw...@gmail.com wrote:
 I've spent a bit of time over last five days reviewing the
 RequestFactory and I have to say it rocks.  I started with the
 STS-2.3.3-M1 roo generated projects and just kept digging into what
 was driving them.  I found a few waves and have been reading through
 the code reviews and commits, but perhaps you could answer a few
 questions to help my research?

 How much is different between what's in the bikeshed project in
 gwt-2.1.0-M1 and the M2 classes (small, medium, large)?  I do see a
 few interfaces have been removed (ServerOperation and ServerType) - I
 just haven't had time to do a deep comparison.

The major change is r8309
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8309

 I would suppose it is
 safe to just use M2 for playing with this new API?

 The best overview I've found was on this wave:
 https://wave.google.com/wave/?pli=1#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%2B...

There are still some show-blockers (for us) in M2, mainly the fact
that each server-side object must have a static findXxx() and instance
persist() and remove() methods.

 Of course I'm eager to see this all come together.

So am I!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.